Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sovereignty

  • Strategic Explanation

    —“Curt, please explain the chart. ty.”—bagofcells

    Outline Map: ..Black = major oil fields ..Red= Iran’s sphere of influence (conquest) ..Green=those who want to contain iran. ..Blue= India and Russia (partnership) ..Yellow = China (power hungry) Yellow-Red Map: … black dots = oil. Green Map: … Population and Muslim Factions ANALYSIS

    1. Core states rule civilizations.
    2. ~500M population necessary for core state.
    3. $1T+ necessary for core state finance of military.
    4. Petro-Currency+Reserve Currency needed to finance military needed for Great Power status.
    5. Iran can take entire gulf oil supply by Kuwait and Saudis and already have people in the area.
    6. Together Iran can achieve both core state of islamic civilization and dominate the region, and obtain Great Power status and heavily influence world affairs.

    World cannot tolerate fundamentalist islamic expansionary, militant nuclear iran with control over world oil reserve,and energy prices. Iran is not USA/UK trying to spread rule of law, human rights, science, medicine, tech, commercial prosperity. 10x as bad as China as enemy. Instead, decimate Iranian military capacity, and economy, pull in competing middle eastern states, and let islamic civilization slowly modernize over generations, and USA can leave. Otherwise another world war and 100’s of millions dead. This is how grownups see the world.

    —“Yeah I will buy this read. Another way to look at it is that it would be irresponsible of the major powers to let radicals who got rich by luck (sitting on oil) have a de facto veto over all world political decisions via nuclear weapons. The ME states never had to fully mature or develop responsible and functional institutions.”—Michael Churchill

  • Are Consumers Sovereign?

    Jan 15, 2020, 3:06 PM No. Because with large corporations we need via-negativa in courts to be able to correct bad behavior. And the state (politicians) are too easily (and frequently) bought. Furthermore they are too economically illiterate to comprehend the choices, and left-economists too dominant as consultants. (Obama only asked left wing jewish economists: Krugman Stiglitz etc). P-Constitution restores the courts as a market for defense of the commons. P-economics restores the financial assets made possible by fiat currency to the state (people), while still permitting bankers, thereby splitting the consumer credit economy, the medium term economy, and the long term economy, to the consumer, business banks, and actors on behalf of the treasury, so that commissions are possible but profits more so, and vast sums can be put to work in the world. As such we WEAPONIZE THE AMERICAN ECONOMY. This is important. P-constitution weaponizes the economy for american (western) interests as have the Chinese at the cost of the major banks (JPM, GS, Citi, HSBC etc). If the People insure the investment then the people obtain the rewards of their risk. For big thinkers this means that we can drive the investment chain further into the future with heavier capital investment using the state, the financial sector can industrialize the application of whatever opportunities those technologies and benefits that can arise. The consumer sector can (interest free) seize the gains. And the proceeds can be directed to commons, so that the work week can be reduced and the working mother population reduced to produce more offspring. (one of the investments needs to be artificial wombs it seems.)

  • Are Consumers Sovereign?

    Jan 15, 2020, 3:06 PM No. Because with large corporations we need via-negativa in courts to be able to correct bad behavior. And the state (politicians) are too easily (and frequently) bought. Furthermore they are too economically illiterate to comprehend the choices, and left-economists too dominant as consultants. (Obama only asked left wing jewish economists: Krugman Stiglitz etc). P-Constitution restores the courts as a market for defense of the commons. P-economics restores the financial assets made possible by fiat currency to the state (people), while still permitting bankers, thereby splitting the consumer credit economy, the medium term economy, and the long term economy, to the consumer, business banks, and actors on behalf of the treasury, so that commissions are possible but profits more so, and vast sums can be put to work in the world. As such we WEAPONIZE THE AMERICAN ECONOMY. This is important. P-constitution weaponizes the economy for american (western) interests as have the Chinese at the cost of the major banks (JPM, GS, Citi, HSBC etc). If the People insure the investment then the people obtain the rewards of their risk. For big thinkers this means that we can drive the investment chain further into the future with heavier capital investment using the state, the financial sector can industrialize the application of whatever opportunities those technologies and benefits that can arise. The consumer sector can (interest free) seize the gains. And the proceeds can be directed to commons, so that the work week can be reduced and the working mother population reduced to produce more offspring. (one of the investments needs to be artificial wombs it seems.)

  • Jan 15, 2020, 5:01 PM —“Jack Sandusky What’s your take on what just happened a

    Jan 15, 2020, 5:01 PM

    —“Jack Sandusky What’s your take on what just happened at the Kremlin?”—

    Putin is (as we should also) removing a clause from the constitution that puts international law above the russian constitution. We have the same vulnerability in our constitution in that it is possible for a treaty to override our constitution. This is yet another hole in the constitution that the P-constitution repairs.

    (a) there is no violation of natural law no matter what. (b) there is no means of violating the constitution no matter what. (c) there is no law higher than the natural law, and no other law higher than the constitution than the natural law. (d) the constitution includes the law of the european peoples. So we have physical reality > the natural law > law of european peoples (our group strategy) and > constitution that implements that strategy in the natural law, using strict construction. Like I said, I think shit thru.

  • Jan 15, 2020, 5:01 PM —“Jack Sandusky What’s your take on what just happened a

    Jan 15, 2020, 5:01 PM

    —“Jack Sandusky What’s your take on what just happened at the Kremlin?”—

    Putin is (as we should also) removing a clause from the constitution that puts international law above the russian constitution. We have the same vulnerability in our constitution in that it is possible for a treaty to override our constitution. This is yet another hole in the constitution that the P-constitution repairs.

    (a) there is no violation of natural law no matter what. (b) there is no means of violating the constitution no matter what. (c) there is no law higher than the natural law, and no other law higher than the constitution than the natural law. (d) the constitution includes the law of the european peoples. So we have physical reality > the natural law > law of european peoples (our group strategy) and > constitution that implements that strategy in the natural law, using strict construction. Like I said, I think shit thru.

  • Our Strategy

    Jan 21, 2020, 10:49 AM

    So, the strategy for the Right is to enumerate a set of ‘rights’ and demonstrate to demand our ‘rights’ including the right to self determination, the preservation of our culture, traditions, institutions, language, religion.

  • Our Strategy

    Jan 21, 2020, 10:49 AM

    So, the strategy for the Right is to enumerate a set of ‘rights’ and demonstrate to demand our ‘rights’ including the right to self determination, the preservation of our culture, traditions, institutions, language, religion.

  • Absolutism

    Absolutism https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/25/absolutism/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-25 19:22:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265000181801648128

  • Absolutism

    Jan 22, 2020, 7:46 PM

    1. Anglo Saxon Absolutism: Sovereignty. Every man a sovereign. The only possible result is a majority middle class with a natural aristocracy.
    2. Christian Absolutism: Every man a subject.
    3. Jewish Absolutism: Every man a resource.

  • Absolutism

    Jan 22, 2020, 7:46 PM

    1. Anglo Saxon Absolutism: Sovereignty. Every man a sovereign. The only possible result is a majority middle class with a natural aristocracy.
    2. Christian Absolutism: Every man a subject.
    3. Jewish Absolutism: Every man a resource.