Theme: Sex Differences

  • Why Women Defect

    [I]n simple terms, men find greater persistence, consumptive, productive, and reproductive advantage in loyalty in pursuit of advantage despite conflict whereas women find greater persistence, consumptive, and reproductive advantage in disloyalty and avoidance of conflict. This is why women defect and why all cultures that survive prevent women from defection by limiting political participation.

  • WISDOM FROM ELSEWHERE —“… I am only now realizing how much of a disaster my

    WISDOM FROM ELSEWHERE

    —“… I am only now realizing how much of a disaster my youth development was because of a lifetime of female teachers. … P has been one of those subjects that scratches my autistic itch and thrill of being as precise as possible.”—-


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 09:59:00 UTC

  • WHAT DOES WHITE MEAN? (possibly controversial post warning)(This post covers gen

    WHAT DOES WHITE MEAN?

    (possibly controversial post warning)(This post covers genetic differences in neoteny, cognition and personality between geographic groups, and between the sexes. Stop reading if you are concerned you would be offended.)

    —“White means….”— Elizabeth Anonymous

    Hmmm…. I do science. I leave intellectual dishonesty for others.

    We don’t have a term for Genetic, Ethic, Europeans other than ‘White’. But “White”, meaning Ancestral Ethnic European, is easily genetically determinable. In general, at least six generations are necessary to launder ethnic outbreeding. Even, by six generations someone will still express certain dominant traits despite constraining breeding within the group. And it is still easy to determine the difference between a full Scandinavian and the same generation with an Iberian ancestor.

    Whites are the remains of the post-glacial maximum peoples, plus the early neolithic farmers, who were conquered, largely genocided and replaced by the ie’s. We are the most genetically homogenous people outside of Han-Korean-Japanese. The only open question is whether we include the remaining pre-ie Anatolian, early neolithic farmer populations of the Balkans, Greece, Southern Italy, and Sardinia in the classification ‘white’ out of cultural affinity under Christianity, or we limit ourselves to genetics using the european branch of the IE expansion: Itals (south), Germanics, Scandinavians, Baltics, Slavs, and Finnics. The rest of the Caucasians descend from the Iranic branch of the IE’s, and anatolians (Hittites), Caucasians (if they existed), and those that integrated into the Semitic peoples – are all lost to us. There were only a few post-glacial maximum west eurasian peoples, and the turks of the northern far east, are the only peoples of the post-glacial that are not indo europeans.

    Science is science. Women fear conflict. Women disapprove rather than accept an undesirable but true statement. Women will deny a truth to avoid conflict. Women will advance a falsehood to eschew conflict. While the male vs female distribution of personality Traits and Facets overlaps, the difference between the sexual (gender) relative homogeneity of traits, and the relative heterogeneity of Facets under those traits, is (a) agreeableness, (c) dominance expression, and this results in the (to females) annoying male habit of stating the truth despite the undesirability of it. It also accounts for the approximately 20% improvement in male detection of general trait expression and symmetric improvement in female detection of individual trait expression. In other words, males are more often correct in the ascertainment of empirically correct stereotypes than females, both at the perceptual-cognitive level and at the agreeability level. While women are equally superior at individual emotional empathy and incentive-sympathy.

    Net net of the science as it sits: Neoteny slows maturity and buys agency (neural formation) at the cost of emotional instability (creativity, neuroticism). This explains the high emotional instability of european women, and the nearly 1/3 of european women that experience psychological issues when not working in close association with other women to limit them. East asians are the most neotenous by far, europeans less so, africans and afro-asiatics lees so. This is why east asians, then europeans, then afrio-asiatics (semitic peoples), the africans have increasing rates of maturity at decreasing agency and verbal ability. Europeans (a) have not over-neotenized like the east asians nor under neotenized like the africans, and at the same time we have practiced cold weather eugenics for thousands of years. So between our neotenic development, our least-clannish(racist) temperament, our balance of verbal and spatial abilities, and our development of sovereignty (what we mistakenly call individualism) and the culture that resulted from it, including tripartism (markets between miltiary-judicial, producers-philosophers, and priests-theologians, we developed reason, empiricism, science, technology and medicine faster than all other peoples in the world combined.

    Ergo, unfortunately, it’s true that at last working class and upward whites are genetically and culturally superior in those ways necessary for the production of advanced and rapidly advancing civilization. And demand by women and immigrants to revert our civilization to primitive, reality-denying, maladaptive, authoritarian, non-market civilization, just proves that (a) these other peoples are unable to integrate in our civilization because they cannot compete in it, (b) our women have defected against our civilization out of fear of conflict and are assisting the destruction of our civilization – just as women and slaves undermined and brought down the roman empire using Christianity from within.

