Theme: Sex Differences

  • Female brain structure, chemistry, and biases (Herd), vs Male brain structure, c

    Female brain structure, chemistry, and biases (Herd), vs Male brain structure, chemistry and biases (Pack). Measurable easily by fear of being left behind/inequality(left) vs disgust/purity (right).


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-03 20:09:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058813406730436613

    Reply addressees: @pgeerkens @mmantyla @SteveStuWill

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057976489419902981


    IN REPLY TO:

    @pgeerkens

    @mmantyla @SteveStuWill From “Big Five”:
    High Openness correlates modestly to left wing political views; and
    High Compassion (sub-trait of Agreeableness) correlates modestly to ‘social justice’ support.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057976489419902981

  • The fear of being left behind is a leftist (female, herd) concern. The right doe

    The fear of being left behind is a leftist (female, herd) concern. The right doesn’t feel this way which accounts for a large part of our differences. Same for disgust. Right is the white blood cell of the polity.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-03 20:06:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058812618515890177

    Reply addressees: @curiouscalvin00 @SteveStuWill

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057993383942217730


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1057993383942217730

  • Whatever political position you favor is just as highly correlated. Male brain M

    Whatever political position you favor is just as highly correlated. Male brain Male reproductive strategy, Female brain structure Female reproductive strategy. Not complicated.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-03 20:05:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058812341003915264

    Reply addressees: @ScottHa92264813 @SteveStuWill @sullydish

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058076280501895168


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058076280501895168

  • MY VERSION OF THE SOCRATIC METHOD: COMPETITION I teach by creating games that me

    MY VERSION OF THE SOCRATIC METHOD: COMPETITION

    I teach by creating games that men will compete in. This is how men are best taught. Instead of asking questions I start arguments. Instead of preaching an angle, I attack a proposition and force others to defend it. Instead of assuming equality I play king of the hill and bait them into attacking me. Instead of writing essays of appeal I write arguments to criticize.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-03 08:38:00 UTC

  • Western Heroism and Semitic Submission – the Masculine versus The Feminine Across 3500 Years of History

    WESTERN HEROISM and SEMITIC SUBMISSION – THE MASCULINE VERSUS THE FEMININE ACROSS 3500 YEARS OF HISTORY (thanks to whomever asked me to comment) [I]t’s a very simple difference. Agency vs Submission. Heathens (Pagans in the pejorative) in western civilization are imagined heroes in competition with the spirits(dead), non-humans(green man, primitive man), demigods(powerful but mortal), and gods (powerful and immortal), and can, by effort and cunning outwit them – or – negotiate (bribe) them. This is a universal artifact of the conquest and replacement of european peoples by the westward expansion of the indo-europeans (Yaman, Corded ware et al) and their Militaristic, Expansionist, Sky Worshipping, Metalsmithing, business of profiting from the domestication of animal man, with horse, bronze, wheel and their very visible power over nature. It is a religion of agency not submission. Demand for a “religion of empires” increases with the distribution of peoples under rule, and the group strategies of those people under rule, and the compatibilities of those group’s strategies under such a universal rule. The semitic methodology of INVERTING the aristocratic (western) ethos by converting the bible of greco roman civilization (iliad of homer) which occupied the vast majority of writings in the greco roman period, with a ‘hero’ of ‘submission and resistance’ was an interesting strategy by which the vast underclasses of the old european (byzantine), and greco-anatolian, syrian levantine world could create a resistance movement by the cultural destruction of their superiors, Just as the Marxists (Marx, Boas, Freud, Cantor, Mises, Adorno et al, Rothbard, and the neocons) repeated 1700 years later (monopoly marxism of private property, monopoly marxism of common property, monopoly marxism of identity-property (culture)). The Semitic method of undermining was as successful in the Modern world (undermining colonialism) as it was in the ancient world (undermining colonialism). False promise of salvation after death. False promise of economic salvation. False promise of cultural (identity) salvation. The method of using sophism (false promise + sophism (Pilpul) + Straw Manning (Critique) is in fact a successful method of undermining a civilization that is overwhelmed by overextension, and profiting from overextension through commerce, and the dependence of commerce at international scales on trust. Christianity succeeded because trade collapsed in europe after (a) undermining by jewish-christian vanguard, (b) enforcement by byzantine (old world, greek) defeat of rome, and (c) collapse of world trade under arab-muslim expansion, (d) and the eventual consumption of all capital of the great civilizations of the ancient world, and the destruction of all those civilizations as a consequence. So, as trade and knowledge increased, europeans gradually (expectedly) extracted themselves from Semitic superstition, the church’s’ monopoly on information and literacy, the 50% of dead capital in europe under the church. and the corruption of the church as a monopoly federal government selling false receipts of salvation the way the current academy sells false diplomas. Given that the remains of Christianity are what leave us vulnerable to Semiticism (abrahamic monotheism, marxism-socialism-postmodernism-feminism, and the use of false promise, sophism, straw-manning, and the discount on disapproval, shaming, ridicule, moralizing, rallying as a substitute for truthful (scientific, rational) argument. It is only logical that the aristocratic right in Europe (using literary philosophy, moralism, and history) and aristocratic right in the States (using law and, economics, and science) should produce arguments to restore our native religion of the hearth to one that is heroic and expansionary rather than submissive and assisting in our surrender. Nothing in human behavior or history is difficult. It’s all simple. Once you understand that nearly all use of language is simply means of lying in order to obtain discounts on the acquisition of the power to alter the probability of outcomes in one’s favor. And all we do is search for narratives to echo (script). Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine https://arktos.com/2018/10/31/alain-de-benoist-paganism-and-the-neo-christian-west/

