Theme: Sovereignty

  • NO THE US AND EU ARE NOT EMPIRES. BUT… US, EU, and NATO are federations(US, EU

    NO THE US AND EU ARE NOT EMPIRES. BUT…
    US, EU, and NATO are federations(US, EU) and alliances (NATO, US&EU) since membership is voluntary. And while the US federal govt is imperial since the Civil War over domestic states, the EU is purely federal. How do you know? You can’t leave an empire. You can leave a federation or an alliance. The american model is superior to the eu model because of the limited and technical criteria of the constitution, but the eu model is superior to the US model becase a state (or territory) cannot secede and restore self determination.

    The general concept is that federations are necessary defense, trade, credit and insurance capacities. While sovereign states are necessary for self determination. WHile empires have no utility other than domestication and conversion of pre-state territories, into functional states that can then participate in a federation.

    A star is born so to speak.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-09 19:51:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633918362160967682

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633905810974842881

  • VOCABULARY LESSON: …. …. “NATION VS FEDERATION VS EMPIRE” na·tion [ˈnāSH(ə)n

    VOCABULARY LESSON:
    …. …. “NATION VS FEDERATION VS EMPIRE”

    na·tion
    [ˈnāSH(ə)n]
    NOUN
    a large body of people united by *COMMON DESCENT*, history, culture, or language, inhabiting a particular country or territory. ie: ethnicity.

    fed·er·a·tion
    [ˌfedəˈrāSH(ə)n]
    NOUN
    a group of states with a central government for international fairs but independence in internal affairs. ie: alliance of ethnicities.

    em·pire
    [ˈemˌpī(ə)r]
    NOUN
    an extensive group of nations (people), states (government), and countries (land) under a single supreme authority. ie: Involuntary rule of ethnicities.

    – A Nation and A Federation produce self-determination.
    – An empire produces self-non-determination.
    – The US Federal govt was designed as federal, and has evolved into imperial.
    – Restore the federation.
    – Spread federalism worldwide.
    – So the more Nations in different Federations the more allies we have in producing self-determination by self-determined means through peaceful cooperation.

    Cheers
    -Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-08 22:07:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633590370494828544

  • VOCABULARY LESSON: …. …. “NATION VS FEDERATION VS EMPIRE” na·tion [ˈnāSH(ə)n

    VOCABULARY LESSON:
    …. …. “NATION VS FEDERATION VS EMPIRE”

    na·tion
    [ˈnāSH(ə)n]
    NOUN
    a large body of people united by *COMMON DESCENT*, history, culture, or language, inhabiting a particular country or territory. ie: ethnicity.

    fed·er·a·tion
    [ˌfedəˈrāSH(ə)n]
    NOUN
    a group of states with a central government for international fairs but independence in internal affairs. ie: alliance of ethnicities.

    em·pire
    [ˈemˌpī(ə)r]
    NOUN
    an extensive group of nations (people), states (government), and countries (land) under a single supreme authority. ie: Involuntary rule of ethnicities.

    – A Nation and A Federation produce self-determination.
    – An empire produces self-non-determination.
    – The US Federal govt was designed as federal, and has evolved into imperial.
    – Restore the federation.
    – Spread federalism worldwide.
    – So the more Nations in different Federations the more allies we have in producing self-determination by self-determined means through peaceful cooperation.

    Cheers
    -Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-08 22:07:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633590370662588420

  • RT @BryanforHD2: Today, I filed HB 3596, which is commonly known as the “Texas I

    RT @BryanforHD2: Today, I filed HB 3596, which is commonly known as the “Texas Independence Referendum Act,” or TEXIT

    If passed, it will p…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-08 07:06:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633363437257359361

  • We are europeans. There is no agreement that can supercede the natural law of se

    We are europeans. There is no agreement that can supercede the natural law of self determination by self determined means, by tests of sovereignty in demonstrated interest, and reciprocity in display word and deed. This is the origin of natural rights and human rights. It is not man’s law. It is a law of nature, and if there is one, nature’s god. Yet, violating this one rule is what all empires depend upon for survival: depriving others of the right to self determination by self determined means.

    There never has been a postwar threat to RU security. Instead, RU has been a threat to it’s neighbors. And no governmnet has a right to conquer and rule another and remove it’s right to self determination. And while we have little interest outside of europe, other than maintaining the energy markets, aggression against Ukraine was the last straw.

    There shall be no ‘next’ Russian empire. And Russian security like the security of all sovereign people must be obtained by alliance in reciprocal defense of borders. Russia is too untrustworhty at home and abroad for that agreement until it has a change of government. Yes, we should have worked to integrate RU into NATO but this is as much RU’s fault as the West’s. There will be no RU in the future without integration with the west. If not, then CN will take asia, RU population will continue to contract, and it will be limited to west of the urals again, and surrounded by enemies of three different civilizations on three different sides.

    I don’t make a lot of errors. And this isn’t one of them.