    So christianity in the ancient world with the false promise of life after death, and promise of freedom from nature’s competition by marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism, human-bio-diversity-denialism, and ‘silencing the truth’ in the modern world to destroy western civlization yet again.

    It’s women that need to look in the mirror. Not men.

    We have the courage to face the man in the mirror.

    Do you have the courage to face the woman in the mirror?

    That is the only test of equality of agency that matters.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 15:03:00 UTC

  • In simple terms, men find greater persistence, consumptive, productive, and repr

    In simple terms, men find greater persistence, consumptive, productive, and reproductive advantage in loyalty in pursuit of advantage despite conflict whereas women find greater persistence, consumptive, and reproductive advantage in disloyalty and avoidance of conflict. This is why women defect and why all cultures that survive prevent women from defection by limiting political participation.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 13:24:00 UTC

  • “SHRILLING” (VS SHRILL, SHREW, SCOLD) |Shrilling| Counter-Signaling -> Outraging

    “SHRILLING” (VS SHRILL, SHREW, SCOLD)

    |Shrilling| Counter-Signaling -> Outraging -> Shrilling -> Shrieking

    Shrilling : hbd science-denialism, feminism, postmodernism, marxism, inappropriate theism.

    shrill

    1a: having or emitting a sharp high-pitched tone or sound

    1b: accompanied by sharp high-pitched sounds or cries

    2: having a sharp or vivid effect on the senses

    3: PIERCING, STRIDENT, INTEMPERATE

    shrew, shrewish (adj.)

    “peevish, malignant, clamorous, spiteful, vexatious, turbulent woman” [Johnson] is late 14c., from earlier sense of “spiteful person” (male or female), mid-13c.,late 14c., “wicked, malignant,” from shrew + -ish. Of women, “malignant and scolding,” from 1560s. Related: Shrewishly; shrewishness.

    scold (n.)

    mid-12c., “person of ribald speech,” later “person fond of abusive language” (c. 1300), especially a shrewish woman [Johnson defines it as “A clamourous, rude, mean, low, foul-mouthed woman”], from Old Norse skald “poet” (see skald). The sense evolution might reflect the fact that Germanic poets (like their Celtic counterparts) were famously feared for their ability to lampoon and mock (as in skaldskapr “poetry,” also, in Icelandic law books, “libel in verse”).


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 10:15:00 UTC

  • (Nurses and stewardesses seem to have a high female quotient but low crazy quoti

    (Nurses and stewardesses seem to have a high female quotient but low crazy quotient, for the same reason mothers with many children have lower crazy quotients: survival. lol )


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 08:18:00 UTC

  • The bad thing is that the west was destroyed by christianity the first time, and

    The bad thing is that the west was destroyed by christianity the first time, and because christians (women really) are vulnerable to the method, we are being conquered a second time.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 22:15:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1231341734220779520

    Reply addressees: @WillReturns1066 @stack_dalton @razibkhan

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1231341228618174464

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @relocateromania @PeterSweden7 @JohnMarkSays Or at least, big

    RT @curtdoolittle: @relocateromania @PeterSweden7 @JohnMarkSays Or at least, big mistake not giving women a separate house of government wh…


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 17:15:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1231266181199400961

  • Or at least, big mistake not giving women a separate house of government when th

    Or at least, big mistake not giving women a separate house of government when they wanted to vote
    1) Monarchy+Military+Judiciary, 2) regions 3) Finance +Industry +Business, 4)Trades + Labor+ Families, 5)Mothers(women). That’ seems to be the minimum number of houses.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 16:59:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1231262365938831360

    Reply addressees: @relocateromania @PeterSweden7 @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1231257066846728194

  • MONOGAMY AS COMPETITIVE NORMATIVE COMMONS by Alain Dwight Sex transactions outsi

    MONOGAMY AS COMPETITIVE NORMATIVE COMMONS

    by Alain Dwight

    Sex transactions outside of monogamous, familial structures can constitute a damage against monogamy, stable families, and investment in children as social norms, which is the optimum strategy for some groups.

    Arguably, it’s the best overall strategy since the groups who have done this, have become the dominant force on the planet – and to the degree that status is challenged, we are slipping into a dark age.

    It’s still possible other strategies could work. In any case, imposing a cost on normative commons will be met with retaliation, our choice is if that retaliation is at a disorganized street level or in an organized institutional level. I suggest both, as I prefer to have people bear their own costs as opposed to free riding on commons that they choose to undermine.

    These normative commons provide such a competitive advantage that it’s questionable if any groups that fail to offer sufficient defense/retaliation will even continue to exist or forward any of their values they claim to champion.

    It might be worth it to allow some elite members to operate outside monogamy but without maintaining monogamy as a norm, competitive advantage is often or always compromised.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 11:35:00 UTC