Theme: Sex Differences

  • What Does White Mean?

    (possibly controversial post warning)(This post covers genetic differences in neoteny, cognition and personality between geographic groups, and between the sexes. Stop reading if you are concerned you would be offended.)

    —“White means….”— Elizabeth Anonymous

    [I] do science. I leave intellectual dishonesty for others. We don’t have a term for Genetic, Ethnic, Europeans other than ‘White’. But “White”, meaning Ancestral Ethnic European, is easily genetically determinable. In general, at least six generations are necessary to launder ethnic outbreeding. Even, by six generations someone will still express certain dominant traits despite constraining breeding within the group. And it is still easy to determine the difference between a full Scandinavian and the same generation with an Iberian ancestor. Whites are the remains of the post-glacial maximum peoples, plus the early neolithic farmers, who were conquered, largely genocided and replaced by the ie’s. We are the most genetically homogenous people outside of Han-Korean-Japanese. The only open question is whether we include the remaining pre-ie Anatolian, early neolithic farmer populations of the Balkans, Greece, Southern Italy, and Sardinia in the classification ‘white’ out of cultural affinity under Christianity, or we limit ourselves to genetics using the european branch of the IE expansion: Itals (south), Germanics, Scandinavians, Baltics, Slavs, and Finnics. The rest of the Caucasians descend from the Iranic branch of the IE’s, and anatolians (Hittites), Caucasians (if they existed), and those that integrated into the Semitic peoples – are all lost to us. There were only a few post-glacial maximum west eurasian peoples, and the turks of the northern far east, are the only peoples of the post-glacial that are not indo europeans. Science is science. Women fear conflict. Women disapprove rather than accept an undesirable but true statement. Women will deny a truth to avoid conflict. Women will advance a falsehood to eschew conflict. While the male vs female distribution of personality Traits and Facets overlaps, the difference between the sexual (gender) relative homogeneity of traits, and the relative heterogeneity of Facets under those traits, is (a) agreeableness, (c) dominance expression, and this results in the (to females) annoying male habit of stating the truth despite the undesirability of it. It also accounts for the approximately 20% improvement in male detection of general trait expression and symmetric improvement in female detection of individual trait expression. In other words, males are more often correct in the ascertainment of empirically correct stereotypes than females, both at the perceptual-cognitive level and at the agreeability level. While women are equally superior at individual emotional empathy and incentive-sympathy. Net net of the science as it sits: Neoteny slows maturity and buys agency (neural formation) at the cost of emotional instability (creativity, neuroticism). This explains the high emotional instability of european women, and the nearly 1/3 of european women that experience psychological issues when not working in close association with other women to limit them. East asians are the most neotenous by far, europeans less so, africans and afro-asiatics lees so. This is why east asians, then europeans, then afrio-asiatics (semitic peoples), the africans have increasing rates of maturity at decreasing agency and verbal ability. Europeans (a) have not over-neotenized like the east asians nor under neotenized like the africans, and at the same time we have practiced cold weather eugenics for thousands of years. So between our neotenic development, our least-clannish(racist) temperament, our balance of verbal and spatial abilities, and our development of sovereignty (what we mistakenly call individualism) and the culture that resulted from it, including tripartism (markets between miltiary-judicial, producers-philosophers, and priests-theologians, we developed reason, empiricism, science, technology and medicine faster than all other peoples in the world combined. Ergo, unfortunately, it’s true that at last working class and upward whites are genetically and culturally superior in those ways necessary for the production of advanced and rapidly advancing civilization. And demand by women and immigrants to revert our civilization to primitive, reality-denying, maladaptive, authoritarian, non-market civilization, just proves that (a) these other peoples are unable to integrate in our civilization because they cannot compete in it, (b) our women have defected against our civilization out of fear of conflict and are assisting the destruction of our civilization – just as women and slaves undermined and brought down the roman empire using Christianity from within. So christianity in the ancient world with the false promise of life after death, and promise of freedom from nature’s competition by marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism, human-bio-diversity-denialism, and ‘silencing the truth’ in the modern world to destroy western civlization yet again. It’s women that need to look in the mirror. Not men. We have the courage to face the man in the mirror. Do you have the courage to face the woman in the mirror? That is the only test of equality of agency that matters.

  • Jews compete with the female means of parasitism on the commons of male hosts, b

    Jews compete with the female means of parasitism on the commons of male hosts, by specializing in baiting into hazard, using the Abrahamic method of deceit baiting into hazard by false promise, pilpul (sophistry),and critique (undermining). They are hostile to every host.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-27 16:38:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233068974423838720

    Reply addressees: @ToneUnknown

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233068196464381952


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @ToneUnknown I don’t reduce deep and complex sets of ideas into trivial essences that can be misinterpreted or misrepresented.

