Theme: Sex Differences

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53121396_10157018500837264_334768026

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53121396_10157018500837264_334768026

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53121396_10157018500837264_3347680269950779392_n_10157018500832264.jpg MEN NEED INCENTIVES, AND WOMEN HAVE NO END OF “SELFISHNESS” (CONSUMPTION)

    —“We are the minds which set the body of tomorrow in motion.”— Michael D Abbott

    The Feminists and Postmodernists assume a steady state. That a sufficient minority of men will not reach the point where they say “Every other alternative is better than this one.”Thomas NorgateCharlie Eddleston-HaynesFeb 28, 2019, 2:23 PMMartin ŠtěpánI think depression (at least in males) might be an instict to stop taking up resources if one can’t figure out a functioning strategy to reproduce or otherwise help kin.Feb 28, 2019, 2:34 PMMichael D. AbbottThe decline of marriage and the sexual revolution harmed children and made a joke of our society.

    Anyone who won’t admit this is basically a fifteen year old posing as an adult–people need to grow up.Feb 28, 2019, 6:13 PMMartin ŠtěpánMichael D. Abbott People today are disincentivized from growing up. White men are the only ones with any incentive (as well as the highest proclivity) to grow up. And they still receive signals against it from all sides.Feb 28, 2019, 6:17 PMMichael D. AbbottFeb 28, 2019, 6:19 PMMichael D. AbbottHere’s how to talk to a feminist: Fatherhood, marriage, and chivalry are essential to a civilized society, and your infantile promotion of fornication, abortion, fatherlessness, and idiocy harms children. You should be ashamed of yourself.Feb 28, 2019, 6:20 PMMartin ŠtěpánMichael D. Abbott In my experience, here’s how to talk to a feminist: Don’t.Feb 28, 2019, 6:20 PMWill HurtReplace chivalry with honor and you have a stronger statementFeb 28, 2019, 11:55 PMJohn JonesThe items males seek as status symbols; Rolex, Ferrari, Armani, etc are just another mode of consumption.Mar 1, 2019, 1:57 AMScott CameronWhy chivalry? Dalrock blames feminism on chivalry.Mar 2, 2019, 5:35 PMMEN NEED INCENTIVES, AND WOMEN HAVE NO END OF “SELFISHNESS” (CONSUMPTION)

    —“We are the minds which set the body of tomorrow in motion.”— Michael D Abbott

    The Feminists and Postmodernists assume a steady state. That a sufficient minority of men will not reach the point where they say “Every other alternative is better than this one.”


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-28 13:22:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53004989_10157013266502264_857885567

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53004989_10157013266502264_857885567

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53004989_10157013266502264_8578855676615327744_n_10157013266492264.jpg THE OMFG Q OF THE DAY: “CAN YOU OWN P-SSY?”

    Answering this ‘fringe’ stuff simply demonstrates the power of propertarian analysis. 😉 And it’s funny….. lol

    —“Curt Doolittle can pu–y be property?”—Kyle Brawn

    You know, under the right conditions, I would answer that question sarcastically and get hammered for it. But at the moment I have my wits about me, and I will say that:

    Empirically, for almost all of history, it has been property. I am not sure it still isn’t. It’s just collective rather than private ownership.

    Empirically, Given The Possible Series:

    1. Possession in fact (under your control – self defense )

    2. Consensual Property. (normative property – reciprocal defense)

    3. Institutional Property (property rights – institutional defense)

    It is possible to have ‘it’ under your control, normatively under your control, and institutional under your control.

    Having ‘it’ just requires your ability to protect your control by individual, reciprocal, or institutional means.

    In general it’s pretty difficult without (a) a slave population, and (b) institutional means of defending it.

    Given that ‘it’ is not capable of self defense, ‘it’ doesn’t have an opinion. It is instead, the men who are willing to insure or prevent ‘ownership’ by individual, reciprocal, or institutional means that determine the outcome.

    In general the outcome depends upon (a) the affordability of surplus native females willingness of native brothers and fathers to tolerate or (b) the affordability of surplus alien females and the ability of native females to rally their protecting males to prohibit the discount of their female market value by alien females.

    The future has a very good chance of restoring slavery as far as I can tell, and the recent period of luxury produced by the western advances in technology may be a temporary rather than permanent progression.

    That is, I think, the argument.

    Hence, scarce females, protected by fathers and brothers produce high female market value, and plentiful females unprotected by fathers and brothers produce low female market value.

    In other words Might Makes Rights – whether right or wrong.

    Always and everywhere.

    “Veritas Et Violentia”James Dmitro Makienko”Hence, scarce females, protected by fathers and brothers produce high female market value, and plentiful females unprotected by fathers and brothers produce low female market value.”

    This just describes muslim/middle east christian women in Canada vs white atheist chicks. When women here were declared “persons” 100 years ago t was originally OK as the existing institutional and reciprocal means from the existing christian (50/50 catholic/ trad protestant) culture worked fine until the 60s when sexual revolutions destroyed it. The value of a patriarchal religion is in getting the women to not spread their legs and forces their emotional nature to follow men and not screw things up in the society.Feb 25, 2019, 11:51 PMCurt Doolittledoesn’t need to be religion, just law, but yes.

    Religion is just shitty law, and bad education.Feb 26, 2019, 12:13 AMJames Dmitro MakienkoCurt Doolittle For women religion has some utility. Religion prevents neurotypical (non-autistic) women’s emotions from causing harm by channeling them into healthy sustainable pro-social behavior that. Emotions is what women need to care for infants. If a woman is autistic they are generally bad at caring for infants (just ask my wife), but they have a foot in both rational and emotional worlds. My wife describes it as being a man on the inside but looks like a woman on the outside. She says that non-autistic women are attracted to things like sparkles (she sells jewelry to them), art, beautiful singing etc – just like what can find in a traditional church or a mosque – as well as the community around it. They are moved by the chanting and repetition.The religion prevents women from using GSRRM on society by creating the monopoly of use of GSRRM on women – using gossip (religious myths), shaming (for emotional destructive behavior), rallying (church service), ridicule (thot patrol), moralizing (here is a moral code for you to follow). This monopoly enables men in congregation/society/polity to be in charge of politics/discourse/agency. It enables men to fight and win while keeping women faithful and not spreading legs to an army of invaders from other countries. By removing religion as a tool of redirecting GSRRM in women both politics/economics in today’s west focus on marketing to women.Feb 26, 2019, 12:37 AMCurt DoolittleJames Dmitro Makienko correctFeb 26, 2019, 12:46 AMCurt Doolittlewell done.Feb 26, 2019, 12:46 AMCurt DoolittleIf I get a chance I’ll edit and quote. too late my time. -sleeping.Feb 26, 2019, 12:46 AMJB BurnsIf you are a Chad they will tell you you own it😂Feb 26, 2019, 11:06 AMJoshua NielsenFeb 26, 2019, 8:16 PMPaul OliverI’m pleasantly surprised you’re not getting fb jailed anymore, you must have caught the rats in your friends listMar 1, 2019, 5:26 AMTHE OMFG Q OF THE DAY: “CAN YOU OWN P-SSY?”

    Answering this ‘fringe’ stuff simply demonstrates the power of propertarian analysis. 😉 And it’s funny….. lol

    —“Curt Doolittle can pu–y be property?”—Kyle Brawn

    You know, under the right conditions, I would answer that question sarcastically and get hammered for it. But at the moment I have my wits about me, and I will say that:

    Empirically, for almost all of history, it has been property. I am not sure it still isn’t. It’s just collective rather than private ownership.

    Empirically, Given The Possible Series:

    1. Possession in fact (under your control – self defense )

    2. Consensual Property. (normative property – reciprocal defense)

    3. Institutional Property (property rights – institutional defense)

    It is possible to have ‘it’ under your control, normatively under your control, and institutional under your control.

    Having ‘it’ just requires your ability to protect your control by individual, reciprocal, or institutional means.

    In general it’s pretty difficult without (a) a slave population, and (b) institutional means of defending it.

    Given that ‘it’ is not capable of self defense, ‘it’ doesn’t have an opinion. It is instead, the men who are willing to insure or prevent ‘ownership’ by individual, reciprocal, or institutional means that determine the outcome.

    In general the outcome depends upon (a) the affordability of surplus native females willingness of native brothers and fathers to tolerate or (b) the affordability of surplus alien females and the ability of native females to rally their protecting males to prohibit the discount of their female market value by alien females.

    The future has a very good chance of restoring slavery as far as I can tell, and the recent period of luxury produced by the western advances in technology may be a temporary rather than permanent progression.

    That is, I think, the argument.