    Reply addressees: @BernieRakocevic @Lavrovskyi


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 02:15:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632203174428721155

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632198872197103616

  • We are europeans. There is no agreement that can supercede the natural law of se

    We are europeans. There is no agreement that can supercede the natural law of self determination by self determined means, by tests of sovereignty in demonstrated interest, and reciprocity in display word and deed. This is the origin of natural rights and human rights. It is not man’s law. It is a law of nature, and if there is one, nature’s god. Yet, violating this one rule is what all empires depend upon for survival: depriving others of the right to self determination by self determined means.

    There never has been a postwar threat to RU security. Instead, RU has been a threat to it’s neighbors. And no governmnet has a right to conquer and rule another and remove it’s right to self determination. And while we have little interest outside of europe, other than maintaining the energy markets, aggression against Ukraine was the last straw.

    There shall be no ‘next’ Russian empire. And Russian security like the security of all sovereign people must be obtained by alliance in reciprocal defense of borders. Russia is too untrustworhty at home and abroad for that agreement until it has a change of government. Yes, we should have worked to integrate RU into NATO but this is as much RU’s fault as the West’s. There will be no RU in the future without integration with the west. If not, then CN will take asia, RU population will continue to contract, and it will be limited to west of the urals again, and surrounded by enemies of three different civilizations on three different sides.

    I don’t make a lot of errors. And this isn’t one of them.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 02:15:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632203174579691528

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632198872197103616

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @ChPayton1 @Lavrovskyi Well, while you’re sentiment’s correct

    RT @curtdoolittle: @ChPayton1 @Lavrovskyi Well, while you’re sentiment’s correct, technically speaking, the UA never had the chance to get…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 01:55:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632198088419954689

  • The rather unfortunate other side of the western guarrantee of self determinatio

    The rather unfortunate other side of the western guarrantee of self determination by self determined means, is we insure you have a choice, but you must “choose wisely”. If a people allows its government to commit such crimes against humanity, then the people are guilty of doing so, and obviously will pay the price for their poor judgement.

    Iraq initiated the problem by Invading and destroying Kuwait. American mistake was in ‘not completeing the job’ at that time. Then Iraq harassed troops and challenging the no fly zone.

    The majority of deaths were due to th esunni-shia conflict and the insurgency.

    DEATHS
    –“Deaths by cause in the iraq war:
    Coalition military forces: According to official sources, a total of 4,431 coalition military personnel, including 4,488 US troops, were killed in the Iraq War.

    Iraqi military forces: It is estimated that between 20,000 and 30,000 Iraqi military personnel were killed in the conflict.

    Iraqi civilians: The number of Iraqi civilian deaths is a subject of debate and varies widely depending on the source. Some estimates suggest that over 100,000 civilians were killed, while others put the figure much higher. The majority of civilian deaths were caused by insurgent attacks, sectarian violence, and military operations.

    Insurgents: It is difficult to estimate the number of insurgents who were killed during the conflict. However, it is believed that many thousands were killed in US-led military operations, including air strikes and ground offensives.

    Contractors and journalists: A significant number of contractors and journalists were also killed during the Iraq War. According to official figures, 318 contractors and 144 journalists were killed.’–

    INSURGENTS
    —“The insurgents included a variety of groups with different motivations and ideologies, including:

    Ba’ath Party loyalists: Many former members of Saddam Hussein’s Ba’ath Party, which had ruled Iraq before the invasion, joined the insurgency. They were motivated by a desire to regain power and opposed the US-led occupation of the country.

    Sunni Arab militias: Sunni Arabs, who made up the majority of the Ba’ath Party and had held significant political and economic power under Saddam Hussein, also joined the insurgency. They were concerned about the loss of their influence and power under the new Shia-dominated government.

    Islamist militants: A number of Islamist groups, including Al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), also joined the insurgency. These groups were motivated by a desire to establish an Islamic state in Iraq and to fight against what they saw as Western imperialism and influence in the Middle East.

    Criminal groups: Some criminal organizations joined the insurgency to take advantage of the instability and to profit from illegal activities.”—

    CAUSES
    –“There are several reasons why so many people died in the Iraq War:

    1. Military conflict: The Iraq War was a military conflict, and therefore, there were many casualties on both sides. The United States, which led the invasion, deployed a large number of troops, and faced significant resistance from Iraqi forces. The fighting was intense and led to many casualties on both sides.

    2. Insurgency and terrorism: After the initial invasion, there was a prolonged insurgency in Iraq, which was marked by terrorist attacks, suicide bombings, and other forms of violence. These attacks targeted both military personnel and civilians, resulting in a high number of deaths.

    3. Sectarian conflict: The Iraq War also exacerbated existing sectarian tensions in the country between the Shia and Sunni populations. This led to violent clashes, including attacks on civilians and mass killings.

    4. Infrastructure damage: The war caused significant damage to the country’s infrastructure, including hospitals, water treatment plants, and electrical grids. This damage led to a deterioration in public health and safety, resulting in additional deaths.”—

    Reply addressees: @MauriceeAubin


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 01:37:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632193590439886848

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632188575541256192

  • The rather unfortunate other side of the western guarrantee of self determinatio

    The rather unfortunate other side of the western guarrantee of self determination by self determined means, is we insure you have a choice, but you must “choose wisely”. If a people allows its government to commit such crimes against humanity, then the people are guilty of doing so, and obviously will pay the price for their poor judgement.

