Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sovereignty

  • Fallen Angels vs Risen Beasts 😉

    90753518_596101140986780_769125924275748864_o

    [S]orry. Man is risen beast (hero) Not fallen angel (criminal). And he is risen by the the law: the physical laws of nature, the natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity, the evolutionary law of transcendence. And the priesthood we love is almost always the enemy of transcendence. And the scientists, judiciary, and entrepreneurs are almost always the advocates of transcendence. If you believe we are fallen angels and that man was oppressed, you’re counter to the evidence and will agree with the oppression and power narrative. If you believe we are risen beasts, and that the underclasses were consistently domesticated like all other animals, then you will be in concert with the evidence. The primary difference between races, sub-races, civilizations, and states is the size of the underclass The struggle for man, that only west and far east achieved at all, is the suppression of the reproduction of the unproductive classes by market means, so that the surpluses of production can be devoted to the production of the high returns on commons. There are various evolutionary reasons why those who are ‘insufficiently valuable for the privilege of reproduction” are unaware of their inadequacy. And there are reasons why elites make use of these useful idiots that don’t know better. Slavery in the european tradition mean’t that others took responsibility for your room and board, in exchange for you doing the work for them. In other words, it was a monetary economy. Only once we develop slavery by conquest (stealing people) does it become a negative institution -and even then slaves were protected from abuse by owners (employers). It’s getting difficult to find places in the world where people are uneducated. But that’s a recent phenomenon. Human beings are not very ‘nice’ to one another by nature. Were purely rational creatures and choose the cheapest means of survival. In advanced civs that happens to be cooperation most of the time. But in most of history war, murder, rape, pillaging, was the most profitable private and public industry. Your ancestors weren’t oppressed. They were domesticated.Humans have no intrinsic value.Your quality of life is more dependent on the smallness of the underclass in relation to the middle and upper classes than it is on your abilities.There is no freedom from physical (scarcity), natural (incentives), and evolutionary (eugenic) laws. None.

  • More Closure on The Abortion Discussion

    by Shannon Constantine The closure on the debate is that there is no debate. Women aren’t sovereign, they operate within a sovereign territory with permission (from men) to have certain rights and liberties, including the right to do things that are generally seen as repugnant to the majority. That permission can be revoked at any time. CD: Ouch. It’s a good thing a woman said that. Not sure I’m brave enough. 😉

    P lands with: “In the cases of killing in war, capital punishment in justice, suicide in suffering, euthanasia in old age or illness, infanticide in defect, and abortion in utero, we (polities) develop norms, traditions, and laws that permit us to terminate life when the consequences of not doing so are more than we can pay restitution for. The only outlier among these is abortion where (a) woman is as in control of her uterus as a man is in control of his violence – so why is she not as accountable for abortion as a man is for accidental murder, and (b) the outcome of the child’s life is unknown. As such we make these decisions empirically. And we are too forgiving of women in this subject as we are too forgiving (coddling) of women in all others. Why? Because we are biologically and traditionally if not consciously aware that women have lower agency than men, but that they are intrinsically more valuable and less disposable than men.”

  • More Closure on The Abortion Discussion

    by Shannon Constantine The closure on the debate is that there is no debate. Women aren’t sovereign, they operate within a sovereign territory with permission (from men) to have certain rights and liberties, including the right to do things that are generally seen as repugnant to the majority. That permission can be revoked at any time. CD: Ouch. It’s a good thing a woman said that. Not sure I’m brave enough. 😉

    P lands with: “In the cases of killing in war, capital punishment in justice, suicide in suffering, euthanasia in old age or illness, infanticide in defect, and abortion in utero, we (polities) develop norms, traditions, and laws that permit us to terminate life when the consequences of not doing so are more than we can pay restitution for. The only outlier among these is abortion where (a) woman is as in control of her uterus as a man is in control of his violence – so why is she not as accountable for abortion as a man is for accidental murder, and (b) the outcome of the child’s life is unknown. As such we make these decisions empirically. And we are too forgiving of women in this subject as we are too forgiving (coddling) of women in all others. Why? Because we are biologically and traditionally if not consciously aware that women have lower agency than men, but that they are intrinsically more valuable and less disposable than men.”

