Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • Women personalize everything. Men generalize everything. It’s like talking to tw

    Women personalize everything. Men generalize everything. It’s like talking to two different species….

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 17:42:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062038036756774912

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46201546_10156773963177264_780420385

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46201546_10156773963177264_7804203851711512576_n_10156773963172264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46003571_10156773963232264_278249366077046784_n_10156773963227264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46147274_10156773963307264_1440236687652290560_n_10156773963302264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45986512_10156773963402264_187061742889598976_n_10156773963397264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46059111_10156773963472264_7868449265310236672_n_10156773963467264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46124379_10156773963647264_187492863116836864_n_10156773963637264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46093252_10156773971407264_1038939411942735872_o_10156773971402264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46101417_10156773984882264_1392653294735720448_o_10156773984852264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46002442_10156774005477264_4966488550875856896_n_10156774005462264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46174807_10156774005757264_4053197492349566976_n_10156774005752264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46049040_10156774006387264_1881615019074912256_n_10156774006382264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46139976_10156774006572264_2252364588999770112_n_10156774006567264.jpg Greg HamiltonInteresting I’ve been doing genealogy and unbeknownst to me most my ancestors end up from Normandy and that upper green part of France

    I was brought up thinking I was Irish and Scottish (and I am) I’m just a whole lot of Viking/Norman alsoNov 13, 2018, 2:21 PMCurt Doolittle(Same here)Nov 13, 2018, 3:38 PMGreg HamiltonLike most conquering peoples the Normans married into local ruling families.

    You can see marriages across the “border”a decent amount to obviously end hostilities

    Hence most the Irish, Scottish, and even the little Welsh blood I have.Nov 13, 2018, 3:50 PM photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45981522_10156774006882264_555580631354966016_n_10156774006872264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46039330_10156774007112264_578697605630918656_n_10156774007092264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46030537_10156774008097264_1549148936495693824_n_10156774008092264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46030538_10156774008417264_4321074387852722176_o_10156774008407264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46253609_10156774008582264_2616270991826878464_n_10156774008577264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46003568_10156774010212264_6147140267016192000_n_10156774010207264.jpg Dan AltschuldHbdchick is 👍Nov 12, 2018, 8:29 PM photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46113180_10156774010252264_5399877263875375104_o_10156774010247264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46118480_10156774010232264_7779446354547310592_n_10156774010227264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46043952_10156774010302264_983068145189126144_n_10156774010292264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46075107_10156774010332264_4012216013922762752_n_10156774010327264.jpg HBDCHICK’S SUMMARY OF BIPARTITE MANORIALISM AND ITS REACH

    ‏

    @hbdchick

    the main feature of bipartite manorialism in medieval europe was the dual, conjoined arrangement of the central manor farm (the demesne) along with the attached individual farms of the tenants, with the tenants owing labor on the demesne (later rent)…

    …tenants were independently responsible for the success of their own farms, i.e. w/the production of foodstuffs for themselves (to be self-sufficient iow) as well as for producing a certain amount of foods and products for the manor (agricultural, but also things like cloth)…

    …another extremely important aspect of bipartite manorialism, tho, was the curious feature of *common* arable fields in which tenants were allotted certain furrows to farm alongside and inbetween the furrows of the demesne…

    …these furrows *were* the tenants’ farms (alongside whatever garden they might have). in the early days of manorialism, the furrows/farms were not passed down within families, but “reassigned” each generation. over time tenancies became inheritable and eventually…

    …the common field system disappeared and farms were restructured to be more like free-standing units (although still within the manor system), but for a good 500-1000 years, depending on the region, the common field system was in place…

    …however, in order to avoid any tragedies of commons, tenants came together on village councils to agree upon plans for planting and the grazing of animals in fallow fields, etc. here from Tradition and Transformation in Anglo-Saxon England (https://books.google.com/books?id=_SlMAQAAQBAJ …):

    …the same practices were found in other regions of nw europe which saw bipartite manorialism + open field systems. here on vaine pâture in nw france:hbd chick added,

    (oh, sorry. forgot. “CPrRs” are “common property regimes.” these collective village institutions that governed open fields and common pastures.)