  • Western Heroism and Semitic Submission – the Masculine versus The Feminine Across 3500 Years of History

    WESTERN HEROISM and SEMITIC SUBMISSION – THE MASCULINE VERSUS THE FEMININE ACROSS 3500 YEARS OF HISTORY (thanks to whomever asked me to comment) [I]t’s a very simple difference. Agency vs Submission. Heathens (Pagans in the pejorative) in western civilization are imagined heroes in competition with the spirits(dead), non-humans(green man, primitive man), demigods(powerful but mortal), and gods (powerful and immortal), and can, by effort and cunning outwit them – or – negotiate (bribe) them. This is a universal artifact of the conquest and replacement of european peoples by the westward expansion of the indo-europeans (Yaman, Corded ware et al) and their Militaristic, Expansionist, Sky Worshipping, Metalsmithing, business of profiting from the domestication of animal man, with horse, bronze, wheel and their very visible power over nature. It is a religion of agency not submission. Demand for a “religion of empires” increases with the distribution of peoples under rule, and the group strategies of those people under rule, and the compatibilities of those group’s strategies under such a universal rule. The semitic methodology of INVERTING the aristocratic (western) ethos by converting the bible of greco roman civilization (iliad of homer) which occupied the vast majority of writings in the greco roman period, with a ‘hero’ of ‘submission and resistance’ was an interesting strategy by which the vast underclasses of the old european (byzantine), and greco-anatolian, syrian levantine world could create a resistance movement by the cultural destruction of their superiors, Just as the Marxists (Marx, Boas, Freud, Cantor, Mises, Adorno et al, Rothbard, and the neocons) repeated 1700 years later (monopoly marxism of private property, monopoly marxism of common property, monopoly marxism of identity-property (culture)). The Semitic method of undermining was as successful in the Modern world (undermining colonialism) as it was in the ancient world (undermining colonialism). False promise of salvation after death. False promise of economic salvation. False promise of cultural (identity) salvation. The method of using sophism (false promise + sophism (Pilpul) + Straw Manning (Critique) is in fact a successful method of undermining a civilization that is overwhelmed by overextension, and profiting from overextension through commerce, and the dependence of commerce at international scales on trust. Christianity succeeded because trade collapsed in europe after (a) undermining by jewish-christian vanguard, (b) enforcement by byzantine (old world, greek) defeat of rome, and (c) collapse of world trade under arab-muslim expansion, (d) and the eventual consumption of all capital of the great civilizations of the ancient world, and the destruction of all those civilizations as a consequence. So, as trade and knowledge increased, europeans gradually (expectedly) extracted themselves from Semitic superstition, the church’s’ monopoly on information and literacy, the 50% of dead capital in europe under the church. and the corruption of the church as a monopoly federal government selling false receipts of salvation the way the current academy sells false diplomas. Given that the remains of Christianity are what leave us vulnerable to Semiticism (abrahamic monotheism, marxism-socialism-postmodernism-feminism, and the use of false promise, sophism, straw-manning, and the discount on disapproval, shaming, ridicule, moralizing, rallying as a substitute for truthful (scientific, rational) argument. It is only logical that the aristocratic right in Europe (using literary philosophy, moralism, and history) and aristocratic right in the States (using law and, economics, and science) should produce arguments to restore our native religion of the hearth to one that is heroic and expansionary rather than submissive and assisting in our surrender. Nothing in human behavior or history is difficult. It’s all simple. Once you understand that nearly all use of language is simply means of lying in order to obtain discounts on the acquisition of the power to alter the probability of outcomes in one’s favor. And all we do is search for narratives to echo (script). Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine https://arktos.com/2018/10/31/alain-de-benoist-paganism-and-the-neo-christian-west/