    Hence, scarce females, protected by fathers and brothers produce high female market value, and plentiful females unprotected by fathers and brothers produce low female market value.

    In other words Might Makes Rights – whether right or wrong.

    Always and everywhere.

    “Veritas Et Violentia”


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-25 19:08:00 UTC

  • Higher disgust sensitivity and comfort in hierarch in the right, higher being le

    Higher disgust sensitivity and comfort in hierarch in the right, higher being left behind sensitivity and therefore demand for equality in the left. Add demand for competitive initiative vs demand for proportionality and you have gender differences in cognitive and moral biases.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-25 16:45:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100074397589749760

    Reply addressees: @QuintusCurtius

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100070665862942722


    IN REPLY TO:

    @QuintusCurtius

    Why are so many of these “guys” on Twitter uptight, humorless, colorless, and hypersensitive? https://t.co/vFfGwlNoAW

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100070665862942722

  • You are cognitively female. Men don’t question. We do

    You are cognitively female. Men don’t question. We do.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-25 16:42:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100073531277275143

    Reply addressees: @sbkaufman

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099722731912945664


    IN REPLY TO:

    @sbkaufman

    I’m having trouble finding my “tribe.” I care deeply about social justice, and I also care deeply about the truth, but I don’t consider myself a warrior. I am more of a seeker. Can anyone else relate to this? Am I alone in refusing to take a polarizing side in this cultural war?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099722731912945664

  • RT @GadSaad: We are a biparental species. Human fathers are unique among mammali

    RT @GadSaad: We are a biparental species. Human fathers are unique among mammalian species. We are great dads and we should be honoured fo…


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-25 16:39:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1100072790739300352

  • FILLING MARKET DEMAND —“Curt: I think one reason you are refreshing is that yo

    FILLING MARKET DEMAND

    —“Curt: I think one reason you are refreshing is that you are an example of older WASP masculinity. We are taught from a young age that to be masculine “cool”, assertive, that we must adopt the identity or manner of Irish or Italians [bravado] to be masculine white men. And most who are not WASPs implicitly support this, as it lowers our SMV relative to theirs, to have a large segment of their competition deemed stiff, uncool and out of style.”— G.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 09:47:00 UTC

  • Pairing off was driven by reduction of violence. Length of Pairing off was drive

    Pairing off was driven by reduction of violence. Length of Pairing off was driven by neoteny. Marriage was driven by economic necessity (property). Universal marriage by farming. And the future is open for interpretation.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 01:14:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099477568154226688

  • THE FUTURE OF “MARRIAGE” Pairing off was driven by reduction of violence. Length

    THE FUTURE OF “MARRIAGE”

    Pairing off was driven by reduction of violence. Length of Pairing off was driven by neoteny. Marriage was driven by economic necessity (property). Universal marriage by farming. And the future is open for interpretation.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 20:13:00 UTC

  • Definition: GSRM (or GSRRM, RRGSM etc.)

    “WHAT DOES GSRM STAND FOR?” (core) —“You mention GSRM all the time, what does it stand for?”– [T]he Female (herd) competitive strategy by circumventing argument by use of undermining, poisoning the well, reputation destruction by use of (G)ossiping (S)haming, (R)allying, (R)idicule, (M)oralizing, (P)sychologizing,(U)ndermining, (R)eputation destruction. and solving for (F)ace or consent – instead of Male (pack) strategy by factual argument solving for truth regardless of face or consent. In other words female “feels” using rejection or approval vs male “reals” of truth of falsehood.

    The Female Technique of Social Superpredation by Gossiping Shaming Ridiculing Rallying and Moralizing

    • Undermining (blaming) by GSRRM: Disapproving > Denying, Shaming > Gossiping, Outraging > Rallying, Psychologizing > Moralizing, Dominating > Oppressing, Reputation-Destruction > Propagandizing (Limiting consumption)

