Sovereignty can be tested by violations of interests that we categorically refer to as Property in Toto. A man is sovereign or he is not. He can demonstrate reciprocity in sovereignty or the cannot. Individualism, like non aggression, is just a weasel word for not defining the scope of interests against which one cannot impose costs, and the institutional means by which such a condition is created and preserved, against competition from those with different intentions. Sovereignty is an empirically testable definition. Individualism is just a means of weaseling out of a testable definition and thereby preserving means of deception.
Theme: Sovereignty
-
Individualism Is a “weasel Word”
Sovereignty can be tested by violations of interests that we categorically refer to as Property in Toto. A man is sovereign or he is not. He can demonstrate reciprocity in sovereignty or the cannot. Individualism, like non aggression, is just a weasel word for not defining the scope of interests against which one cannot impose costs, and the institutional means by which such a condition is created and preserved, against competition from those with different intentions. Sovereignty is an empirically testable definition. Individualism is just a means of weaseling out of a testable definition and thereby preserving means of deception.
-
WHY WE GET IT WRONG: ‘ABLENESS AND AGENCY’ That’s why we always get it wrong: on
WHY WE GET IT WRONG: ‘ABLENESS AND AGENCY’
That’s why we always get it wrong: only SOME of us want sovereignty, liberty, and freedom. Most all humans instead want security and subsidy. Which is ok. As long as they don’t have say in anything.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-14 14:32:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1007269561471848448
-
WHY WE GET IT WRONG: ‘ABLENESS AND AGENCY’ That’s why we always get it wrong: on
WHY WE GET IT WRONG: ‘ABLENESS AND AGENCY’
That’s why we always get it wrong: only SOME of us want sovereignty, liberty, and freedom. Most all humans instead want security and subsidy. Which is ok. As long as they don’t have say in anything.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-14 10:32:00 UTC
-
INDIVIDUALISM IS A “WEASEL WORD” Sovereignty can be tested by violations of inte
INDIVIDUALISM IS A “WEASEL WORD”
Sovereignty can be tested by violations of interests that we categorically refer to as Property in Toto. A man is sovereign or he is not. He can demonstrate reciprocity in sovereignty or the cannot.
Individualism, like non aggression, is just a weasel word for not defining the scope of interests against which one cannot impose costs, and the institutional means by which such a condition is created and preserved, against competition from those with different intentions.
Sovereignty is an empirically testable definition. Individualism is just a means of weaseling out of a testable definition and thereby preserving means of deception.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-14 09:34:00 UTC
-
by Vincent Deschenes 1. Globalism: Denies the importance and legitimacy of Natio
by Vincent Deschenes 1. Globalism: Denies the importance and legitimacy of Nations. Lolbertarianism: Denies the importance and legitimacy of nations. 2. Globalism: Open borders and mass immigration. Lolbertarianism: Open borders and mass immigration. 3. Globalism: Race is a social construct, the mere thought that races may exhibit slight biological differences is irredeemably racist. Lolbertarianism: Race is a social construct, the mere thought that races may exhibit slight biological differences is irredeemably racist. 4. Globalism: Multiculturalism, multi-racialism is strength. Lolbertarianism: Multiculturalism/multi-racialism is strength. Conclusion. Radical individualism may serve to further the advancement of globalism, it is controlled opposition. This is not an issue where a middle ground exists, either you’re opposed to Globalism or you’re not, either you don’t recognize the importance of nations or you do, either you wish to preserve nations or you don’t.
-
by Vincent Deschenes 1. Globalism: Denies the importance and legitimacy of Natio
by Vincent Deschenes 1. Globalism: Denies the importance and legitimacy of Nations. Lolbertarianism: Denies the importance and legitimacy of nations. 2. Globalism: Open borders and mass immigration. Lolbertarianism: Open borders and mass immigration. 3. Globalism: Race is a social construct, the mere thought that races may exhibit slight biological differences is irredeemably racist. Lolbertarianism: Race is a social construct, the mere thought that races may exhibit slight biological differences is irredeemably racist. 4. Globalism: Multiculturalism, multi-racialism is strength. Lolbertarianism: Multiculturalism/multi-racialism is strength. Conclusion. Radical individualism may serve to further the advancement of globalism, it is controlled opposition. This is not an issue where a middle ground exists, either you’re opposed to Globalism or you’re not, either you don’t recognize the importance of nations or you do, either you wish to preserve nations or you don’t.
-
The West’s Strategy
THE WEST’S UNIQUE STRATEGY: TRUTH, DUTY, SOVEREIGNTY, RECIPROCITY AND MARKETS IN EVERYTHING. Trump is demanding truth, duty, sovereignty, reciprocity and markets in everything. The outcome of simply constructing only fair deals produces western civilization. And the balance of powers.
-
The West’s Strategy
THE WEST’S UNIQUE STRATEGY: TRUTH, DUTY, SOVEREIGNTY, RECIPROCITY AND MARKETS IN EVERYTHING. Trump is demanding truth, duty, sovereignty, reciprocity and markets in everything. The outcome of simply constructing only fair deals produces western civilization. And the balance of powers.
-
by Vincent Deschenes 1. Globalism: Denies the importance and legitimacy of Natio
by Vincent Deschenes
1. Globalism: Denies the importance and legitimacy of Nations.
Lolbertarianism: Denies the importance and legitimacy of nations.
2. Globalism: Open borders and mass immigration.
Lolbertarianism: Open borders and mass immigration.
3. Globalism: Race is a social construct, the mere thought that races may exhibit slight biological differences is irredeemably racist.
Lolbertarianism: Race is a social construct, the mere thought that races may exhibit slight biological differences is irredeemably racist.
4. Globalism: Multiculturalism, multi-racialism is strength.
Lolbertarianism: Multiculturalism/multi-racialism is strength.
Conclusion.
Radical individualism may serve to further the advancement of globalism, it is controlled opposition.
This is not an issue where a middle ground exists, either you’re opposed to Globalism or you’re not, either you don’t recognize the importance of nations or you do, either you wish to preserve nations or you don’t.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-12 09:04:00 UTC