Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • MEN VS WOMEN Jihadi John’s father wants him dead and to burn in hell. Ted Bundy’

    MEN VS WOMEN

    Jihadi John’s father wants him dead and to burn in hell. Ted Bundy’s mother loved her son and denied his crimes until the day she died. Sigh….

    Source date (UTC): 2015-03-06 02:43:00 UTC

  • “Soros is also the key sponsor for Femen, the radical feminist organization. Tho

    —“Soros is also the key sponsor for Femen, the radical feminist organization. Though he threatened to remove funds when they spread to Israel. It seems radical feminism is quite alright in Western societies, but isn’t Kosher.”—Mamela Fiallo Flor

    Source date (UTC): 2015-03-04 09:17:00 UTC

  • If you aren’t willing to fight, then your opinion is irrelevant. Pacifism was me

    If you aren’t willing to fight, then your opinion is irrelevant.

    Pacifism was merely a convenient pretence to provide women, intellectuals and priests with the illusion of equal political standing.

    It is just a pretence.

    Warriors grant them permission.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-03-03 06:36:00 UTC

  • Warriors Grant Permission

    [I]f you aren’t willing to fight, then your opinion is irrelevant. Pacifism was merely a convenient pretense to provide women, intellectuals and priests with the illusion of equal political standing. It is just a pretense. Warriors grant them permission.

  • Warriors Grant Permission

    [I]f you aren’t willing to fight, then your opinion is irrelevant. Pacifism was merely a convenient pretense to provide women, intellectuals and priests with the illusion of equal political standing. It is just a pretense. Warriors grant them permission.

  • Gold Diggers are the Wife Beaters of Men

    Gold Diggers are the Wife Beaters of Men.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0gaYyNk7QA

    Source date (UTC): 2015-02-28 10:35:00 UTC

  • “Yin and Ying are not merely a social construct.”— James Santagata

    —“Yin and Ying are not merely a social construct.”— James Santagata

    Source date (UTC): 2015-02-23 00:07:00 UTC

  • THE WAR ON SOCIAL SCIENCE Left off the cover was: 1. Human differences don’t exi

    THE WAR ON SOCIAL SCIENCE

    Left off the cover was:

    1. Human differences don’t exist

    2. IQ isn’t real

    3. There’s no such thing as human nature

    4. Capitalism doesn’t work

    Source date (UTC): 2015-02-22 09:29:00 UTC

  • “Women possess intrinsic value simply be “being”. At an early age and continuing

    —“Women possess intrinsic value simply be “being”. At an early age and continuing up until 32 years old, everyday is a girl’s birthday. Attention is lavished, doors are held open, free drinks, dinners and compliments given and so on. Then the decline begins, albeit slowly before accelerating. Men on the other hand, have no intrinsic value in “being” and can only create their value by “building”. Men are left to their own devices – from birth – to face the crucible, and many don’t make it. But as their value is appraised by what they build, their value appreciates with age and even when the peak is hit, they decline in value slowly. …….. Money is Men’s Botox. …….. Cash flow is a Man’s Fountain of Youth.”—

    James Santagata

    What has changed is that men, through their building, have made it possible for women to also build. So men must build and provide a marginal difference in order to be valuable. And fewer of them can.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-02-22 05:21:00 UTC

  • a couple of centuries or so. Is that really enough time to effect that much gene

    http://pic.twitter.com/EUQafiYnlX—“…just a couple of centuries or so. Is that really enough time to effect that much genetic change according to your theory?”—

    “Yes:

    “One of the simplest models of directional selection, truncation selection, where the bottom (or top) x% for a trait fail to reproduce is easy to model and produces something that closely fits observed situations.

    “Say those 1 standard deviation below average for a trait fail to reproduce – roughly the bottom 16%. (In terms of numbers, this isn’t far off from the fraction of people that fail to reproduce in modern America.)

    “The breeder’s equation gives us the selective effect:

    “[R = h^2 * S]

    “R = response to selection (mean of trait in following generation. S = selection differential (mean of trait of parental population). h^2 = additive heritability of trait.

    “If we assume those 1 s.d. below average fail to reproduce, then the mean of the parental population (assuming trait in question is normally distributed) is the mean of truncated bell curve cut at -1 s.d. which you can find (with some…fancy math) to be +0.29 sd.

    “Since the additive heritability of most traits is 0.5, the response to selection in that case is 0.29 * 0.5 = 0.145 sd/generation. If this were IQ, that would correspond to a ~2.2 point gain per generation. Assuming sustained selection, the population mean would move one whole standard deviation in just 7 generations (or about 200 years)! I mentioned IQ, but this will work just as well for any quantitative trait with a similar additive heritability, including the personality traits associated with a fine manorial serf – which you [could] model collectively as a ‘manorial quotient’ (MQ).”

    …and here…

    “The World Values Survey gives us a neat way to quantify overall mean clannishness around the world:

    Based on #WVS data: Welzel-Inglehart Cultural Map 2015. pic.twitter.com/EUQafiYnlX

    — World Values Survey (@ValuesStudies) January 26, 2015

    “It’s even mapped in standard deviations.

    “Outbreeding has produced an evolutionary shift to the right (maybe to the upper right) for NW Euros on this map. If we assume they started about where the Slavs are now, that means they moved +2 or +3 s.d. over the course of the relevant evolutionary time. Such a change (given the case of strong, sustained directional selection) could take as little as 400-600 years, given the formula above.”

    Source date (UTC): 2015-02-21 07:26:00 UTC