Theme: Sovereignty

  • Churchianity vs Christianity vs The Philosophy of Jesus.

    Jan 22, 2020, 9:50 PM You now, I follow the religion of my ancestors (Excellence, heroism, sovereignty, and debts that are ‘true’) and the philosophy of Jesus (purchase of cooperation through exhaustion of love, forgiveness, charity), and the philosophy of my civilization (falsification by realism, naturalism, materialism, operationalism, empiricism, sovereignty-volition, reciprocity, and testimonial truth). I use the philosophy of Jesus, Aristotle, and our ancestors long lost to history (European Aryanism). I understand that those that lack agency need christianity in exclusivity (monopoly) even if the rest of us use different archetypes for different purposes given that we have more agency (markets). So it depends upon the portfolio of control you have over your life. Modern life would suggest that the monopoly of the abrahamic deceits is harmful. And that we can see jesus as a philosopher of the personal and social if not the material, economic, political, military, and strategic. This is why I will always and everywhere recommend Markets (our group strategy) and criticize christianity (monpoly), as harmful. We need many saints, demigods, or gods (role models), but each of us may or must, choose the hierarchy of those gods that we will spend most of our time imitating. I know who I use: Aristotle, Alexander, Caesar, Arthur, Jefferson and Hayek. And when

  • Churchianity vs Christianity vs The Philosophy of Jesus.

    Jan 22, 2020, 9:50 PM You now, I follow the religion of my ancestors (Excellence, heroism, sovereignty, and debts that are ‘true’) and the philosophy of Jesus (purchase of cooperation through exhaustion of love, forgiveness, charity), and the philosophy of my civilization (falsification by realism, naturalism, materialism, operationalism, empiricism, sovereignty-volition, reciprocity, and testimonial truth). I use the philosophy of Jesus, Aristotle, and our ancestors long lost to history (European Aryanism). I understand that those that lack agency need christianity in exclusivity (monopoly) even if the rest of us use different archetypes for different purposes given that we have more agency (markets). So it depends upon the portfolio of control you have over your life. Modern life would suggest that the monopoly of the abrahamic deceits is harmful. And that we can see jesus as a philosopher of the personal and social if not the material, economic, political, military, and strategic. This is why I will always and everywhere recommend Markets (our group strategy) and criticize christianity (monpoly), as harmful. We need many saints, demigods, or gods (role models), but each of us may or must, choose the hierarchy of those gods that we will spend most of our time imitating. I know who I use: Aristotle, Alexander, Caesar, Arthur, Jefferson and Hayek. And when

  • A Lesson of How a Warrior Is to To Become a King: Through Nobility

    A Lesson of How a Warrior Is to To Become a King: Through Nobility. https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/25/a-lesson-of-how-a-warrior-is-to-to-become-a-king-through-nobility/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-25 18:42:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264990205322330112

  • That the People Have an Indubitable, Unalienable, and Indefeasible Right to Reform or Change Their Government,

    Jan 26, 2020, 8:42 AM

    —-“That the people have an indubitable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to reform or change their Government, whenever it be found adverse or inadequate to the purposes of its institution.”—- James Madison, Amendments

  • That the People Have an Indubitable, Unalienable, and Indefeasible Right to Reform or Change Their Government,

    Jan 26, 2020, 8:42 AM

    —-“That the people have an indubitable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to reform or change their Government, whenever it be found adverse or inadequate to the purposes of its institution.”—- James Madison, Amendments

  • The average man does not want to be free

    The average man does not want to be free https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/25/the-average-man-does-not-want-to-be-free/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-25 17:57:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264978816859992070

  • The average man does not want to be free

    Jan 28, 2020, 1:32 PM

    —“Who was it that said something to the affect “most men I don’t want freedom, but rather would have just masters.”—Peter Vey

    SALLUS Sallust (86-ca. 35 B.C.), or Gaius Sallustius Crispus, was a Roman statesman and historian. Rejecting the annalistic method of writing history, he concentrated with improved accuracy and narrative technique on critical stages in the decline of the Roman Republic

    —“The average man does not want to be free. He simply wants to be safe.”— Henry Louis Mencken

  • The average man does not want to be free

    Jan 28, 2020, 1:32 PM

    —“Who was it that said something to the affect “most men I don’t want freedom, but rather would have just masters.”—Peter Vey

    SALLUS Sallust (86-ca. 35 B.C.), or Gaius Sallustius Crispus, was a Roman statesman and historian. Rejecting the annalistic method of writing history, he concentrated with improved accuracy and narrative technique on critical stages in the decline of the Roman Republic

    —“The average man does not want to be free. He simply wants to be safe.”— Henry Louis Mencken

  • He Who Can Destroy a Thing, Controls a Thing

    He Who Can Destroy a Thing, Controls a Thing https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/25/he-who-can-destroy-a-thing-controls-a-thing/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-25 17:26:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264971066159566850

  • Definitions: Conqueror > Settler > Immigrant > Refugee > Invader

    Definitions: Conqueror > Settler > Immigrant > Refugee > Invader https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/25/definitions-conqueror-settler-immigrant-refugee-invader/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-25 17:16:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264968622423846912