  • The Anglo Peoples Need …

    Feb 1, 2020, 7:06 PM THE ANGLO PEOPLES NEED WRITTEN CONSTITUTIONS OF INVIOLABLE NATURAL LAW REQUIRING TRANSACTIONAL CHANGES, AND THE PEOPLE NEED JURIDICAL DEFENSE AND THE LEGISLATURE NEEDS JURIDICAL ACCOUNTABILITY by Reece Haynes 5 years in British politics (observing, theorizing, debating, practicing), proves everything you’ve said. The supremacy of Parliament is for nought when that Parliament is filled with the wrong people. And our unwritten constitution, plus the common law, is routinely disobeyed – with no sanctions applied by the judiciary. Not codifying the constitution, not maintaining the Empire, and not preserving the Aristotelian mixed model (hereditary monarchy and nobility, plus limited democracy) were all big mistakes. And then there’s the historical geopolitical mistakes which you also mention.

    CD: The judicial novelties I’ve found are:

    1. The hereditary monarchy as a judge of last resort in defense against the fashions of the people, the malice of a minority, and the failure of the political process, is indispensable.

    2. The commonwealth model is to be embraced by any future american political order, with the monarchy representing the english speaking peoples.

    3. The British parliamentary and debate model is superior to the american.

    4. The British two (or more) Tiered legal system is superior to the american.

    5. The German Proportional Party System is superior to the British and american — allowing superior policy and superior adaptation.

    6. The requirement for strict construction from the first principle of reciprocity, specific statement of the scope(limit), and reference of any prior legislation , legislation, or finding of the court, upon which it depends.

    7. the requirement that the judiciary return the undecidable to the legislature thereby preventing legislation from the bench – and the mechanism for judiciary to require the legislature settle the matter in reasonable time

    8. The liability of legislators, regulators, and judges to warranty (hold involuntary liability) for their actions in so much that they do not violate the constitution of natural law.

    9. The vulnerability of legislators, regulators, judges and their agents to judicial prosecution for violations of the constitution.

    10. The vulnerability of the public to prosecution for advocation in public to the public in matters public, of violation of the constitution.

    11. The addition of involuntary warranty and therefor liability, for the entire scope of baiting into hazard upon which the 20th century deceits were constructed.

    12. The reversal of borrower beware to lender beware.

    13. Universal standing in matters of the commons

    14. Restoration of every man (citizen) a sheriff (deputy), defense of self, property and commons, restoration of extrajudicial punishment; the judicially sanctioned duel; and the sovereignty of men and as such their requirement to bear arms.

    15. The jewish-french cosmopolitan sponsored invasion of western civlization has destroyed our experiment in democracy – and universal democracy must and will end and we have proposed a set of options for polities to choose from, the easiest of which is multiple houses to maintain numbers, or fewer voters by much higher criteria, or lastly, kinship(ethnic) voters only.
      Edit

  • The Anglo Peoples Need …

    Feb 1, 2020, 7:06 PM THE ANGLO PEOPLES NEED WRITTEN CONSTITUTIONS OF INVIOLABLE NATURAL LAW REQUIRING TRANSACTIONAL CHANGES, AND THE PEOPLE NEED JURIDICAL DEFENSE AND THE LEGISLATURE NEEDS JURIDICAL ACCOUNTABILITY by Reece Haynes 5 years in British politics (observing, theorizing, debating, practicing), proves everything you’ve said. The supremacy of Parliament is for nought when that Parliament is filled with the wrong people. And our unwritten constitution, plus the common law, is routinely disobeyed – with no sanctions applied by the judiciary. Not codifying the constitution, not maintaining the Empire, and not preserving the Aristotelian mixed model (hereditary monarchy and nobility, plus limited democracy) were all big mistakes. And then there’s the historical geopolitical mistakes which you also mention.

    CD: The judicial novelties I’ve found are:

    1. The hereditary monarchy as a judge of last resort in defense against the fashions of the people, the malice of a minority, and the failure of the political process, is indispensable.

    2. The commonwealth model is to be embraced by any future american political order, with the monarchy representing the english speaking peoples.

    3. The British parliamentary and debate model is superior to the american.

    4. The British two (or more) Tiered legal system is superior to the american.

    5. The German Proportional Party System is superior to the British and american — allowing superior policy and superior adaptation.

