Theme: Science

  • @RedPilledWorld @voxday Oh. I know Vox’s “Math” and as an explanation: non corre

    @RedPilledWorld@voxday

    Oh. I know Vox’s “Math” and as an explanation: non correlation without explaining causation. Now, the means of falsifying this particular argument is relatively simple and someone has already done so in this thread.

    For example, there are about 100M neural columns in your head. They manage to predict and iteratively test and re-predict a model of the world within a few milliseconds. This EVOLUTION of disorder into order you call perception is possible because those 100M neural colums work in PARALLEL. And they do so by adversarial competition for prediction over time. And those columns that correctly predict contain neurons that get fed for that correct prediction. Now, evolution works the same way. In massive parallel and variation and hybridization and variation and speciation and so on. So the (moronic) oversight of such calculations as vox has stated is presuming that taking an average rate of mutation in a stable life form that by its stability limits mutations is sufficient to statistically represent the wide variety of rates of mutation, the wide variety of selection criteria, and the massive parallelism that occurs as this wide range of potentials compete. Now, of course, the correct answer is that because evolution (evolutionary computation) is the function (first principle) of the universe, and because of the absolutely stupid-simple method of computation by which the universe computes increase in the capture of energy as existence – a stable relation, that anything that can be computed will be computed.

    And the rate of computation is simply the set of methods of evolutionary computation, the rate of trial and error, the rate and number of regulatory processes, the complexity of the exchange between the cellular biochemistry and the production of molecules, the rate of reproduction, the degree of parallelization, the number and frequency of speciation and recombination, the division of responsibility between cells, organisms, and complex organisms, and the chaos of the selection criteria produced by the environment, resources and competitors. Not how few of those factors are present in the ‘moron math’ of vox day. And how easily you morons are fooled by a basic incomprehension of basic statistics.

    The big ‘oops’ for example is the capture of mitochondria by one cell that tried to eat another cell. This allowed cells to divide by providing external resources of energy production, and the nucleus to divide the genetic material without increasing genetic mass, and without accounting for energy production. This ‘oops’ is not the only ‘oops’ that appears to have happened.

    SIMPLE MATH VERSION
    Any math that ends in infinities is false.
    Any math that is non-correspondent is false.
    Any math that cannot provide an operational construction is false.
    Because all of these failures are evidence of a failure to account for variables – what we call ‘hidden variables’.

    Vox’s math (which isn’t his by the way), is false.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 22:37:49 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107764768384038667

  • @asomd2021 @ScuzzaMan @voxday 1) Changes happen because mutation (fragility) has

    @asomd2021@ScuzzaMan@voxday

    1) Changes happen because mutation (fragility) has not been eradicated from the replication process for reasons too technical to go into here. What we don’t yet know is why some organisms are so good at controling limited mutation and some are not (cancer cells) or why some cells are within the norm of mutation and some are extrme outliers with 100M times as many mutations in the same generational series.

    2) Evolution isn’t the paradigm of evolution it’s the paradigm of existence itself. In other words, evolution is the first principle of the universe. I cover in normie prose in this interview:

    These three sections explain the evolution as the function of the universe, and my position on Christianity and comparative religion.

    0:11:00 – Evolution: Explaining Continous Recursive Disambiguation of Disorder into Order – A Hierarchy of Stable Relations: Existence.

    0:25:47 – Curt’s understanding of god. Christianity and Religion and General

    0:37:16 – European Evolution of Trifunctionalism vs Everyone Else’s Failure into Monopoly.

    3) So why it happens is that the universe is under pressure either by an inability to expand or a pressure to contract. This results in the energy content of the quantum background (which is terrifyingly huge in every single cubic centimeter, and every single Planck unit). So the universe can only use entropy to dissipate energy or use evolution to capture energy in a higher stable relation (state). All existence (mass) is the result of the capture of energy in complex combinations of electromagnetic bonds, where each bond assists in producing the stability of the related bonds. In other words the universe will never run out of evolutionary pressure until it ends – if it ever ends.

    4) As for one species evolving into another, I’m not sure I understand that statement, since a ‘species’ is just a taxonomy we use to represent a stable relation of a genome expressed in a life form, for some stable period of time. For example, humans are still evolving, and have evolved rapidly over the past ten thousand years, and we speciating into at least four new species before the agrarian revolution. Humans are sexually opportunistic, and sexually hyperadaptive, so we are less likely at least in the norm, to limit homogenization by hybridization. So a stable state of any organism just means it’s adapted to its environment such that limited change occurs and only slowly. Yet under duress, we see punctuated equilibriums created by the opportunity for adaptation given the potential to express adaptive mutation that was previously limited by competitors. And this allows for increase in mass by capturing those new niches. So a ‘spiecies’ is a ‘photograph’ of a common state of a related genome at a point in time so that we can measure (perceive) differences, and from those differences, learn something.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 21:52:23 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107764589743421199

  • @RenegadeScoutr @Snidely_Whiplash @voxday You just lied again by 1) equating dev

    @RenegadeScoutr@Snidely_Whiplash@voxday You just lied again by

    1) equating devotion (religion) to trust (science)
    Faith (religion) > Belief (Philosohy) > Trust (Action (economics, law))

    2) equating science(testifiable) to a faith(specifically because its untestifiable)

    3) equating the absence of trust in the untestifiable (science) with faith(religion) in the untestifiable specifically because it is untestifiable.

