Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • FEMINISTS: BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR The first problem for any society is to

    FEMINISTS: BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR

    The first problem for any society is to find positive incentives for men.

    Feminism seeks to position men as oppressors – instead of our traditional roles as a compromise. But it is a compromise for both genders.

    For most of us, Islamic paternal domination, and daily tribal warfare, or African enslavement of women is a more desirable way to live than the tedium of labor, office, tax, law and family.

    In the family, women compromise and men compromise. But, If not, then men will no longer compromise either. They will first abandon society. Then family. Then pursue self interest.

    5%,unhappy women just complain. 5% unhappy men without access to sex and marriage cause revolutions every time.

    And or tribes are not equal in aggression. The relative docility of Asian males should not obscure the relative aggressiveness of steppe and desert males.

    So we compromise or be subjugated. None of us gets our ideal.

    Any soldier will in confidence confess that robbing, raping and pillaging is far preferable to sedentary life.

    The Romans made a business of it. The Muslims are currently making entertainment out of it.

    Men build the world for the benefit of and approval of women.

    We can just as easily destroy it if that incentive ends.

    Women are along for the ride.

    Be careful what you wish for.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-03-23 04:25:00 UTC

  • Feminists: Be Careful What You Wish For

    [T]he first problem for any society is to find positive incentives for men.

    Feminism seeks to position men as oppressors – instead of our traditional roles as a compromise. But it is a compromise for both genders.

    For most of us, Islamic paternal domination, and daily tribal warfare, or African enslavement of women is a more desirable way to live than the tedium of labor, office, tax, law and family.

    In the family, women compromise and men compromise. But, If not, then men will no longer compromise either. They will first abandon society. Then family. Then pursue self interest.
    5%,unhappy women just complain. 5% unhappy men without access to sex and marriage cause revolutions every time.

    And or tribes are not equal in aggression. The relative docility of Asian males should not obscure the relative aggressiveness of steppe and desert males.

    So we compromise or be subjugated. None of us gets our ideal.

    Any soldier will in confidence confess that robbing, raping and pillaging is far preferable to sedentary life.

    The Romans made a business of it. The Muslims are currently making entertainment out of it.

    Men build the world for the benefit of and approval of women.

    We can just as easily destroy it if that incentive ends.

    Women are along for the ride.

    Be careful what you wish for.

  • Feminists: Be Careful What You Wish For

    [T]he first problem for any society is to find positive incentives for men.

    Feminism seeks to position men as oppressors – instead of our traditional roles as a compromise. But it is a compromise for both genders.

    For most of us, Islamic paternal domination, and daily tribal warfare, or African enslavement of women is a more desirable way to live than the tedium of labor, office, tax, law and family.

    In the family, women compromise and men compromise. But, If not, then men will no longer compromise either. They will first abandon society. Then family. Then pursue self interest.
    5%,unhappy women just complain. 5% unhappy men without access to sex and marriage cause revolutions every time.

    And or tribes are not equal in aggression. The relative docility of Asian males should not obscure the relative aggressiveness of steppe and desert males.

    So we compromise or be subjugated. None of us gets our ideal.

    Any soldier will in confidence confess that robbing, raping and pillaging is far preferable to sedentary life.

    The Romans made a business of it. The Muslims are currently making entertainment out of it.

    Men build the world for the benefit of and approval of women.

    We can just as easily destroy it if that incentive ends.

    Women are along for the ride.

    Be careful what you wish for.

  • LOL QUOTE (H/T to my ex in SF) —“I try not to flex my sex appeal too much arou

    LOL QUOTE (H/T to my ex in SF)

    —“I try not to flex my sex appeal too much around the engineers, it’s like feeding bears…always ends in disaster.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2015-03-22 17:11:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    8,000 Years Ago, 17 Women Reproduced for Every One Man

    Source date (UTC): 2015-03-20 00:27:00 UTC

  • ELI ON CHIVALRY –“Chivalry is an offer that men extend to women; make certain c

    ELI ON CHIVALRY

    –“Chivalry is an offer that men extend to women; make certain concessions, receive certain rights and considerations in return.

    But there is no point in being a gentleman if there are no ladies. If women will not refrain from scolding, shaming and gossip, to get their way, there’s no benefit to men in refraining from violence.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2015-03-14 14:30:00 UTC

  • Steve Sailer’s Law of Female Journalism: “The most heartfelt articles by female

    Steve Sailer’s Law of Female Journalism: “The most heartfelt articles by female journalists tend to be demands that social values be overturned in order that the journalist herself be considered hotter.”

    Source date (UTC): 2015-03-14 04:14:00 UTC

  • (Serious, even if it seems antagonistic) So, the principle result of western man

    (Serious, even if it seems antagonistic) So, the principle result of western manorialism was to make best use of land for the community, and by consequence, prevent the reproduction of those who were unproductive. This was an enormously successful program when combined with prohibition on inbreeding – it converted most of Europe into the descendants of the middle class. And while it is an uncomfortable truth that the underclasses are both unproductive and expensive, why is it that we should redistribute to the unproductive, rather than use land to constrain the reproduction of the unproductive, as we have done, and others have done, for thousands of years? We must be equal under the law for a variety of reasons, none of which are just, all of which are necessary for the production of competitive economic velocity. But we are certainly not equal in value to one another. Vast numbers are dead weight on the rest. Even for the productive, I do not understand why I have any particular right to live in central manhattan when those who live there make better value of close proximity to others of exceptional ability than I would make of it. Nor do I understand why progressive taxation of property transactions and income which is onerous already, is not a sufficient means of extraction of value that can be contributed to the commons. I have been struggling to understand this movement for a long time and I am still unfortunately mystified by the assumption that the idea is a ‘good’ one. And I am still hoping that someone can inform me. (Although, truthfully I expect the usual rants rather than to be informed.) Thanks for anyone who helps.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-03-12 14:46:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://cnsnews.com/news/article/barbara-hollingsworth/bachelor-nation-70-men-aged-20-34-are-not-married#.VPyNGs7D_lU.twitter

    Source date (UTC): 2015-03-09 00:55:00 UTC

  • MEIXNER ON MORALITY (a bit of genius) —“Assessment of another person’s moralit

    MEIXNER ON MORALITY

    (a bit of genius)

    —“Assessment of another person’s morality is assessing how much the person’s reproductive strategy is compatible with your own.

    Nothing more, nothing less. “Immoral” persons pursue reproductive strategies that are antagonistic to your own. It’s as simple as that.”— Johannes Meixner

    Source date (UTC): 2015-03-08 15:34:00 UTC