WEALTH PERMITS CHOICE AND WE CHOOSE SEPARATISM.
You may choose whatever you want once we are separated. Otherwise the only solution is war.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 18:31:00 UTC
WEALTH PERMITS CHOICE AND WE CHOOSE SEPARATISM.
You may choose whatever you want once we are separated. Otherwise the only solution is war.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 18:31:00 UTC
—“Why cant we all be shareholders? Who are we serving?”— Tom James
Bingo. Consider yourself fully enlightened. There is only us and them until there is US ALONE.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 18:30:00 UTC
WE MUST CORRECT OUR ERROR. WE BEGIN AND END WITH THE MILITIA.
We must discard our belief that sovereignty, reciprocity, monarchies, houses, and an independent jury cannot be improved upon. The uncomfortable truth is that either the militia owns the state, the military owns the state, or the bureaucracy owns the state, or the church(academy) owns the state. Or the financial sector owns the state. The only equality of intersets in that list is the MILITIA.
Western civilization begins and ends with the militia. This is how you distinguish between a conservative and a libertarian. Those who fight, and those who preach.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 18:28:00 UTC
THE MARKET IS A CONSEQUENCE OF SOVEREIGNTY, RECIPROCITY, TRUTH, DUTY, AND THE INDEPENDENT JUDICIARY COMMON OF THE COMMON (Tort) LAW.
We create a market by creating sovereignty. we expand the market by incremental suppression of impositions of costs upon the investments made by others. We create private, corporate, and common assets. And we suppress impositions against them. The central problem of sovereignty is reduction of the lower classes that cannot survive in the CURRENT market order. In other words, we must genetically improve our distributions as we improve our productivity.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 18:26:00 UTC
That’s why we always get it wrong: only SOME of us want sovereignty, liberty, and freedom. Most all humans instead want security and subsidy. Which is ok. As long as they don’t have say in anything.
That’s why we always get it wrong: only SOME of us want sovereignty, liberty, and freedom. Most all humans instead want security and subsidy. Which is ok. As long as they don’t have say in anything.
—“The more I look into it, the more I think that the family should be sovereign and not the individual.”—Steven Jackson
(bingo)
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 15:42:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1008011839878455297
—“The more I look into it, the more I think that the family should be sovereign and not the individual.”—Steven Jackson
(bingo)
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-16 11:41:00 UTC
I don’t try to convince you with a single argument – but with a thousand. Anything simple enough that one argument would suffice, would have been done already. Nomocracy: Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Markets in Everything – The distributed dictatorship of sovereign men.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-15 15:11:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1007641675718627333
I don’t try to convince you with a single argument – but with a thousand. Anything simple enough that one argument would suffice, would have been done already. Nomocracy: Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Markets in Everything – The distributed dictatorship of sovereign men.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-15 11:10:00 UTC