Money is money (commodity money). Fiat money is a currency. (a money substitute). Private money is a fiduciary instrument (a money substitute). Nature insures commodity, the state fiat, the private org fiduciary instruments, and who insures stock/btc?
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-23 03:13:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1485088346888187909
Reply addressees: @oswaldspangled
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1485086897647284228
@Coywolf Germany is demilitarized, has been under a female docile leader for a generation, and is afraid of political assent. France has militarized, has maintained its colonies in africa, and is capable of at least policing the mediterranean. From there she can influence all of european politics because she’s the only viable military force.
China has invested in massive stockpiles of missiles and modernization of troops, and the chinese are naturally militaristic, and the red army is capable of organizing vast numbers and strategic planing. whereas the Hindus were on the way to militarism but failed, and retain their ancient timidity that has made the vitctims of every hostile that has drifeted into their territory, seem incapable of strategic planning, evade strategic responsibility, and can’t organize a frat party without someone shooting himself or his neighbor.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-21 23:51:51 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107663137900695884
@Brandneet@Helikzhan I always counter incrementalism. The solution is to imitate the founders, and show up in large numbers, and issue reasonable demands for separation. If that fails then you can war, or incrementally separate – because once the gauntlet is thrown down the government has lost legitimacy. it’s that loss of legitimacy that provides the power we need for separation.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-21 23:43:42 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107663105909087103
@Helikzhan All of those strategies have however consistently failed over the past century and a half, because they are entirely passive – we lack teh monarchy and universal military as means of organizational defense against the female means of social destruction of knowledge, tradition, and institutions. What you’re suggesting is a repetition of the libertarian fantasy that incremental separation is possible. It’s not. Libertarians are always wrong. Just as much as marxists are always wrong. For the same reason. There is no means of voluntary separation from kelptoparasites who depend on that parasitism and absence of competition.
The first existential threat to the enemy is forcible political separation, or forcibile political domination. Separation is superior becuase it eliminates the cost of spending the next 1000 years genetically pacifying their instinct for feminine kleptoparasitism. We simply separate, restore our evolutionary velocity and high trust by restoring society-as-army, under rule of law, and family as the purpose of policy, and leave them behind. There is no downside to this strategy because it takes the moral high ground.
The second existential threat is conquest and rule – which honestly is something we don’t want. Let them suicide into favellas. The problem with this strategy is that it makes the entire planet fear you and boycott you.
The third existential threat is one we find morally reprehensible – which is the even higher cost of deportation, displacement, or elimination. The problem with this method is that it makes the entire planet war with you.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-21 16:51:42 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107661485843813618
@roger_penrose Ukrainian people claim Ukraine for themselves. We insure their right to self-determination by self-determined means free of imposition of hardship on others, just as we insure our own, and every other we possibly can. Because that is the first right of natural rights, and the foundation necessary for all human rights.
WHether you understand it or not the foundation of our entire civilization and the reason for our continuous rapid evolution faster than all the rest, is our reciprocal insurance of self-determination by self-determined means by sovereignty in demonstrated interest, reciprocity in display word and deed, including truth before face, and duty and loyalty before self. This was developed on the steppe, but first manifested by the greeks, and is a tradition that is 6000 years old.
Ukraine is not special. They have chosen self-determination by self-determined means. And if we wish others to defend their and our self-same right we must defend theirs.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-21 02:41:06 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107658141123571767
RT @ContraFabianist: @curtdoolittle Values are intermediate capital… The problem with civic nationalism is that it intuits a need to defe…
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-20 19:41:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1484249855954505739
Background: I asked how me and my (small) organization would differ from Bannon and his (large).
ENDING THE FALSE DICHOTOMY BETWEEN CIVIC AND ETHNONATIONALISM.
(The supermajority of Europeans can practice scientific social, economic, political, and group evolutionary strategy that the enemies pejoratively call ‘whiteness’. Only a super-minority of non-Europeans can do so.)
I don’t do ideology. I do science. The science says what it says. Restore scientific law, we call the constitution of natural law, and in doing so restore a ‘scientific’ civilization, including the unscientific method by which christianity indoctrinates the common folk into the scientific basis of optimum social order: the solution to the prisoner’s dilemma: the exhaustion of forgivness by the extension of kinship love.
The thing is, you need a homogenous ethnocentric polity to pay the cost of the purely scientific european group evolutionary strategy of continuous innovation, application, and adaptation to the continuous discovery the laws of the universe: the only laws any god if there is one ever made.
All we have to so is raise our standards (which my work on restoring the constitution and completing what’s missing from it), and we will drive out the enemy and the inferior simply because they cannot tolerate the demand for people of good character that put family, society, polity, nation, and race before their individual hedonism.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-20 17:41:25 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107656019027848876
Ending the False Dichotomy Between Civic and Ethnonationalistm.
(the supermajority of Europeans can practice scientific social, economic, political, and group evolutionary strategy that the enemies pejoratively call ‘whiteness’. Only a super-minority of non-Europeans can do so.) https://t.co/vBDjvaAIjE
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-20 17:33:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1484217485670899712
The french are immoral as hell by germanic standards – particulary in fidelity, responsibility, sovereignty. They are cognitively and behaviorally female. The germans are still stuck in psychological and moral fictionalism. Both produced sh-t philosophy for those reasons.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-19 17:02:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1483847346622451712
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1483847345284464648
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
Look: Rousseau was a deeply perverse immoral man. Kant was a deeply religious man. Both the French and the German traditions that they began were revolutions AGAINST the British empirical enlightenment.Rousseau created informal moral sophistry and Kant pseudoscientific sophistry.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1483847345284464648
QUEEN SENDS NAVY TO STOP ILLEGAL MIGRATION:
The monarchy is the court of appeal of last resort. This is why the monarchy+military+courts are necessary: to compensate for the natural incompetence of political systems at the extremes. Americans were cursed when Washington refused the role of monarch. Why? Because the natural law of reciprocity, the common law from which it evolved, the monarchy as a judge of last resort, the court and the military as internal and external judges (Rule), the Cabinet and parliament for the production of commons (Government), The family (production of generations), and the citizens (production of goods, services, and information) is the optimum system of government invented by man – and it was invented by the English who used it to develop the modern state. There is no superior method of government. However, it places the greatest burden on the discipline of the population, all of whom must police the commons against degradation of those institutions of cultural production. And the purpose of the Marxist, neo-Marxist, postmodern, pc-woke, anti-western, anti-white, anti-male revolution is, a rebellion against the modern state, just as Judaism, Christianity, and Islam rebelled against the formation of the Roman modern state. Why? The modern state requires individual mindfulness, from agency, autonomy, and responsibility. And there is a large percentage of every population that prefers benevolent serfdom to agency, autonomy, and responsibility. In other words, the enlightenment false promise of an aristocracy of everyone is a nice dream, but too many are unfit for it. Because too many are unfit for the cost of mindfulness, agency, autonomy, and responsibility necessary for citizenship: self-government.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-17 18:01:53 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107639112545917709