I need to find a week to write a paper challenging the scientific community to falsify the IQ/Personality argument because as far as I know it’s solved.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-12 15:52:00 UTC
I need to find a week to write a paper challenging the scientific community to falsify the IQ/Personality argument because as far as I know it’s solved.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-12 15:52:00 UTC
RE: THE NEUROSCIENCE OF INTELLIGENCE
@charlesmurray
0. Correct but the opposite, via-negativa: The neuroscience is trivial. The causes of defect in intelligence are almost limitless. It’s not so much that we need to understand intelligence (g), it’s that we need to understand why defects in intelligence are so common.
1. AFAIK, (g) is the most accurate measure in psychology, and stereotypes are the most accurate measure in social sciences. The problem with testing is casting (g) separately from personality traits (which it is), and therefore not ALSO testing for trait-conscientiousness.
2 If we test intelligence, and the Big5 traits we see that success is determined MORE by trait conscientiousness than by intelligence, and that intelligence increases income only because it grants access to problems of greater complexity. Intelligence REDUCES ERROR in complexity.
3. As such ADAPTABILITY (success) consists of applying trait conscientiousness and trait intelligence to exploit opportunities at one’s optimum of complexity. This means ‘the bell curve’ of overlapping bell curves from low IQ/conscientiousness to high IQ/conscientiousness.
4. There are plenty of people who are high in both intelligence,high in conscientiousness, and high in agreeableness and therefore low in competitiveness. So once we stack the priority of these traits in the context of a given economy and rule of law, sortition is obvious.
5. Furthermore, once we combine all 5/6 traits we see that personalities cluster around three archetypes: female mother(teach),ascendant male(experiment), and established or dominant male(defend).
The world is simple – if and only if you use enough dimensions of measurement.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-12 15:47:00 UTC
The best numbers are:
C,
e,
h (Planck),
Pi,
.999…
0
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-12 01:08:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1216165043475222528
Reply addressees: @AlanLevinovitz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1216112812864483329
IN REPLY TO:
@AlanLevinovitz
what’s the best number? no words please, just the best number sans explanation
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1216112812864483329
If we replace the system of lying we call Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, with pseudoscientific version two invented by Cantor-Bohr,Marx-Mises, Boas-Freud, Adorno-Fromm-Friedan, Rand-Rothbard, Trotsky-Strauss, it does no good whatsoever. The FEMALE political strategy fails.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-10 17:50:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215692445981212672
Reply addressees: @sapinker
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215453310754398208
IN REPLY TO:
@sapinker
This astonishing change is consistent with the long-running global shift from traditional to secular-rational values documented by the World Values Survey. MENA (like the US before it) was a holdout, but the dam appears to be breaking. https://t.co/H3H23OwxIj
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215453310754398208
UNTIL BEHAVIORAL ECON AND THE COG-SCI SPLIT FROM PSYCHOLOGY, PRETTY MUCH ALL PSYCH IS (HARMFUL) PSEUDOSCIENCE.
—“At the risk of getting you started π , what is your take on Integral politics, philosophy, or whatever?”—βFrank Chandler
I love it that you asked the question honestly. lol.
Wilber’s Integral theory, much like say, MBTI vs Big5/Moral Foundations is a pseudoscientific framework for a rather obvious empirical pattern, framed by his search through eastern philosophy upon what many mid-century thinkers perceived as a failure of the western model – but what was instead, the peak of the success of the second jewish abrahamic undermining of western civilization under marx, boas, freud, adorno-fromm, derrida, friedan et al, to replace masculine hierarchical military western order in competition with the church with a feminine monopoly pseudoscientific and sophomoric order of public intellectuals (secular priesthood) by undermining from within.
Traditional western tripartism (military-law-faith and Fight-Work-Pray) was and what remains, still is, a system of cooperation between the classes and genders mediated by familial and individual sovereignty under our thousands of years of traditional customary law.
So, one can take the traditional western system of cooperation and simply describe it in scientific terms. Or as we do in Propertarianism, do the same in biological and economic terms, or one can make silly stuff up like Wilber does, or the entire field of ‘pseudoscientific psychology’ that has been replaced by behavioral economics (scientific psychology), neurology, and cognitive science.
This is another problem of literary empathic and sympathetic (feminine immature) vs scientific analytic and operational (masculine mature) systems of thinking which perpetuates the historical competition between Theological nonsense by external analogy, philosophical ideal nonsense by internal analogy, and scientific and empirical truth by falsifying both.
But our brains evolved from the sensory to the physical to the interpersonal to the analytic, and it is understandable why the process of development is limited and therefore ability and agency by our individual distribution of ability along that spectrum – and that is why training people in physical fitness(body), stoicism(emotions), manners-ethics-morals(intuition), the grammars (measurements), and job skills (productive cooperation) is necessary to produce fully functional human beings in each of the cognitive series of development.
