Theme: Sovereignty

  • what 1k armed would do … what 10K armed would do….. what 100K armed would do

    what 1k armed would do …
    what 10K armed would do…..
    what 100K armed would do…
    what 1,000K armed would do…
    what 10,000K armed would do ….
    Power, Communications, Water, Food. Three weeks. It’s over.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-12 17:06:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1028689153788203013

    Reply addressees: @dagmar_schmitt

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1028683035749695488


    IN REPLY TO:

    @GudistGrug

    @curtdoolittle Just remember how 2 amateurs tied the Boston police in knots. Imagine what 200 trained could do.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1028683035749695488

  • Hey. Majorities only matter when voting under monopoly majoritarianism. When civ

    Hey. Majorities only matter when voting under monopoly majoritarianism. When civil wars begin, it’s simply because *enough* people want to start them – not a majority. Historically that’s a fraction of one percent. There are MORE THAN ENOUGH to start a civil war. #UniteTheRight


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-12 16:12:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1028675705150877697

  • #Trump Civil War, Devolution to the States, Preservation of Insurer of Last Reso

    #Trump Civil War, Devolution to the States, Preservation of Insurer of Last Resort: Military, Treasury, and restoration of the constitution prior to the civil war. This will happen. There is zero chance an Imperial Continental Government will Survive over Heterogeneous Polities.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-11 16:37:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1028319452440522752

  • Um. Is it ok to admit I want a hard BREXIT so that there is a minuscule chance t

    Um. Is it ok to admit I want a hard BREXIT so that there is a minuscule chance that in the upcoming Second American Civil War, that when we secede, some of us can ask to restore the monarchy and admit our ancestors really screwed up? 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-11 16:20:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1028315298393415681

  • MONARCHY vs. CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY vs. DEMOCRACY Assuming rule of law exists (

    MONARCHY vs. CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY vs. DEMOCRACY

    Assuming rule of law exists (european customary law of sovereignty and tort):

    In a constitutional monarchy either the monarchy asks for approval from the people directly or from their representatives, or the people ask approval of the monarchy.

    However, without approval one direction or the other you have Democracy (population) or Prussianism (monarchy) – not any form of monarchy no matter what pretenses you make.

    So, a monarchy may include democratic and republican participation, but a democracy cannot contain a monarchy.

    The principle reason being where the decision of last resort rests: with the house or with the monarch.

    As I undrestand it, in order to retain rule of law, where the monarchy is the judge of last resort, the monarchy must retain right of veto (dissent).

    If a monarchy is successful in manufacturing rule of law it should be possible for the people to produce houses of governance.

    This is simply a utilitarian solution, since there is little if any evidence that democracy does anything other than consume accumulated capital at the expense of those who created it, and those who would have inherited it, and the goods that come from its preservation.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-11 12:33:00 UTC

  • —-”Is Marxism the opiate of the envious?”—-

      1. Marxism (Boasianism, Marxism, Freudianism, Frankfurt School) consists of a **pseudoscientific** revolt against aristocratic european civilization’s sovereignty, reason, markets, and meritocracy, and is merely a restatement of the Jewish, Christian, and Islamic **supernatural** REVOLT against the great aristocratic civilizations of the ancient world – this time with a false promise of prosperity in search for power, just as in the ancient world, a false promise of life after death or paradise in search for power. 2. Postmodernism is a **pseudo-rational** restatement of the Marxist (Boasian, Marxist, Freudian, Frankfurt School) REVOLT against reason markets, meritocracy and eugenics that result from that merit. This time abandoning both the supernatural, the pseudoscientific, and merely engaging in gossip, rallying, shaming, ridicule, disapproval, in the pursuit of power to resist meritocracy (eugenics) 3. So whether Semitic Abrahamic **Supernatural** Religion, Marxist **pseudoscientific** reformation of abrahamic religion, or Postmodern pseudo-rational justification is used, the same argumentative **sophisms **of **justificationary Pilpul**, and **critical Critique **are used to circumvent reason, appeal to intuition. 4. Why? We are, because of our genetics, and the intuitions that result from our genetics, of differing interpersonal, social, sexual, economic, political, and military market value. This market value is generally categorized as ‘class’. We do, because of genetics, physically possess physical brain and physical chemical intuitions that reflect our class and our genders. And just as the female reproductive strategy (herds) evolved to persist her genes regardless of the merit of her offspring, and men evolved to persist their genes (packs) by the merit of himself and his male kin, classes evolved to express either the feminine dysgenic or male eugenic group strategies. Our differences in moral intuitions are the result of these axis: gender cognitive bias, and class cognitive bias, and the degree of group neoteny that evolved in our relative geographies. 5. So to some degree just as religion is an opiate of the lower classes, philosophy provides an opiate of the middle classes, and pseudoscience the upper middle classes – the upper classes need no opiate other than the rewards of their market position (desirability). Why? we want hope or promise of raising our interpersonal, social, sexual, economic, political, and military market value. Because after all – that is what drives reproduction, and what drives all our behavior. 6. The underclasses are not oppressed. They are just six times as bad for the polity as every good person is good for it. Markets cannot lie. They contain lottery effects. And the lottery effect provides us with the incentives (hope) just as religion, philosophy, and pseudoscience provide us with hope. Hope that we will obtain the benefits of being of higher market value than we are. In other words: status rules us. 7. The duration of a Democracy is determined by the time it takes to redistribute, and spend down a windfall, from war, conquest, technical innovation, or accident of nature. We are rapidly running out of the industrial (petroleum) windfall, just as Athens ran out of it’s silver mine. 8. A mixed economy ruled by an authoritarian, an oligarchy, or a ‘party’ – differing only in scale – is the only survivable, with fascism necessary in war, and the luxury of social democracy possible under windfalls.

