[G]od does not speak to us. He wrote to us with reality. We can only read his writings in the fabric of the universe.
Theme: Science
-
Evolution and Counter-Evolution in Philosophy
THE EVOLUTION AND COUNTER EVOLUTION IN PHILOSOPHY Reasonable Philosophy – Tradition and Mysticism Rational Philosophy – Theological Philosophy Analytic Philosophy – Pseudoscience and Postmodernism Scientific (Operational) Philosophy – (What lie will they invent next?) EUGENIC (truth) vs DYSGENIC (lies)
-
Evolution and Counter-Evolution in Philosophy
THE EVOLUTION AND COUNTER EVOLUTION IN PHILOSOPHY Reasonable Philosophy – Tradition and Mysticism Rational Philosophy – Theological Philosophy Analytic Philosophy – Pseudoscience and Postmodernism Scientific (Operational) Philosophy – (What lie will they invent next?) EUGENIC (truth) vs DYSGENIC (lies)
-
OK. SO PHILOSOPHERS? THERE ARE SOME. Aristotle (almost-science)(structure of phi
OK. SO PHILOSOPHERS? THERE ARE SOME.
Aristotle (almost-science)(structure of philosophy)
Bacon (empiricism)
Locke (property as unit of commensurability)
Smith(econimics)
Hume (epistemology)
Jefferson(constitutional construction),
Darwin(evolutionary processes),
Durkheim(sociology), Haidt (social psychology)
Pareto(economic sociology),
Spencer (operationalism),
Hayek(law is our social science) and
Nietzsche(aesthetics)
These men create a pretty good corpus. But they didn’t solve the problem of truth, and didn’t unite science philosophy law morality and politics (social science). And except for Hayek did not grasp that empirical, discovered, non-conflated, common law was the origin of our civilization’s achievements.
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-17 05:38:00 UTC
-
THE EVOLUTION AND COUNTER EVOLUTION IN PHILOSOPHY Reasonable Philosophy – Tradit
THE EVOLUTION AND COUNTER EVOLUTION IN PHILOSOPHY
Reasonable Philosophy – Tradition and Mysticism
Rational Philosophy – Theological Philosophy
Analytic Philosophy – Pseudoscience and Postmodernism
Scientific (Operational) Philosophy – (What lie will they invent next?)
EUGENIC (truth) vs DYSGENIC (lies)
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-17 03:49:00 UTC
-
Not sure if you’ve seen this, but thought I’d share just in case you haven’t. As
Not sure if you’ve seen this, but thought I’d share just in case you haven’t. As with all such modern-day studies that seek to place genetic attribution to “squishy measurables”, it needs plenty of vetting. However, the idea that a plurality of intelligence genes reside on the X chromosome is extremely consistent with the principle of males having a shallower-but-wider IQ bell curve relative to females. (Basically, males roll once on a 3d6 for Intelligence, while females roll twice and average the two.)
From a breeding strategy POV, it suggests that a man’s best bet for selecting for intelligent offspring is to mate with a woman with an intelligent father and an intelligent maternal grandfather.
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-16 23:14:00 UTC
-
God does not speak to us. He wrote to us with reality. We can only read his writ
God does not speak to us. He wrote to us with reality. We can only read his writings in the fabric of the universe. @tlot @tcot @altright
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-16 04:16:00 UTC
-
Most (western) judges are scientists Most politicians are wishful thinkers. Most
Most (western) judges are scientists
Most politicians are wishful thinkers.
Most philosophers are verbal illusionists.
All prophets are liars.
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-15 13:17:00 UTC
-
WHY? COST: – Myth must only be envisioned and accepted. – Philosophy must be rea
WHY? COST:
– Myth must only be envisioned and accepted.
– Philosophy must be reasoned and understood to be envisioned and accepted.
– Science must be measured, reasoned, and understood, to be envisioned and accepted.
Why do we possess these forms of ethics:
instinctual, imitated, mythical, virtue, rule, and outcome?
Answer: Pedagogy.
Why do we possess fairy tails, myths and legends, history, literature, and philosophy?
Answer: Pedagogy.
Why do we teach arithmetic, mathematics, geometry, calculus, non-euclidean geometry, and statistics?
Answer: Pedagogy.
Why do we argue with one another using emotive approval and disapproval, morality, reason, rationalism, historical analogy, empirical evidence(direct), economic evidence(indirect), and ratio-operational-empirical argument?
Answer? ABILITY
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-15 13:14:00 UTC
-
God Does Not Speak To Us. We Can Only Read His Writings In the Fabric of the Universe
THE LANGUAGE OF GOD? OR OF MEN? Sorry religious folk, but religious language is a language of men, not god – science and mathematics are the language of god. Religious law is the command of men, not god – natural law discovered by science is the law of god. Heaven is not created by god, but created by men – it is nature that we domesticate for our use that produces paradise in a universe that is hostile to us. Prophets were not speaking the word of god, but spinning stories by men for the control and manipulation of the ignorant. There is nothing found in the lies of the prophets that cannot be stated truthfully in the language of god: Math, Scientific Truth Natual Law, Physical Law, created by god, put into the minds of man through his discovery, and put to work by the hand of man because of that discovery. God wrote to us with reality. He does not speak to us. We can only read his writings in the fabric of the universe.