  • HEROISM, SEMITIC SUBMISSION THE MASCULINE VERSUS THE FEMININE ACROSS 3500 YEARS

    https://arktos.com/2018/10/31/alain-de-benoist-paganism-and-the-neo-christian-west/WESTERN HEROISM, SEMITIC SUBMISSION THE MASCULINE VERSUS THE FEMININE ACROSS 3500 YEARS OF HISTORY

    (thanks to whomever asked me to comment)

    It’s a very simple difference. Agency vs Submission.

    Heathens (Pagans in the pejorative) in western civilization are imagined heroes in competition with the spirits(dead), non-humans(green man, primitive man), demigods(powerful but mortal), and gods (powerful and immortal), and can, by effort and cunning outwit them – or – negotiate (bribe) them. This is a universal artifact of the conquest and replacement of european peoples by the westward expansion of the indo-europeans (Yaman, Corded ware et al) and their Militaristic, Expansionist, Sky Worshipping, Metalsmithing, business of profiting from the domestication of animal man, with horse, bronze, wheel and their very visible power over nature. It is a religion of agency not submission.

    Demand for a “religion of empires” increases with the distribution of peoples under rule, and the group strategies of those people under rule, and the compatibilities of those group’s strategies under such a universal rule. The semitic methodology of INVERTING the aristocratic (western) ethos by converting the bible of greco roman civilization (iliad of homer) which occupied the vast majority of writings in the greco roman period, with a ‘hero’ of ‘submission and resistance’ was an interesting strategy by which the vast underclasses of the old european (byzantine), and greco-anatolian, syrian levantine world could create a resistance movement by the cultural destruction of their superiors, Just as the Marxists (Marx, Boas, Freud, Cantor, Mises, Adorno et al, Rothbard, and the neocons) repeated 1700 years later (monopoly marxism of private property, monopoly marxism of common property, monopoly marxism of identity-property (culture)).

    The Semitic method of undermining was as successful in the Modern world (undermining colonialism) as it was in the ancient world (undermining colonialism). False promise of salvation after death. False promise of economic salvation. False promise of cultural (identity) salvation. The method of using sophism (false promise + sophism (Pilpul) + Straw Manning (Critique) is in fact a successful method of undermining a civilization that is overwhelmed by overextension, and profiting from overextension through commerce, and the dependence of commerce at international scales on trust.

