( Ely Harman December 20 at 11:45pm · ) Tell me where I’m wrong. Mixed male/female institutions and spaces of any size under feminism will tend to end up female dominated, or at least dominated by feminine sensibilities, if not female persons. Why? Because in any conflict between a man and a woman the woman will always have recourse to the feminine means of coercion (rallying, shaming, gossip, reputational agression.) But the first rule of feminism is that the masculine means of coercion (violence) are illegitimate, and doubly illegitimate when used, by a man, against a woman. So, if a woman gets in my face about something, anything, and begins to resort to feminine coercion. There are only 4 ways I can respond. 1) Submit. Give her what she demands. 2) Disassociate. Leave. Cut off the interaction. 3) Retaliate in kind, with feminine coercion. 4) Resort to Violence. Well, we already said 4 is ruled out. 1) Results in female domination. 2) Cedes the territory to females. 3) Is not seen as honorable behavior for men. But even if men made the adjustment and began systematically employing feminine coercion, and successfully, then feminine sensibilities prevail (through them.) The second rule of feminism is there are no exclusively male or masculine spaces or institutions. These are to be identified and subjected to feminine coercion until they are opened up to integration. What about smaller institutions, like a household? Well, a man may preserve some sovereignty within a household if he can offer benefits and therefore potentially withold them, in part, or by disassociating entirely. If the benefits are compelling enough, and their potential loss compelling enough, that can uphold certain boundaries. But as institutions are feminized and select for and promote women and effeminate men, men must progressively either accept subordinate roles and statuses within those institutions, leave, or become effeminate. And that diminishes men’s abilities to produce and to bring home benefits with which to bargain for sovereignty even in their home life. And as the relative wealth and status of men declines in society and within institutions, so must their relative status and sovereignty at home. The process of feminization must tend to proceed, therefore, until it encounters and is reversed either by violent revolt or violent conquest. Patriarchy and matriarchy are the only options, long-term. There is no stable middle ground. Which direction we are headed depends largely on whether or not, and how much, men are using violence (including against women.) But even an established matriarchy is unstable because it cannot defend itself against an external patriarchy, (or a sufficiently broad based revolt) while a patriarchy need not allow itself to be threatened by any matriarchy.
Theme: Sex Differences
-
Men: task specialists, moral generalists. Women: moral specialists, task general
Men: task specialists, moral generalists. Women: moral specialists, task generalists.
Fascinating.
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-24 15:09:00 UTC
-
I doubt that the progressive program to infantilize males grasps that they just
I doubt that the progressive program to infantilize males grasps that they just make it easier for those of us who weren’t, to conquer them. And they have no one to call upon to help them. lol
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-13 10:54:00 UTC
-
Living in a house with other men, and hiring a housekeeper/cook is cheaper and m
Living in a house with other men, and hiring a housekeeper/cook is cheaper and more satisfying than living in a house with a woman that is less than a constant joy.
Thankfully, aside from being soft and smelling good, there are a lot of women to live with that are a constant joy. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-13 09:35:00 UTC
-
Psychological Terminology Was Invented to Lie.
HINT: ALL PSYCHOLOGICAL TERMS ARE LIES, JUST AS ALL RELIGIOUS TERMS ARE LIES. HUMANS SEEK TO ACQUIRE IN FURTHERANCE OF THEIR REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY. EVERYTHING ELSE IS POSTURING AND NEGOTIATION. The only thing that differs is our reproductive strategy: Gender, Class, Age, Race. Jessa Faya Alexander —“How about: Empaths seek connection, Sociopaths seek power; your results may vary”—
Curt Doolittle To experience the feeling of “connection: is a impulsive MEANS to an evolutionary END. That women tend to be incognizant of the ends that they pursue by seeking their emotions is simply to say that they are less human and more animal than men. A sociopath(ends) like an empath(means) can pursue either moral ends or immoral ends. There is no moral difference between immoral sociopaths(ends) and immoral empaths (means). Just as there is no moral difference between moral sociopaths(ends) and moral empaths(means). The difference lies only in animal impulse and lying about, and human reason and telling the truth of it. -
Psychological Terminology Was Invented to Lie.
