Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sovereignty

  • THE SECOND AMENDMENT WILL NEVER END. I’m an authoritative interpreter of the sec

    THE SECOND AMENDMENT WILL NEVER END.
    I’m an authoritative interpreter of the second amendment, and there are others. The NRA has nothing to do with interpreting the constitution. There is a constitutional process for modification of that amendment. Use it. You can’t. Because it will fail. Why? First, it wouldn’t obtain the commonality of votes of the States. Second, and more importantly, because Rule of Law of Natural, Common, Concurrent, Discovered Law and the Constitution that embodies its application in institutions to govern under it, requires reciprocal insurance of individual sovereignty by every citizen by force of arms. In other words, the second amendment is the insurance clause that prevents the conversion of natural, concurrent, common, law – which is a total prohibition on ANY authority – to a document, and then a government, of authority that violates the natural concurrent, common, law. Which is what you want. You want to circumvent Concurrency and Commonality, The Natural Law of Sovereignty and Reciprocity, and the Responsibility of reciprocal insurance by all of all. In other words by attacking the 2nd you’re violating commonality, concurrency, reciprocity, sovereignty, and our right, obligation, and inalienation, to insure that sequence.
    Our constitution is an articulation of the science of cooperation – the culmination of five thousand years of prohibition on authority, respect for sovereignty, and demand for individual responsibility. To prohibit authority it requires as did our ancient laws it evolved from,
    Our constitution requires the second amendment, because the existence of rule of law, and the prohibition of rule of authority, requires the second amendment, and we are all citizens required to respect it, because that is where sovereignty and responsibility lies: in the people. Not the government. Not anyone else. And that individual sovereignty and responsibility are only possible under this constitution – the only constitution worth the paper it’s written on, on this earth. Every other constitution is a fantasy story imitation of ours.

    So, no. I don’t trust you in authority. Or anyone else. And if you’ve created a dysfunctional society, with a dysfunctional education system, and dysfunctional families, and dysfunctional individuals, by propagating dysfunctional lies that we can be free of the physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws, by some sort of new religion by social construction – then you are the danger not only to us, to our country, to our civilization, but to all the goods past present and future that have come from European peoples over the past 5000 years, that have almost exclusively dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, the vicissitudes of nature all but hostile to man, in a universe that is other was a vast irradiated wasteland hostile to life.

    The West is evolved to maximize individual responsibility at the cost of greater possibility of internal conflict, which must be resolved by rational argument or a jury in court – because there is no authority other than the people and the law and the our law alone is the science of cooperation. Your attempt to violate the laws of nature, and to create a false fantasy religion, for the purpose of ending responsibility, so that you are no longer responsible for the reciprocal insurance of all of us against those very behaviors that lead to mental illness, criminality, and worse, — you’re the problem.

    Grow up. Man Up. Take Responsibility. Fix the people. And to fix people you must have a standard to conform them to, and the only standard is the laws of nature, and that law of nature of human cooperation is the natural, common, concurrent, judge-discovered law, or sovereignty reciprocity duty and truth-before-face, regardless of cost – that maximizes individual responsibility regardless of how much you wish to escape it.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-28 20:26:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640812658336190464

  • I’m an authoritative interpreter of the second amendment, and there are others.

    I’m an authoritative interpreter of the second amendment, and there are others. The NRA has nothing to do with it. There is a constitutional process for modification of that amendment. Use it. You can’t. Because it will fail. Why? Because Rule of Law of Natural, Common, Concurrent, Discovered Law and the Constitution that embodies its application in institutions to govern under it, requires reciprocal insurance of individual sovereignty by every citizen by force of arms. In other words, the second amendment is the insurance clause that prevents the conversion of natural, concurrent, common, law – which is a total prohibition on ANY authority – to a document of authority. (which is what you want). You want to circumvent Concurrency and Commonality, The Natural Law of Sovereignty and Reciprocity, and the Responsibility of reciprocal insurance by all of all. In other words by attacking the 2nd you’re violating commonality, concurrency, reciprocity, sovereignty, and our right, obligation, and inalienation to insure that sequence.