    The Technique of “GSRRM” includes: … (L)ying by Plausible Deniability By: … (E)vading the Truth By: … (E)quating Truth to (F)ace, (A)pproval, or (C)onsent By: … (D)isapproving … … (D)enying … … … (S)ilence And By Escalating To: … (S)haming, … … (M)oralizing, … … … (P)sychologizing, … … … … (R)idiculing … … … … … (O)utraging, And By Escalating To: … (R)allying … … (G)ossiping … … … (U)ndermining, … … … … (P)ropagandizing And By Escalating To: … (S)houting Down … … (S)ilencing … … … (C)ancelling  … … … … (D)eplatforming (interference in communication and colaboration) And By Escalating to: … (R)eputation destruction (interference in reputation) … … (D)oxxing (interference in safety and anonymity) … … … (J)ob Doxxing (interference in employement) … … … … (B)usiness Doxxing (interference in the conduct of a business) And By Escalating to: … (C)ourt Abuse (using cost of litigation to silence, obtain false confession, or to harm) … … (J)udicial Abuse (using select cases to exploit vunlerabilities in the law) … … … (C)onstitutional Abuse (using advocacy of incrementally harmful legislation to exploit vulnerabilities in the construction of the constitution, under cover of moral pretense)

    In western history under our ancient laws, men were prohibited from reputation destruction by direct violence between men under the law of the Duel. 

    In western history Female Conflict (social violence by GSRRM) was largely illegal or punishable under laws against “scolds” –women’s gossiping and undermining – were enforced to keep the peace.

    During the democratic and Marxist and postmodern movements as women demanded political power, they undermined these laws of the duel, libel, slander, and scolding, under the pretense of free speech – rather than free truthful factual speech (testimony).

    Marxism, Postmodernism, and feminism consist largely of sophism pseudoscience and denialism defended by GSRM.

    GSRM, like outright denial, is one of the means of dishonesty that avoids argument, whereas dishonestly constructing argumentative deception is done by Loading Framing Obscuring Cherry Picking, Fictionalizing, Sophisms, and the Fictionalisms of idealism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience. [M]en generally make an argument and let the argument do its work. We use shaming if necessary in response to GSRM. Whereas the feminine cognitive strategy is to rely entirely on GSRM as a means of denying or suppressing the argument rather than refuting it. GSRRM (LEFTIST, POSTMODERN, FEMININE) SPEECH Leftist speech is not protected speech. It is always either: Fraud – promising benefits that will never be delivered at costs that will never be disclosed. Slander(oral) and Libel(written) Defamation – malicious lies designed to slur, marginalize, and dehumanize rivals or critics. Obscenity – Transgression of taboos for the purpose of subversion, demoralization, and/or parasitic profit. Blasphemy – Attacking the sacred for the purpose of subversion, undermining, the destruction of intergenerational wisdom, and the erosion of necessary and helpful moral rules. False Alarm : relentlessly fear-mongering and sensationalizing imaginary threats as a means of obscuring/justifying real ones. Abrahamism : False Promise Pilpul (Sophism) – Overloading. Misdirecting. Obscuring. Disputation by sheer volume and variety of fallacy to overwhelm resistance to false and pernicious conclusions.  Can include sophism, pseudoscience, fiction, fictionalisms, or supernaturalists. Critique (Undermining) – Criticism of a straw man to undermine without proposing an alternative or superior solution open to equal analysis and criticism. Includes loading, framing, obscuring, suggesting, fictionalizing, denying, deceiving and outright lying. Heaping of Undue Praise – Advancing a hero in order to create an appeal to authority rather than advancing an argument to test whether it survives application to the context. Propaganda – narrative manufacturer by sheer repetition to fill the “marketplace of ideas” with bullshit congenial to the gatekeepers who control the broadcast channels and media. Psychoanalysis (Psychologising) – pseudo-scientifically pathologizing legitimate disagreement as a means of obtaining and exercising social control and marginalizing and silencing dissenting voices and views. Feminine Coercion – Rallying, shaming, gossip, disapproval, moralizing, mockery, ridicule, nagging, scolding, and character assassination to raise the emotional and social cost of disagreement and dissent without addressing their causes. Or some combination of these and other categories of parasitic, deceptive, and destructive speech.   HISTORY [I]n western history GSRM was largely illegal or punishable by direct violence between men. And laws against “scolds” -women’s gossiping and undermining – were enforced to keep the peace. During the democratic and marxist and postmodern movements as women demanded political power, they undermined these laws of the duel, libel, slander, and scolding, under the pretense of free speech – rather than free truthful factual speech (testimony). Marxism, Postmodernism, and feminism consist largely of sophism pseudoscience and denialism defended by GSRM. GSRM, like outright denial, is one of the means of dishonesty that avoids argument, whereas dishonestly constructing argumentative deception is done by Loading Framing Obscuring Cherry Picking, Fictionalizing, Sophisms, and the Fictionalisms of idealism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience. This is why the abrahamic (jewish in particular, or semitic in general) means of countering greco-roman-european argument by using false promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul (sophism), and critique (undermining) is so effective: it is how our females talk to us, and because of our high trust, we are either genetically or culturally vulnerable to it – where other lower trust people are not. And we are easily undermined politically and academically because our females naturally find greater ‘affinity’ with semitic non-argument (religion, postmodernism, feminism, denialism) than with european reason science truth testimony. Male European – Truth over Face, Regardless of cost. Male everywhere else – some degree of face over truth. Female everywhere – nearly universal face over truth. Yet it is truth over face that is the reason for the ‘western miracle’ – why the rest is so different from the rest. Hence why christians are the vulnerability of western civilization: their religion was developed to obtain the attention of women, and to appeal to GSRM. The religion is stated and argued with false promise(‘salvation’), baiting into hazard (cultural vulnerability to conquest), using pilpul (excuse making) and critique (straw manning), and the fictionalism of supernaturalism. Judaism to undermine, Christianity to weaken, and islam to destroy. The middle east uses the female reproductive strategy and the far east and the west use the male reproductive strategy, with the far east using face over truth to defend hierarchy and the west using truth before face to defend the market of the peerage. And the middle east today just as in the age of the greeks, just lying and shaming all truth without end. The world is not complicated. It is our lies that make it seem so. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute

  • Definition: GSRM (or GSRRM, RRGSM etc.)

    “WHAT DOES GSRM STAND FOR?” (core) —“You mention GSRM all the time, what does it stand for?”– [T]he Female (herd) competitive strategy by circumventing argument by use of undermining, poisoning the well, reputation destruction by use of (G)ossiping (S)haming, (R)allying, (R)idicule, (M)oralizing, (P)sychologizing,(U)ndermining, (R)eputation destruction. and solving for (F)ace or consent – instead of Male (pack) strategy by factual argument solving for truth regardless of face or consent. In other words female “feels” using rejection or approval vs male “reals” of truth of falsehood.

    The Female Technique of Social Superpredation by Gossiping Shaming Ridiculing Rallying and Moralizing

    • Undermining (blaming) by GSRRM: Disapproving > Denying, Shaming > Gossiping, Outraging > Rallying, Psychologizing > Moralizing, Dominating > Oppressing, Reputation-Destruction > Propagandizing (Limiting consumption)

    The Technique of “GSRRM” includes: … (L)ying by Plausible Deniability By: … (E)vading the Truth By: … (E)quating Truth to (F)ace, (A)pproval, or (C)onsent By: … (D)isapproving … … (D)enying … … … (S)ilence And By Escalating To: … (S)haming, … … (M)oralizing, … … … (P)sychologizing, … … … … (R)idiculing … … … … … (O)utraging, And By Escalating To: … (R)allying … … (G)ossiping … … … (U)ndermining, … … … … (P)ropagandizing And By Escalating To: … (S)houting Down … … (S)ilencing … … … (C)ancelling  … … … … (D)eplatforming (interference in communication and colaboration) And By Escalating to: … (R)eputation destruction (interference in reputation) … … (D)oxxing (interference in safety and anonymity) … … … (J)ob Doxxing (interference in employement) … … … … (B)usiness Doxxing (interference in the conduct of a business) And By Escalating to: … (C)ourt Abuse (using cost of litigation to silence, obtain false confession, or to harm) … … (J)udicial Abuse (using select cases to exploit vunlerabilities in the law) … … … (C)onstitutional Abuse (using advocacy of incrementally harmful legislation to exploit vulnerabilities in the construction of the constitution, under cover of moral pretense)

    In western history under our ancient laws, men were prohibited from reputation destruction by direct violence between men under the law of the Duel. 

    In western history Female Conflict (social violence by GSRRM) was largely illegal or punishable under laws against “scolds” –women’s gossiping and undermining – were enforced to keep the peace.

    During the democratic and Marxist and postmodern movements as women demanded political power, they undermined these laws of the duel, libel, slander, and scolding, under the pretense of free speech – rather than free truthful factual speech (testimony).

    Marxism, Postmodernism, and feminism consist largely of sophism pseudoscience and denialism defended by GSRM.

