****”They’re just gene machines: ‘lie, gossip, rally, shame, and form enough of an irritant that I can get what I want through cost imposition rather than productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchanges.”***
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 09:30:00 UTC
as soon as a boy matures, we must remove him from the influence of women. this has been true for all of history – until ‘the snowflake now’.
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-27 08:56:00 UTC
(on race and IQ)
…
Flynn, Lynn, Vanen, and as far as I know the vast majority of specilists agree with the difference in racial distributions.
What is not obvious is simply the consequence of size of the bottom of the distributions. Meaning, that whites and east asians, because of climate, agriculture, and government, have literally killed off large portions of the underclasses for more than one thousand years, and in both societies used reverse redistribution to increase rates of reproduction in their upper middle, and upper classes.
As far as I know, the difference between the races is largely a function of the rates of reproduction of the classes. This heavily affected by the difference between the burden of particularist thought (memory) and the advantage of generalist thought (general theories), plus the increase provided by education and nutrition.
However, the deltas between the racial distributions raised universally across all races maintaining the relative centers of the distributions.
Futhermore, ashkenazis, whites, and east asians, have succeeded in selective breeding for pedomorphism producing much lower testosterone levels, and much lower impulsivity and aggression than the warmer(temperate) and more competitive (africa) regions. So much so that this appears to be a reproductive problem for east asians in modernity. (impulsivity and lower intelligence in the absence of subsistence pressures produce higher rates of reproduction, while lack of impulsivity and higher intelligence produce lower rates of reproduction.)
So as far as I know (and I am pretty completely informed), the issue remains not one of necessarily material differences (although there are some) but largely a matter of the size of the underclasses in the relative groups, and the degree of ‘domestication’ through pedomorphic reproduction that has been possible in the territory of racial occupation.
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-23 20:52:00 UTC
If you’re selfish, stupid, and ugly, you’re undesirable for cooperation, association, reproduction, and employment. I realize this frustrates the female intuition. Because just as a gay man desires the attention we give to females and is ‘hurt’ by its absence – because men are disposable, and their sexual attention unwanted – an undesirable woman feels the same ‘hurt’.
But because of the reproductive necessity of feminine solipsism, these women lack agency: they are unable to distinguish between, or unable to tolerate, their undesirability and need for self-reformation, from active hostility toward them. Absence of attention is not the same as the presence of malice. Instead, the fact is, that if you are impulsive, selfish, stupid, and ugly, you’re just a dead weight cost on the rest of humanity. And no one pays you any attention until you change yourself.
(The more I understand the differences in male and female agency the more disappointed I become with the prospects. men evolved greater agency because we’re dangerous to one another if we can’t develop it. Women’s lack of agency was tolerable before politics and nearly disappeared when they had multiple children. In that sense women’s lack of agency is an evolutionary asset for women with three or more children, and a detriment without them.)
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-23 10:05:00 UTC
(What is it with being photo spammed by LBFM’s? Sucker-hunting? I mean, seriously. I feel like an unpaid fake account detector.)
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-22 11:15:00 UTC
http://historicallyhandsomemen.tumblr.com/LOOK THROUGH THIS LIST OF FACIAL EXPRESSIONS
Then search for the most handsome men of the contemporary era. And compare the facial expressions.
What you will see is remarkable.
You will see a desperate attempt at likability in the present, and calm masculine confidence in the past.
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-20 16:20:00 UTC
ADD A DIFFERENCE IN AGENCY AND COST TO THE GENDERS
The whole (a) Agency ( Left-lacks-agency vs Right-has-agency) concept provides just as much explanatory power as (b) the solipsism vs autism, (c) the intertemporal division of reproductive perception, cognition and labor, (d) the competing but compatible differences in reproductive costs, and (c) R/K (herd/pack) selection analogy.
But all those statements fall prey to our metaphysical acceptance of some sort of equality, when instead, the consequences of this effect are similar to the evidence of differences in investment strategy: women invest more conservatively (they take less risk) and men more aggressively. So women tend to do better, especially when they work in groups (investment clubs).
But this is to ignore causality: only men would create a stock market (risk market) containing a sub-market of low risk stocks. Otherwise we would only have investment, bond, and banking industries but no stock market. The stock market functions on speculation and risk calculation. The externality produced by that market is a set of lower risk stocks that those with lower risk tolerance can profit from.
We see the same thing in claims that women are more civilized. But this is nonsense. Men create civilization by absorbing the majority of stress, damage, and risk.
Men must defeat the dark forces of time and ignorance. Women must just make use of what ‘gets through our shield-wall’.
So while women bear higher reproductive production costs. Men bear higher defense, management, and research and development costs.
And the evidence is that the man’s cost is higher…..
Civilization is not so much in our interest as it is in our mother’s sisters, wives, and daughter’s. Otherwise. hunting other humans is higher risk but greater enjoyment – and often greater reward.
Assuming that research and development was invested in weaponry, mobility, fitness, cooperation, and skill.
Full accounting means never taking any assumptions about natural order for granted.
Man is a rational creature who chooses rational ends. That is all.
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-18 17:00:00 UTC
THE LEFT’S CASTING OF GENDER SPECIALIZATION AS CLASS WARFARE – BUT MASCULINITY IS A VIRTUE NOT A VICE
January 11, 2017 by Alberto Zambrano
—“The left has to use indignation and offenses because it is absolutely incapable of using the truth without exposing itself.
So, given the inability to use the truth, the leftists extract their cooperative procedures and threaten to withdraw.
We must respond to the threats of retreat as severely as we respond to threats or to those who cheat or cheat us.
This is deeply important as a concept to study in the sick behavior of the leftists.
