Theme: Science

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/81808273_550546745542220_28844016769

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/81808273_550546745542220_2884401676947554304_o_550546738875554.jpg WHY IS THERE OIL IN THE MIDDLE EAST? (LESSONS)

    Hydrocarbons are from dead organic material – and you need an astonishing set of circumstances to make oil out of these things and preserve them.

    First, you’ve got to concentrate them somewhere where they’re not dispersed or oxidized – which means in swamps, marshes, lakes or something like that. (See “Peat Marshes” and “Bog Bodies”.) Then you’ve got to heat them up slowly over a long, long period to cook them up to make oil. And then, when they make oil and start to ‘ferment’, you’ve got to have some way of trapping the liquid and the gas.

    All these things, it turns out, happen on the margins of continents. Sediments just get washed in, and all those dead things get buried deeper and deeper and gently get cooked for a long time. So, the circumstances for making oil are very good on the margins of continents. Especially the margins of oceans that aren’t on a plate boundary – because there are no earthquakes there.

    Now, what happened in Saudi Arabia is that that happened to be on the margin of a huge ocean which separated Asia from the southern continents. So, a hundred million years ago, Africa, India and Arabia were all a long way further south from where they are now and they’ve all moved north and bashed into Asia.

    One of those places is [what is now] Saudi Arabia, Iran and Iraq.

    And what’s happened is the margin of that ocean, with the margins of Arabia, and Africa and India, have all just popped up above sea level from the pressure of colliding together.

    Millions of years ago, most of the Middle East was covered by what scientists call the Tethys Ocean (aka Tethys Sea). Rivers flowing into the ocean gave rise to trillions of microscopic organisms and other marine plants and animals. The corpses of these organisms on the ocean floor is where oil (and natural gas) comes from. This is why they are called fossil fuels.

    Over millions of years, this decomposing organic material became covered by miles of new organic matter and also the sand and salt flowing in from the rivers and streams. Yes, salt flows into the ocean from freshwater rivers and streams. Anyway, these layers became more and more packed as newer layers formed on top of the previous layers. The pressure and heat from these upper layers change the buried organic matter into a sludgy substance of hydrocarbons and other compounds that constitute what we know as crude oil. Theoretically, as long as marine life keeps dying, oil will keep being created

    So it’s not that there is more oil in the middle east than anywhere else. There’s loads of oil on the other continental margins – but that’s all underwater. It’s hard and expensive to get out. Whereas in Saudi Arabia, Iran and Iraq it’s popped up nicely above sea level and also in. So it’s actually extremely easy to find, an cheap to take out.

    It’s just more that it is conveniently situated than anything else.

    (Source: From an interview with James Jackson from the University of Cambridge and other sources on the internet, map from paleomap project)WHY IS THERE OIL IN THE MIDDLE EAST? (LESSONS)

    Hydrocarbons are from dead organic material – and you need an astonishing set of circumstances to make oil out of these things and preserve them.

    First, you’ve got to concentrate them somewhere where they’re not dispersed or oxidized – which means in swamps, marshes, lakes or something like that. (See “Peat Marshes” and “Bog Bodies”.) Then you’ve got to heat them up slowly over a long, long period to cook them up to make oil. And then, when they make oil and start to ‘ferment’, you’ve got to have some way of trapping the liquid and the gas.

    All these things, it turns out, happen on the margins of continents. Sediments just get washed in, and all those dead things get buried deeper and deeper and gently get cooked for a long time. So, the circumstances for making oil are very good on the margins of continents. Especially the margins of oceans that aren’t on a plate boundary – because there are no earthquakes there.

    Now, what happened in Saudi Arabia is that that happened to be on the margin of a huge ocean which separated Asia from the southern continents. So, a hundred million years ago, Africa, India and Arabia were all a long way further south from where they are now and they’ve all moved north and bashed into Asia.

    One of those places is [what is now] Saudi Arabia, Iran and Iraq.

    And what’s happened is the margin of that ocean, with the margins of Arabia, and Africa and India, have all just popped up above sea level from the pressure of colliding together.

    Millions of years ago, most of the Middle East was covered by what scientists call the Tethys Ocean (aka Tethys Sea). Rivers flowing into the ocean gave rise to trillions of microscopic organisms and other marine plants and animals. The corpses of these organisms on the ocean floor is where oil (and natural gas) comes from. This is why they are called fossil fuels.

    Over millions of years, this decomposing organic material became covered by miles of new organic matter and also the sand and salt flowing in from the rivers and streams. Yes, salt flows into the ocean from freshwater rivers and streams. Anyway, these layers became more and more packed as newer layers formed on top of the previous layers. The pressure and heat from these upper layers change the buried organic matter into a sludgy substance of hydrocarbons and other compounds that constitute what we know as crude oil. Theoretically, as long as marine life keeps dying, oil will keep being created

    So it’s not that there is more oil in the middle east than anywhere else. There’s loads of oil on the other continental margins – but that’s all underwater. It’s hard and expensive to get out. Whereas in Saudi Arabia, Iran and Iraq it’s popped up nicely above sea level and also in. So it’s actually extremely easy to find, an cheap to take out.

    It’s just more that it is conveniently situated than anything else.