    …and, again, here are the regions in nw “core” europe where bipartite manorialism/open field systems were found:hbd chick added,

    here you go. core europe. the dark regions of communal open fields (i.e. regions that had bipartite manorialism during the middle ages). from Regions, Institutions, and Agrarian Change in European History…

    by the time manorialism got to east germany (east of the elbe) it was a purely rent-based system. individual tenant farmers working their own farms and paying cash rents. (further east in russia it was often extended families.)

    …and the outcome of all this, i think (*theorize*)?

    and selecting for behavioral traits related to reciprocal altruism while selecting out traits related to parochial altruism, since these folks were neither living/working in extended family groups or marrying close family members, but, instead, cooperating w/unrelated fellows.

    btw, some medieval ridge and furrow field systems are still visible in england. here are three from: gloucestershire

    (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Medieval_Ridge_and_Furrow_above_Wood_Stanway_-_geograph.org.uk_-_640050.jpg …); buckinghamshire (http://www.heritage-explorer.co.uk/web/he/searchdetail.aspx?id=1488&large=1 …); and worcestershire (https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1366&bih=654&ei=lNfoW4ynE6LlkgWSqoCIBA&q=common+fields+furrows&oq=common+fields+furrows&gs_l=img.3…1482.5260.0.5427.21.13.0.8.2.0.156.1397.3j9.12.0….0…1ac.1.64.img..1.13.1330…0j0i8i30k1j0i24k1j0i10i24k1.0.8oaGF6jdXv0#imgdii=KJ7ZkoGp3VKs9M:&imgrc=B81gElEVEKUnbM …):

    and there are even a handful of open field systems still in operation in england today. there’s one in laxton, nottinghamshire. you can read about how the farmers all work together on their manor here!: http://www.laxtonnotts.org.uk/Laxton%20manorial_system.htm …

    oh, yes. forgot to mention: given that WHEAT was pretty much the main crop of medieval manors w/their *common property regimes* (i.e. *collective* village institutions), i can’t see how @ThomasTalhelm et al. argue that rice farming leads to holistic thinking patterns because…

    …of its collective nature

    wheat plus oats and rye. (^_^)

    SEE:

    (http://science.sciencemag.org/content/344/6184/603

    …. nw “core” european wheat farming WAS collective for something like 500-1000 years (depending on region).

    afaics, the diff ofc is *who* one is collective with: family? or unrelated individuals?

    http://science.sciencemag.org/content/344/6184/603

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 17:39:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46201546_10156773963177264_780420385

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46201546_10156773963177264_7804203851711512576_n_10156773963172264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46003571_10156773963232264_278249366077046784_n_10156773963227264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46147274_10156773963307264_1440236687652290560_n_10156773963302264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45986512_10156773963402264_187061742889598976_n_10156773963397264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46059111_10156773963472264_7868449265310236672_n_10156773963467264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46124379_10156773963647264_187492863116836864_n_10156773963637264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46093252_10156773971407264_1038939411942735872_o_10156773971402264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46101417_10156773984882264_1392653294735720448_o_10156773984852264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46002442_10156774005477264_4966488550875856896_n_10156774005462264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46174807_10156774005757264_4053197492349566976_n_10156774005752264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46049040_10156774006387264_1881615019074912256_n_10156774006382264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46139976_10156774006572264_2252364588999770112_n_10156774006567264.jpg Greg HamiltonInteresting I’ve been doing genealogy and unbeknownst to me most my ancestors end up from Normandy and that upper green part of France

    I was brought up thinking I was Irish and Scottish (and I am) I’m just a whole lot of Viking/Norman alsoNov 13, 2018, 2:21 PMCurt Doolittle(Same here)Nov 13, 2018, 3:38 PMGreg HamiltonLike most conquering peoples the Normans married into local ruling families.

