Curt Doolittle

Theme: Science

  • “LAW IS NOW POLITICS” The (((Strategy))) was to replace science with pseudoscien

    “LAW IS NOW POLITICS” The (((Strategy))) was to replace science with pseudoscience(Marx,Freud,Boas), reason w/ sophistry(Derrida), class/gender cooperation w/ conflict(Friedan), Heroism w/ Victimization(Frankfurt), and Law with Politics. Anti-civilization: Their Second Dark Age.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-07 13:37:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1214541520692502528

    Reply addressees: @StefanMolyneux

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1214365242773397505

    IN REPLY TO:

    @StefanMolyneux

    Seth Rich

    Vegas Shooting

    Jeffrey Epstein

    9/11 + Saudis

    Russia Collusion hallucination

    Impeachment of Trump over Biden crimes

    Awan brothers infiltration of Congress

    Law has abandoned morality.

    Law is now politics.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1214365242773397505

  • THE GRAMMARS OF CIVILIZATIONS Europeans Develop Competition-law, Reason, Realism

    THE GRAMMARS OF CIVILIZATIONS

    Europeans Develop Competition-law, Reason, Realism, Naturalism, Empiricism, Technology-Science, Geometry.

    CALCULATION

    Chinese Develop Bureaucracy-rule, Reason-lite-Wisdom Literature, Realism, Naturalism, Technology but not science, and Arithmetic. They settle on Reason and Bureaucracy.

    REASON

    Indians Develop Class Roles, Political Reason, Supernaturalism, Mythicism, Pragmatism, limited technology, arithmetic and positional names. That this is the remnant of a military order is lost in time. The indians settle on “the Way” – wisdom literature.

    REASONABLENESS

    Iranians-Persians Develop the optimum human, Hierarchy instead of Castes and Roles. But are seduced by babylon and their own aryan religion. The are ruined by the muslims and despite, like the Germans, rising out of it, descend once again and they can’t get out of it now (similar to how the west is being brought down again by Judaism and islam).

    IDEALS

    The Egyptians Run with Animism and Archtetypes and Myth and it’s beautiful. They try a single dominant god but the priests wisely reverse it.

    MYTHS

    The Jews Invent the abrahamic method of deceit by combining

    DICTATORSHIP LAW OF PARASITISM

    The Arabs

    DICTATORSHIP WISDOM LIT OF PREDATION

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-05 16:52:00 UTC

  • ECONOMICS IS JUST AN EXTENSION OF PHYSICS We can quantify all sorts of metrics o

    ECONOMICS IS JUST AN EXTENSION OF PHYSICS

    We can quantify all sorts of metrics of human behavior, but you’re confusing mathematics with physics, the same way most people confuse averages with instances or distributions. In other words, mathematics describes averages of points in time, it doesn’t not describe operations.Mathematics consist of operations that describe states and changes in states and averages. But not the underlying operations. Physics studies both the quantitative and the operational. Mathematics just the quantitative (positional). So while mathematics describes ‘sums’ operations describe changes in state.

    Here:

    At every “level’ of reality we discover an underlying limited number of operations (Grammar) producing some set of symmetries (outcomes, equilibria), and above that a new limited number of operations (Grammar, outcomes, equilibria)) that produce another set of symmetries, and above that and so on.

    So, we don’t yet know what causes the quantum level

    We have a fairly good idea what causes the subatomic level.

    we have a very good idea what causes the atomic level.

    We have such a good understanding of chemistry that it’s boring.

    We are getting a fair understanding of biochemistry (and that it’s mechanical).

    We are getting a beginning understanding of proteins (and that it’s mechanical(operational) )

    We are getting a beginning understanding of genetic reproduction (and that it’s mechanical- operational) .

    We are getting a fairly good understanding of cells.

    We have a more than fairly good understanding of multi-cellular (complex) organisms.

    I’ll stop there since I think you can see the pattern of some set of physically possible operations producing a finite set of physically possible states, followed by another set of physically possible operations producing a finite set of physically possible states, and that this process continues indefinitely, all the way to what we call consciousness.

    Now life buys us conservation of energy (defeat of entropy), but it’s still bound by the laws of physics (the underlying grammars).

    Memory buys us prediction. And prediction provides our ability to perform operations (actions) that improve our defeat of entropy.

    Increase in neural( brain) volume provides Competition between predictions, which provides us choices of options for defeating entropy.

    Increase in Brain volume provides iterations on predictions for increasing choices of defeating entropy the sequence of actions (or inactions for that matter).

    Increase in brain volume provides prediction of others predictions and predicting opportunities for cooperation that further improve our ability to capture and use energy by defeating entropy.

    Human ability to capture energy is limited by the grammar of human action (possible actions and sequences of actions and parallel combinations of other’s actions).

    So the grammar of human action consists in the physical, emotional-intuitionistic, and cognitive operations.

