https://t.co/ACbTNQBIE2Retweeted Charles Murray (@charlesmurray):
What’s the word when a woman explains something to a man without being asked?
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-02 21:48:00 UTC
Theme: Sex Differences
-
Charles Murray (@charlesmurray): What’s the word when a woman explains something
-
SUBVERT: FEMININE / OVERT: MASCULINE
SUBVERT: FEMININE / OVERT: MASCULINE
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-28 10:57:00 UTC
-
The Continental Marriage is Better
Male-Female Relationship lessons learned from Ukraine. 1 – Men are barely tamed gorillas. Love them. Feed them. F– them. If necessary dress them. 2 – Women are incomprehensible. Their job is to love. Love them. Supply them. Make them feel safe. 3 – No talk of equality or how we should behave. No trying to train or change each other. No criticizing men for gorilla-ing, and no criticizing women for loving. Their system is better. No Question. That’s why they’re so poor but still so wonderful. That’s why we’re so broken. We ended the contract between men and women. Men are not women. Women are not men. And any pretense of otherwise is just a lie to perpetuate a fraud, by which to steal, instead of trade. That’s what I learned.
-
The Continental Marriage is Better
Male-Female Relationship lessons learned from Ukraine. 1 – Men are barely tamed gorillas. Love them. Feed them. F– them. If necessary dress them. 2 – Women are incomprehensible. Their job is to love. Love them. Supply them. Make them feel safe. 3 – No talk of equality or how we should behave. No trying to train or change each other. No criticizing men for gorilla-ing, and no criticizing women for loving. Their system is better. No Question. That’s why they’re so poor but still so wonderful. That’s why we’re so broken. We ended the contract between men and women. Men are not women. Women are not men. And any pretense of otherwise is just a lie to perpetuate a fraud, by which to steal, instead of trade. That’s what I learned.
-
Politics is a Proxy for Violence
Politics is a proxy for violence between men. A market for trades to avoid violence. Women have permission to use this proxy -within limits. But risking life and limb is not substitutable. They risk men, not themselves. So, women: be very careful what you do with that violence. Because men are very aware that the proxy is revokable, and we can return to violence. We always, like children, test one another. Sometimes we find the limits .Unfortunately, the limit in politics is the restoration of violence.
-
Politics is a Proxy for Violence
Politics is a proxy for violence between men. A market for trades to avoid violence. Women have permission to use this proxy -within limits. But risking life and limb is not substitutable. They risk men, not themselves. So, women: be very careful what you do with that violence. Because men are very aware that the proxy is revokable, and we can return to violence. We always, like children, test one another. Sometimes we find the limits .Unfortunately, the limit in politics is the restoration of violence.
-
Aphorisms
An urban minority is not the same as a demographic or territorial minority. Outside of the urban favelas-in-training, it’s homogenous. Of course suburbans and rurals have higher sensitivity to costs imposed: the police vast commons that urbanites take for granted. There are many ways to sell yourself into slavery. Democracy, Marx, Keynes, and Multiculturalism are just the best pitch since monotheism. I’m autistic. Childhood was traumatic in many ways.But I didn’t ask for special pleading.I trained the h-ck out of myself to adapt to norms.
-
Aphorisms
An urban minority is not the same as a demographic or territorial minority. Outside of the urban favelas-in-training, it’s homogenous. Of course suburbans and rurals have higher sensitivity to costs imposed: the police vast commons that urbanites take for granted. There are many ways to sell yourself into slavery. Democracy, Marx, Keynes, and Multiculturalism are just the best pitch since monotheism. I’m autistic. Childhood was traumatic in many ways.But I didn’t ask for special pleading.I trained the h-ck out of myself to adapt to norms.
-
Is Male Bonding The Source Of Civilization?
(hmmm… well, lets do a propertarian analysis of that question) —“How do you feel about mannerbunds?”—Harrison Baker Well you know, I tend to stay away from silly terminology and instead make operationally testable statements. men evolved to work in groups of brothers to herd women, hold territory, and kill competitors and take their stuff. this requires both cooperation: shared risk, and loyalty: elimination of defectors and parasites, and a division of spoils preserving both cooperation, loyalty, and the punishment of defectors and cheats. civilization is the result of teh accumulated knowledge and institutions that allow us to scale this system to ever larger and ever more competitive circumstances. in this sense, yes, the bond between men that we traditionally call the ‘intitiatic brotherhood of soldiers’ is in fact the source of what we call ‘civilization;: cooperation at very large scales. But we could just as likely say that it’s the need for men to bind to herd women and hold territory and develop institutions that is the source of civilization. or we could say that it is man’s reaction to the untrustworthiness of women that is the origin of civilization since all we do is invent better farms in which to herd our women at lower cost to us. Or we could say that women are untrustworthy in order to force us to build good farms (nests) for them in which they can nest. And that it is women’s untrustworthiness that forces us to cooperate and create nesting areas for them. Roll that little model around in your head for a while? 😉 Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
-
Is Male Bonding The Source Of Civilization?
(hmmm… well, lets do a propertarian analysis of that question) —“How do you feel about mannerbunds?”—Harrison Baker Well you know, I tend to stay away from silly terminology and instead make operationally testable statements. men evolved to work in groups of brothers to herd women, hold territory, and kill competitors and take their stuff. this requires both cooperation: shared risk, and loyalty: elimination of defectors and parasites, and a division of spoils preserving both cooperation, loyalty, and the punishment of defectors and cheats. civilization is the result of teh accumulated knowledge and institutions that allow us to scale this system to ever larger and ever more competitive circumstances. in this sense, yes, the bond between men that we traditionally call the ‘intitiatic brotherhood of soldiers’ is in fact the source of what we call ‘civilization;: cooperation at very large scales. But we could just as likely say that it’s the need for men to bind to herd women and hold territory and develop institutions that is the source of civilization. or we could say that it is man’s reaction to the untrustworthiness of women that is the origin of civilization since all we do is invent better farms in which to herd our women at lower cost to us. Or we could say that women are untrustworthy in order to force us to build good farms (nests) for them in which they can nest. And that it is women’s untrustworthiness that forces us to cooperate and create nesting areas for them. Roll that little model around in your head for a while? 😉 Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine