Theme: Sovereignty

  • UNDERSTANDING THE UNSTATED GEOSTRATEGY OF THE USA RE RUSSIA-UKRAINE

    UNDERSTANDING THE UNSTATED GEOSTRATEGY OF THE USA RE RUSSIA-UKRAINE
    https://naturallawinstitute.com/the-american-understanding-of-geostrategy-vs-ukraine/


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-29 20:57:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1487530316503859207

  • To some degree, this ‘love of man’ is my ‘religion’. It requires one to have fai

    To some degree, this ‘love of man’ is my ‘religion’. It requires one to have faith in man. And that the law of nature and nature’s god is: ‘Evolve through individual sovereignty, reciprocity in display word and deed, truth-before face, duty to commons before self and family.’


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-28 18:32:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1487131608272547841

    Reply addressees: @elbanna101

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1487130905525334020


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @elbanna101 So IMO it is easy to love all mankind if you can equally trust all to equally share the risk of producing complex networks of cooperation in which none of us siezes an opportunity for gain at others expense – thus decreasing prices, increasing wealth, and increasing commons.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1487130905525334020

  • yes but the current trajectory given russian and chinese moves is anglosphere (n

    yes but the current trajectory given russian and chinese moves is anglosphere (naval), eurosphere (continental), russosphere(borderland), east asia (rising power), and india(on defensive) with the future of africa an open question depending on chrisianity vs islam.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 06:22:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1486585280463261701

    Reply addressees: @Nordacus

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1486583108979810308

  • Won’t matter. It’s not so much their fund as that europe has spent seventy years

    Won’t matter. It’s not so much their fund as that europe has spent seventy years in the USA’s shadow focusing on politics and virtue signaling, and not on restoring it’s independencde and world power status. Difference is that anti-whtieness is now a world wide phenom.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 06:07:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1486581735672487940

    Reply addressees: @Nordacus

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1486577588113973249

  • 3) Putin is acting to insure his legacy given his age rather than the lower cost

    3) Putin is acting to insure his legacy given his age rather than the lower cost of waiting out deterministic USA and EU decline. World estimate of chinese and russian self sufficiency vs impatience vs risk was optimistic and conditions accelerated under covid,Biden, Post-Merkel.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 05:55:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1486578705099071488

    Reply addressees: @Nordacus

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1486577600650747907


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Nordacus 2) I let my long term bias interfere with my valuation of russian self assessment. While I understand them I didnt appreciate their want of power restoration vs risk tolerance. I should have weighted the taiwan opportunity and multi front problem as more opportunistic for russia.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1486577600650747907

  • 2) I let my long term bias interfere with my valuation of russian self assessmen

    2) I let my long term bias interfere with my valuation of russian self assessment. While I understand them I didnt appreciate their want of power restoration vs risk tolerance. I should have weighted the taiwan opportunity and multi front problem as more opportunistic for russia.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 05:51:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1486577600650747907

    Reply addressees: @Nordacus

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1486576616528654336


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Nordacus 1) He has determined that russan production, reserves, combined with increase in world commodity prices, will benefit from instability, and russia can hold out longer than europe, and he can regain great power status,and cause muliti front war forthe usa in the weak-Biden window.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1486576616528654336

  • Putin calculated the timing correctly

    Putin calculated the timing correctly.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 05:34:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1486573341943160832

  • You idiot. Trump’s strategy was the same with everyone: show personal respect, u

    You idiot. Trump’s strategy was the same with everyone: show personal respect, understanding of our difference, but maintain strategic opposition, and military conviction, thereby preserving the ability to communicate and negotiate while maintaining strategic control.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-26 03:10:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1486174614535512064

    Reply addressees: @firefilmz @mchooyah

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1486173690781962243

  • HOW MANY ARE ENOUGH, AND WHO ARE THE NAZIS? — “Q: How many do you think is enou

    HOW MANY ARE ENOUGH, AND WHO ARE THE NAZIS?