    6. The requirement for strict construction from the first principle of reciprocity, specific statement of the scope(limit), and reference of any prior legislation , legislation, or finding of the court, upon which it depends.

    7. the requirement that the judiciary return the undecidable to the legislature thereby preventing legislation from the bench – and the mechanism for judiciary to require the legislature settle the matter in reasonable time

    8. The liability of legislators, regulators, and judges to warranty (hold involuntary liability) for their actions in so much that they do not violate the constitution of natural law.

    9. The vulnerability of legislators, regulators, judges and their agents to judicial prosecution for violations of the constitution.

    10. The vulnerability of the public to prosecution for advocation in public to the public in matters public, of violation of the constitution.

    11. The addition of involuntary warranty and therefor liability, for the entire scope of baiting into hazard upon which the 20th century deceits were constructed.

    12. The reversal of borrower beware to lender beware.

    13. Universal standing in matters of the commons

    14. Restoration of every man (citizen) a sheriff (deputy), defense of self, property and commons, restoration of extrajudicial punishment; the judicially sanctioned duel; and the sovereignty of men and as such their requirement to bear arms.

    15. The jewish-french cosmopolitan sponsored invasion of western civlization has destroyed our experiment in democracy – and universal democracy must and will end and we have proposed a set of options for polities to choose from, the easiest of which is multiple houses to maintain numbers, or fewer voters by much higher criteria, or lastly, kinship(ethnic) voters only.
      Edit

  • To Violate Our Sovereignty Is to Invite Us to War

    To Violate Our Sovereignty Is to Invite Us to War https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/24/to-violate-our-sovereignty-is-to-invite-us-to-war/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-24 23:04:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264693769871466496

  • To Violate Our Sovereignty Is to Invite Us to War

    Feb 1, 2020, 7:45 PM See, you don’t get it. The only reason not to conquer, deprive, exploit, enserf, enslave, or end – or worse, is reciprocity. You see, ‘sovereign means’ capable of defense – every man a sovereign: a king, a legislature, a knight, a husband, a craftsman and all else he might be. That is why natural law and international law are the same: because no man has say over another unless he violates the sovereignty of another – and if so then they may war. If they choose not to war they may duel. If they choose not to duel they may seek decision from the people in a jury. If they do not abide by the jury they have lost the insurance of their sovereign peers, and are limited to their own defense. And as such, they will easily be the victims of war by the polity rather than just their prior enemy. We are the men of Europa. We are sovereigns – all. And to violate that sovereignty is to invite us into war.

  • To Violate Our Sovereignty Is to Invite Us to War

    Feb 1, 2020, 7:45 PM See, you don’t get it. The only reason not to conquer, deprive, exploit, enserf, enslave, or end – or worse, is reciprocity. You see, ‘sovereign means’ capable of defense – every man a sovereign: a king, a legislature, a knight, a husband, a craftsman and all else he might be. That is why natural law and international law are the same: because no man has say over another unless he violates the sovereignty of another – and if so then they may war. If they choose not to war they may duel. If they choose not to duel they may seek decision from the people in a jury. If they do not abide by the jury they have lost the insurance of their sovereign peers, and are limited to their own defense. And as such, they will easily be the victims of war by the polity rather than just their prior enemy. We are the men of Europa. We are sovereigns – all. And to violate that sovereignty is to invite us into war.

  • No you aren’t going to take away our guns. 😉

    No you aren’t going to take away our guns. 😉 https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/24/no-you-arent-going-to-take-away-our-guns/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-24 20:27:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264654307405824000

  • The values of our civlization are four thousand years old, first captured in wri

    The values of our civlization are four thousand years old, first captured in writing by the Greeks: Excellence and Beauty, Heroism and Duty, Truth and Oath, Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Jury and Law, and resulting markets in everything as the only means of survival: evolution.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-24 13:15:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264545507545960448

    Reply addressees: @HanielAzzi @DegenRolf

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264544600418631681

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @HanielAzzi @DegenRolf Christianity is the religion of false promise, ignorance, deceit, manipulation, enserfment, poverty, and the dark ages, that asks women, slaves, and the weak, to submit to a false god, of an alien people, who produced nothing except lies, usury, rent seeking, and organized crime.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1264544600418631681