âWhere they have burned books, they will end in burning human beings.â
â Heinrich Heine
âWe should forgive our enemies, but not before they are hangedâ
â Heinrich Heine
âAll I really want is enough to live on, a little house in the country… and a tree in the garden with seven of my enemies hanging in it. â
â Heinrich Heine
âIn dark ages people are best guided by religion, as in a pitch-black night a blind man is the best guide; he knows the roads and paths better than a man who can see. When daylight comes, however, it is foolish to use blind, old men as guides.â
â Heinrich Heine
âOrdinarily he was insane, but he had lucid moments when he was merely stupidâ
â Heinrich Heine
âThere are more fools in the world than there are people.â
â Heinrich Heine
âThe music at a wedding procession always reminds me of the music of soldiers going into battle.â
â Heinrich Heine
Theme: Sex Differences
-
Wooing is Expensive
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
WOMEN FOR SUPERGEEKS Women are easy. Take them shopping. Be nice to their friends, and make her look good in front of them. Listen. Give them permission to feel. Say “yes: to anything that you can easily do so. Say “no I can’t or won’t do that” – not, “no that’s a bad idea” – and don’t ask forgiveness or permission or agreement to say that kind of “no.” That is what it means to be a man and different from a woman. In addition, have male friends and many of them. I love talking through thoughts and issues and ideas with a woman. And honesty in those things makes them feel safe with you. In other words, bring them into your emotional world but not your cognitive world. Bringing them into your cognitive world is a form of selfishness. It makes you needy. If you bring them into your emotional, personal, and social, world, you make them successful in bonding with you. My particular issue is that I can be anchored if I talk about something before I am ready – and being anchored takes away my superpower so to speak. So I can’t talk about some issues until I am ready, and this can create the perception that I am hiding something. Worse, not everyone can understand what I am thinking, so I try to humor people to save myself effort, frustration, and potential alienation, which can also create the impression that I have ‘plans’. Worse, I managing one’s creativity is different from managing one’s work. Creativity is a manageable process but time consuming, and cannot, like ordinary task work, be forced. So it is not always clear that I am in fact (as taleb also laments) ‘working’, when in fact I am, under almost all circumstances, ‘working’ and only vaguely ‘present’. Stuff spills out of your fingertips when it’s ready, not when you want it to. So lots of intimate, in that I mean, ‘us time’ talking is necessary to preserve trust and connection to compensate. And that is what I learned to do. Women give AMAZINGLY GOOD ADVICE on anything personal, emotional, social, and ‘real’. so much so that at least for me it’s very hard to function without it.
-
Wooing is Expensive
âWhere they have burned books, they will end in burning human beings.â
â Heinrich Heine âWe should forgive our enemies, but not before they are hangedâ
â Heinrich Heine âAll I really want is enough to live on, a little house in the country… and a tree in the garden with seven of my enemies hanging in it. â
â Heinrich Heine âIn dark ages people are best guided by religion, as in a pitch-black night a blind man is the best guide; he knows the roads and paths better than a man who can see. When daylight comes, however, it is foolish to use blind, old men as guides.â
â Heinrich Heine âOrdinarily he was insane, but he had lucid moments when he was merely stupidâ
â Heinrich Heine âThere are more fools in the world than there are people.â
â Heinrich Heine âThe music at a wedding procession always reminds me of the music of soldiers going into battle.â
â Heinrich Heine -
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
WOMEN FOR SUPERGEEKS Women are easy. Take them shopping. Be nice to their friends, and make her look good in front of them. Listen. Give them permission to feel. Say “yes: to anything that you can easily do so. Say “no I can’t or won’t do that” – not, “no that’s a bad idea” – and don’t ask forgiveness or permission or agreement to say that kind of “no.” That is what it means to be a man and different from a woman. In addition, have male friends and many of them. I love talking through thoughts and issues and ideas with a woman. And honesty in those things makes them feel safe with you. In other words, bring them into your emotional world but not your cognitive world. Bringing them into your cognitive world is a form of selfishness. It makes you needy. If you bring them into your emotional, personal, and social, world, you make them successful in bonding with you. My particular issue is that I can be anchored if I talk about something before I am ready – and being anchored takes away my superpower so to speak. So I can’t talk about some issues until I am ready, and this can create the perception that I am hiding something. Worse, not everyone can understand what I am thinking, so I try to humor people to save myself effort, frustration, and potential alienation, which can also create the impression that I have ‘plans’. Worse, I managing one’s creativity is different from managing one’s work. Creativity is a manageable process but time consuming, and cannot, like ordinary task work, be forced. So it is not always clear that I am in fact (as taleb also laments) ‘working’, when in fact I am, under almost all circumstances, ‘working’ and only vaguely ‘present’. Stuff spills out of your fingertips when it’s ready, not when you want it to. So lots of intimate, in that I mean, ‘us time’ talking is necessary to preserve trust and connection to compensate. And that is what I learned to do. Women give AMAZINGLY GOOD ADVICE on anything personal, emotional, social, and ‘real’. so much so that at least for me it’s very hard to function without it.
-
once males had tools, and particularly spears it was possible for females to ral
once males had tools, and particularly spears it was possible for females to rally males to constrain alphas – and females could gain some control of reproduction, – and contractualism could improve among males.