    4) science consists of the application of testimony outside of the field of its origin in the law. In the adversarial marketplace to falsify competing statements, that which survives falsification is the truth candidate. This is not true of faith (social construction of a falsehood). Instead, that which is desirable survives and propagates. Not because it is true – but because it is false and desirable. Why? We only need to know what is true in order to resolve conflicts. We can invent truth, falshood, fraud, and deceit in order to coerce others in to giving us what we want.

    This is why abrahamic religoin spreads: its a lie simple people want to be true. Because it means they are good by social constuction not by the evience of their actions in life.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 20:11:13 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107764191934489504

  • 4) In defense, I will say that the west ended in 1945, and that the second Jewis

    4) In defense, I will say that the west ended in 1945, and that the second Jewish undermining of western thought as another revolt against truth, science, reason, evolution, and the West’s institutions of cultural production are destroying the West as Islam did the ME civs.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 19:01:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1491125034542575616

    Reply addressees: @mohanadAmrr @mklixi

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1491124455803809793


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @mohanadAmrr @mklixi 3) And the problem is the sequence Mythologizing > Analogizing > Logicizing reflects a spectrum of precision, and spectrum of cognitive maturity, and a spectrum of increasing difficulty in avoiding the truth.

    Truth is simple. Variation by demographic necessity = political needs.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1491124455803809793

  • Boost of @AngeloJohnGage Creationists (who are a dying minority of religious fol

    Boost of @AngeloJohnGage Creationists (who are a dying minority of religious folks) refuse to realize their “holy books” are not meant to be taken literally; that goat-herding, sand-dwellers 2000 years ago, literally got everything wrong, and we can objectively verify those things to be wrong with several fields of science, so much so, that the majority of Christian scientists accept evolution: one because it is a fact, and two, because it has literally nothing to do with the existence of God, or how life began on Earth (that is abiogenesis)—evolution is simply how life evolves. But because Creationists take their “holy books” literally, they cannot accept a single fact, and must deny everything, in the face of proof, otherwise they think that God doesn’t exist, or the Bible is false, when it is obvious that the Bible, and other religious texts, are manmade and have no bearing on whether God, or any gods, exist. One can easily be religious and accept the FACT of evolution, by understanding that if God exists, he created self-replicating life that evolved into everything he wanted it to, including humans.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 16:13:54 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107763466529715495

  • @asomd2021 @voxday ACCUSATON: LIAR All early theories are imprecise and evolve t

    @asomd2021@voxday

    ACCUSATON: LIAR
    All early theories are imprecise and evolve to increasingly precise. Haeckel was working in right along and after Darwin, and did the best he could to communicate the idea of developmental similarity with the resources available. So he created those he could, borrowed some from others, duplicated those he couldn’t tell the difference, removed egg sacs, chose different stages of development, oritented, and scaled the different drawings, to illustrate the develomental similarity for the ordinary reader – not other biologists.

    In the drawing I’ve attached here, the photos are accurate.

    VERDICT:
    There is a difference in precision but his early attempt to illustrate the developmental similarity and sequence stands.

    Like I said. Abrahamic religion teaches you to lie. And you;re happy to lie. And the liars attempted to claim errors in precision are equal to falsity. As if a cartoon or a parable cannot be used to tell a fundamentl truth despite their extraordinary imprecision – if you catch my meaning – by appeal to the supernatural.

    Original Drawings vs Photos attached.

    Commonly Cited Paper:
    home.uchicago.edu/~rjr6/articles/Haeckel–fra


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 14:27:23 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107762839968759052

  • Funny. I think I’m still one of the more authoritative and viewed sources on Quo

    Funny. I think I’m still one of the more authoritative and viewed sources on Quora on this subject with 10k views per week or something, but once the suppression of genetics started there I stopped investing my time there.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 04:40:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1490908295842123777

    Reply addressees: @bigbrojacksmack

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1490877311779893248

  • Genetics are clear that the Ashkenazim constitute one of the diasporic subgroups

    Genetics are clear that the Ashkenazim constitute one of the diasporic subgroups, and that a predominantly male group migrating to italy, married primarily local women, and then restored insular inbreeding. Local genetic capture by continued during migration. Theyre hybrids. https://t.co/NRQg7XyrQU


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 04:38:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1490907941033345025

    Reply addressees: @bigbrojacksmack

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1490877311779893248

  • Agreed. Though the problem is r/K is considered or at least treated as a rule of

    Agreed. Though the problem is r/K is considered or at least treated as a rule of thumb at best and pseudoscientific at worst. So we have to ground these differences in some sort of hard science. And I think we have.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 00:42:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1490848476527497216

    Reply addressees: @Aaronyourface

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1490845843229872129

  • The question is why didn’t china ever develop truth before face, rule of law, po

    The question is why didn’t china ever develop truth before face, rule of law, politics, and empiricism?

    So Chinese think the culture and government is their success when it was just GEOGRAPHY.

    Try being neighbors to the middle east.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-07 18:27:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1490754055710416902

    Reply addressees: @real_abusalem

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1490753585948278784


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @real_abusalem Well that’s not true and nepotism and corruption was endemic in china. The emperor’s wives are the humorous example. Eunichs are evidence of failure, and change of the government from empirical to ideal was a catastrophe. Democracy and Bureaucracy dont matter – rule of law does.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1490753585948278784