    You can see marriages across the “border”a decent amount to obviously end hostilities

    Hence most the Irish, Scottish, and even the little Welsh blood I have.Nov 13, 2018, 3:50 PMKevin WuOnce you go Huguenot

    In France you are welcome notNov 13, 2018, 5:29 PM photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45981522_10156774006882264_555580631354966016_n_10156774006872264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46039330_10156774007112264_578697605630918656_n_10156774007092264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46030537_10156774008097264_1549148936495693824_n_10156774008092264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46030538_10156774008417264_4321074387852722176_o_10156774008407264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46253609_10156774008582264_2616270991826878464_n_10156774008577264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46003568_10156774010212264_6147140267016192000_n_10156774010207264.jpg Dan AltschuldHbdchick is 👍Nov 12, 2018, 8:29 PM photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46113180_10156774010252264_5399877263875375104_o_10156774010247264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46118480_10156774010232264_7779446354547310592_n_10156774010227264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46043952_10156774010302264_983068145189126144_n_10156774010292264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46075107_10156774010332264_4012216013922762752_n_10156774010327264.jpg HBDCHICK’S SUMMARY OF BIPARTITE MANORIALISM AND ITS REACH

    ‏

    @hbdchick

    the main feature of bipartite manorialism in medieval europe was the dual, conjoined arrangement of the central manor farm (the demesne) along with the attached individual farms of the tenants, with the tenants owing labor on the demesne (later rent)…

    …tenants were independently responsible for the success of their own farms, i.e. w/the production of foodstuffs for themselves (to be self-sufficient iow) as well as for producing a certain amount of foods and products for the manor (agricultural, but also things like cloth)…

    …another extremely important aspect of bipartite manorialism, tho, was the curious feature of *common* arable fields in which tenants were allotted certain furrows to farm alongside and inbetween the furrows of the demesne…

    …these furrows *were* the tenants’ farms (alongside whatever garden they might have). in the early days of manorialism, the furrows/farms were not passed down within families, but “reassigned” each generation. over time tenancies became inheritable and eventually…

    …the common field system disappeared and farms were restructured to be more like free-standing units (although still within the manor system), but for a good 500-1000 years, depending on the region, the common field system was in place…

    …however, in order to avoid any tragedies of commons, tenants came together on village councils to agree upon plans for planting and the grazing of animals in fallow fields, etc. here from Tradition and Transformation in Anglo-Saxon England (https://books.google.com/books?id=_SlMAQAAQBAJ …):

    …the same practices were found in other regions of nw europe which saw bipartite manorialism + open field systems. here on vaine pâture in nw france:hbd chick added,

    (oh, sorry. forgot. “CPrRs” are “common property regimes.” these collective village institutions that governed open fields and common pastures.)

    …and, again, here are the regions in nw “core” europe where bipartite manorialism/open field systems were found:hbd chick added,

    here you go. core europe. the dark regions of communal open fields (i.e. regions that had bipartite manorialism during the middle ages). from Regions, Institutions, and Agrarian Change in European History…

    by the time manorialism got to east germany (east of the elbe) it was a purely rent-based system. individual tenant farmers working their own farms and paying cash rents. (further east in russia it was often extended families.)