    Iraq initiated the problem by Invading and destroying Kuwait. American mistake was in ‘not completeing the job’ at that time. Then Iraq harassed troops and challenging the no fly zone.

    The majority of deaths were due to th esunni-shia conflict and the insurgency.

    DEATHS
    –“Deaths by cause in the iraq war:
    Coalition military forces: According to official sources, a total of 4,431 coalition military personnel, including 4,488 US troops, were killed in the Iraq War.

    Iraqi military forces: It is estimated that between 20,000 and 30,000 Iraqi military personnel were killed in the conflict.

    Iraqi civilians: The number of Iraqi civilian deaths is a subject of debate and varies widely depending on the source. Some estimates suggest that over 100,000 civilians were killed, while others put the figure much higher. The majority of civilian deaths were caused by insurgent attacks, sectarian violence, and military operations.

    Insurgents: It is difficult to estimate the number of insurgents who were killed during the conflict. However, it is believed that many thousands were killed in US-led military operations, including air strikes and ground offensives.

    Contractors and journalists: A significant number of contractors and journalists were also killed during the Iraq War. According to official figures, 318 contractors and 144 journalists were killed.’–

    INSURGENTS
    —“The insurgents included a variety of groups with different motivations and ideologies, including:

    Ba’ath Party loyalists: Many former members of Saddam Hussein’s Ba’ath Party, which had ruled Iraq before the invasion, joined the insurgency. They were motivated by a desire to regain power and opposed the US-led occupation of the country.

    Sunni Arab militias: Sunni Arabs, who made up the majority of the Ba’ath Party and had held significant political and economic power under Saddam Hussein, also joined the insurgency. They were concerned about the loss of their influence and power under the new Shia-dominated government.

    Islamist militants: A number of Islamist groups, including Al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), also joined the insurgency. These groups were motivated by a desire to establish an Islamic state in Iraq and to fight against what they saw as Western imperialism and influence in the Middle East.

    Criminal groups: Some criminal organizations joined the insurgency to take advantage of the instability and to profit from illegal activities.”—

    CAUSES
    –“There are several reasons why so many people died in the Iraq War:

    1. Military conflict: The Iraq War was a military conflict, and therefore, there were many casualties on both sides. The United States, which led the invasion, deployed a large number of troops, and faced significant resistance from Iraqi forces. The fighting was intense and led to many casualties on both sides.

    2. Insurgency and terrorism: After the initial invasion, there was a prolonged insurgency in Iraq, which was marked by terrorist attacks, suicide bombings, and other forms of violence. These attacks targeted both military personnel and civilians, resulting in a high number of deaths.

    3. Sectarian conflict: The Iraq War also exacerbated existing sectarian tensions in the country between the Shia and Sunni populations. This led to violent clashes, including attacks on civilians and mass killings.

    4. Infrastructure damage: The war caused significant damage to the country’s infrastructure, including hospitals, water treatment plants, and electrical grids. This damage led to a deterioration in public health and safety, resulting in additional deaths.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 01:37:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632193590846734336

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632188575541256192

  • WHAT WESTERN HEGEMONY? What hegemony? The USA insures all PEOPLE (not government

    WHAT WESTERN HEGEMONY?
    What hegemony? The USA insures all PEOPLE (not governments) have the right to free trade, secure borders, human rights, and natural rights, in order to prevent the reconstruction of empires that abused all of the above.

    That was the ‘trade’ the USA/UK offered after the world wars: “We will sacrifice our modern economies to pay for policing the world until the age of agrarian empires is over and the age of federations of sovereign nations and people with natural rights has completed the transformation under free trade and the internaltional-rules-order (reciprocity), creating a condition where world wars made necessary by empires is never created again.”

    Where has the USA or NATO interfered where it was not to preserve this promise for all human beings?

    Why should any group of people in any government have the right or ability to deprive other people of self-determination, by self-determined means, by the natural law of reciprocity, and the human rights and obligations necessary to create and preserve that reciprocity?

    You can’t make an argument against it that doesn’t justify the extermination of you and yours (or anyone) for doing so. It’s not possible.

    The only complaint that’s possible is that the west’s experiment with ‘liberalism’ meaning placing the individual’s wants above those of the family’s needs, has been a failure because it creates decadence that destroys countries from within.

    That doesn’t change anything other than a few constitutional rules, and you get everything the rest of the world wants, EXCEPT the ability to rule those who do not want to be ruled by you. And the right to call upon the world for rescue if any group tries to rule you against your will.

    There is no possible moral argument against this policy.

    The fact that the USG and EUROPE don’t state it as clearly as I did, and instead harp on liberty and democracy is merely internal propaganda whereby our own governments try to implement policies we don’t want.

    Go ahead and argue with me. All you can say is that as the world’s police, we have made mistakes because we have too optimistic an opinion of less developed people’s abilities, development, and behavior.

    -Curt


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-05 00:27:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632176029958643713