    Christianity succeeded because trade collapsed in europe after (a) undermining by jewish-christian vanguard, (b) enforcement by byzantine (old world, greek) defeat of rome, and (c) collapse of world trade under arab-muslim expansion, (d) and the eventual consumption of all capital of the great civilizations of the ancient world, and the destruction of all those civilizations as a consequence.

    So, as trade and knowledge increased, europeans gradually (expectedly) extracted themselves from Semitic superstition, the church’s’ monopoly on information and literacy, the 50% of dead capital in europe under the church. and the corruption of the church as a monopoly federal government selling false receipts of salvation the way the current academy sells false diplomas.

    Given that the remains of Christianity are what leave us vulnerable to Semiticism (abrahamic monotheism, marxism-socialism-postmodernism-feminism, and the use of false promise, sophism, straw-manning, and the discount on disapproval, shaming, ridicule, moralizing, rallying as a substitute for truthful (scientific, rational) argument. It is only logical that the aristocratic right in Europe (using literary philosophy, moralism, and history) and aristocratic right in the States (using law and, economics, and science) should produce arguments to restore our native religion of the hearth to one that is heroic and expansionary rather than submissive and assisting in our surrender.

    Nothing in human behavior or history is difficult. It’s all simple. Once you understand that nearly all use of language is simply means of lying in order to obtain discounts on the acquisition of the power to alter the probability of outcomes in one’s favor. And all we do is search for narratives to echo (script).

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    https://arktos.com/2018/10/31/alain-de-benoist-paganism-and-the-neo-christian-west/


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-01 13:10:00 UTC

  • The Genetics and Instincts of The Genders

    THE GENETICS AND INSTINCTS OF THE GENDERS AND A THREAT TO CIVILIZATION WITHOUT CONSTRAINING LIMITS. [M]ales are hyper-producers and females hyper-consumers. That’s the evidence. the problem is that without reciprocal markets in everything to limit women to trades, of family to limit women to family resources, or Paternalism to limit to women our local judgement, then the hyperconsumption includes everything: genetic capital, territorial capital, institutional capital, traditional capital, normative capital, There is no end to woman’s wants for self, nest, and self image by obtaining signals for giving away that which others (men) have produced. Women produce income, and offspring and consumption. Men produce civilization. And if not limited by men, they will destroy the very men who made their hyperconsumption possible.

  • The Genetics and Instincts of The Genders

    THE GENETICS AND INSTINCTS OF THE GENDERS AND A THREAT TO CIVILIZATION WITHOUT CONSTRAINING LIMITS. [M]ales are hyper-producers and females hyper-consumers. That’s the evidence. the problem is that without reciprocal markets in everything to limit women to trades, of family to limit women to family resources, or Paternalism to limit to women our local judgement, then the hyperconsumption includes everything: genetic capital, territorial capital, institutional capital, traditional capital, normative capital, There is no end to woman’s wants for self, nest, and self image by obtaining signals for giving away that which others (men) have produced. Women produce income, and offspring and consumption. Men produce civilization. And if not limited by men, they will destroy the very men who made their hyperconsumption possible.

  • THE GENETICS AND INSTINCTS OF THE GENDERS AND A THREAT TO CIVILIZATION WITHOUT C

    THE GENETICS AND INSTINCTS OF THE GENDERS AND A THREAT TO CIVILIZATION WITHOUT CONSTRAINING LIMITS.

    Males are hyper-producers and females hyper-consumers. That’s the evidence. the problem is that without reciprocal markets in everything to limit women to trades, of family to limit women to family resources, or Paternalism to limit to women our local judgement, then the hyperconsumption includes everything: genetic capital, territorial capital, institutional capital, traditional capital, normative capital,

    There is no end to woman’s wants for self, nest, and self image by obtaining signals for giving away that which others (men) have produced. Women produce income, and offspring and consumption. Men produce civilization. And if not limited by men, they will destroy the very men who made their hyperconsumption possible.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-31 09:43:00 UTC