Theme: Sovereignty

  • “The U.S. “homeland is no longer a sanctuary,” according to the four-star genera

    —“The U.S. “homeland is no longer a sanctuary,” according to the four-star general in charge of both U.S. Northern Command and North American Aerospace Defense Command, Air Force Gen. Terrence O’Shaughnessy”—

    Our island-ish continent is no longer.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-28 20:12:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1034534316666171394

  • —“Q: Why the Rise in Nazbol?”–

    (not the russian political party, the modern equivalent) I think (a) there are three symbols of power to ‘regress’ to: 1) the soviet/russians/communists, 2) the nazis, 3) and the church, … and that people have given up on the enlightenment. (and the monarchies). In the west the church is dead. So we are really left with the two fascisms: authoritarian working class (bolshevism) and authoritarian executive class (naziism). I’m in the minority which says that the answer is nationalism and constitutional monarchy under natural law, where we have a judicial cult that prosecutes the parasites and liars until none remain. My understanding is that NazBol is a combination of communism and nazism and that it’s reducible to Strasserism. But I am not ‘clued in’ on pop movements. —“Strasserism was the strand of Nazism that called for a more radical, mass-action and worker-based form of National Socialism, hostile to Jews not from a racial perspective, but from an anti-capitalist basis, to achieve a national rebirth. It derives its name from Gregor and Otto Strasser, the two Nazi brothers initially associated with this position”—-

  • —“Q: Why the Rise in Nazbol?”–

    (not the russian political party, the modern equivalent) I think (a) there are three symbols of power to ‘regress’ to: 1) the soviet/russians/communists, 2) the nazis, 3) and the church, … and that people have given up on the enlightenment. (and the monarchies). In the west the church is dead. So we are really left with the two fascisms: authoritarian working class (bolshevism) and authoritarian executive class (naziism). I’m in the minority which says that the answer is nationalism and constitutional monarchy under natural law, where we have a judicial cult that prosecutes the parasites and liars until none remain. My understanding is that NazBol is a combination of communism and nazism and that it’s reducible to Strasserism. But I am not ‘clued in’ on pop movements. —“Strasserism was the strand of Nazism that called for a more radical, mass-action and worker-based form of National Socialism, hostile to Jews not from a racial perspective, but from an anti-capitalist basis, to achieve a national rebirth. It derives its name from Gregor and Otto Strasser, the two Nazi brothers initially associated with this position”—-

  • What if America Becomes Insular Again?

    —-“What do Europeans, Canadians, Australians and other western societies think of what is happening politically in America right now? Is there fear for the future should the USA become insular once again?”— Quora User We Americans are going to do everything we can to end imperial postwar America, end the remains of the British empire, and return to the balance of power system, where we are not responsible for financing and policing the ‘uncivilized world’. We are pretty tired of europeans, austrialians and canadians in particular from signaling moral superiority when the are just free riders on the military financial cultural and political costs born by american peoples. So if you mean by ‘insular’ we are no longer going to tolerate your virtue signaling, paying for your military defense, the world financial system, the world political system, and being the dumping ground for immigrants, yeah, insular means ‘no more free rides for people who disrespect you for having given them the ride’. Canada, like Sweden is on the way to making itself the middle east. Parts of america are on the way to making themselves brazil. England is on it’s way to making itself north africa, And france already is north africa. You don’t get diversity with diversity. You get underclass monopoly. All states that try turn in to poor countries with corrupt governments and some sort of stated or unstated caste system You can diversity from NATION STATES where every people pays the cost of carrying their own development, and particularly of their underclasses.

  • What if America Becomes Insular Again?