    No I don’t trust you in authority. Or anyone else. And if you’ve created a dysfunctional society, with a dysfunctional education system, and dysfunctional families, and dysfunctional individuals, by propagating dysfunctional lies that we can be free of the physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws, by some sort of new religion by social construction – then you are the danger not only to us, to our country, to our civilization, but to all the goods that have come from European peoples over the past 5000 years, that have almost exclusively dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition,hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, the vicissitudes of nature all but hostile to man, in a universe that is other was a vast irradiated wasteland hostile to life.

    The problem is the west is evolved to maximize individual responsibility at the cost of greater possitibitly of internal conflict, which must be resolved by rational argument or a jury in court. Your attempt to violate the laws of nature, and to create a false fantasy religion, for the purpose of ending responsibility, so that you are no longer responsible for the reciprocal insurance of all of us against those very behaviors that lead to mental illness, criminality, and worse, — you’re the problem.

    Grow up. Man Up. Take Responsibility. Fix the people. And to fix people you must have a standard to conform them to, and the only standard is the laws of nature, and that law of nature of human cooperation is the natural, common, concurrent, judge-discovered law, or sovereignty reciprocity duty and truth-before-face, regardless of cost – that maximizes individual responsibility regardless of how much you wish to escape it.

    Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-28 16:31:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640753605421432832

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640428550074318883

  • I’m an authoritative interpreter of the second amendment, and there are others.

    I’m an authoritative interpreter of the second amendment, and there are others. The NRA has nothing to do with it. There is a constitutional process for modification of that amendment. Use it. You can’t. Because it will fail. Why? Because Rule of Law of Natural, Common, Concurrent, Discovered Law and the Constitution that embodies its application in institutions to govern under it, requires reciprocal insurance of individual sovereignty by every citizen by force of arms. In other words, the second amendment is the insurance clause that prevents the conversion of natural, concurrent, common, law – which is a total prohibition on ANY authority – to a document of authority. (which is what you want). You want to circumvent Concurrency and Commonality, The Natural Law of Sovereignty and Reciprocity, and the Responsibility of reciprocal insurance by all of all. In other words by attacking the 2nd you’re violating commonality, concurrency, reciprocity, sovereignty, and our right, obligation, and inalienation to insure that sequence.

    No I don’t trust you in authority. Or anyone else. And if you’ve created a dysfunctional society, with a dysfunctional education system, and dysfunctional families, and dysfunctional individuals, by propagating dysfunctional lies that we can be free of the physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws, by some sort of new religion by social construction – then you are the danger not only to us, to our country, to our civilization, but to all the goods that have come from European peoples over the past 5000 years, that have almost exclusively dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition,hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, the vicissitudes of nature all but hostile to man, in a universe that is other was a vast irradiated wasteland hostile to life.

    The problem is the west is evolved to maximize individual responsibility at the cost of greater possitibitly of internal conflict, which must be resolved by rational argument or a jury in court. Your attempt to violate the laws of nature, and to create a false fantasy religion, for the purpose of ending responsibility, so that you are no longer responsible for the reciprocal insurance of all of us against those very behaviors that lead to mental illness, criminality, and worse, — you’re the problem.

    Grow up. Man Up. Take Responsibility. Fix the people. And to fix people you must have a standard to conform them to, and the only standard is the laws of nature, and that law of nature of human cooperation is the natural, common, concurrent, judge-discovered law, or sovereignty reciprocity duty and truth-before-face, regardless of cost – that maximizes individual responsibility regardless of how much you wish to escape it.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @FrankMikeDavis1 @JoyceWhiteVance

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-28 16:31:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640753605123751936

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640428550074318883

  • he has been misinterpreted intentionally. It means thereis no divine right of ki

    he has been misinterpreted intentionally.
    It means thereis no divine right of kings.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-28 15:57:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640744895357878272

    Reply addressees: @AlainVarenne @TheAutistocrat @anon12376301335 @whatifalthist @themaxstoic

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640743983788728321

  • So for self ownership to exist, we have to insure one another’s self-ownership (

    So for self ownership to exist, we have to insure one another’s self-ownership (legal: ‘sovereignty’). To insure one another’s sovereignty, we have to agree on what we insure, and the terms of insurance. Reciprocity is the only possible means, but we would have to agree on the terms of reciprocity. To form a polity of sovereignty and reciprocity we have to insure ENOUGH that a polity can form, produce, survive, compete. And we have to suppress that which prohibits a polity for forming, producing, surviving, and competing.
    So what does that look like?

