Theme: Sovereignty

  • Under rule of law by the natural law, Monarchy serves a necessary function just

    Under rule of law by the natural law, Monarchy serves a necessary function just as do the judiciary, the jury, and the various ‘houses’ (Thangs) that test for concurrency across classes and regions.

    That function is necessary because monarchies have (a) long term familial ownership interests instead of short term renter interests (b) can compensate for the tendency of all political systems to produce errors and bad decisions due to conflicts, passions, and fashions of the age, (c) in the case where the state, church, or commercial interests – or in rare cases factions among the people (such as our academy and media today) – escape the natural law by art or artifice, so that the people an appeal to the monarchy and as such the military, to ‘throw the bums out’ so to speak because “Monarchy is above the law in the restoration of the natural law – but only in that restoration” – thus providing the people with a defense against those organs and organizations whose interests are at opposition with the people or the natural law.

    In other words monarchy does not so much need to rule under rule of law (common) and republican (concurrency) government, but it functions as a “Judge of Last Resort” in case the organizations and organs public or private fail the natural law of self determination by self determined means of sovereignty, reciprocity, duty, truth, excellence and beauty that demand all citizens bear the costs of defense of private and common material, institutional, and informational capital that preserves self determination by sovereignty, reciprocity, duty, truth, excellence, and beauty.

    Which is, after all, the law of nature (Evolution) and the natural law (Cooperation).


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-13 21:34:03 UTC

    Original post: https://x.com/i/articles/1768027769907171328

  • Q: WHY IS MONARCHY NECESSARY AND PART OF THE ANSWER TO OUR PRESENT CRISIS? Under

    Q: WHY IS MONARCHY NECESSARY AND PART OF THE ANSWER TO OUR PRESENT CRISIS?
    Under rule of law by the natural law Monarchy serves a necessary function just as do the judiciary, the jury, and the various ‘houses’ (Thangs) that test for concurrency across classes and regions. That function is necessary because monarchies have (a) long term familial ownership instead of short term renter interests (b) can compensate for the tendency of all political systems to produce errors and bad decisions due to conflicts, passions, and fashions of the age, (c) in the case where the state, church, or commercial interests – or in rare cases factions among the people (such as our academy and media today) – escape the natural law by art or artifice, so that the people an appeal to the monarchy and as such the military, to ‘throw the bums out’ so to speak because “Monarchy is above the law in the restoration of the natural law – but only in that restoration” – thus providing the people with a defense against those organs and organizations whose interests are at opposition with the people or the natural law. In other words monarchy does not so much need to rule under rule of law (common) and republican (concurrency) government, but it functions as a “Judge of Last Resort” in case the organizations and organs public or private fail the natural law of self determination by self determiend means of sovereignty, reciprocity, duty, truth, excellence and beauty that demand all citizens bear the costs of defense of private and common material, institutional, and informational that preserve self determination by sovereignty, reciprocity, duty, truth, excellence, and beauty. Which is, after all, the law of nature (Evolution) and the natural law (Cooperation).

    Reply addressees: @ThomasAnon2005


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-13 21:33:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1768027677733068800

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1768024262277808336

  • Curtis Yarvin’s New Post Favoring (absolute) Monarchy I interpret Yarvin’s argum

    Curtis Yarvin’s New Post Favoring (absolute) Monarchy
    https://t.co/V4crM7UBxJ
    I interpret Yarvin’s argument, as I generally do all his arguments in this vein, as an admission of failure to understand the problem of contemporary governance, and discover and articulate a solution to it.

    While (you won’t agree) a republic (rule of law) with universal enfranchisement (mass democracy) appears to have been the failed experiment that the ancients warned us of, and while the rigidity of the US constitution and resulting houses of government have provided greater stability than the european parliamentary systems, that does not mean that we should abandon rule of law, the republic, participatory government, in favor of authoritarianism, or that we cannot, as our anglo ancestors have repeatedly demonstrated, simply change the constitution to correct for our failed optimism, and the sedition against our civilization, culture, people and institutions by the repetition of the christian destruction of the ancient world this time in the pseudoscientific method of the marxist sequence of seditions by false and impossible promise from the laws of scarcity, human behavior, and natural selection.

    It may take, as have the english revolution, and the american revolution, a threat of or escalation to conflict to do so but our system is not predicated upon personalities but rules encoded in law and the activism of the population to hold the state and those seditionists that undermined us accountable.

