Theme: Sovereignty

  • Race: The Desire for Liberty and Equality

    [M]y objective is the achievement of liberty. But there are very few means of achieving it.

    For all intents and purposes, classes are genetic in origin: reproductive desirability, intelligence, impulsivity, aggression determine your class as much as do your parents norms.

    As a rule of thumb, the races act as political blocks (kinship) and they possess different distributions of abilities, forming a racial stratification of means, with east asians, Askenazim and northern europeans on the higher side and others on the lower side. As far as I know this difference in distributions means only that there are more people in the lower classes of some races than there are in the lower classes of others. And that the reason for this is the reproductive challenge of the circumpolar peoples, plus the Ashkenizi outcast of those who can’t pass the tests of admission; the northern european use of manorialism to reduce breeding of the lower classes; the asian systemic murder of anyone and everyone with the least impulsivity.

    The problem of racial conflict is one of defense of our lower classes. Our white lower classes are justifiably racist, because their elites have abandoned them and redistributed their kinship privileges to other groups.

    EQUALITY

    Equality is impossible without tyranny. The only way to approach equality is either homogenous populations of near-kin, (the nordic model) or heterogenous populations with marginally indifferent abilities (aristocratic classes, and suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses).

    An advanced economy requires sortition: the voluntary organization of production by natural ability. Any group that does not practice natural meritocracy will be crushed and impoverished by those that do. (because that is the logic and the evidence).

    THREE POSSIBLE AVENUES FOR ACHIEVING EQUALITY:

    (a) Tyranny – forcible organization of production and forcible redistribution (the anglo model); 
    (b) Homogeneity (kinship) of small states which voluntarily organize and redistribute, (the nordic model) or;
    (c) Dramatic reduction of the reproduction of the lower classes (those below 105-107) for larger states, in which all members can contribute to production. (ancient model)

    That is it. As far as I now human beings can and will possess liberty only under (b) and (c). And only those models can produce both relative equality and relative liberty.

    ONLY RACISTS CAN DISAGREE

    If you disagree with this then you are de-facto arguing in favor of racism.

    As far as I know my argument stands under all conditions no matter what.

  • Liberty: A Distributed Dictatorship of Free Men

    Guest Post By Eli Harman

    [L]iberty can triumph because liberty is the most robust sort of authoritarianism. You can kill a king. You can corrupt a democracy. But a distributed dictatorship of free men is practically irresistible and unassailable in comparison. Its power derives from a degree of all-seeing omnipresence that exceeds even the wildest fantasies of an autocrat; yet does not detract from its adaptability, resilience or ability to react rapidly to nearly any contingency.

    ( Damn.  Very smart. -Curt.)

  • Liberty: A Distributed Dictatorship of Free Men

    Guest Post By Eli Harman

    [L]iberty can triumph because liberty is the most robust sort of authoritarianism. You can kill a king. You can corrupt a democracy. But a distributed dictatorship of free men is practically irresistible and unassailable in comparison. Its power derives from a degree of all-seeing omnipresence that exceeds even the wildest fantasies of an autocrat; yet does not detract from its adaptability, resilience or ability to react rapidly to nearly any contingency.

    ( Damn.  Very smart. -Curt.)

  • Not enough brave men with guns. They don’t own society. So they dont act like it

    Not enough brave men with guns.

    They don’t own society.

    So they dont act like it.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-26 13:58:00 UTC

  • VIA STRATFOR: –“It is unclear as yet whether the Islamic state can survive”—

    VIA STRATFOR: –“It is unclear as yet whether the Islamic state can survive”—

    Well, that’s not true. A state survives only because others states tolerate its existence, and they tolerate its existence only because the cost of intolerance may be higher than the cost of tolerance.

    The question instead, is how a bunch of bandits and thieves who stole material goods and rob banks can construct a durable economy and can therefore provide income with which to sustain a state as an organization of individuals with common incentives.

    ALL WARS ARE CIVIL WARS BUT ALL WARS REQUIRE FUNDING

    It is terribly terribly easy to destroy the economic capacity of a region and reduce it tot he stone age. We have demonstrated how easy that is.

    The problem is then in killing every living soul who comes out of that region until they prefer to form a productive polity rather than perform raiders.

    It is a uniquely Christian stupidity NOT to kill every living soul that comes in and out of such regions.

    Either stay and fight, or try to leave and die. That is the only means by which we provide people with the incentives to resist barbarism. Otherwise they merely make barbarism our problem instead of theirs.

    When it is they and their culture and believes that create barbarism.

    http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/islamic-state-reshapes-middle-east#axzz3K17snwqD


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-25 08:26:00 UTC

  • JUDGE DREDD AS ARISTOCRATIC EGALITARIAN DYSTOPIA (humor) Speak the truth, even i

    JUDGE DREDD AS ARISTOCRATIC EGALITARIAN DYSTOPIA

    (humor)

    Speak the truth, even if it means your death.

    Punish the wicked.

    Safeguard the helpless.

    Never submit, never surrender, never stop.

    Crush your enemies completely.

    🙂


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-22 02:55:00 UTC

  • 1) HEROISM and SOVEREIGNTY(Competition), 2) TECHNOLOGY, 3) PROPERTY, 4) TRUTH an

    1) HEROISM and SOVEREIGNTY(Competition), 2) TECHNOLOGY, 3) PROPERTY, 4) TRUTH and PROMISE(CONTRACT), 5) JURY, 6) THE HANDS-OFF COMMONS (Sacred Commons).

    That is ‘our way’. Nial Ferguson’s six killer apps are consequences (Pareto’s Derivations) not CAUSES (Hegelian differences) nor instincts and intuitions (Pareto’s ‘Residues’).

    The western difference is our struggle to speak the truth before the jury of our peers.

    It is NOT majority rule.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-22 02:38:00 UTC

  • The Walls Of Europa

    [M]en are the walls of Europa, and the points of our swords its boundaries.

    Words and laws do not freedom make.

  • The Walls Of Europa

    [M]en are the walls of Europa, and the points of our swords its boundaries.

    Words and laws do not freedom make.

  • Men are the walls of Europa, and the points of our swords its boundaries. Words

    Men are the walls of Europa, and the points of our swords its boundaries.

    Words and laws do not freedom make.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-11-17 09:11:00 UTC