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 01:29:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640164212327546880

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640162403110232071

  • So for self ownership to exist, we have to insure one another’s self-ownership (

    So for self ownership to exist, we have to insure one another’s self-ownership (legal: ‘sovereignty’). To insure one another’s sovereignty, we have to agree on what we insure, and the terms of insurance. Reciprocity is the only possible means, but we would have to agree on the terms of reciprocity. To form a polity of sovereignty and reciprocity we have to insure ENOUGH that a polity can form, produce, survive, compete. And we have to suppress that which prohibits a polity for forming, producing, surviving, and competing.
    So what does that look like?

    Reply addressees: @IanISSawesome @BobMurphyEcon

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 01:29:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640164212235198465

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640162403110232071

  • THE RULES OF DECIDABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL NATURAL LAW 1) RECIPROCITY in self-de

    THE RULES OF DECIDABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL NATURAL LAW
    1) RECIPROCITY in self-determination by self determined means is the natural law of non-conflict (cooperation).
    2) IMPROVEMENT by capital investment, by the people in the territory, by domestication, infrastructure, institutions, and monuments, determines who has ‘rights’ (priority) to the territory.
    3) The superiority of SMALL HOMOGENOUS ethnocentric states, because of the trust, velocity of cooperation, low power distance, and absence of conflict, that in turn promotes investment in commons that in turn reduce the cost for all, limiting the need for individual and family income.
    4) The superiority of RULE OF LAW BY THE NATURAL LAW, the sovereignty of that natural law, and an independent court, regardless of the form of government that operates under that law, from monarchy, to ideology, to bureaucracy, to republic to democracy. Natural Law matters not government. It suppresses private and public corruption by creating a market for prosecution of irreciprocity.
    4) Only FEDERATIONS – and not empires – can produce defense for small homogenous states, and maintain natural (necessary) rights. All existing hostilities are attempts to override the natural law of self determination by self determined means – mostly be the remaining agrarian empires that have failed to transition to rule of law: at least Russia, Iran, and China. Or those states with artificial borders created during colonial period, that haven’t yet converted (peacefully) to ethnostates.
    5) GOVERNMENTS HAVE NO RIGHTS and cannot have rights, only people can. Governments can only act to produce and preserve natural rights – else they are not governments but organized crime.
    6) The NATURAL PROGRESSION OF MAN, as with all life, is toward a large number of small homogeneous ethnocentric states, operating under natural law, creating a market for polities to accomodate our differences, and trading meritocratically with one another, all defended by federations, producing a market for innovation adaptation and evolution, that peacefully and prosperously transcends man into the gods we imagine we might yet be – and perhaps better than those we have yet imagined.

    -FIN-

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-24 21:15:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639375521535467532

  • THE RULES OF DECIDABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL NATURAL LAW 1) RECIPROCITY in self-de

    THE RULES OF DECIDABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL NATURAL LAW
    1) RECIPROCITY in self-determination by self determined means is the natural law of non-conflict (cooperation).
    2) IMPROVEMENT by capital investment, by the people in the territory, by domestication, infrastructure, institutions, and monuments, determines who has ‘rights’ (priority) to the territory.
    3) The superiority of SMALL HOMOGENOUS ethnocentric states, because of the trust, velocity of cooperation, low power distance, and absence of conflict, that in turn promotes investment in commons that in turn reduce the cost for all, limiting the need for individual and family income.
    4) The superiority of RULE OF LAW BY THE NATURAL LAW, the sovereignty of that natural law, and an independent court, regardless of the form of government that operates under that law, from monarchy, to ideology, to bureaucracy, to republic to democracy. Natural Law matters not government. It suppresses private and public corruption by creating a market for prosecution of irreciprocity.
    4) Only FEDERATIONS – and not empires – can produce defense for small homogenous states, and maintain natural (necessary) rights. All existing hostilities are attempts to override the natural law of self determination by self determined means – mostly be the remaining agrarian empires that have failed to transition to rule of law: at least Russia, Iran, and China. Or those states with artificial borders created during colonial period, that haven’t yet converted (peacefully) to ethnostates.
    5) GOVERNMENTS HAVE NO RIGHTS and cannot have rights, only people can. Governments can only act to produce and preserve natural rights – else they are not governments but organized crime.
    6) The NATURAL PROGRESSION OF MAN, as with all life, is toward a large number of small homogeneous ethnocentric states, operating under natural law, creating a market for polities to accomodate our differences, and trading meritocratically with one another, all defended by federations, producing a market for innovation adaptation and evolution, that peacefully and prosperously transcends man into the gods we imagine we might yet be – and perhaps better than those we have yet imagined.