    (Source: From an interview with James Jackson from the University of Cambridge and other sources on the internet, map from paleomap project)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 14:59:00 UTC

  • There was academic consensus on Freud, Boas, Marx and still is on Derrida and Fr

    There was academic consensus on Freud, Boas, Marx and still is on Derrida and Friedan. Consensus means nothing.
    We falsified IQ indifference by 2000
    We falsified gender indifference by 2012
    We falsified race indifference last year (2019)
    We’re falsifying the Jewish Century now.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 14:44:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215283167571124224

    Reply addressees: @Steve_Sailer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215121675013906433


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Steve_Sailer

    Which A.S. knows more about biological science:

    Adam Serwer, Angela Saini, or Andrew Sullivan? https://t.co/5L5DnQfatD

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215121675013906433

  • I don’t understand. hawking radiation was an achievement. Black holes an achieve

    I don’t understand. hawking radiation was an achievement. Black holes an achievement. What’s the deal with Hawking?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 14:38:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215281764110938113

    Reply addressees: @EricLiford

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215120618942844928


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215120618942844928

  • Math is math, science is science, there is just SOME overlap. But pure math is n

    Math is math, science is science, there is just SOME overlap. But pure math is not scientific, only applied mathematics. It just turns out that pure math ‘tricks’ (techniques) can sometimes be very useful describing physical phenomenon.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 03:41:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215116399934427141

    Reply addressees: @EricLiford

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215115511459086336


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215115511459086336

  • I mention Einstein pretty often. I can’t really pick on Hawking. If i start with

    I mention Einstein pretty often. I can’t really pick on Hawking. If i start with mathiness in physics I’d be here for month typing.

    But like any very good mathematician would say: “Truth is for philosophers, we just do math.”


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 03:32:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215114160708734976

    Reply addressees: @EricLiford

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215103982886146048


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215103982886146048

  • False Promise, Baiting into Hazard, Pilpul+, Critique- Friedan = Denial Derrida

    False Promise, Baiting into Hazard, Pilpul+, Critique-

    Friedan = Denial
    Derrida et al = Sophistry
    Adorno-Fromm et all = Fictionalism
    Marx, Freud, Boas = Pseudoscience
    Krugman, Stiglitz et al= Pseudo-economics
    Cantor, Bohr = Pseudo-mathematics

    =Judaism > Christianity > Islam V2


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 02:39:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215100792224526337

  • Look. A movement requires an ideology, party, or faith. Science and logic aren’t

    Look. A movement requires an ideology, party, or faith. Science and logic aren’t movements.If you mean, we won’t attract popular support, well,we don’t use ideology, party, or faith,we use law and policy that is in everyone’s interest.
    Not attracting people like you is a good. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 02:18:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215095505291829248

    Reply addressees: @rayjohnd @galt_the

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215062233987850241


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215062233987850241

  • “The dissident right wing is split on Aristotle and Plato. You being an Aristote

    —“The dissident right wing is split on Aristotle and Plato. You being an Aristotelian and someone like Richard Spencer being a Platonist. Save the West with science and law for the Aristotelian vs Save the West with justification and idealism for the Platonist.”—Clown Baby @ClownBa73413423

    Correct. Aristotelian < Platonist < Theologian. The three grammars of cognitive development. Empathic, Narrative, Theological > Rational, Ideal, Platonist > Empirical Measurement Aristotelian. The brain evolves in that order. It’s not a mystery why we preserve the use all three. But why don’t other civ’s?

    Feel drag along (Comfort) – Empirical Measurement Aristotelian

    … Reason sell (Explain) – Rational, Ideal, Platonist

    … … Empirical tell (Decide) – Empathic, Narrative, Theological


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-08 08:04:00 UTC

  • WISDOM LITERATURES Aristotle:….Real/Natural:………….Science (Decidability

    WISDOM LITERATURES

    Aristotle:….Real/Natural:………….Science (Decidability) Law

    Plato:………Ideal/Natural:………….Sophistry (Justification) Philo

    Confucian: Real/Myth-Natural:….~Reason(Harmony) Reason

    Hindu:……..Unreal/Supernatural..Wisdom (Harmony) Mytho.

    Persian……Unreal/Supernatural…Wisdom (?) Mytho/Philo.

    Egyptian….Unreal/Supernatural…Wisdom (Order) Mytho.

    Semitic:…..Unreal/Supernatural:..Fraud(Authority) Theo.

    We are forever bound by the grammars of our wisdom literatures.

    (Grammar: paradigms, vocabulary, logic, grammar)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-07 14:13:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/81760855_548902475706647_74289695327

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/81760855_548902475706647_7428969532770746368_n_548902472373314.jpg FYI

    Realism > Naturalism > Prediction > Operationalism > Empiricism > Acquisition > Rational Choice > Demonstrated Preference > Reciprocity > Power Distribution of Law > Pareto Distribution of Assets > Nash Distribution of Rewards:

    If it doesn’t pass, it’s false.FYI

    Realism > Naturalism > Prediction > Operationalism > Empiricism > Acquisition > Rational Choice > Demonstrated Preference > Reciprocity > Power Distribution of Law > Pareto Distribution of Assets > Nash Distribution of Rewards:

    If it doesn’t pass, it’s false.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-07 13:58:00 UTC