Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • Spectrum: “Autism Spectrum” or The Female-Male Brain spectrum: (Female) Psychoti

    Spectrum: “Autism Spectrum” or The Female-Male Brain spectrum: (Female) Psychotic < Solipsistic < Sensitive < Feminine < Balanced > Masculine > Analytic > Aspie > Autistic (Male)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-08 02:21:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1103843212836384769

    Reply addressees: @Cat9bx0219

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1103840727161819142

    IN REPLY TO:

    @Cat9bx0219

    @curtdoolittle But did you answer me asking you about “what spectrum are you talking about”?

    Why did you say “Autistic SD =23/25, Normies 15. Ashkenazi 14. Anglican 12”?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1103840727161819142

  • Traits: Autism: Autistic SD =23/25, Normies 15. Ashkenazi 14. Anglican 12

    Traits: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10156479504977264
    Autism: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10156479504977264
    Autistic SD =23/25, Normies 15. Ashkenazi 14. Anglican 12.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-07 23:35:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1103801280542191617

    Reply addressees: @Cat9bx0219

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1103799584478904321

    IN REPLY TO:

    @Cat9bx0219

    @curtdoolittle What kind of personality traits and what spectrum are you talking about?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1103799584478904321

  • Christians cower under pretense of wisdom and virtue. This is why Christians don

    Christians cower under pretense of wisdom and virtue. This is why Christians don’t matter. The Feminine vs the Masculine. The Jewish vs the European. The virtue in submission vs the virtue in dominance. Our people are defeated by christianity for the second time.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-07 11:53:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1103624659990441987

    Reply addressees: @Nick_B_Steves

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1103497294060679168

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1103497294060679168

  • YA SO – IN UTERO In Utero. Sex is determined at fertilization. Sexuality is dete

    https://www.ipce.info/library/journal-article/minor-physical-anomalies-prenatal-pedophilia?fbclid=IwAR3AlKmVeeg4Yit3eFFRmRSaTEtrYppGM_W9Jfc6EKNkRNYgJm_nB-MT8ZQTOLD YA SO – IN UTERO

    In Utero. Sex is determined at fertilization. Sexuality is determined in utero. Variation from heterosexuality is a birth defect. Greater variation is due to greater degrees of birth defect. Birth defects are preventable. Birth defects are ‘prohibitable’.

    Yes, traumas can affect one. Particularly females who are less hetero than males. But vulnerability to trauma is likewise a birth defect.

    Conversely, as we see in sub saharans, excessive testosterone in utero produces frequent hermaphroditic qualities in females. By the late pleistocene (the period of human development) we had all adapted to our regions. But even over the past 12k years we have adapted more.

    The primary means of adaptation has been developmental – endocrinological, with noetony, reverse neoteny, and gender dimorphism and reverse dimorphism the principle directions of evolutionary change.

    https://www.ipce.info/library/journal-article/minor-physical-anomalies-prenatal-pedophilia

    (thanks to whomever tipped me off to this collection of articles)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-07 09:19:00 UTC

  • by Rosenborg Predmetsky Something I’ve been considering: A forceful imposition o

    by Rosenborg Predmetsky

    Something I’ve been considering: A forceful imposition of obscenity laws that criminalizes and censors pornography and public display of sexually arousing material, because the catastrophic psychological insecurity created in women by such media is precisely what motivates them to so profoundly resent men that they engage in their sociopathic revaluation of values that privileges the morbidly obese, the ugly, the mutilated, the masculinized, etc.

    Men exist not only to protect women from other men, but also from the ruthlessness of intra-sexual competition between women, and we protect women from other women, because the female underclass lashes out at males when they are made to feel worthless.

    Women have a need to be desired, seen and recognized, and being sexually desirable is one of their main means of doing so. On the one hand, the unnatural supra-normal stimulus generated by the ubiquity of fattening food and a sedentary lifestyle, has caused women to become monstrously ugly, and on the other hand, totally unrealistic portrayals of female beauty causes even the more attractive women to be extremely insecure. So the situation we’re in is *profoundly* unnatural.

    Women need to test men to feel safe and desired, to test their loyalty and desire. But they can never feel safe or desired in our current context, and their reaction to this despair is the kind of despairing rage that is the rough equivalent of a mass incel shooting among men. I think even 2nd wave feminists are actually on to something when they argue that women shouldn’t have to shave their bodies or face.

    Some women will complain that men are stifling their sexual expression. And they are right. But men need to learn to say “no” to women. Cultivating a healthy limiting impulse would lead to much happier men and women alike. Patriarchy, properly understood and implemented, is a necessary precondition for a healthy society because female sexuality is always already as aggressive and dominating as men, just in different ways.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-06 10:42:00 UTC

  • “It follows that the physically weaker must engage in subterfuge in order to sur

    —“It follows that the physically weaker must engage in subterfuge in order to survive the disgust of the stronger and better-constituted. Leftists and degenerate women disingenuously employ the masculine language of reciprocity in order to conceal the feminine substance of dysgenic equality, in attempting to convince others that they have been defrauded of their just deserts. This is the function of social constructionism; to make the creditor their debtor by arguing that inequality of outcome is the function of a historically contingent narrative rather than the natural order of things.”—Rosenborg Predmetsky

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-06 10:15:00 UTC

  • THE DEAL IS WORKING WELL FOR WHITE WOMEN —“We can essentially offer a same dea

    THE DEAL IS WORKING WELL FOR WHITE WOMEN

    —“We can essentially offer a same deal as the Devil, a lifetime subsidy in exchange for the lives of your unborn.”—Martin Štěpán

    It’s working pretty well for white women.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-05 17:13:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1102980462480244736

  • THE DEAL IS WORKING WELL FOR WHITE WOMEN —“We can essentially offer a same dea

    THE DEAL IS WORKING WELL FOR WHITE WOMEN

    —“We can essentially offer a same deal as the Devil, a lifetime subsidy in exchange for the lives of your unborn.”—Martin Štěpán

    It’s working pretty well for white women.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-05 12:13:00 UTC

  • By: Bill Joslin Removing barriers allows people to express there preferences mor

    By: Bill Joslin

    Removing barriers allows people to express there preferences more fully. As seen in the Nordics – general differences are more greatly expresses.

    Further to that, the largest impact over the smallest time horizon to reduce crime and increase productivity in a society is to educate and enfranchise mother’s into the economy.

    Why? Because values on education and work ethic are learned first from the mother (at home) which deepens instillation of those values. Countries which open education and work to there woman after these being closed to woman see a start increase in productivity and crime reduction in less than ten years.

    Our issue isn’t woman working but rather an economic situation where woman must work. When woman must work for a family to survive this causes an intra-family competition over resources and resource distribution (marital tensions) – when working for luxuries this competition doesn’t come into play… It ends up being a net benefit for the family.

    (via Brandon Hayes)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 16:17:00 UTC

  • IMO he provided a convenient means of ending ‘the squabble of women’ which the b

    IMO he provided a convenient means of ending ‘the squabble of women’ which the british are want to devolve into, as if they were enfant members of Louis’ Court. Right now there are no men in Europe to draw from.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 13:31:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1101837341675671563

    Reply addressees: @FrederikL12

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1101819986488647681

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1101819986488647681