Curt Doolittle

Theme: Truth

  • SAYING “SCIENTIFIC PROOF” OF A POSITIVE JUST MEANS YOUR STUPID. –“Scientific Pr

    SAYING “SCIENTIFIC PROOF” OF A POSITIVE JUST MEANS YOUR STUPID.

    –“Scientific Proof Is A Myth. We can demonstrate, suggest, and convince ourselves that a scientific truth is valid. But proof? That’s an impossibility for science.”—

    This is the dumbest bit of idiocy I’ve heard in quite some time.

    Priests, Philosophers, and lawyers, create JUSTIFICATIONS of compliance with scripture, text, moral pretense, or law.

    Mathematicians construct PROOFS of the possibility of deducibility using the preservation of constant relations, by the preservation of ratios.

    Scientists accumulates FALSIFICATIONS. Science doesn’t construct proofs or justifications. It accumulates produces, and provides alternative opportunities for investigation.

    All non trivial knowledge is contingent. Science collects evidence that tells us what is not true. The purpose of science is to end ignorance, error, bias, and deceit, by the continuous reduction through falsification. Conversely, the purpose of justification is to make excuses for priors.

    One justifies as one makes excuses for one’s actions.

    One constructs proofs as a merchant weights goods on a scale.

    One falsifies as a sculpture chisels away stone.

    We never know what is true. We just know what is false, or what cannot be claimed to be true. Excuses may be valid but they are only true if they survive all attempts at falsification by deflation (decomposition into constant relations) and measurement (science)

    Philosophy is more often a vehicle for lying than for truth. Science produces falsehoods and possibilities, but never claims truth except by survival.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-04 12:24:00 UTC

  • The Left hate decidability. God is just another means of it. Truth is just anoth

    The Left hate decidability. God is just another means of it. Truth is just another means of it. Law is just another means of it. They want the world to be run by gossip not law.

  • The Left hate decidability. God is just another means of it. Truth is just anoth

    The Left hate decidability.

    God is just another means of it.

    Truth is just another means of it.

    Law is just another means of it.

    They want the world to be run by gossip not law.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-03 10:10:00 UTC

  • The Left hate decidability. God is just another means of it. Truth is just anoth

    The Left hate decidability. God is just another means of it. Truth is just another means of it. Law is just another means of it. They want the world to be run by gossip not law.

  • The Technique – Insult, Repeat Central Argument, Exhaust.

    Nah. I don’t make argumentative fallacies. Whenever I think the other party is disingenuous or stupid I use Ad Hominems to increase their frustration and dampen their feeling of success, then restate the central argument, and repeat that process in response to every retort until the other party gives up. This allows me to construct an argument and appeal to the audience, rather than interact with the individual. It makes enemies that tend to leave you alone afterward as not being worth their trouble – which is the whole point. Meanwhile you’ve enlightened all the lurkers by using the useful idiot’s blathering as a promotional vehicle. I learned this technique back in the 80’s and i’ve maintained the zero-tolerance-policy and unforgiving retaliation since that time.

  • THE TECHNIQUE – INSULT, REPEAT CENTRAL ARGUMENT, EXHAUST. Nah. I don’t make argu

    THE TECHNIQUE – INSULT, REPEAT CENTRAL ARGUMENT, EXHAUST.

    Nah. I don’t make argumentative fallacies. Whenever I think the other party is disingenuous or stupid I use Ad Hominems to increase their frustration and dampen their feeling of success, then restate the central argument, and repeat that process in response to every retort until the other party gives up. This allows me to construct an argument and appeal to the audience, rather than interact with the individual. It makes enemies that tend to leave you alone afterward as not being worth their trouble – which is the whole point. Meanwhile you’ve enlightened all the lurkers by using the useful idiot’s blathering as a promotional vehicle. I learned this technique back in the 80’s and i’ve maintained the zero-tolerance-policy and unforgiving retaliation since that time.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-02 14:00:00 UTC

  • The Technique – Insult, Repeat Central Argument, Exhaust.

    Nah. I don’t make argumentative fallacies. Whenever I think the other party is disingenuous or stupid I use Ad Hominems to increase their frustration and dampen their feeling of success, then restate the central argument, and repeat that process in response to every retort until the other party gives up. This allows me to construct an argument and appeal to the audience, rather than interact with the individual. It makes enemies that tend to leave you alone afterward as not being worth their trouble – which is the whole point. Meanwhile you’ve enlightened all the lurkers by using the useful idiot’s blathering as a promotional vehicle. I learned this technique back in the 80’s and i’ve maintained the zero-tolerance-policy and unforgiving retaliation since that time.

  • Framing, from false dichotomies through the addition of subsequent dimensions, t

    Framing, from false dichotomies through the addition of subsequent dimensions, to entire narratives dependent upon them, serve as a means of deception by suggestion. We use the term paradigm for networks of theories.We use the suite of scientific paradigms to provide commensurability between unscientific paradigms. For the simple reason that the scientific (deflationary) paradigms consist of constant relations independent of ignorance, error, bias, suggestion, obscurantism, and deceit. For the simple reason that the function of scientific investigation is the elimination of ignorance error bias wishful thinking and deceit from our speech by isolation and measurement of constant relations.

  • Framing, from false dichotomies through the addition of subsequent dimensions, t

    Framing, from false dichotomies through the addition of subsequent dimensions, to entire narratives dependent upon them, serve as a means of deception by suggestion. We use the term paradigm for networks of theories.We use the suite of scientific paradigms to provide commensurability between unscientific paradigms. For the simple reason that the scientific (deflationary) paradigms consist of constant relations independent of ignorance, error, bias, suggestion, obscurantism, and deceit. For the simple reason that the function of scientific investigation is the elimination of ignorance error bias wishful thinking and deceit from our speech by isolation and measurement of constant relations.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-02 09:46:00 UTC

  • Framing, from false dichotomies through the addition of subsequent dimensions, t

    Framing, from false dichotomies through the addition of subsequent dimensions, to entire narratives dependent upon them, serve as a means of deception by suggestion. We use the term paradigm for networks of theories.We use the suite of scientific paradigms to provide commensurability between unscientific paradigms. For the simple reason that the scientific (deflationary) paradigms consist of constant relations independent of ignorance, error, bias, suggestion, obscurantism, and deceit. For the simple reason that the function of scientific investigation is the elimination of ignorance error bias wishful thinking and deceit from our speech by isolation and measurement of constant relations.