Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • P LOGIC IN RELATIONSHIPS You don’t use P-logic to argue with your wife, girlfrie

    P LOGIC IN RELATIONSHIPS

    You don’t use P-logic to argue with your wife, girlfriend – even if you probably should use it with your daughters. You use P to UNDERSTAND your wife or girlfriend, so that you can ask the right questions and give the right answers.

    The most important of which isn’t to tell her her feelings are wrong, or her desires are wrong, but whether they are possible or not, and whether they would achieve desired ends or not. Women need you to listen while they work through suppressing the emotion and impulse. They need you to support them as they work through those thoughts impulses and emotions so that you relieve them of the burden of doing it alone. And they need you to help them come to a conclusion on their own – just as they help you through your male anger or frustration when it clouds your vision. And they need you to say ‘no’ when it’s your fking job to say ‘these are the limits’ beyond which you are not willing to go – and not apologize for it. Be a man. Give her room to exercise emotional frustration by emotional expression like you exercise emotional frustration by physical expression.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 23:15:00 UTC

  • Democrats (liberals) are psychotic, solipsistic, and kleptocratic by nature. Onc

    Democrats (liberals) are psychotic, solipsistic, and kleptocratic by nature. Once you grok it’s all genetics, that they’re all cognitively female, and that nothing can be done, there is no possibility for democracy to survive without market pressure on lower class reproduction.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 15:17:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1230511769342369792

    Reply addressees: @Libertyworld

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1230498352439025666

  • “As economic concerns disappear in first world countries, K-select mating patter

    —“As economic concerns disappear in first world countries, K-select mating patterns are increasingly centered on aesthetics — for which height is a solid measure for men. Thus we already see speciation: K-select high-IQ whites with tall attractive children, and then a larger mass of the opposite. Andrew Yang talked about exactly this phenomonon in his campaign.”—Michael Churchill

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 16:11:00 UTC

  • he is saying that we don’t understand each other, but (supposedly) we need eacho

    he is saying that we don’t understand each other, but (supposedly) we need eachother.

    i have a very different understanding: eugenic vs dysgenic

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 03:42:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229974425971437569

    Reply addressees: @TruthRespecter

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229967996883472384

  • You can’t defend women – it’s a NAXALT fallacy no matter what you do. You can on

    You can’t defend women – it’s a NAXALT fallacy no matter what you do. You can only suggest how to create reciprocity in a relationship. In other words, you can’t correct a criticism without justifying it, so the only solution is to provide solutions.

    ( We do this all the time. )

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-18 22:21:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229893760017981442

    Reply addressees: @TennyTennison2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229893322979889155

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @TennyTennison2 No, the men are overcompensating to correct the overcompensation by feminists and postmodernists. The problem is that it’s almost impossible for a woman to say much that is distinguishable from NAXALT and resulting marxist, postmodernist, feminist science denialism. https://t.co/Tb2VIJvhaK

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1229893322979889155

  • No, the men are overcompensating to correct the overcompensation by feminists an

    No, the men are overcompensating to correct the overcompensation by feminists an

    No, the men are overcompensating to correct the overcompensation by feminists and postmodernists. The problem is that it’s almost impossible for a woman to say much that is distinguishable from NAXALT and resulting marxist, postmodernist, feminist science denialism. https://t.co/Tb2VIJvhaK

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-18 22:19:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229893322979889155

    Reply addressees: @TennyTennison2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229839965124792320

  • What you never seem to grasp, is that he (and the right) are just using your (Al

    What you never seem to grasp, is that he (and the right) are just using your (Alinsky) tactics against you. Those tactics: the female method of undermining as a means of denying the painful truth – that the left’s more aggressive social science deniers than right are theologians.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-18 22:06:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229889845192994816

    Reply addressees: @GregMolidor

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229889234863042560

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @GregMolidor Of course he’s trolling.That’s how he controls the news cycle, controls the information distributed to you, controls you, and tells you every single day that your opinion doesn’t matter, and he’s immune to your gossiping, shaming, rallying, moralizing, psychologizing undermining.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1229889234863042560

  • “I can’t be manipulated. I’m immune. I care what my wife thinks. That’s the only

    –“I can’t be manipulated. I’m immune. I care what my wife thinks. That’s the only woman whose thinking i need to care about. And she’s happy with that monopoly on my care. And most women will be very happy with that monopoly of my care.”— Noah J Revoy

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-18 14:42:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/86969884_210695976995230_86050063280

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/86969884_210695976995230_86050063280

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/86969884_210695976995230_8605006328026365952_o_210695973661897.jpg AGAIN: MALE VARIATION IN BRAIN STRUCTURE

    By: Alexander Kruel via Brandon Hayes

    New preprint of massive study finds that there is greater variance in the brain structure of males than females, even after accounting for the mean size differences.

    This is a confirmation of results from at least two previous brain imaging studies.

    Studies:

    -https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.17.952010v1

    -https://academic.oup.com/cercor/article/28/8/2959/4996558

    -https://academic.oup.com/cercor/article/28/8/2741/3872365

    via @Scientific_BirdAGAIN: MALE VARIATION IN BRAIN STRUCTURE

    By: Alexander Kruel via Brandon Hayes

    New preprint of massive study finds that there is greater variance in the brain structure of males than females, even after accounting for the mean size differences.

    This is a confirmation of results from at least two previous brain imaging studies.

    Studies:

    -https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.17.952010v1

    -https://academic.oup.com/cercor/article/28/8/2959/4996558

    -https://academic.oup.com/cercor/article/28/8/2741/3872365

    via @Scientific_Bird

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-18 13:41:00 UTC

  • (Humor.) Re: “Mansplaining and Womansplaining” Yeah. I’m a little done with woma

    (Humor.) Re: “Mansplaining and Womansplaining”

    Yeah. I’m a little done with womansplaining as well.

    Mansplaining is merely useless – it won’t accomplish anything even if it should. Womansplaining is useless and false – but often succeeds even though it shouldn’t. 😉

    Womansplaining:”There is no bell curve. Everyone is equal. Everyone has equal potential. And everyone that’s unsuccessful is inhibited by others’ bias or malice.”

    In other words, “I want my dead weight offspring to have a chance at achieving devolutionary and undeserving equality with his or her genetic superiors.”

    Short term, female, empathetic, feels.

    Mansplaining:”There is always a bell curve – and a third of people are dead weight, and its genetic, and women decide who they mate with – so it’s their fault.”

    In other words, “I want my tribe to be free of dead weight offspring so we have a chance at achieving at defeating competing tribes who seek to defeat our genes.”

    Long term, male, analytic, reals.

    That’s the net of it.

    Understand the speaker’s bias, and you understand his brain structure and you understand his reproductive strategy – and that none of that is under his cognitive control and everything he (or she) says is just the persona-puppet following instructions of one’s genes.

    Really. That’s the entirety of the left (Female cognitive bias) right (male cognitive bias)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-18 13:20:00 UTC