    …and the outcome of all this, i think (*theorize*)?

    and selecting for behavioral traits related to reciprocal altruism while selecting out traits related to parochial altruism, since these folks were neither living/working in extended family groups or marrying close family members, but, instead, cooperating w/unrelated fellows.

    btw, some medieval ridge and furrow field systems are still visible in england. here are three from: gloucestershire

    (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Medieval_Ridge_and_Furrow_above_Wood_Stanway_-_geograph.org.uk_-_640050.jpg …); buckinghamshire (http://www.heritage-explorer.co.uk/web/he/searchdetail.aspx?id=1488&large=1 …); and worcestershire (https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1366&bih=654&ei=lNfoW4ynE6LlkgWSqoCIBA&q=common+fields+furrows&oq=common+fields+furrows&gs_l=img.3…1482.5260.0.5427.21.13.0.8.2.0.156.1397.3j9.12.0….0…1ac.1.64.img..1.13.1330…0j0i8i30k1j0i24k1j0i10i24k1.0.8oaGF6jdXv0#imgdii=KJ7ZkoGp3VKs9M:&imgrc=B81gElEVEKUnbM …):

    and there are even a handful of open field systems still in operation in england today. there’s one in laxton, nottinghamshire. you can read about how the farmers all work together on their manor here!: http://www.laxtonnotts.org.uk/Laxton%20manorial_system.htm …

    oh, yes. forgot to mention: given that WHEAT was pretty much the main crop of medieval manors w/their *common property regimes* (i.e. *collective* village institutions), i can’t see how @ThomasTalhelm et al. argue that rice farming leads to holistic thinking patterns because…

    …of its collective nature

    wheat plus oats and rye. (^_^)

    SEE:

    (http://science.sciencemag.org/content/344/6184/603

    …. nw “core” european wheat farming WAS collective for something like 500-1000 years (depending on region).

    afaics, the diff ofc is *who* one is collective with: family? or unrelated individuals?

    http://science.sciencemag.org/content/344/6184/603

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 17:39:00 UTC

  • THE COMING CIVIL WAR WILL NOT BE OVER RACE It is, and will be war over SPECIATIO

    THE COMING CIVIL WAR WILL NOT BE OVER RACE

    It is, and will be war over SPECIATION. Whether we will regress into the equalitarian herd, or evolve into hierarchical packs. We are wealthy enough to speciate. Each side wants to produce commons that suit its method of speciation: herd(r), or pack(k). Since this question is not possible to resolve by compromise, our only choice is separation. This means that some significant portion of the ingroup will exit. And this is politically, economically, strategically, and evolutionarily desirable. Unfortunately the herd always fears the pack, and will resist it.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 15:46:00 UTC

  • THE ECONOMICS OF GENDER —“the Hermetic principle. Gender exists within everyth

    THE ECONOMICS OF GENDER

    —“the Hermetic principle. Gender exists within everything. Male, female, hard, soft, light, dark. The similarities between his comparisons are characteristics of gender.”–Bradley Morgan

    Um.. how would you state that scientifically: I can, in that the computational efficiency (calculation of successful specialization) of genders (two of them) defeated all other permutations and the additional calculative variation of additional genders seems to NOT provide enough additional value to compete with two genders. There is an argument that male and female cognitive structures in humans produce a spectrum from extremes of either end to a balance, and that this allows us to calculate the exploitation of a wider variety of opportunities than rigid specialization would. This is possibly the optimum method of evolutionary progress because we do not require the cost of a third or more gender, but we can still produce adaptive responses and express them anywhere between the extremes.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 15:16:00 UTC

  • Women personalize everything. Men generalize everything. It’s like talking to tw

    Women personalize everything. Men generalize everything. It’s like talking to two different species….

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 12:42:00 UTC

  • Well I mean, white men ADDED to humanity lifting all. But Adding women and under

    Well I mean, white men ADDED to humanity lifting all. But Adding women and underclasses to the workforce has not been an increase for men, it has been a redistribution from men to women and underclasses – a LOSS.