    — “Q: How many do you think is enough?” — Empire’s Frontiers

    Enough is something on the order of 2M. Sufficient is the 10k that allows us to collect the 25K, to the 100K, to the 1M to the 2M. Mao strategy: recruit the countryside. We only need enough men to produce confindence from recruits. The more we have the more we can get because size decreases uncertainty. However, the point of 2M is to attract enough attention that we can issue demands for corretion under the plausible possibility that we can force those demands. In other words teh value in numbers is that we eliminate the need for civil war. Our proposals (my work) is a moral soluton to the problem of modernity, and it simply restores and reinforces the original constitution which itself was the first written attempt at a scientific government. If we can ‘get attention’ without the nazis or christians ruining it, then we can propose our solution which satisfies the majority center-right and center left, and protects the ‘right’ propert, and only screws over the hard left, academy, financial sector, and the state.

    — “Who is a Christian is clear, but what in your view constitutes the nazis? Beside posters here on Gab who have more or less similar desires as what your work means to achieve, are there more established groups/men you would describe as nazis who might interfere?” — Empire’s Frontiers @EmpiresFrontiers

    I equate ‘nazi’ with just being imature and stupid.

    If we begin with rule of law by the natural law (as I’ve exhaustively documented it) it results in a nation with all the benefits of national socialism, none of the negative symbolism, and none of the authoritarianism, because (contrary to Schmidt etc) the science says we are right, and that if we launder christianity of its judaism the underlying ethic expressed in legal terms is scientifically right.

    In other words, nazism, national socialism, like communism and Woke is an ingorant religion for the dumb folk.

    We get an even better result without the baggage.

    Ethnocentrism is the optimum group strategy. Europeanism is the optimum evolutionary strategy. Rule of law is the optimum rule strategy. And monarchy, cabinet, and houses for the classes is the optimum political strategy, and mixed economy cmbining state time preference and capital, with private time preference and use of capital, is simply the optimum political order FOR THOSE WHO CAN DO IT.

    The thing is, you have to be more genetically and culturally evolved to do it. Thats why it’s a more evolved strategy. So our ‘competitors’ can’t do it.

    So why ‘carry their dysgenic incompetent dead weight’ instead of separating and leaving them behind?

    Same for naziism national socialism. Leave the dead weight behind. Learn the science. Join the 21st century. And depriec the enemy of their means of demonizing you and deplatforming you.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-25 22:10:25 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107685388306113064

  • @EmpiresFrontiers @Wanderers_Choice I equate ‘nazi’ with just immaturity, stupid

    @EmpiresFrontiers@Wanderers_Choice

    I equate ‘nazi’ with just immaturity, stupidity, and ignorance.

    If we begin with rule of law by the natural law (as I’ve exhaustively documented it) it results in a nation with all the benefits of national socialism, none of the negative symbolism, and none of the authoritarianism, because (contrary to Schmidt etc) the science says we are right, and that if we launder Christianity of its Judaism the underlying ethic expressed in legal terms is scientifically right.

    In other words, nazism, national socialism, like communism and Woke is an ignorant religion for the dumb folk. We can’t win the middle with a histronic evil cult of dumb folk. The majority middle will fight it to the death.

    BUT …. we can get an even better result without the baggage.

    Ethnocentrism is the optimum group strategy.
    Europeanism is the optimum evolutionary strategy.
    Rule of law is the optimum rule strategy.
    And monarchy, cabinet, and houses for the classes is the optimum political strategy,
    And mixed economy combining state time preference and capital, with private time preference and use of capital, is simply the optimum economic order … FOR THOSE WHO CAN DO IT.

    The thing is, you have to be more genetically and culturally evolved to do it. That’s why it’s a more evolved strategy. And so our ‘competitors’ can’t do it. That’s why they rebel against ‘whiteness’. They can’t behaviorally do it.

    So why ‘carry their dysgenic incompetent dead weight’ instead of separating and leaving them behind?

    Just eradicate NS and Naziism and Fascism as a failed strategy and let’s just go with Anglo Legal Science, and increase the suppression of criminality with that legal science.

    Those ‘power words’ just mean you’re a dumb fuck that’s deterministically without exception going to lose – and take down better people with you.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-25 22:03:02 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107685359254358527