    GSRM, like outright denial, is one of the means of dishonesty that avoids argument, whereas dishonestly constructing argumentative deception is done by Loading Framing Obscuring Cherry Picking, Fictionalizing, Sophisms, and the Fictionalisms of idealism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience. [M]en generally make an argument and let the argument do its work. We use shaming if necessary in response to GSRM. Whereas the feminine cognitive strategy is to rely entirely on GSRM as a means of denying or suppressing the argument rather than refuting it. GSRRM (LEFTIST, POSTMODERN, FEMININE) SPEECH Leftist speech is not protected speech. It is always either: Fraud – promising benefits that will never be delivered at costs that will never be disclosed. Slander(oral) and Libel(written) Defamation – malicious lies designed to slur, marginalize, and dehumanize rivals or critics. Obscenity – Transgression of taboos for the purpose of subversion, demoralization, and/or parasitic profit. Blasphemy – Attacking the sacred for the purpose of subversion, undermining, the destruction of intergenerational wisdom, and the erosion of necessary and helpful moral rules. False Alarm : relentlessly fear-mongering and sensationalizing imaginary threats as a means of obscuring/justifying real ones. Abrahamism : False Promise Pilpul (Sophism) – Overloading. Misdirecting. Obscuring. Disputation by sheer volume and variety of fallacy to overwhelm resistance to false and pernicious conclusions.  Can include sophism, pseudoscience, fiction, fictionalisms, or supernaturalists. Critique (Undermining) – Criticism of a straw man to undermine without proposing an alternative or superior solution open to equal analysis and criticism. Includes loading, framing, obscuring, suggesting, fictionalizing, denying, deceiving and outright lying. Heaping of Undue Praise – Advancing a hero in order to create an appeal to authority rather than advancing an argument to test whether it survives application to the context. Propaganda – narrative manufacturer by sheer repetition to fill the “marketplace of ideas” with bullshit congenial to the gatekeepers who control the broadcast channels and media. Psychoanalysis (Psychologising) – pseudo-scientifically pathologizing legitimate disagreement as a means of obtaining and exercising social control and marginalizing and silencing dissenting voices and views. Feminine Coercion – Rallying, shaming, gossip, disapproval, moralizing, mockery, ridicule, nagging, scolding, and character assassination to raise the emotional and social cost of disagreement and dissent without addressing their causes. Or some combination of these and other categories of parasitic, deceptive, and destructive speech.   HISTORY [I]n western history GSRM was largely illegal or punishable by direct violence between men. And laws against “scolds” -women’s gossiping and undermining – were enforced to keep the peace. During the democratic and marxist and postmodern movements as women demanded political power, they undermined these laws of the duel, libel, slander, and scolding, under the pretense of free speech – rather than free truthful factual speech (testimony). Marxism, Postmodernism, and feminism consist largely of sophism pseudoscience and denialism defended by GSRM. GSRM, like outright denial, is one of the means of dishonesty that avoids argument, whereas dishonestly constructing argumentative deception is done by Loading Framing Obscuring Cherry Picking, Fictionalizing, Sophisms, and the Fictionalisms of idealism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience. This is why the abrahamic (jewish in particular, or semitic in general) means of countering greco-roman-european argument by using false promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul (sophism), and critique (undermining) is so effective: it is how our females talk to us, and because of our high trust, we are either genetically or culturally vulnerable to it – where other lower trust people are not. And we are easily undermined politically and academically because our females naturally find greater ‘affinity’ with semitic non-argument (religion, postmodernism, feminism, denialism) than with european reason science truth testimony. Male European – Truth over Face, Regardless of cost. Male everywhere else – some degree of face over truth. Female everywhere – nearly universal face over truth. Yet it is truth over face that is the reason for the ‘western miracle’ – why the rest is so different from the rest. Hence why christians are the vulnerability of western civilization: their religion was developed to obtain the attention of women, and to appeal to GSRM. The religion is stated and argued with false promise(‘salvation’), baiting into hazard (cultural vulnerability to conquest), using pilpul (excuse making) and critique (straw manning), and the fictionalism of supernaturalism. Judaism to undermine, Christianity to weaken, and islam to destroy. The middle east uses the female reproductive strategy and the far east and the west use the male reproductive strategy, with the far east using face over truth to defend hierarchy and the west using truth before face to defend the market of the peerage. And the middle east today just as in the age of the greeks, just lying and shaming all truth without end. The world is not complicated. It is our lies that make it seem so. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute