Theme: Sex Differences

  • SKASKIW ON GENDER RATIO THEORY Gender ratio theory: Societies seem to work bette

    http://aeon.co/magazine/society/how-rising-inequality-is-changing-marriage/ROMAN SKASKIW ON GENDER RATIO THEORY

    Gender ratio theory: http://aeon.co/…/how-rising-inequality-is-changing-marriage/

    Societies seem to work better (and more people get married) when men outnumber and have to compete for women. This seems to have a lot of explanatory power:

    -the sustained marriage rate of top 10% income earning women

    -university hook up culture

    -communities with high incarceration

    -even stories about ancient Spartan vs Athenian women.

    #hbd_chick #propertarianism


    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-18 05:20:00 UTC

  • I’m going to start a petition to declare Ukrainian women our national treasure.

    I’m going to start a petition to declare Ukrainian women our national treasure.

    Seriously


    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-11 08:11:00 UTC

  • The Demographics of Gun Ownership

    A CORRELATIVE ANSWER, THEN THE CAUSAL ANSWER

    The Correlative Answer: Part 1: Social Structure
    Northern Europeans above the Hanjal Line (The North Sea Peoples who successfully out-bred) sometimes referred to as the Protestant Peoples) retain an ancient set of traditions requiring all men to obtain legitimacy and honor (equal status) through participation in the militia, and the purpose of the militia is to deny all men power over all other men. This is preserved most strongly in the anglos dutch and less so in the germans, who were anglicized.

    The Causal Answer: Part 2 Tradition
    There are a small number of underlying heroic traditions that carry the western Aristocratic (meritocratic) Egalitarian (enfranchisement to all who fight) tradition – and that tradition is the cause of the rapid rate of western development compared to all other civilizations, both in the ancient, and modern eras. These are:
    1) Heroism (purchase of enfranchisement and status through sacrifice)
    2) All property is private (all property is earned)
    3) Every man is his own legislator over his domain.
    4) The common law and independent judiciary permit the resolution of differences between equals without appeal to authority.
    5) The rule of law, the common law (organic law, natural law) applies to all men equally. 
    6) Hierarchy is necessary for decision making in war, the resolution of conflicts, and for the suppression of free riding.

    The value in this structure is that the common law can evolve with the first judicial ruling, and therefore both transaction cost and risk are reduced, and the chance of free riding, parasitism, fraud and predation are eliminated before they can be institutionalized. The market for law suppresses parasitism as fast as innovations in parasitism are created. In turn, innovation in products, services and ideas can progress with the least resistance from predators. Costs: The consequence for the underclasses is that while they benefit from the rapid innovation, they are more aware of the difference between those who are less productive and those who are are more so.

    The Causal Answer: Part 3 : Incentives
    As population destiny increases, all effects increase by approximately 20% for every doubling of the population. 
    The incentives for people in rural areas where all men bear a high cost of policing the commons, is more restrictive than the incentives for people in urban areas where few bear the cost of policing the commons.

    In general, people in areas of dense population discount the cost of policing commons and norms because opportunity, transaction and policing costs are lower.

    The Causal Answer Part 4: Diversity.
    Diversity decreases trust, increases political divisiveness and decreases economic velocity. Urban areas can afford immigrating diversity. Rural areas cannot.

    It’s all rational really.

    WHAT IS HAPPENING
    The effort to expand ownership has been successful and once people have limited skill with, and ownership of guns, it tends to transfer like all traditions between families.

    The greater the effort to suppress gun ownership the greater the passion with which gun owners preserve the tradition.

    We have roughly tripled gun sales under this administration. Demographically the argument is over and the pro gun movement has won. (surprisingly)

    The supreme court has learned a tragic lesson from Roe v Wade: that the court should not solve social matters until they are first resolved by the states. That decision has nearly destroyed the court. “The Democratic Process Must Do Its Work” is the phrase we hear from the court.

    The general consensus is that we have a problem controlling mental illness, and urban poverty, and not a problem with firearms.

    So as far as I understand, the matter is settled for at least the next generation.

  • GENDER BIAS IN EVERYTHING Consensus through Affirmation (Rational – Female – Pro

    GENDER BIAS IN EVERYTHING

    Consensus through Affirmation (Rational – Female – Progressive)

    …………………………….-VS-…………………………….

    Consensus through Criticism (Scientific – Male – Conservative)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-05-08 01:56:00 UTC

  • MOVES ELLIE, SMALL MOVES” Vast human behavior complexity can be constructed by v

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Androgen”SMALL MOVES ELLIE, SMALL MOVES”

    Vast human behavior complexity can be constructed by very small variations in androgenic production. Races, tribes, and civilizations, exist as a behavioral demonstrations of reproductive strategies, using various formal and informal institutions to manage cooperate between groups with different androgenic, and therefore behavioral differences.

    As I have written profusely, variations in Median IQ, Language vs Spatial IQ, impulsivity, aggression, and disgust can produce completely different societies. And conversely, not all peoples are capable of (or in need of) similar institutional models.

