Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sovereignty

  • WHAT IF AMERICA BECOMES INSULAR AGAIN? —-“What do Europeans, Canadians, Austra

    WHAT IF AMERICA BECOMES INSULAR AGAIN?

    —-“What do Europeans, Canadians, Australians and other western societies think of what is happening politically in America right now? Is there fear for the future should the USA become insular once again?”— Quora User

    We Americans are going to do everything we can to end imperial postwar America, end the remains of the British empire, and return to the balance of power system, where we are not responsible for financing and policing the ‘uncivilized world’.

    We are pretty tired of europeans, austrialians and canadians in particular from signaling moral superiority when the are just free riders on the military financial cultural and political costs born by american peoples.

    So if you mean by ‘insular’ we are no longer going to tolerate your virtue signaling, paying for your military defense, the world financial system, the world political system, and being the dumping ground for immigrants, yeah, insular means ‘no more free rides for people who disrespect you for having given them the ride’.

    Canada, like Sweden is on the way to making itself the middle east.

    Parts of america are on the way to making themselves brazil.

    England is on it’s way to making itself north africa,

    And france already is north africa.

    You don’t get diversity with diversity. You get underclass monopoly. All states that try turn in to poor countries with corrupt governments and some sort of stated or unstated caste system

    You can diversity from NATION STATES where every people pays the cost of carrying their own development, and particularly of their underclasses.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 13:07:00 UTC

  • Pagan: The Natural World (all of it) Women (fertility), Men (heroism) Archetypes

    Pagan:

    The Natural World (all of it)
    Women (fertility), Men (heroism)
    Archetypes (Roles)
    Truth, Sovereignty (Western Uniqueness)

    The term Pagan was, as are all the best terms, originally a… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=287144658549098&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 12:11:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033688400904314881

  • IT ISN’T COMPLICATED: How simple does it need to be? Sovereignty requires Insura

    IT ISN’T COMPLICATED:

    How simple does it need to be? Sovereignty requires Insurance, requires Reciprocity, requires Truth, produces Law, limits us to Markets, produces competition, produces goods, services, and information as a means of survival.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 11:35:00 UTC

  • PAGAN The Natural World (all of it) Women (fertility), Men (heroism) Archetypes

    PAGAN

    The Natural World (all of it)

    Women (fertility), Men (heroism)

    Archetypes (Roles)

    Truth, Sovereignty (Western Uniqueness)

    The term Pagan was, as are all the best terms, originally a pejorative (term of ridicule or disrespect). The origin of the term is in ‘villager’ or today ‘peasant’.

    Pagans were Pantheistic (Divinity is the same as reality, ergo, that reality is sacred and divine).

    Pagans were Animistic (Divinity exists in places, objects, plants, and animals.

    I can think of nothing better than those values, because in fact, they are truthful values.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 08:11:00 UTC

  • The purpose of the militia is to deny usurpers power

    The purpose of the militia is to deny usurpers power.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-23 13:32:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1032621670987694080

  • The purpose of the militia is to deny usurpers power

    The purpose of the militia is to deny usurpers power.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-23 09:32:00 UTC

  • Sovereignty: The Distillation of Western Civilization

    Text: THE DISTILLATION OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION If you would be sovereign, you must fight. If you would be sovereign and win, you must equally confederate. If you would be sovereign and confederate, you must equally compromise. If you would be sovereign and equally compromise, you must equally forgo opportunities for gain at another’s loss. If you would be sovereign and equally forgo equal opportunities to gain at another’s loss, your actions are limited to those that are productive, fully informed, warrantied, and voluntary, and limited to productive externalities. If you limit your actions to those, then the ONLY possible rule is rule by Common, judge-discovered, Natural Law of Non Imposition of Costs, and therefore, voluntary markets in everything: association, cooperation, reproduction, production, production of commons, production of dispute resolution, production of institutions, productions of monuments, production of war, productions of generations, This is Western Civilization: the choice of Sovereignty once made produces all that we have done. Small things in large numbers have vast consequences. If you would be Sovereign, and reap the benefits of Sovereignty, you must fight – fight to deny others all possible alternatives. If you will not fight you cannot be sovereign. You may beg the Sovereigns for commercial liberty, or physical freedom, or charity, in exchange for compensation. But you may never be in fact sovereign. by William Butchman, Eli Harman, and Curt Doolittle

  • Sovereignty: The Distillation of Western Civilization

    Text: THE DISTILLATION OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION If you would be sovereign, you must fight. If you would be sovereign and win, you must equally confederate. If you would be sovereign and confederate, you must equally compromise. If you would be sovereign and equally compromise, you must equally forgo opportunities for gain at another’s loss. If you would be sovereign and equally forgo equal opportunities to gain at another’s loss, your actions are limited to those that are productive, fully informed, warrantied, and voluntary, and limited to productive externalities. If you limit your actions to those, then the ONLY possible rule is rule by Common, judge-discovered, Natural Law of Non Imposition of Costs, and therefore, voluntary markets in everything: association, cooperation, reproduction, production, production of commons, production of dispute resolution, production of institutions, productions of monuments, production of war, productions of generations, This is Western Civilization: the choice of Sovereignty once made produces all that we have done. Small things in large numbers have vast consequences. If you would be Sovereign, and reap the benefits of Sovereignty, you must fight – fight to deny others all possible alternatives. If you will not fight you cannot be sovereign. You may beg the Sovereigns for commercial liberty, or physical freedom, or charity, in exchange for compensation. But you may never be in fact sovereign. by William Butchman, Eli Harman, and Curt Doolittle

  • Not Radical Individualism, but Individual Sovereignty and Intolerant Familialism

      —“And I’ll be the first to concede that radical individualism is indeed problematic when you’re faced with collectivists who want you gone, but I do think that individualism is ideal after the threat has been adequately dealt with, and is in keeping with the general ethos of the West.”–Matthew Genack Radical individualism is just an attack on the very commons that made western civilization competitive. Individual Sovereignty, and Radical Familialism is a better strategy.

  • Not Radical Individualism, but Individual Sovereignty and Intolerant Familialism

      —“And I’ll be the first to concede that radical individualism is indeed problematic when you’re faced with collectivists who want you gone, but I do think that individualism is ideal after the threat has been adequately dealt with, and is in keeping with the general ethos of the West.”–Matthew Genack Radical individualism is just an attack on the very commons that made western civilization competitive. Individual Sovereignty, and Radical Familialism is a better strategy.