    We can, quite easily restore the monarchy as ‘outside the law in restoration of the law’ and achieve the same ends. And we can quite easily state the law with such precision and defended by such institutions that it is criminal for participants in government to even try to evade it.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-12 17:16:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1767600487602233344

  • Curtis Yarvin’s New Post Favoring (absolute) Monarchy I interpret Yarvin’s argum

    Curtis Yarvin’s New Post Favoring (absolute) Monarchy
    https://graymirror.substack.com/p/a-conversation-about-monarchy
    I interpret Yarvin’s argument, as I generally do all his arguments in this vein, as an admission of failure to understand the problem of contemporary governance, and discover and articulate a solution…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-12 17:16:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1767600487841333307

  • Chinese INVADERS Flood Southern Border: Mexico Gets Cozy With New BRICS Financia

    Chinese INVADERS Flood Southern Border: Mexico Gets Cozy With New BRICS Financial Order https://rumble.com/v4i1v13-chinese-invaders-flood-southern-border-mexico-gets-cozy-with-new-brics-fina.html


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-12 06:04:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1767431530169729392

  • RT @TexasNatMov: The only way that Texans’ priorities are front and center is if

    RT @TexasNatMov: The only way that Texans’ priorities are front and center is if the decisions are made right here in Texas – not 2,000 mil…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-11 23:27:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1767331560565428307

  • “Q: What’s the difference between a civilization state and an empire?”– The con

    –“Q: What’s the difference between a civilization state and an empire?”–

    The concepts of a “civilization state” and an “empire” represent two different ways of organizing and understanding political, cultural, and social entities on a large scale. While there is some overlap in how these terms can be applied historically and contemporarily, they are distinct in several key aspects:

    Civilization State
    Definition: A civilization state is a concept where the state’s identity, legitimacy, and organizational principles are deeply rooted in the long-standing cultural, historical, and civilizational identity of a specific group or society. It emphasizes a shared civilization as the core of its national identity, rather than just political boundaries or governance structures.

    Cultural Unity: In a civilization state, there is a strong emphasis on cultural unity and continuity. The state sees itself as the custodian of a particular civilization’s heritage, values, and traditions, which transcend current political and geographical boundaries.

    Homogeneity: Although a civilization state is characterized by a dominant culture or civilization, it can be inclusive of various ethnic, linguistic, and cultural groups within its territory, provided these groups identify with or assimilate into the primary civilization narrative.

    Modern Examples: China is often cited as a modern example of a civilization state, with its leaders emphasizing the country’s 5,000-year history and civilization as central to its national identity and statecraft.

    Empire
    Definition: An empire is a political entity characterized by the extensive territorial or colonial dominion controlled by a single sovereign authority, usually an emperor or a monarch. Empires are defined by their expansionist tendencies, conquests, and the subjugation of diverse peoples.

    Political and Military Power: Empires are typically established and maintained through military conquest and the exercise of political power over conquered territories. The central authority imposes control, often integrating or assimilating various peoples into the empire’s administrative and governance structures.

    Heterogeneity Through Conquest: While empires can encompass a wide range of cultures, languages, and ethnic groups, this diversity is usually a result of conquest and annexation rather than a shared civilizational identity. The cohesion of an empire is often maintained through force, administration, and the central authority’s power, rather than a voluntary shared identity.

    Historical Examples: Historical examples of empires include the Roman Empire, the British Empire, and the Ottoman Empire. These entities expanded through military conquest and exerted control over diverse peoples and territories.

    Key Differences
    Basis of Unity: Civilization states are united by a shared civilizational identity, whereas empires are often held together by political and military power.
    Expansion: Empires typically expand through conquest, while civilization states emphasize cultural and historical continuity within their existing boundaries.
    Identity: In a civilization state, the identity is rooted in historical and cultural commonality. In contrast, an empire’s identity may be more closely tied to the power and reach of its ruling authority.

    Reply addressees: @OrganBuxtehude


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-08 01:19:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1765910159417544704

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1765909085172404722

  • This would be rational for members of the Visegrad Group of states, for slightly

    This would be rational for members of the Visegrad Group of states, for slightly less demanding reasons than that of Russia as the ‘borderland’.
    Meaning small countries late to enlightenment, late to industrialization, and late to economic power require scale to defend against those states that due to geography and limited trade, and distance from the british intellectual revolutions, are repeatedly at a disadvantage economic and strategically even if at a cultural advantage by observing the failures that emerge in those countries that evolve earlier and faster.
    This is true of all tech. It’s better to be second or third. This is why fascism was better than anglo classical liberalism, French utopian liberalism, jewish communism – they saw what happened and wanted none of it.

    What you want and what is good for you is different from the science that describes the spectrum of choices given our differing states of development and our positions as innovators vs adopters.

    You’re vaforing the adopter position because it’s logical for you to do so – and you and yours still have SOME opportunity to prevent the ‘bads’ whether liberal(finance), authoritarian (state), or islamic (Faith)

    See: https://t.co/uI5FujWKcv

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-08 00:37:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1765899560981815296

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1765896923855134828

  • RT @DougAMacgregor: Elected officials must first be loyal to their country, then

    RT @DougAMacgregor: Elected officials must first be loyal to their country, then everything else.

    Why is this so hard for so many in Wash…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-05 22:05:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1765136538008965427

  • RT @NoahRevoy: Right of conquest >>>>> right of origin We are in this strange ag

    RT @NoahRevoy: Right of conquest >>>>> right of origin

    We are in this strange age where many want to say, “We are the natives here,” as if…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-03 02:28:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1764115691269980214