    From what I can gather, the normative means of breaking familial bonds and extending kinship trust to non-kin (what we call religion) is far more important than we had assumed. However, this does not eliminate the problems of immorality, impulsivity, aggression, general intelligence, and verbal intelligence, demonstrated in the curve of abilities regardless of the race, tribe, or culture.

    So the intensity of enforcement of norms and institutions is directly proportional to the degree of impulsivity, aggression, general intelligence, and verbal intelligence.

    I suspect that while improving human genome so that it is longer lived, is far harder than improving the human genome so that it produces greater neurogenesis, more white matter, less impulsivity and aggression.

    But the point remains that one must be impulsive, aggressive, intelligent enough to keep out the more impulsive, aggressive, and less intelligent.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-04-27 07:19:00 UTC

  • If you can choose to abort, I can choose not to support. There is no difference.

    If you can choose to abort, I can choose not to support. There is no difference.

    ***So the basic female argument is to (a) justify her imposition of costs upon others, but (b) refuse to bear costs that are her responsibility.***

    ie: parasitism.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-04-19 03:28:00 UTC

  • WORDS OF THE DAY – REPRODUCTION! 🙂 Consanguinity, Consanguinous, or Panaluan (g

    WORDS OF THE DAY – REPRODUCTION! 🙂

    Consanguinity, Consanguinous, or Panaluan (genetics): mating within an extended family, excluding only one’s children. (in theory the prohibition on reproducing with one’s children evolved as a stage, but no culture practices it any longer.)

    Inbreeding(genetics): mating with individuals that are closely related genetically. Specific case is Father’s Brother’s Daughter or Cousin-marriage. Antonym:outcrossing

    Near-breeding(genetics): mating with extended relations but with a prohibition on cousin marriage (out to some minimum number of generations.)

    Endogamy (norm): the practice of mating within a specific ethnic group, class, or social group.

    Homogamy: (norm) mating between individuals who are, in some culturally important way, similar to each other. Homogamy may be based on socioeconomic status, class, gender, ethnicity, or religion. (I avoid this term, and rely on ‘endogamous’.)

    Outbreeding(genetics): Mating by choice with those outside of near genetic relations.

    Exogamy, Exogamous (norms): mating only outside specific ethnic group, class, or social group.

    Assortative Mating(selection bias): a nonrandom mating pattern in which individuals with similar genotypes and/or phenotypes mate with one another more frequently than would be expected under a random mating pattern.

    Hypergamic, Hypergamy (selection bias): Seeking to mate with genetic(desirable), social(status) and wealth(consumption) superiors.

    Panmixia, Panmixis, Panmitic: random mating. A panmictic population is one where all individuals are potential partners.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-04-13 06:13:00 UTC

  • Why do members of the opposite sex cause us to do stupid things?

    Why do members of the opposite sex cause us to do stupid things?


    Source date (UTC): 2015-04-12 08:16:00 UTC

  • DIFFERENCES IN REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY, NOT THINKING Our weights are different not

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBsT9XTwsn0SEX DIFFERENCES IN REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY, NOT THINKING

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBsT9XTwsn0

    Our weights are different not our processes.

    – Female value in harmony, consensus, compliance or submission. The female reproductive strategy. Female reproductive strategy is not to draw ire, and to ensure the success of her offspring at all costs – regardless of merit.

    vs

    – Male value in change, leadership, differential advantage or dominance. The male reproductive strategy. Male intuition is to protect and improve the tribe – the brother’s ability to keep and pair off with females – by consciousness of merit.

    We measure and value different outcomes. We do not apply different reasoning. This is why the regions of the brain differ..

    Propertarianism provides greater explanatory power that psychology.

    Cheers.

    (HT Roman Skaskiw)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-04-07 12:40:00 UTC

  • IN FAIRNESS TO BOTH SEXES – WE MISREPRESENT EACH OTHER’S PERSPECTIVES> So true.

    IN FAIRNESS TO BOTH SEXES – WE MISREPRESENT EACH OTHER’S PERSPECTIVES>

    So true. Women want, and often need, to vent their emotions. And to organize them, so that they can self-correct them. It’s much harder to be a woman than a man. Our minds are much less cluttered. I think of our function in a relationship as helping women bail out the boat, so that it’s floating on it’s own enough that they can pilot it in the waves. Once we’ve bailed out the boat, you can often suggest ideas. but it is important that women feel the solution is their own, and that they do not have to fight their emotions to adopt it. A woman cannot suppress the chaos in her mind and emotions, any more than we can suppress our anxiety about various threats. In our case we need care-taking so that we can restore our energy and therefore will to continue fighting. Women need to have their emotions bailed out so that they can think straight. It’s the same problem for both sides. It’s just that our stress is low level and pre-cognitive, and theirs is high level and dominates their ability to think. So we both need ‘restoration’. The problem in both cases is to provide one another with the energy with which to deal with stresses. It is not in itself to solve the problem. We can usually solve our problems if we have the emotional wherewithal to solve them. It is this wherewithal that we give to each other. Albeit in different ways.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-04-07 04:58:00 UTC