    Those operations are bounded by physical limitations of the grammars upon which they are constructed.

    Both Physics and Economics are bound by the same underlying grammars (laws) but because humans have memories, prediction, sentience, and consciousness, reason, calculation, symbolism, and computation, we can use debts and credits with each other to temporarily lend to each other, in presumption of future returns on that investment or debt.

    We don’t violate that physical law. Because humans observe reciprocity (equilibrium) just as the physical world obeys equilibrium (entropy). If we didn’t we wouldn’t be here.

    And so some people specialize in capitalization (productivity) and some people specialize in consumption, and others in parasitism or predation.

    But in the end, over time, we are limited by the physical laws of the universe. We can create productivity (as does life), or we can parasite upon other lives (as do bacteria and viruses).

    We cannot run the clock on parasitism (Socialism or gypsies) or conquest (islamism) forever because we will run out of hosts to prey upon.

    So economics is just physics with debits and credits (ability t steal, to borrow, to exchange,to produce, or to save) made possible by consciousness, by test of reciprocity (account balances), within the limit of proportionality (exit).

    TRIANGLE:

    What limits to human operations?

    ………………What Limits?……………….

    ………………………|…………………………

    …………….Human Actions……………..

    ……………..Consciousness…………….

    …………………Sentience………………..

    …………………….Life………………………

    …………………./………\……………………

    ……….subatomic..macro-atomic…..

    ………………./…………..\…………………

    ……….?Limits………….Limits?…………

    Human limits are reciprocity (positive) with the limits of proportionality (negaitve).

    The subatomic level appears to run out of energy by maximum dissipation.

    The macro atomic level appears to run out of ability to compress energy.

    Sorry but it’s just Physics with the ability to use each other for debt and credit that we call ‘cooperation”.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-05 15:53:00 UTC

  • Mathematics is the measurement of averages with limited variance in category, an

    Mathematics is the measurement of averages with limited variance in category, and economics is the measurement of averages in wide variance in category.

    The universe changes state by operations.

    We use mathematics to describe point changes.

    Calculus breaks down at the subatomic level.

    Calculus breaks down at the economic level.

    The problem is we don’t have a calculus of geometries (yet) and we may not have one until we solve either the subatomic problem, or the protein folding problem or the economic problem. I’m betting on the second mostly because both math and physics are lost in nonsense land.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-05 13:57:00 UTC

  • ECONOMICS IS JUST AN EXTENSION OF PHYSICS We can quantify all sorts of metrics o

    ECONOMICS IS JUST AN EXTENSION OF PHYSICS

    We can quantify all sorts of metrics of human behavior, but you’re confusing mathematics with physics, the same way most people confuse averages with instances or distributions. In other words, mathematics describes averages of points in time, it doesn’t not describe operations.Mathematics consist of operations that describe states and changes in states and averages. But not the underlying operations. Physics studies both the quantitative and the operational. Mathematics just the quantitative (positional). So while mathematics describes ‘sums’ operations describe changes in state.

    Here:

    At every “level’ of reality we discover an underlying limited number of operations (Grammar) producing some set of symmetries (outcomes, equilibria), and above that a new limited number of operations (Grammar, outcomes, equilibria)) that produce another set of symmetries, and above that and so on.

    So, we don’t yet know what causes the quantum level

    We have a fairly good idea what causes the subatomic level.

    we have a very good idea what causes the atomic level.

    We have such a good understanding of chemistry that it’s boring.

    We are getting a fair understanding of biochemistry (and that it’s mechanical).

    We are getting a beginning understanding of proteins (and that it’s mechanical(operational) )

    We are getting a beginning understanding of genetic reproduction (and that it’s mechanical- operational) .

    We are getting a fairly good understanding of cells.

    We have a more than fairly good understanding of multi-cellular (complex) organisms.

    I’ll stop there since I think you can see the pattern of some set of physically possible operations producing a finite set of physically possible states, followed by another set of physically possible operations producing a finite set of physically possible states, and that this process continues indefinitely, all the way to what we call consciousness.

    Now life buys us conservation of energy (defeat of entropy), but it’s still bound by the laws of physics (the underlying grammars).

    Memory buys us prediction. And prediction provides our ability to perform operations (actions) that improve our defeat of entropy.

    Increase in neural( brain) volume provides Competition between predictions, which provides us choices of options for defeating entropy.

    Increase in Brain volume provides iterations on predictions for increasing choices of defeating entropy the sequence of actions (or inactions for that matter).

    Increase in brain volume provides prediction of others predictions and predicting opportunities for cooperation that further improve our ability to capture and use energy by defeating entropy.

    Human ability to capture energy is limited by the grammar of human action (possible actions and sequences of actions and parallel combinations of other’s actions).

    So the grammar of human action consists in the physical, emotional-intuitionistic, and cognitive operations.