    -FIN-

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-24 21:15:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639375521388589057

  • THE RULES OF DECIDABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL NATURAL LAW 1) RECIPROCITY in self-de

    THE RULES OF DECIDABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL NATURAL LAW
    1) RECIPROCITY in self-determination by self determined means is the natural law of non-conflict (cooperation).
    2) IMPROVEMENT by capital investment, by the people in the territory, by domestication, infrastructure, institutions, and monuments, determines who has ‘rights’ (priority) to the territory.
    3) The superiority of SMALL HOMOGENOUS ethnocentric states, because of the trust, velocity of cooperation, low power distance, and absence of conflict, that in turn promotes investment in commons that in turn reduce the cost for all, limiting the need for individual and family income.
    4) The superiority of RULE OF LAW BY THE NATURAL LAW, the sovereignty of that natural law, and an independent court, regardless of the form of government that operates under that law, from monarchy, to ideology, to bureaucracy, to republic to democracy. Natural Law matters not government. It suppresses private and public corruption by creating a market for prosecution of irreciprocity.
    4) Only FEDERATIONS – and not empires – can produce defense for small homogenous states, and maintain natural (necessary) rights. All existing hostilities are attempts to override the natural law of self determination by self determined means.
    5) GOVERNMENTS HAVE NO RIGHTS and cannot have rights, only people can. Governments can only act to produce and preserve natural rights – else they are not governments but organized crime.
    6) The NATURAL PROGRESSION OF MAN is like all life, toward a large number of small homogeneous ethnocentric states, operating under natural law, creating a market for polities to accomodate our differences, and trading meritocratically with one another, all defended by federations, producing a market for innovation adaptation and evolution, that transcends man into the gods we imagine we might yet be – and perhaps better than those we have yet imagined.

    -FIN-

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-24 21:15:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639374722738552833

  • THE RULES OF DECIDABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL NATURAL LAW 1) RECIPROCITY in self-de

    THE RULES OF DECIDABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL NATURAL LAW
    1) RECIPROCITY in self-determination by self determined means is the natural law of non-conflict (cooperation).
    2) IMPROVEMENT by capital investment, by the peoplem in the territory, by domestication, infrastructure, institutions, and monuments, determines who has ‘rights’ to the territory.
    3) The superiority of SMALL HOMOGENOUS ethnocentric states, because of the trust, velocity of cooperation, low power distance, and absence of conflict, that in turn promotes investment in commons that in turn reduce the cost for all, limiting the need for individual and family income.
    4) The superiority of RULE OF LAW BY THE NATURAL LAW, the sovereignty of that natural law, and an independent court, regardless of the form of government that operates under that law, from monarchy, to ideology, to bureaucracy, to republic to democracy. Natural Law matters not government. It suppresses private and public corruption by creating a market for prosecution of irreciprocity.
    4) Only FEDERATIONS – and not empires – can produce defense for small homogenous states, and maintain natural (necessary) rights. All existing hostilities are attempts to override the natural law of self determination by self determined means.
    5) GOVERNMENTS HAVE NO RIGHTS and cannot have rights, only people can. Governments can only act to produce and preserve natural rights – else they are not governments but organized crime.
    6) The NATURAL PROGRESSION OF MAN is like all life, toward a large number of small homogeneous ethnocentric states, operating under natural law, creating a market for polities to accomodate our differences, and trading meritocratically with one another, all defended by federations, producing a market for innovation adaptation and evolution, that transcends man into the gods we imagine we might yet be – and perhaps better than those we have yet imagined.

    -FIN-

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-24 21:15:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639371443610742787