  • —-”Is Marxism the opiate of the envious?”—-

      1. Marxism (Boasianism, Marxism, Freudianism, Frankfurt School) consists of a **pseudoscientific** revolt against aristocratic european civilization’s sovereignty, reason, markets, and meritocracy, and is merely a restatement of the Jewish, Christian, and Islamic **supernatural** REVOLT against the great aristocratic civilizations of the ancient world – this time with a false promise of prosperity in search for power, just as in the ancient world, a false promise of life after death or paradise in search for power. 2. Postmodernism is a **pseudo-rational** restatement of the Marxist (Boasian, Marxist, Freudian, Frankfurt School) REVOLT against reason markets, meritocracy and eugenics that result from that merit. This time abandoning both the supernatural, the pseudoscientific, and merely engaging in gossip, rallying, shaming, ridicule, disapproval, in the pursuit of power to resist meritocracy (eugenics) 3. So whether Semitic Abrahamic **Supernatural** Religion, Marxist **pseudoscientific** reformation of abrahamic religion, or Postmodern pseudo-rational justification is used, the same argumentative **sophisms **of **justificationary Pilpul**, and **critical Critique **are used to circumvent reason, appeal to intuition. 4. Why? We are, because of our genetics, and the intuitions that result from our genetics, of differing interpersonal, social, sexual, economic, political, and military market value. This market value is generally categorized as ‘class’. We do, because of genetics, physically possess physical brain and physical chemical intuitions that reflect our class and our genders. And just as the female reproductive strategy (herds) evolved to persist her genes regardless of the merit of her offspring, and men evolved to persist their genes (packs) by the merit of himself and his male kin, classes evolved to express either the feminine dysgenic or male eugenic group strategies. Our differences in moral intuitions are the result of these axis: gender cognitive bias, and class cognitive bias, and the degree of group neoteny that evolved in our relative geographies. 5. So to some degree just as religion is an opiate of the lower classes, philosophy provides an opiate of the middle classes, and pseudoscience the upper middle classes – the upper classes need no opiate other than the rewards of their market position (desirability). Why? we want hope or promise of raising our interpersonal, social, sexual, economic, political, and military market value. Because after all – that is what drives reproduction, and what drives all our behavior. 6. The underclasses are not oppressed. They are just six times as bad for the polity as every good person is good for it. Markets cannot lie. They contain lottery effects. And the lottery effect provides us with the incentives (hope) just as religion, philosophy, and pseudoscience provide us with hope. Hope that we will obtain the benefits of being of higher market value than we are. In other words: status rules us. 7. The duration of a Democracy is determined by the time it takes to redistribute, and spend down a windfall, from war, conquest, technical innovation, or accident of nature. We are rapidly running out of the industrial (petroleum) windfall, just as Athens ran out of it’s silver mine. 8. A mixed economy ruled by an authoritarian, an oligarchy, or a ‘party’ – differing only in scale – is the only survivable, with fascism necessary in war, and the luxury of social democracy possible under windfalls.