    Those operations are bounded by physical limitations of the grammars upon which they are constructed.

    Both Physics and Economics are bound by the same underlying grammars (laws) but because humans have memories, prediction, sentience, and consciousness, reason, calculation, symbolism, and computation, we can use debts and credits with each other to temporarily seize and advantage and then later return to equilibrium by repayment of the cooperation.

    We don’t violate that physical law. Because humans observe reciprocity (equilibrium) just as the physical world obeys equilibrium (entropy).

    And some people specialize in capitalization (productivity) and some people specialize in consumption, and others in parasitism or predation.

    But in the end, over time, we are limited by the physical laws of the universe. We can create productivity (as does life), or we an parasite upon other lives (as do bacteria and viruses).

    We cannot run the clock on parasitism (Socialism or gypsies) or conquest (islamism) forever because we will run out of hosts to prey upon.

    So economics is just physics with debits and credits (ability t steal, to borrow, to exchange,to produce, or to save) made possible by consciousness, by test of reciprocity (account balances), within the limit of proportionality (exit).

    TRIANGLE:

    What limits to human operations?

    ………………What Limits?……………….

    ………………………|…………………………

    …………….Human Actions……………..

    ……………..Consciousness…………….

    …………………Sentience………………..

    …………………….Life………………………

    …………………./………\……………………

    ……….subatomic..macro-atomic…..

    ………………./…………..\…………………

    ……….?Limits………….Limits?…………

    Human limits are reciprocity (positive) with the limits of proportionality (negaitve).

    The subatomic level appears to run out of energy by maximum dissipation.

    The macro atomic level appears to run out of ability to compress energy.

    Sorry but it’s just Physics with the ability to use each other for debt and credit that we call ‘cooperation”.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-05 13:53:00 UTC

  • P IS A LEAP IN THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD. SORRY. MAN UP AND LEARN. —“Brandon Hayes

    P IS A LEAP IN THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD. SORRY. MAN UP AND LEARN.

    —“Brandon Hayes so in other words p has similar descriptive and predictive powers to things like astrology and Marxism. If you recite these dogmas enough I’m sure they come to seem like objective truths, but my suggestion would be that you read a few things that are not by other cult members, or books of quotations taken out of context”—John Tangney

    Alright you overconfident idiot, let’s dance.

    —“Lol, who writes your dialogue?”—John Tangney

    1. Is science defined as the use of the scientific method or not? If not, then what is it defined as?

    2. Is that scientific method justificationary or falsificationary?

    3. Is mathematics the logic of constant positional relations, if not then what?

    4. What are the limits of mathematics as we currently understand them? (I’ll tell you: quantum mechanics (probability at the low end), and economics (probability at the high end). Why? Informational availability and categorical consistency.

    5. So is prediction in science limited? Or limited is it by current mathematical understanding? (I’ll tell you: it’s a limit of our current understanding of single-position mathematics, and we haven’t – see Wolfram – developed the geometric equivalent that we have in curves (calculus ), lines (geometry), points (arithmetic). It appears that it is not possible for humans without the help of computers. We can however use variation from intermediary symmetries (constants) in the meantime.

    6. Is prediction or explanation by constant relations a test of falsification? It doesn’t matter.

    P is a falsificationary, operational, explicatory, logic of limits. It is predictive given information (bounded rationality), and is predictive given symmetries (findings of general rules of economics). It cannot be as mathematics can be closed, because we can innovate and axioms can’t.

    Not only is P itself scientific, it defines science and the scientific method completely.

    Now watch john engage in GSRRM, Pilpul and Critique.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-05 10:38:00 UTC

  • ECONOMICS IS JUST PHYSICS WITH MEMORY Human behavior is all physics. It has to b

    ECONOMICS IS JUST PHYSICS WITH MEMORY

    Human behavior is all physics. It has to be. Economics is just physics with debts and credits. Our consciousness is just a vehicle for negotiating terms of cooperation. Cooperation is just a means of obtaining higher returns on investments of time and calories.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-04 10:44:00 UTC

  • EXPLAINING (DEFINING) PROPERTARIANISM – FOR NEWBS: 1 – The completion of the sci

    EXPLAINING (DEFINING) PROPERTARIANISM – FOR NEWBS:

    1 – The completion of the scientific method and all that it entails – which is a lot and why P is such a big program: it touches everything and it converts almost all psychological, social, and political speech to economic expressions – which is counter-intuitive because it’s scientific where our current psychological social, moral, and political speech is only normative or in the case of psychology sociology and politics, both pseudoscientific and sophomoric.

    2 – The explanation for western success in ancient and modern worlds (adaptive velocity because of our individual sovereignty and resulting traditional law of property/tort.)

