Theme: Sex Differences

Men may be bad. But women are evil.
Do you want to be terrified and have trouble facing the world every day?
Given Feminine, empathizing, in-time, hyperconsumption and status by evasion of responsibility for the common
vs
Masculine systematizing, over time, capitalization, and status by responsibility accumulation for the commons.
What is the difference in moral intuitions? All sex differences in moral intuitions are reducible to sex differences in the pursuit of responsibility or irresponsibility for the commons.
Ergo; whenever a woman disagrees with a man in matters public, seek only to determine what irresponsibility for the commons she is avoiding.
Likewise, when any man disagrees with a woman in matters private, seek only what responsibility for the commons is he attempting to impose on the individual

If you develop any skill at this you will then be ready to learn sex differences in lying, so that you can rapidly identify what ‘theft’ the opposite sex making or prohibiting, and what method of argument he or she is using to do so.

The truth is that the industrialization of lying by false promise of continuous hyperconsumption has been produced to cause women to defect from civilization the second time (as they did by Christianity, now marxism-femininsm-woke) because women treat demand for responsibly for the commons as oppression rather than civilized domestication.

Sorry. Just is.
I didn’t set out to do this.
Discovering how and why industrialization of lying was made possible led me to yet one painful truth after another.

Men may be bad (predatory). But women are evil (seditious)

Men may be bad. But women are evil.
Do you want to be terrified and have trouble facing the world every day?
Given Feminine, empathizing, in-time, hyperconsumption and status by evasion of responsibility for the common
vs
Masculine systematizing, over time, capitalization, and status by responsibility accumulation for the commons.
What is the difference in moral intuitions? All sex differences in moral intuitions are reducible to sex differences in the pursuit of responsibility or irresponsibility for the commons.
Ergo; whenever a woman disagrees with a man in matters public, seek only to determine what irresponsibility for the commons she is avoiding.
Likewise, when any man disagrees with a woman in matters private, seek only what responsibility for the commons is he attempting to impose on the individual

If you develop any skill at this you will then be ready to learn sex differences in lying, so that you can rapidly identify what ‘theft’ the opposite sex making or prohibiting, and what method of argument he or she is using to do so.

The truth is that the industrialization of lying by false promise of continuous hyperconsumption has been produced to cause women to defect from civilization the second time (as they did by Christianity, now marxism-femininsm-woke) because women treat demand for responsibly for the commons as oppression rather than civilized domestication.

Sorry. Just is.
I didn’t set out to do this.
Discovering how and why industrialization of lying was made possible led me to yet one painful truth after another.

Men may be bad (predatory). But women are evil (seditious)

Reply addressees: @gentKarter91 @KaeleyT @RealCandaceO

(Counsel. This discourse between male and female is unconstructive other than to illustrate sex differences in cognition and conflict. You cannot override female cognition with reason, nor overload male cognition with emotion and GSRRM. All you’ve done (together) is illustrate that my work is simply true.

The question then, is how do we work on means, ends both, or neither when the feminine will tolerate no constraint regardless of cost to the commons and the masculine will tolerate no imposition of costs on the common by the failure of constraint.

It’s amazing we get along at all.

And it is the reason why the family is so important to the survival of a polity – because ONLY as families do we share common political interests.

But as individuals of opposite sexes, single mothers, single fathers, ex-fathers who are extracted from, dysfunctional families, classes of families, and healthy families, we have NO COMMON interests so we have no common values systems.

Add diversity of races that creates vast differences rates of agency, vast differences in in class size, and demand for resulting laws, institutions economies, norms traditions values that different groups, classes and sexes are capable of and desirous of. And then put these people in proximity in democratic polities, and you will end up with what’s deterministic:
1) authoritarianism because there is no other means of reconciliation;
2) vast corruption instead of high trust.
3) and a race to the bottom which is the only point where we are even vaguely equal.

Which is what socialism and communism accomplish, and what women will drive for, because it absolves women of maximum responsibility, and female demand for irresponsibility for the commons and thereby generating authority is the reason women are incompatible with democracy rule of law and liberty.

I don’t make the laws of nature. I just try to prevent people lying about them. So that we don’t suffer the consequences of people who live by false promise selling lies that we can evade the laws of the physical world (scarcity), the behavioral world (self interest, sex class race differences), the evolutionary world (neoteny, genetic mutation, defect, load, regression to the mean, dysgenia, natural selection and the consequence of the absence of natural selection.)

Sorry. True is true.

Reply addressees: @DiceCookPlate @RobOU812Rob @terrilbruce @GregAbbott_TX

(Counsel. This discourse between male and female is unconstructive other than to illustrate sex differences in cognition and conflict. You cannot override female cognition with reason, nor overload male cognition with emotion and GSRRM. All you’ve done (together) is illustrate that my work is simply true.

The question then, is how do we work on means, ends both, or neither when the feminine will tolerate no constraint regardless of cost to the commons and the masculine will tolerate no imposition of costs on the common by the failure of constraint.

It’s amazing we get along at all.

And it is the reason why the family is so important to the survival of a polity – because ONLY as families do we share common political interests.

But as individuals of opposite sexes, single mothers, single fathers, ex-fathers who are extracted from, dysfunctional families, classes of families, and healthy families, we have NO COMMON interests so we have no common values systems.

Add diversity of races that creates vast differences rates of agency, vast differences in in class size, and demand for resulting laws, institutions economies, norms traditions values that different groups, classes and sexes are capable of and desirous of. And then put these people in proximity in democratic polities, and you will end up with what’s deterministic:
1) authoritarianism because there is no other means of reconciliation;
2) vast corruption instead of high trust.
3) and a race to the bottom which is the only point where we are even vaguely equal.

Which is what socialism and communism accomplish, and what women will drive for, because it absolves women of maximum responsibility, and female demand for irresponsibility for the commons and thereby generating authority is the reason women are incompatible with democracy rule of law and liberty.

I don’t make the laws of nature. I just try to prevent people lying about them. So that we don’t suffer the consequences of people who live by false promise selling lies that we can evade the laws of the physical world (scarcity), the behavioral world (self interest, sex class race differences), the evolutionary world (neoteny, genetic mutation, defect, load, regression to the mean, dysgenia, natural selection and the consequence of the absence of natural selection.)

Sorry. True is true.