Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • RT @LukeWeinhagen: @curtdoolittle Inversions: “racism” Inversion of in-group pre

    RT @LukeWeinhagen: @curtdoolittle Inversions:

    “racism”
    Inversion of in-group preference

    “homophobia”
    Inversion of mate selection by repro…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-19 03:24:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648527884682932224

  • No one argues that. The more equal the opportunity the MORE women select for cog

    No one argues that.
    The more equal the opportunity the MORE women select for cognitively and emotionally female biases.
    Agrarianism and industrialism made us feel more similar than at any time before. And we are, as we see throughout the culture, restoring the historical difference of the near separation of the sexes in all walks of life.
    It wasn’t until agrarianism, the property, and the division of labor maintaining life under it, that long term relationships and the resulting compromises between the sexes became common.
    It wasn’t until industrialization and contraception that women could work by clerical and communication for income rather than physical labor with animals and machines.
    And as such there is an increasing disutility of one another, and this is showing up in female hyperconsumption in exchange for reproduction, and male escape into entertainment given how inexpensive it is for a man to survive in comfort with other men.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-18 22:25:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648452750647369729

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648439756974604289

  • No one argues that. The more equal the opportunity the MORE women select for cog

    No one argues that.
    The more equal the opportunity the MORE women select for cognitively and emotionally female biases.
    Agrarianism and industrialism made us feel more similar than at any time before. And we are, as we see throughout the culture, restoring the historical difference of the near separation of the sexes in all walks of life.
    It wasn’t until agrarianism, the property, and the division of labor maintaining life under it, that long term relationships and the resulting compromises between the sexes became common.
    It wasn’t until industrialization and contraception that women could work by clerical and communication for income rather than physical labor with animals and machines.
    And as such there is an increasing disutility of one another, and this is showing up in female hyperconsumption in exchange for reproduction, and male escape into entertainment given how inexpensive it is for a man to survive in comfort with other men.

    Reply addressees: @DiceCookPlate

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-18 22:25:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648452750504755200

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648439756974604289

  • As far as I know, there is no other test of concurrency of wants between sexes,

    As far as I know, there is no other test of concurrency of wants between sexes, classes, and regions than the market for votes – whether individual, proportional, or economic. Conversely there are insufficient tests of the limits on amendments, legislation, regulation, and command. And there may be insufficient insurance of the court’s decisions by the military, militia, and people in defense of rule of law.
    What you’re saying (and yes you’re a good person Tom) is that you don’t know how to solve the problem. Yet, we have plenty of evidence of how to solve the problem. We just experiment and learn from each experiment. And as I stated in my previous response, our current experiment with wider participation, wider participation without a separate house, and especially participation with women without a separate house for them, has been a failure.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-18 21:01:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648431618246205445

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648429794739224579

  • As far as I know, there is no other test of concurrency of wants between sexes,

    As far as I know, there is no other test of concurrency of wants between sexes, classes, and regions than the market for votes – whether individual, proportional, or economic. Conversely there are insufficient tests of the limits on amendments, legislation, regulation, and command. And there may be insufficient insurance of the court’s decisions by the military, militia, and people in defense of rule of law.
    What you’re saying (and yes you’re a good person Tom) is that you don’t know how to solve the problem. Yet, we have plenty of evidence of how to solve the problem. We just experiment and learn from each experiment. And as I stated in my previous response, our current experiment with wider participation, wider participation without a separate house, and especially participation with women without a separate house for them, has been a failure.

    Reply addressees: @TomKawczynski

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-18 21:01:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648431618132959235

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648429794739224579

  • I have two very competent daughters I am very proud of tho I can’t take much cre

    I have two very competent daughters I am very proud of tho I can’t take much credit – it belongs to their mothers. Even so, would you lie about a matter of science if it offended your children? Or would you do the right, moral, thing and speak the truth regardless of cost, which…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-18 20:50:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648428733064265729

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648426665020882947

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @TheAutistocrat @money_bait @Will_Benge THE SCIENCE ON CREATI

    RT @curtdoolittle: @TheAutistocrat @money_bait @Will_Benge THE SCIENCE ON CREATIVITY VS SEXES, POLITICS
    Creativity is largely due to Intell…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-18 18:18:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648390602046812160

  • THE SCIENCE ON CREATIVITY VS SEXES, POLITICS Creativity is largely due to Intell

    THE SCIENCE ON CREATIVITY VS SEXES, POLITICS
    Creativity is largely due to Intelligence, trait Openness (novelty seeking), energy(physical and mental) and persistence (discipline, conscientiousness), and requires mastery of a subject matter that can be only achieved through persistence, with the cost and complexity (content) of the subject matter determining the distribution.

    As for political disposition there is a spectrum of creativity from ‘little-c” to “Big-c” and this distribution generally reflects sex differences. Ergo many women engage in (cheap) expressive decorative creativity, while most (almost exclusively) famous revolutionary artists (expensive) are male. You’ll find this in every single discipline. Even those that are left-biased like writers in entertainment. (tho movies have almost collapsed the professional art market through high reward talent consumption).

    As such we should see and we do see the range of creativity distributed across sexes and across political biases reflecting the differences in the sexes.

    I think this is all there is to say. Other than the falsehood that liberals(feminine) are more creative than conservatives (masculine) has to do with their creativity related to hyperconsumption rather than capitalization – which again is just another expression of sex differences.

    (We do have one pretty amazing female architect now. Aside from that, no.)

    Reply addressees: @TheAutistocrat @money_bait @Will_Benge

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-18 18:18:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648390590650785803

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648387415906697223

  • THE SCIENCE ON CREATIVITY VS SEXES, POLITICS Creativity is largely due to Intell

    THE SCIENCE ON CREATIVITY VS SEXES, POLITICS
    Creativity is largely due to Intelligence, trait Openness (novelty seeking), energy(physical and mental) and persistence (discipline, conscientiousness), and requires mastery of a subject matter that can be only achieved through persistence, with the cost and complexity (content) of the subject matter determining the distribution.

    As for political disposition there is a spectrum of creativity from ‘little-c” to “Big-c” and this distribution generally reflects sex differences. Ergo many women engage in (cheap) expressive decorative creativity, while most (almost exclusively) famous revolutionary artists (expensive) are male. You’ll find this in every single discipline. Even those that are left-biased like writers in entertainment. (tho movies have almost collapsed the professional art market through high reward talent consumption).

    As such we should see and we do see the range of creativity distributed across sexes and across political biases reflecting the differences in the sexes.

    I think this is all there is to say. Other than the falsehood that liberals(feminine) are more creative than conservatives (masculine) has to do with their creativity related to hyperconsumption rather than capitalization – which again is just another expression of sex differences.

    (We do have one pretty amazing female architect now. Aside from that, no.)

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-18 18:18:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648390590797586432

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648387415906697223

  • (interesting: deserve? How can you ‘deserve’ rather than ‘earn’ a right, obligat

    (interesting: deserve? How can you ‘deserve’ rather than ‘earn’ a right, obligation, and inalienation? Note that ‘deserve’ is female tell, because it all female ‘tells’ result in evasion of responsibility for reciprocity.)

    You really don’t want to play this game with me, because as far as I know I’m the most knowledgeable person living on these subjects. 😉 It will just result in using you as a vehicle for demonstrating I’m correct.

    Reply addressees: @gentKarter91 @TysonBay @KaeleyT @RealCandaceO

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-18 16:25:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648362161574477826

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1648080276193419264