    3 – The explanation of the different systems of argument used in the different civilizations, and in particular the abrahamic means of deceit used in the ancient world (judaism, Christianity, islam) and in the modern world (marxism, feminism, postmodernism, denialism/political correctness).

    EXPLANATION

    Do you know what a formal logic is? It’s grammar of the logic of inference using sets and binary truth or falsehood.

    Do you know what programming is? It’s a grammar of operational logic using binary truth or falsehood.

    Do you know what law is? It’s a formal operational rational grammar of conflict resolution, using ternary falsehood, truth candidacy, and undecidability.

    Do you know what tort law is? it’s a formal rational operational grammar of conflict resolution over demonstrated interests that we enumerate as property, using ternary logic of falsehood, truth candidacy, undecidability.

    Propertarianism is a formal (strict), operational(sequential action), grammar (vocabulary, grammar, syntax, logic), of Tort (demonstrated interests), and as a consequence a value neutral universal language (vocabulary, grammar, syntax, logic) across all disciplines (physical science, language-metaphysics, psychology, sociology, politics, ethics, law, group strategy), that allows us to falsify (test) every possible dimension of human action, intuition, cognition, and speech, for both testimonial possibility (truth) and reciprocity(ethics, morality, trespass, tort), and as a consequence allows us to create uninterpretable constitutions, and their enumerated rights and responsibilities, the most influential of which is the conversion of free speech to free truthful and reciprocal speech, in public, to the public, on matters public (commerce, economics, commons, politics, group strategy) by extending the involuntary warranty of due diligence and involuntary liability for the truthfulness and reciprocity of commercial speech to that of political speech. As such it allows us to outlaw hostile religions, and pseudo-religions especially the pseudoscientific and sophomoric restatements of supernatural judaism , christianity, and islam, in pseudoscientific and sophomoric and ir-reciprocal marxism, socialism, feminism, and postmodernism.

    Propertarianism is equivalent in scope to the revolutions of Aristotelian reason (Realism, Naturalism, Reason), the Empirical Revolution(Realism, Naturalism, Empiricism), in that it completes the scientific method by extending it from the physical to the psychological and social sciences, including that of law, politics, and group strategy.

    In other words, “Propertarianism consists of the completion of the Scientific Method; its application to the totality of human knowledge; producing a universally commensurable language of all thought; its embodiment in the common law of tort; resulting in a logical and scientific constitution; permitting the criminalization of ir-reciprocal and un-testifiable speech, and as a consequence the eradication of superstition, pseudoscience, sophism, fraud, and deceit from the commercial, financial, economic, political, and informational commons.”

    When we explain the reason for western success we discover:

    “Heroism and Excellence; Truth and Duty; Oath and Warranty; Sovereignty and Reciprocity; Law and Jury; And Voluntary Markets in Every Aspect of Life: Association, Cooperation, Production, Reproduction, Commons, Polities and War; The direction of surpluses to the production of commons and the returns therefrom; at the cost of suppression of the reproduction of the unproductive underclasses; and the Direction of Dominance Expression to the Production of Commons by a Distributed Dictatorship of Individually Sovereign People and the Reciprocal Warranty of Denial of Power To Any and All.”

    Propertarianism is (a) the completion of the Aristotelian program (b) the completion of the scientific method (c ) the logic and science of the social sciences, and (d) the Natural Law of Reciprocity under which all display word and deed is expressible and commensurable. (e) and the means of institutionalizing in a “Market for the Suppression of Fraud” the suppression of the greatest crime against humanity: the big lies that are responsible for the last dark age and the new one that the enemy has sought to bring about.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-02 18:35:00 UTC

  • by JWarren Prescott The concept of the supernatural, ie. beyond nature, outside

    by JWarren Prescott

    The concept of the supernatural, ie. beyond nature, outside our reality, magical, being independent of logic and inexplicable by science because it defies the laws of physics, is from the infancy of human civilization where we had no idea what the natural world was. It was our attempt to fill the gaps of understanding.

    The unintended consequences of the lack of understanding was the rise of the huckster class – the priests, those apex parasitical manipulators of mankind’s fears of the unknown.

    They leveraged their verbal skills to political power as rulers were the only ones capable of protecting them from scrutiny of their failed predictions and the liability of malpractice.

    The hucksters always knew that the warlords, kings and rulers were generally far more gullible to the supernatural as it was a legitimation of, and a securing of their right to rule and a comfort to their insecurities of bad decisions.

    The “will of the gods” was a convenient escape of the responsibility of liability.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-02 13:18:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/81188343_177397240325104_60880656031

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/81188343_177397240325104_6088065603199827968_n_177397236991771.jpg DEFINITIONS: “RED QUEEN”, “NATURE’S RED QUEEN”

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Queen_hypothesis?DEFINITIONS: “RED QUEEN”, “NATURE’S RED QUEEN”

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Queen_hypothesis?

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-01 18:14:00 UTC