Quite the opposite.
SHORT LIST OF FEMALE MEANS OF ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR, EVADING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COMMONS WHILE HIDING BEHIND MORAL PRETENSE
CAUSE: Evasion of responsibility for the common but demand for control of the commons, externalizing consequential responsibility to males.
Industrialize the sale and distribution of false promises by the tactics of by means of:
Denial
1. Dismissal of the Evidence, History, Argument, Incentives, Norm, or Tradition
2. Evading providing a competitive, equally criticizable and testable alternative.
3. Equating Desirability-Undesirability and Approval-Disapproval or Denial with Truth and Falsehood
4. Face-Before-Truth rather than European truth-before-face, or threat to the dominance or competence hierarchy.
4. NAXALT – “Not All X Are Like That” – Denying a general rule describing a distribution is false because there are some cases at the tails.
Undermining by Ad Hominem (GSRRM)
Consisting of:
1. Poisoning the Well (Polluting the Informational Commons)
2. GSRRM:
… denial
… disapproval,
… outraging
… ridicule,
… shaming,
… moralizing,
… psychologizing,
… rallying,
… gossiping,
… reputation destruction
… and Social Construction
Creating Plausible Deniability
1. Hiding Behind Moral Pretense
2. Hiding behind Voluntary Choice
3. Hiding behind Sympathy for Hyper consumption (experiences)
4. Hiding Behind (Selective) Evasion of Responsibility
5. Heaping Undue Criticism (Persecution) and Undue Praise (personalizing)
Fraud by: Claiming Oppression by individuals as a proxy for laws of nature, or conversely claiming false promise of possibility of evading the laws of nature:
1. False Promise of Freedom from Formal Laws (logic, truth) by the use of social construction of repetitive feedback of information counter to formal, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws.
2. False Promise of Freedom from Physical Laws (scarcity, false promise of endless growth). by the false promise of endless growth, an end to scarcity, and an end to human competition by demonstrated acquisition.
3. False Promise of Freedom Natural Laws (of self-interest, rational choice, amorality, reciprocity, competitive organization), by the false promise of an end to kin selection, koinophillia, ethnocentrism, sex, class, subrace, and racial differences, and the sexual, social, economic, and political value of organization by ethnocentrism given the class, subrace, and subrace differences in sexual, social, economic, and political value to one another, given the substantial evolutionary difference between the races and subraces.
4. False Promise of Freedom from Evolutionary Laws ( ending natural, and market selection, accumulating mutation and regulation, the impossibility of isolation, inescapable regression, accumulated genetic load, dysgenia, and the red queen of resources, competitors, biological, climatological, geological, solar, and galactic risks. ).
Using “Storytelling” by:
1. Faith Healing, delaying into hazard. Faith Healing consists of providing temporary psychological relief while allowing the cause to persist, grow, and evolve.
2. False Story Telling, baiting you into empathy, loading, framing, obscurantism, suggestion, suspension of disbelief and overloading.
3. False Promise, baiting into hazard. Baiting into hazard consists of making false promises of freedom from the laws of the universe. arguing them with sophistry to idealism, magic to pseudoscience, or occult to theology.
4. False Criticism, undermining into hazard.
5. Duplicitous, Double Standard, Irreciprocal, and Poly Logical Ethics, like their polylogical unequal laws,
Escalating from the least burdensome to the most burdensome tactic:
1. Faith healing at every opportunity (lie and deny)
2. Selling false promise if they can (fraud)
3. Evading or silencing at every necessity (shaming, moralizing, psychologizing)
4. Undermining if they have opportunity to (sedition)
5. Attack if they can get away with it (de-platforming, conspiracy)
6. Hiding behind plausible deniability of freedom of choice (non-coercion)
he opposite.
Reply addressees: @WomanPissedoff