    —-“What do Europeans, Canadians, Australians and other western societies think of what is happening politically in America right now? Is there fear for the future should the USA become insular once again?”— Quora User We Americans are going to do everything we can to end imperial postwar America, end the remains of the British empire, and return to the balance of power system, where we are not responsible for financing and policing the ‘uncivilized world’. We are pretty tired of europeans, austrialians and canadians in particular from signaling moral superiority when the are just free riders on the military financial cultural and political costs born by american peoples. So if you mean by ‘insular’ we are no longer going to tolerate your virtue signaling, paying for your military defense, the world financial system, the world political system, and being the dumping ground for immigrants, yeah, insular means ‘no more free rides for people who disrespect you for having given them the ride’. Canada, like Sweden is on the way to making itself the middle east. Parts of america are on the way to making themselves brazil. England is on it’s way to making itself north africa, And france already is north africa. You don’t get diversity with diversity. You get underclass monopoly. All states that try turn in to poor countries with corrupt governments and some sort of stated or unstated caste system You can diversity from NATION STATES where every people pays the cost of carrying their own development, and particularly of their underclasses.

  • “CURT: WHY THE RISE IN NAZBOL?”– (not the german political party, the modern eq

    —“CURT: WHY THE RISE IN NAZBOL?”–

    (not the german political party, the modern equivalent0

    I think (a) there are three symbols of power to ‘regress’ to:

    1) the… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=287263525203878&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 19:13:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033794504845942784

  • IT ISN’T COMPLICATED: How simple does it need to be? Sovereignty requires Insura

    IT ISN’T COMPLICATED:

    How simple does it need to be? Sovereignty requires Insurance, requires Reciprocity, requires Truth, produces Law, limits us to Markets, produces competition, produces goods, services, and information as a means of survival.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 15:35:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1033739662978891777

  • Pagan (Heathen)

    The Natural World (all of it)Women (fertility), Men (heroism)Archetypes (Roles)Truth, Sovereignty (Western Uniqueness) The term Pagan was, as are all the best terms, originally a pejorative (term of ridicule or disrespect). The origin of the term is in ‘villager’ or today ‘peasant’. Pagans were Pantheistic (Divinity is the same as reality, ergo, that reality is sacred and divine). Pagans were Animistic (Divinity exists in places, objects, plants, and animals.) I can think of nothing better than those values, because in fact, they are truthful values. Divinity?  Excellence. That which we Love as we love our own.

  • Pagan (Heathen)

    The Natural World (all of it)Women (fertility), Men (heroism)Archetypes (Roles)Truth, Sovereignty (Western Uniqueness) The term Pagan was, as are all the best terms, originally a pejorative (term of ridicule or disrespect). The origin of the term is in ‘villager’ or today ‘peasant’. Pagans were Pantheistic (Divinity is the same as reality, ergo, that reality is sacred and divine). Pagans were Animistic (Divinity exists in places, objects, plants, and animals.) I can think of nothing better than those values, because in fact, they are truthful values. Divinity?  Excellence. That which we Love as we love our own.

  • “CURT: WHY THE RISE IN NAZBOL?”– (not the russian political party, the modern e

    —“CURT: WHY THE RISE IN NAZBOL?”–

    (not the russian political party, the modern equivalent)

    I think (a) there are three symbols of power to ‘regress’ to:

    1) the soviet/russians/communists,

    2) the nazis,

    3) and the church,

    and that people have given up on the enligthenment. (and the monarchies).

    In the west the church is dead. So we are really left with the two fascisms: authoritarian working class (bolshevism) and authoritarian executive class (naziism).

    I’m in the minority which says that the answer is nationalism and constitutional monarchy under natural law, where we have a judicial cult that prosecutes the parasites and liars until none remain.

    My understanding is that NazBol is a combination of communism and nazism and that it’s reducible to Strasserism. But I am not ‘clued in’ on pop movements.

    —“Strasserism was the strand of Nazism that called for a more radical, mass-action and worker-based form of National Socialism, hostile to Jews not from a racial perspective, but from an anti-capitalist basis, to achieve a national rebirth. It derives its name from Gregor and Otto Strasser, the two Nazi brothers initially associated with this position”—-


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 15:13:00 UTC