    It is one thing to redistribute to your kin. It is another to redistribute to the enemy who seeks to eradicate you.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 20:16:00 UTC

  • TRUISM —-“Being friends with other women … well, I just don’t really underst

    TRUISM

    —-“Being friends with other women … well, I just don’t really understand other women. But being friends with men has a whole other set of problems….” — Jennifer Dean

    Women don’t want you to have anything they don’t have, and men want something they don’t have … 😉

    (lolz)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 13:25:00 UTC

  • by Brandon Hayes (I am speculating on another’s thoughts below) Peterson sees th

    by Brandon Hayes

    (I am speculating on another’s thoughts below)

    Peterson sees the world as current as masculine order (benevolent patriarchy) with chaos (feminine [naturalistic intuition based] violence) on the horizon.

    That I believe is too simplistic; due to the corruption and lies; it can’t be a benevolent patriarchy; it’s been subverted (some will call this toxic masculinity; some feminine subversion… ). It is over-ordered. We need the chaos; I think evidenced clearly enough by Trump (chaos) being able to intuit the proper way to aim the ship.

    He sees the individual as paramount.

    But, it’s the interplay between collectivism and individualism that is necessary; stable groups AND individuals in an upward spiral. An easily reiterating game. Social outliers survive not in resource scarce groups; as adherence to norms and competition are advantageous.

    He is right about words creating habitable order from chaos; as he correctly adds the caveat TRUTHFUL SPEECH ONLY [the LOGOS; but, we have been trained/indoctrinated {and are biologically programmed} to lie].

    I believe the blind spot [ and I truly believe it is a blind spot and if discussed with say; Curt or Bill he’d see clear evidence and come around on tactics and strategy (I see reasonable pragmatism)] is collective strategies (group level strategies; due to the focus on the individual [which he has “solved” with self-authoring] psychology is a serious strength of Peterson) AND violence.

    He has a logical stream that takes violence off the table (never accounts for it). If he is to reground in group strategy (group sovereignty being the only thing to uphold person sovereignty). This would be “good,” “moral,” “forward thinking,” etc. IF AND ONLY IF all of the competition at the group level took violence (including lying) off the table. AND by demonstration they have NOT!

    Pre-planned violence is NOT chaos (not feminine; not intuitive nature reactionary based); war is NOT chaos it is order.

    He’s white collar solving a blue collar problem.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-10 21:00:00 UTC

  • WOMEN FOR SUPERGEEKS Women are easy. Take them shopping. Be nice to their friend

    WOMEN FOR SUPERGEEKS

    Women are easy. Take them shopping. Be nice to their friends, and make her look good in front of them. Listen. Give them permission to feel. Say “yes: to anything that you can easily do so. Say “no I can’t or won’t do that” – not, “no that’s a bad idea” – and don’t ask forgiveness or permission or agreement to say that kind of “no.” That is what it means to be a man and different from a woman. In addition, have male friends and many of them.

    I love talking through thoughts and issues and ideas with a woman. And honesty in those things makes them feel safe with you.

    In other words, bring them into your emotional world but not your cognitive world. Bringing them into your cognitive world is a form of selfishness. It makes you needy. If you bring them into your emotional, personal, and social, world, you make them successful in bonding with you.

    My particular issue is that I can be anchored if I talk about something before I am ready – and being anchored takes away my superpower so to speak. So I can’t talk about some issues until I am ready, and this can create the perception that I am hiding something.

    Worse, not everyone can understand what I am thinking, so I try to humor people to save myself effort, frustration, and potential alienation, which can also create the impression that I have ‘plans’.

    Worse, I managing one’s creativity is different from managing one’s work. Creativity is a manageable process but time consuming, and cannot, like ordinary task work, be forced. So it is not always clear that I am in fact (as taleb also laments) ‘working’, when in fact I am, under almost all circumstances, ‘working’ and only vaguely ‘present’. Stuff spills out of your fingertips when it’s ready, not when you want it to.

    So lots of intimate, in that I mean, ‘us time’ talking is necessary to preserve trust and connection to compensate. And that is what I learned to do.

    Women give AMAZINGLY GOOD ADVICE on anything personal, emotional, social, and ‘real’. so much so that at least for me it’s very hard to function without it.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-10 19:21:00 UTC