  • RT @PoseidonAwoke: White Supremacy noun The radical notion that European peoples

    RT @PoseidonAwoke: White Supremacy
    noun
    The radical notion that European peoples should not be ethnically cleansed from their ancestral h…


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-08 23:21:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1027333979932946432

  • By which judgement? That of creating a high trust society by the institutionaliz

    By which judgement? That of creating a high trust society by the institutionalization of truth, duty, sovereignty, and piety (humility)? That their civilization is unique in successful achievement of those goals? That they created a culture that is a high trust mixed economy?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-07 21:48:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1026948179995099139

    Reply addressees: @Hispanogoyim

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1026945599348920321


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1026945599348920321

  • Paradigm Shifts

    Author: William S. Lind CD: 1 – Unipolar Power (Monopoly) vs return to balance of powers – nationalism (Markets). 2 – An Endless Supply of Money vs Return to ‘harder’ money (markets) 2 – Wilsonianism (Expansionary Democracy) vs Nationalism (Markets) 3 – Cultural Marxism (Anti-Whitism) vs Nationalism (Markets) 4 – The End of White Acquiescence. By William S Lind. The Establishment knows how to succeed in obtaining what it cares about, power and money, within the current paradigms. Those paradigms include America as the only real world power, before which all other nations must bow; an endless supply of money; Wilsonianism, i.e. forcing “democracy” down all other countries’ throats; and cultural Marxism, which seeks to put women over men, blacks over whites, and gays over straights (where they conflict, cultural Marxism takes precedence over democracy). But those paradigms are all beginning to shift. President Trump represents, at least in part, new paradigms which leave today’s Establishment irrelevant, isolated, and powerless. In response, the Establishment howls in fear and in hatred, especially hatred of a President who represents the heartland instead of the coastal elites. If we look at each of the above paradigms, we can see the shifts occurring. Not only does America lack the military power, money, and moral credit to dictate to every other country, all countries now face the challenge of Fourth Generation war, war waged by entities other than states. This challenge renders competition between states obsolete, something President Trump seems instinctively to grasp, at least in part. He knows a post-Communism Russian-American rivalry makes no strategic sense; he correctly thinks NATO is obsolete; and he may sense that states everywhere face crises of legitimacy, although of widely varying intensity. The Establishment howls because one of its major components, the Military-Industrial-Congressional complex must have “peer competitors”, other states it can inflate as threats, in order to justify the trillion dollars a year we spend on national security. F-35s, Ford-class aircraft carriers, and opposed amphibious landings have little relevance to 4GW. Meanwhile, the money is running out. The U.S., and most of the rest of the world, is heading for a colossal debt crisis. When it hits, we may not be able to afford $100 billion a year in defense, much less a trillion. This points to a third paradigm shift: the end of Wilsonianism. Our “defense” budget is really an offense budget. It supports a military that is supposed to force “democratic capitalism”, which is really oligarchic rent-seeking, down the throats of every people on earth — along with cultural Marxism and its definitions of “human rights”. Even if the money were not about to run out, Wilsonianism would be doomed from the start. Russell Kirk wrote, “There is no surer way to make a man your enemy than telling him you are going to remake him in your image for his own good.” Even Robespierre, too late, said that missionaries with bayonets are seldom welcome. President Trump grasps that attempts to turn places such as Afghanistan into Switzerland are foolish nonsense. Yet at the same time, he chose a neo-con, one of the people who tried to turn Iraq into a peaceful, secular democracy by invading it and destroying the state, as his national security advisor. So he still has a ways to go to ride this paradigm shift. ( cd: my view is that trump sees punishment until defeat and making ‘better choices’ rather than reconstruction in our demon-cratic image as his strategy and it’s working.) The last shift he not only grasps but rode into the White House on: the revolt of America’s heartland against political correctness, e.i., cultural Marxism. The Establishment either believes in cultural Marxism (most democrats) or is too cowardly to challenge it (most Republicans). Heartland voters are fed up with it, its advocates, and its sacred “victims” groups, most of whom distinguish themselves by their bad behavior. In a political battle between the coastal elites and their clients on the one hand and the heartland on the other, the heartland will win. Look at the percentage of whites among people who actually vote in all the swing states. The collapse of white acquiescence in cultural Marxism, both here and in Europe, may be the biggest paradigm shift of them all. And so, faced with irrelevance, the Establishment howls, froths at the mouth and chews the carpet, raging at President Trump. Like a madman whose derangement is killing him, it screams meaningless words, most ending in “ism”, as it dies. I’m sure the President will give it a grand funeral.