    All it does is make more work for me. So you have to spend the time to learn the argument posted and not distill it down to some grade school triviality.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1233068196464381952

  • Let me add a little clarity though: (a) Humans have very little agency (self awa

    Let me add a little clarity though:
    (a) Humans have very little agency (self awareness)
    (b) All groups have a competitive strategy
    (c) The jewish group strategy is the female strategy
    (d) The jewish method of war is female (undermining)
    (e) Reform our law for BOTH women and jews.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-27 16:26:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233065912217079809

    Reply addressees: @DriftedA

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233064198797746179

  • You probably want to read and share this because it weaves together the jewish s

    You probably want to read and share this because it weaves together the jewish strategy, the reason they undermine darwin to preserve separation, the use of female undermining from within to achieve it, and the sequence of movements to undermine every aspect of the civilization.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-27 16:17:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233063538094149632

  • Who produced pseudoscience and sophistry for the academic market?

    Who produced pseudoscience and sophistry for the academic market? Are women the source of, or market for, academic pseudoscience and sophism?Math: Cantor-Bohr-Einstein, Man: Boas-Freud, Econ: Marx-Mises, Culture: Adorno-Fromm, Philosophy: Derrida, Feminism: Friedan, Neocons: Trotsky-S…-Crystal and Rothbard/Rand are the innovators – but Europeans readily jump on the opportunity for advancement by pseudoscience and sophism.

  • Who produced pseudoscience and sophistry for the academic market?

    Who produced pseudoscience and sophistry for the academic market? Are women the source of, or market for, academic pseudoscience and sophism?Math: Cantor-Bohr-Einstein, Man: Boas-Freud, Econ: Marx-Mises, Culture: Adorno-Fromm, Philosophy: Derrida, Feminism: Friedan, Neocons: Trotsky-S…-Crystal and Rothbard/Rand are the innovators – but Europeans readily jump on the opportunity for advancement by pseudoscience and sophism.

  • You probably want to read and share this because it weaves together the jewish s

    You probably want to read and share this because it weaves together the jewish strategy, the reason they undermine darwin to preserve separation, the use of female undermining from within to achieve it, and the sequence of movements to undermine every aspect of the civilization.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-27 15:43:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233055004761698304

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233051441218105346


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    The Century of The Jewish Counter-Revolution Against Darwin and Darwinian Civilization https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/27/the-century-of-the-jewish-counter-revolution-against-darwin-and-darwinian-civilization/

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1233051441218105346

  • Book. From Blog. “Whistleblower”

    [W]oman is on ride-sharing site with fellow employees. Guy propositions her. She rejects it. This is somehow ‘sexual harassment’ since according to women, only women should initiate seduction, because they are not adult enough to reject it. She reports it to HR. HR says ‘it’s his first offense, he’s a high performer (and you are not) so either stay on his team and deal with it, or move to another team’. This is the correct solution to the problem when dealing with a high performer and a low performer. You move the lower performer. Instead she plays victim, does not act in the company interest, and acts instead in her own interest, and rallies other women to HR with her. HR says it is his first offense because it’s the first offense we have record of. And we have more people complaining about YOU. Women feels she is self righteously due, so continues, writes blog, and undermines company’s competitive male culture of ‘stepping on toes to do what’s right’. This is why it is important to (a) have recruiting, benefits, payroll, and legal departments but NOT HR departments who are universally agents of undermining organizations by politicking – and force people to legal recourse outside the business. (b) this is why high performing companies should be very cautious about hiring women until the naturally destructive nature of women can be tolerated by scale. Sexual harassment is an obvious thing. Unwanted advancement is not sexual harassment. It’s just human. Why don’t we teach women how to reject men, and that men must respect it and not retaliate when rejected – rather than all these layers of deceit and destruction.

  • Book. From Blog. “Whistleblower”

    [W]oman is on ride-sharing site with fellow employees. Guy propositions her. She rejects it. This is somehow ‘sexual harassment’ since according to women, only women should initiate seduction, because they are not adult enough to reject it. She reports it to HR. HR says ‘it’s his first offense, he’s a high performer (and you are not) so either stay on his team and deal with it, or move to another team’. This is the correct solution to the problem when dealing with a high performer and a low performer. You move the lower performer. Instead she plays victim, does not act in the company interest, and acts instead in her own interest, and rallies other women to HR with her. HR says it is his first offense because it’s the first offense we have record of. And we have more people complaining about YOU. Women feels she is self righteously due, so continues, writes blog, and undermines company’s competitive male culture of ‘stepping on toes to do what’s right’. This is why it is important to (a) have recruiting, benefits, payroll, and legal departments but NOT HR departments who are universally agents of undermining organizations by politicking – and force people to legal recourse outside the business. (b) this is why high performing companies should be very cautious about hiring women until the naturally destructive nature of women can be tolerated by scale. Sexual harassment is an obvious thing. Unwanted advancement is not sexual harassment. It’s just human. Why don’t we teach women how to reject men, and that men must respect it and not retaliate when rejected – rather than all these layers of deceit and destruction.

  • This is the answer you know. All political conflict is reducible to this questio

    This is the answer you know. All political conflict is reducible to this question.

    LEFT: Maternal, equalitarian, dysgenic devolutionary
    -vs-
    RIGHT: Paternal, meritocratic, eugenic evolutionary.

    Revolt. Separate. Continue to Speciate. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1232724530948382720