There is a lot of research that confirms how we react to such lies and rejections, those differences are biological, existent and widely diffused. And those same researches have shown that the female sex is more sensitive to them, which is why the left has sought to seize the vanguard of women.
As men we must fight at all costs to retain the integrity of our group. We are genetically programmed by nature to do so. And it affects us at cognitive levels in the same way that music affects us.
The influence of our force is the ultimate strategy to defeat the left, to sabotage its norms, to challenge its conventions by being brutally honest causes the mass withdrawal of the lies that the leftists throw at us daily.
If we raise not only the level of debate, but our ability to create a vanguard that borders the left, we will have won the ideological war by default. The cost of cohesion and internal preferences for our own group, cooperating with our peers, and caring for our women and children creates in the left a series of doubts that they consider dangerous threats for their survival since the leftists appeal to what We do not protect as a group for them to create avant-garde.
The left rejects the masculine character of the struggle and substitutes it for the class struggle, putting us in a terrain where we are equal in a struggle that does not exist. If we reject the class struggle and rejoice at the true meaning of the blood, sweat and tears that men have shed in order to make their nations great, we will have made our great nations again and we will have gained them to the left.
Masculinity is positive, desirable and attractive to the opposite sex
Just as femininity is fundamental to civilization, to preserve the species, and to cultivate lasting relationships, masculinity is necessary to preserve the character and moral fiber of our nation.
The left with its lies seeks to separate us from our women and children and put them against us.
Leftist elites, with their false intelligentsia, produce silly and deceptive ideas that gain their status as a result of the merit of those who spit them out, and that these ideas (feminism, gender ideology) parasitize our nation’s superior order of trust. These elites and those who follow them believe that they will win, and may do so unless we have patience and do not alter the conditions under which they are able to exploit the higher order of trust upon which our nation depends.
If our superior order of trust is so superior that it is impassable for the left, we will preserve a society and nation that can flourish homogeneously, a tactic that the left, so ethnically, morally, and ideologically heterogeneous, is incapable of preserving without entering into Fundamental contradictions of their own ideals.
It is for this reason that the left is unable to obtain and maintain the loyalty of the interests of the other classes without maintaining a proper warrior and masculine class of its own.”—
Alberto R. Zambrano U.
In collaboration for The Propertarian Institute.
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-18 13:32:00 UTC
Grades and Age demonstrate only that one is not terribly defective.
The major variations between groups and classes are (a) rate of maturity, (b) depth of sexual maturity (aggression, degree of success at pedomorphic reproduction), and (c) genetic quality (physical symmetry/health, impulsivity, conscientiousness, intelligence, gender symmetry. All of which can most easily be categorized under successful pedomorphic reproduction.
Childhood is an artificial modern construct for the purpose of adding women to the workforce for the purpose of increasing tax revenues. This has culminated in the current generation as ‘infantilization’ of the millennials. however, a human being does not really ‘mature’ until past his or her prime mating years (25). Conversely, a human being can mentally mature in mid teens with sufficient responsibilities (female reproduction, male military service, and work).
Women mature faster than men – men specialize and take longer.
Blacks faster than middle easterners, faster than mediterraneans, faster than europeans, faster than east asians. Hence testosterone differences.
The problem? Not enough stressors.
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-13 14:53:00 UTC
MY THOUGHTS ON : John-Paul Wright / Stefan Molyneux
THE LEFT
– People on the left score lower than people on the right in self control.
– Self control (impulsivity) along with IQ, is an ubiquitous predictor of life outcomes.
– People on the left score higher on aggression than people on the right.
– Leftists assume through self experience that agency is limited.
– Criminals overwhelmingly tend to be leftists.
– Justify and glamorize anti-social violence (rebels, criminals, political deceit)
– Moral Specialization (motherhood)
– Left academia is engaged in ADVOCACY not in CRITICISM. (lying)
THE RIGHT
– The right is more conscientious, less impulsive, less aggressive, has greater assumption of agency, and far lower criminality.
– Justify and glamorize pro-social violence (war, police, sheriff, heroism).
– Moral Generalization(‘tribal-hood’)
– Right academia is engaged in criticism, not advocacy.
TIME PREFERENCES
– The right is empirical(skeptical) ‘show me, so that we know the consequences first.’
– The right self corrects and prosecutes its own members.
– The left is rational(optimistic) ‘just do it and figure out the consequences later’
– The left ‘forgets’ rather than self-corrects, and ‘reframes’ its own members.
INARGUABLE CORRELATIONS
There are two of the strongest correlations in social science:
1) impulsivity and aggression
2) stereotypes.
The left lies about these two factors consistently.
ORIGINS
– Women need to be impulsive since the cost of child rearing is irrationally high.
– Women must invest heavily in children so they advance them regardless of their merit (denial).
– Women who are married with children develop conservative political positions.
– Women who are married with more than two children develop most conservative political positions because they are unable to fantasize given the evidence before them.
CONSEQUENCES
1. the left produces a kleptocratic order (female strategy)
2. it’s necessary for women to employ a kleptocratic (parasitic) strategy given the asymmetry of costs of reproduction.
3. gender biases can cross genders, and do, so men demonstrate the same parasitic strategy when they cannot compete without doing so.
4. some individuals adopt these biases for signaling purposes.
5. the only method of improving a society is to reduce the number of the impulsive (leftists). A leftist society will always degenerate.
6. the method of decreasing the possibility of leftist action is rule of natural law.
7. the method of decreasing the number of leftist actors is by limiting the reproduction of leftist actors.
8. the method of increasing the number of rightist actors is by retention of the results of their productivity when allocated to reproduction, and subsidy of their reproduction if possible.
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-12 09:24:00 UTC