“CURT: WHY THE RISE IN NAZBOL?”– (not the russian political party, the modern e

—“CURT: WHY THE RISE IN NAZBOL?”–

(not the russian political party, the modern equivalent)

I think (a) there are three symbols of power to ‘regress’ to:

1) the soviet/russians/communists,

2) the nazis,

3) and the church,

and that people have given up on the enligthenment. (and the monarchies).

In the west the church is dead. So we are really left with the two fascisms: authoritarian working class (bolshevism) and authoritarian executive class (naziism).

I’m in the minority which says that the answer is nationalism and constitutional monarchy under natural law, where we have a judicial cult that prosecutes the parasites and liars until none remain.

My understanding is that NazBol is a combination of communism and nazism and that it’s reducible to Strasserism. But I am not ‘clued in’ on pop movements.

—“Strasserism was the strand of Nazism that called for a more radical, mass-action and worker-based form of National Socialism, hostile to Jews not from a racial perspective, but from an anti-capitalist basis, to achieve a national rebirth. It derives its name from Gregor and Otto Strasser, the two Nazi brothers initially associated with this position”—-