Her argument that females were abused is a moralism – meaningless. evolution doesn’t care.
groups of males possess territory and females in competition with other males who desire to take both. females can obtain ingroup status and influence more safely than outgroup.
humans developed pairing off and serial monogamy out of safety since males will kill over access to females (reproduction) more so than any other incentive.
agrarianism changed everything and gave us marriage and property. as well as customs and laws.
we are in a post agrarian period and reverting to serial monogamy in lower classes and maintaining monogamy in the upper. this has drastically increased single motherhood, lower male loyalty to offspring, decreased household size and eliminated the middle class.
women’s intuitions are cumulatively decivilizing (experiential rather than consequential) under monopoly democracy, so without creating separate houses of government for males and females, we should continue to decline into the south american model with women’s entry into the voting pool the cause.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-09 12:55:00 UTC
-
Seems like is not an argument. Simple statement of fact. Your method of argument
Seems like is not an argument. Simple statement of fact. Your method of argument gives priority to the feminine rather than masculine reproductive interest.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-08 19:11:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060610765319798784
Reply addressees: @readomain
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060608670025875462
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060608670025875462
-
No, that is what a woman would say. A man says, “For my people – whatever it tak
No, that is what a woman would say. A man says, “For my people – whatever it takes.” The only restitution for the reciprocity of displacement and genocide is displacement and genocide. This is morality, this is the Law.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-08 18:48:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060605113012772865
Reply addressees: @readomain
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060599792315916288
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060599792315916288
-
THE VULNERABILITY CREATED WITHIN OUR CIVILIZATION – TWICE by Marra McKinney “Whe
THE VULNERABILITY CREATED WITHIN OUR CIVILIZATION – TWICE
by Marra McKinney
“When lower IQ people move to more feminised countries, they find an already existing parasitic environment (created by women) that is particularly well suited for people like them.
Women there already complain that they are victims, that they are oppressed, that men are privileged, that they deserve special quotas and affirmative action, that they should be given stuff via the welfare system, via special (without competitive bidding) government contracts and loans, via special grants and scholarships for women and minorities, or via alimony and divorce.
Obviously that environment will be great for low IQ “Give me, Give me, I’m Victim” people as well and they too will join the party and start behaving that way (until there are too many takers and the whole redistribution system collapses).
In contrast, low IQ migrants won’t find a parasitic environment like that in Turkey, Israel or Japan. No one there feels guilty, could be made to feel guilty, or is going to give them anything.
Men evolved to protect the perimeter against males from other (mainly patriarchal) tribes (chimps do the same). Having women involved in decisions about the perimeter (think of Merkel or Swedish feminists) results in what we see – open borders, multiculture, diversity, “tolerance”, border chaos.
In nature, when you weaken the local males, then other males move in and replace them. You can observe this among lions, among primates, or among europeans. After feminist women (with the encouragement of jewish thought leadership) weakened their own men, then other men (muslims) started moving in.
Males are the immune system of society. The nationalism that they create is the wall. Without them, there is no nationalism or resistance to foreigners. Weaken them, and then other foreigners, often males, start moving in.
Thus, we can expect any ethnic group with large female influence and female leadership to self destroy, as the female leadership will not care about preserving their own ethnicity or group cohesion, leading to the feminised group opening their borders, trying to help anyone in need, accepting anyone in, and eventually becoming a minority in their own country.
Women, for the most part, care about resources and smoothing conflict over. They evolved to fill that role. Women are less likely to support military action even against ISIS, a group known for enslaving women and using them as sex slaves, and are less likely to support ban on muslim immigration.
Stockholm Syndrome is more pronounced in females . Women were frequently taken captive by (or in some cases traded to) other groups, and so they evolved to smooth things over with distant groups (whereas their male kinfolk were simply killed). The survival of their genes, unless they were exceptionally ugly, was more or less guaranteed – whichever tribe they end up being with. That is why they are more accepting of foreigners and foreign rule. Men form tribes. Women join tribes. So, women tend to vote for resource redistribution (from men) and being nice to everybody (including those who aren’t in their group), and for helping anyone in need, regardless of their group.
Theory is that if you want to destroy an ethnic group, simply increase female influence in that group. Increase it a lot. And voila. Since females don’t care about ethnicity that much, and are less xenophobic, the country will open it’s borders, will try to help anyone in need, and will welcome everyone. As a bonus, you will also get a negative birth rate for the feminized host group.
All kinds of other ethnic, religious and racial groups will move in, and will start vying for dominance; as for the feminized host group, its fate is to become a minority in its own country, to mix with the foreigners, and then to ultimately disappear.”
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-06 14:55:00 UTC
-
REVERSE OF DIMORPHIC ADAPTATION TO HIDE IN COVER OF THE HERD I mean, if you’re t
REVERSE OF DIMORPHIC ADAPTATION TO HIDE IN COVER OF THE HERD
I mean, if you’re the female of the species, with nesting urges, peacock (preening) urges, virtue signaling urges, solipsistic impulses to protect young, not ‘sticking out’ too far from the herd urges, but can ‘bait’ (moral hazard) males as means of obtaining resources for free or for mere attention then …, …. but what if you’re the male of the species but use the same strategy? You signal cooperation, but it’s all just baiting moral hazard?
I mean. That’s their entire strategy right?
They hide in the herd of females.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-06 13:21:00 UTC
-
OMG… I get it. …. They literally evolved to specialize in lying
OMG… I get it. …. They literally evolved to specialize in lying.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-06 13:14:00 UTC