So I view ‘that stuff’ as pseudoscientific nonsense for simpletons no matter what it is, from freud through the reformation in psychology with the “Operationalist Movement” that began in the 80’s . Thankfully the cognitive scientists branched off and and matured by 2000, and settled all this nonsense over the past twenty years.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-10 16:01:00 UTC
I would be fairly … critical … on that subject and I think it would be over the audience’s head. Rationalism can’t compete with Operationalism. So, I do science. Not philosophy. I just call it philosophy because of the limit of our current understanding of that term.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-10 00:51:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215436061989580800
Reply addressees: @AnCapZero @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215432498630537221
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable β we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215432498630537221
Bohr (Copenhagen interpretation) brought sophistry (like Cantor before him) into mathematics – something that Descartes to Hilbert had worked to remove. Physics is lost in silly mathiness. AFAIK (and Gerard ‘t Hooft agrees) the universe is classical (geometric).
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 22:24:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215398978596102150
Reply addressees: @LLaddon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215396717409062913
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable β we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215396717409062913
Look at the people who created the Jewish century of Undermining:Cantor-Bohr (Pseudomathematics), Boas, Freud, Marx(pseudoscience), Adorno-From et all (Fictionalism), Derrida (sophistry), Friedan (Denial). The female strategy of warfare against the group by instigating conflict.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 20:25:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215369082297626626
Reply addressees: @EricRWeinstein @AndrewYang @MSNBC
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215367585019170819
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@EricRWeinstein @AndrewYang @MSNBC If you industrialize lying, foment conflict,by false promise of freedom from natural laws (differences) with pseudoscience,sophism and denial then eventually, even a high trust population will be forced to adopt your tactics for no other reason than the low cost of lies vs truth.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1215367585019170819
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@EricRWeinstein @AndrewYang @MSNBC If you industrialize lying, foment conflict,by false promise of freedom from natural laws (differences) with pseudoscience,sophism and denial then eventually, even a high trust population will be forced to adopt your tactics for no other reason than the low cost of lies vs truth.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1215367585019170819
If you industrialize lying, foment conflict,by false promise of freedom from natural laws (differences) with pseudoscience,sophism and denial then eventually, even a high trust population will be forced to adopt your tactics for no other reason than the low cost of lies vs truth.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 20:19:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215367585019170819
Reply addressees: @EricRWeinstein @AndrewYang @MSNBC
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1215365764896776192
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@EricRWeinstein @AndrewYang @MSNBC Eric; You reap what you sew. All the Alt Right, Infowars, and Qanon do is imitate the Jewish postwar technique of environmental saturation of outrage by undermining w/ half truths: False Promise, Baiting into Hazard, Pilpul and Critique, Plausible Deniability, Absent Warranty.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1215365764896776192
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@EricRWeinstein @AndrewYang @MSNBC Eric; You reap what you sew. All the Alt Right, Infowars, and Qanon do is imitate the Jewish postwar technique of environmental saturation of outrage by undermining w/ half truths: False Promise, Baiting into Hazard, Pilpul and Critique, Plausible Deniability, Absent Warranty.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1215365764896776192
WHY IS THERE OIL IN THE MIDDLE EAST? (LESSONS)
Hydrocarbons are from dead organic material – and you need an astonishing set of circumstances to make oil out of these things and preserve them.
First, you’ve got to concentrate them somewhere where they’re not dispersed or oxidized – which means in swamps, marshes, lakes or something like that. (See “Peat Marshes” and “Bog Bodies”.) Then you’ve got to heat them up slowly over a long, long period to cook them up to make oil. And then, when they make oil and start to ‘ferment’, you’ve got to have some way of trapping the liquid and the gas.
All these things, it turns out, happen on the margins of continents. Sediments just get washed in, and all those dead things get buried deeper and deeper and gently get cooked for a long time. So, the circumstances for making oil are very good on the margins of continents. Especially the margins of oceans that aren’t on a plate boundary – because there are no earthquakes there.
Now, what happened in Saudi Arabia is that that happened to be on the margin of a huge ocean which separated Asia from the southern continents. So, a hundred million years ago, Africa, India and Arabia were all a long way further south from where they are now and they’ve all moved north and bashed into Asia.
One of those places is [what is now] Saudi Arabia, Iran and Iraq.
And what’s happened is the margin of that ocean, with the margins of Arabia, and Africa and India, have all just popped up above sea level from the pressure of colliding together.
Millions of years ago, most of the Middle East was covered by what scientists call the Tethys Ocean (aka Tethys Sea). Rivers flowing into the ocean gave rise to trillions of microscopic organisms and other marine plants and animals. The corpses of these organisms on the ocean floor is where oil (and natural gas) comes from. This is why they are called fossil fuels.
Over millions of years, this decomposing organic material became covered by miles of new organic matter and also the sand and salt flowing in from the rivers and streams. Yes, salt flows into the ocean from freshwater rivers and streams. Anyway, these layers became more and more packed as newer layers formed on top of the previous layers. The pressure and heat from these upper layers change the buried organic matter into a sludgy substance of hydrocarbons and other compounds that constitute what we know as crude oil. Theoretically, as long as marine life keeps dying, oil will keep being created
So it’s not that there is more oil in the middle east than anywhere else. There’s loads of oil on the other continental margins – but that’s all underwater. It’s hard and expensive to get out. Whereas in Saudi Arabia, Iran and Iraq it’s popped up nicely above sea level and also in. So it’s actually extremely easy to find, an cheap to take out.
It’s just more that it is conveniently situated than anything else.
(Source: From an interview with James Jackson from the University of Cambridge and other sources on the internet, map from paleomap project)Updated Jan 9, 2020, 3:52 PM
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 15:52:00 UTC