Curt Doolittle

Theme: Truth

  • Well, I don’t do fiction, or moral literature (conflation and inflation), I do s

    Well, I don’t do fiction, or moral literature (conflation and inflation), I do science, economics, law, argument and testimony (deflation). So as far as I know I’m as right as possible without being wrong. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-01 02:13:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/936417873270071296

    Reply addressees: @KANTBOT20K

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/936386447841611776

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @KANTBOT20K Ok. I’m your huckleberry. Now I have to do a little research. Cause Rousseau’s just a fictional statement of pre-agrarian feminism, and Marxism is just the pseudoscientific version of abrahamism, and abrahamism is just the supernatural version of pastoralism. “Chick Stuff.”

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/936386447841611776

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @KANTBOT20K Ok. I’m your huckleberry. Now I have to do a little research. Cause Rousseau’s just a fictional statement of pre-agrarian feminism, and Marxism is just the pseudoscientific version of abrahamism, and abrahamism is just the supernatural version of pastoralism. “Chick Stuff.”

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/936386447841611776

  • As Far Right As Possible Without Being Wrong

    Well, I don’t do fiction, or moral literature (conflation and inflation), I do science, economics, law, argument and testimony (deflation). So as far as I know I’m as right as possible without being wrong. 😉

  • As Far Right As Possible Without Being Wrong

    Well, I don’t do fiction, or moral literature (conflation and inflation), I do science, economics, law, argument and testimony (deflation). So as far as I know I’m as right as possible without being wrong. 😉

  • AS FAR RIGHT AS POSSIBLE WITHOUT BEING WRONG Well, I don’t do fiction, or moral

    AS FAR RIGHT AS POSSIBLE WITHOUT BEING WRONG

    Well, I don’t do fiction, or moral literature (conflation and inflation), I do science, economics, law, argument and testimony (deflation). So as far as I know I’m as right as possible without being wrong. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-30 21:13:00 UTC

  • “Speaking truth to power when it truly matters can render someone a perceived hi

    —“Speaking truth to power when it truly matters can render someone a perceived high threat, especially if in response to someone else’s bad behaviours towards that someone. Doing so often makes us “bad” and “aggressive” because, yes, we won’t submit to being good as you characterise it, as being someone’s mere tool. Tools are expended and dispensed of.”— Davin Eastley

  • “Speaking truth to power when it truly matters can render someone a perceived hi

    —“Speaking truth to power when it truly matters can render someone a perceived high threat, especially if in response to someone else’s bad behaviours towards that someone.

    Doing so often makes us “bad” and “aggressive” because, yes, we won’t submit to being good as you characterise it, as being someone’s mere tool. Tools are expended and dispensed of.”— Davin Eastley

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-30 13:15:00 UTC

  • “Speaking truth to power when it truly matters can render someone a perceived hi

    —“Speaking truth to power when it truly matters can render someone a perceived high threat, especially if in response to someone else’s bad behaviours towards that someone. Doing so often makes us “bad” and “aggressive” because, yes, we won’t submit to being good as you characterise it, as being someone’s mere tool. Tools are expended and dispensed of.”— Davin Eastley

  • Look. I Won’t Get On The Anti-Anyone Bandwagon. I Prosecute Ideas, Arguments, Falsehoods, And Lies.

    We must all advocate for our kin first. Yes. But small-state nationalism is the answer. —“…if you’re not racist…”– A ‘friend’ Racial Realism is very different from racism (criticism of others). Other races or tribes, or cults, or parties are only a problem if YOU LET THEM BE. The primary difference between the races appears to be degree of neotonic evolution, and the degree of suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses. The higher the distribution (suppression of the underclass) and the higher the neoteny (slowing of maturity) the greater the trust, the higher the velocity, the greater the production of knowledge and wealth. As far as I know, that’s the science. My opinion remains: if you’re bitching about others you’re just like some woman gossiping because she doesn’t like her position in the status hierarchy. If you say act to alter that condition for the preservation of your kin, and your status, due to the competitive advantage of your elites, by changing yourself, your government, to preserve that advantage from competitors, then that’s just boring ordinary scientific rationality.

  • LOOK. I WON’T GET ON THE ANTI-ANYONE BANDWAGON. I PROSECUTE IDEAS, ARGUMENTS, FA

    LOOK. I WON’T GET ON THE ANTI-ANYONE BANDWAGON. I PROSECUTE IDEAS, ARGUMENTS, FALSEHOODS, AND LIES.

    We must all advocate for our kin first. Yes. But small-state nationalism is the answer.

    —“…if you’re not racist…”– A ‘friend’

    Racial Realism is very different from racism (criticism of others). Other races or tribes, or cults, or parties are only a problem if YOU LET THEM BE.

    The primary difference between the races appears to be degree of neotonic evolution, and the degree of suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses.

    The higher the distribution (suppression of the underclass) and the higher the neoteny (slowing of maturity) the greater the trust, the higher the velocity, the greater the production of knowledge and wealth.

    As far as I know, that’s the science.

    My opinion remains: if you’re bitching about others you’re just like some woman gossiping because she doesn’t like her position in the status hierarchy.

    If you say act to alter that condition for the preservation of your kin, and your status, due to the competitive advantage of your elites, by changing yourself, your government, to preserve that advantage from competitors, then that’s just boring ordinary scientific rationality.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-30 12:59:00 UTC

  • Look. I Won’t Get On The Anti-Anyone Bandwagon. I Prosecute Ideas, Arguments, Falsehoods, And Lies.

    We must all advocate for our kin first. Yes. But small-state nationalism is the answer. —“…if you’re not racist…”– A ‘friend’ Racial Realism is very different from racism (criticism of others). Other races or tribes, or cults, or parties are only a problem if YOU LET THEM BE. The primary difference between the races appears to be degree of neotonic evolution, and the degree of suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses. The higher the distribution (suppression of the underclass) and the higher the neoteny (slowing of maturity) the greater the trust, the higher the velocity, the greater the production of knowledge and wealth. As far as I know, that’s the science. My opinion remains: if you’re bitching about others you’re just like some woman gossiping because she doesn’t like her position in the status hierarchy. If you say act to alter that condition for the preservation of your kin, and your status, due to the competitive advantage of your elites, by changing yourself, your government, to preserve that advantage from competitors, then that’s just boring ordinary scientific rationality.