HINT: ALL PSYCHOLOGICAL TERMS ARE LIES, JUST AS ALL RELIGIOUS TERMS ARE LIES. HUMANS SEEK TO ACQUIRE IN FURTHERANCE OF THEIR REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY. EVERYTHING ELSE IS POSTURING AND NEGOTIATION. The only thing that differs is our reproductive strategy: Gender, Class, Age, Race. Jessa Faya Alexander —“How about: Empaths seek connection, Sociopaths seek power; your results may vary”—
Curt Doolittle To experience the feeling of “connection: is a impulsive MEANS to an evolutionary END. That women tend to be incognizant of the ends that they pursue by seeking their emotions is simply to say that they are less human and more animal than men. A sociopath(ends) like an empath(means) can pursue either moral ends or immoral ends. There is no moral difference between immoral sociopaths(ends) and immoral empaths (means). Just as there is no moral difference between moral sociopaths(ends) and moral empaths(means). The difference lies only in animal impulse and lying about, and human reason and telling the truth of it. -
The Why of Shrinking Brains
SHRINKING BRAIN SIZE, PAEDOMORPHIC SELECTION, OR FASTER REPRODUCTION OF THE UNDERCLASSES? http://www.ancient-origins.net/…/scientists-are-alarmed-shr… Given that (a) yes, brain size makes a demonstrable difference in current human intelligence.
And given that (b) it’s unclear whether our brains are getting smaller or whether more of the smaller humans are breeding in cities. (which appears to be the case since cities are genetic and IQ sinks). And given that (c) we have been selecting for immaturity for 10K years (paedomorphic selection). And given that (d) women generally possess superior verbal skills and weaker modeling skills despite smaller brains. I would hypothesize that all of the above are driving down AVERAGE brain size. I would suggest we will saw additional paedomorphic selection domestication up and until the period of ‘Peak Human’ which I suspect was around 1500 bc. And that at present we are seeing a rapid expansion of dysgenic classes, tilting the data dramatically. Unfortunately I suspect that the initial shift caused by the adoption of general rules (science) rather than rules of specific cases (recipes), as well as the reduction in the malnutrition at the bottom (left) of the curve, means that the downward shift in genetic IQ and brain size from underclass reproduction is being hidden by the Flynn effect. But in real terms, on average we are getting smaller, more verbal brains, and a lot more dumb people breeding. Curt Doolittle -
The Why of Shrinking Brains
SHRINKING BRAIN SIZE, PAEDOMORPHIC SELECTION, OR FASTER REPRODUCTION OF THE UNDERCLASSES? http://www.ancient-origins.net/…/scientists-are-alarmed-shr… Given that (a) yes, brain size makes a demonstrable difference in current human intelligence.
And given that (b) it’s unclear whether our brains are getting smaller or whether more of the smaller humans are breeding in cities. (which appears to be the case since cities are genetic and IQ sinks). And given that (c) we have been selecting for immaturity for 10K years (paedomorphic selection). And given that (d) women generally possess superior verbal skills and weaker modeling skills despite smaller brains. I would hypothesize that all of the above are driving down AVERAGE brain size. I would suggest we will saw additional paedomorphic selection domestication up and until the period of ‘Peak Human’ which I suspect was around 1500 bc. And that at present we are seeing a rapid expansion of dysgenic classes, tilting the data dramatically. Unfortunately I suspect that the initial shift caused by the adoption of general rules (science) rather than rules of specific cases (recipes), as well as the reduction in the malnutrition at the bottom (left) of the curve, means that the downward shift in genetic IQ and brain size from underclass reproduction is being hidden by the Flynn effect. But in real terms, on average we are getting smaller, more verbal brains, and a lot more dumb people breeding. Curt Doolittle -
WOMEN ARE CAPABLE OF RATIONAL THOUGHT. MEN ARE CAPABLE OF RESPONSIBLE THOUGHT. I
WOMEN ARE CAPABLE OF RATIONAL THOUGHT. MEN ARE CAPABLE OF RESPONSIBLE THOUGHT.
https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154785265992264
ITS HARDER FOR WOMEN TO FIND MEN TO TRUST
https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154785328047264
A FATHER NEEDS TO BE THE ONE MAN A WOMAN CAN TRUST
https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154788310172264
THIS TRUST ISSUE MIGHT BE VERY IMPORTANT
https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154790756607264
I NOTICE THE TRUST THING EVERYWHERE
https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154810769102264
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-09 21:17:00 UTC
-
Ever since I made the statement that women have a far harder time knowing which
Ever since I made the statement that women have a far harder time knowing which men to trust I see it FREAKING EVERYWHERE.
I had a strange conversation with a woman today and I kept thinking “she can’t be that stupid” but then a man got involved and I explained it to him and it was fine. I think women understand each other’s devious motives, but I think women really have no idea at all when they look at men, and listen to us. How do we read? Do we read that we’re scary? What? I don’t get it.
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-09 20:00:00 UTC