Curt Doolittle

Theme: Science

  • VOX DAY GAMMA MORONS ARE THE MOST WRONG IT’S POSSIBLE TO BE — “Nope, do nothin

    VOX DAY GAMMA MORONS ARE THE MOST WRONG IT’S POSSIBLE TO BE

    — “Nope, do nothing. people WAY fucking smarter than you and even smarter than I disproved Evolution. it has NEVER been more than a theory. Physics denounces evolution. Its called entropy. Entropy is the natural decay of a system. IF evolution occurred, it would be backwards, things would get less and less complex, not more complex.
    still haven’t seen anyone make an intelligent argument for how sexual reproduction came about. I said INTELLIGENT argument. According to “scientists” life just spontaneously arose when the Earth was still very “young,” and conditions were quite hostile TO life. it’s bullshit and anyone who has thought it through sees it for the BULLSHIT it is. Mental midgets like yourself hang onto the brainwashing with your cognitive dissonance for reasons no one can fathom. Can’t rationalize the irrational mind. If scientists can’t assemble the components of a simple lifeform and bring it TO life, no reason to think it just happened all by itself. ridiculous.” — @jemcase63 @voxday

    LET’S RESPOND:

    There are a few people smarter than I am in any population. None of them will engage with you because they find it a waste of time. We can talk to our pets with as much likelihood of your comprehension, but at least our pets appreciate the attention. Unfortunately for my work ‘slumming’ with you morons is necessary since I’m unable to sympathize and empathize with morons. Research is necessary to discover how and why you’re inferior.

    That said there is no one living or even close ‘smarter than I am’ in the discipline of scientific and logical decidability, including the scientific description of the various methods of lying. And I am the only one in our organization that will waste time on you because i’m the only one that cares to do the research.

    The universe has one model of negative entropic change: evolution. So not only is evolution true, it’s the first principle upon which all of existence without exception has evolved into being.

    And I know this because it turns out it’s relatively simple science. We just didn’t know enough until this decade to be positive that this was the case. But we do now.

    Sorry. Not only are you behind the empirical and scientific revolutions but your entire denial of evolution turns out to be the MOST WRONG it’s possible to be.

    Which is rather humorous.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-10 00:45:52 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107770934210014097

  • SUMMARY OF THE KOTH GAME FALSIFYING THE VOX DAY MORONS @StevenV The arguments I

    SUMMARY OF THE KOTH GAME FALSIFYING THE VOX DAY MORONS
    @StevenV

    The arguments I made were operational (scientific) of which empiricism is but one dimensions. The responses were without exception evidence of the female means of non-argument, defending the abrahamic method of deceit, combined with a failure to grasp basic concepts necessary to hold the claims your clowns asserted. In return I maintained the same strategy I have a long reputation for: reflect the insult and restate the central argument – or at least some component of it. Just as I have done in this paragraph. I even sent a set of links describing what I was doing and why. Yet all that occurred was evidence I was correction: common feminine justification of pretense of knowlege, use of GSSRM, pilpul, critique, as defense of the social construction of false promise (fraud) of freedom from formal, physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws.

    Really simply: no one has even understood basic criticisms of the variables that affect rates of evolution, nor a basic understanding of the limits of such mathematics, when results approach infinity. It’s like talking to kindergardeners about calculus. Adn I’ve baited every dimension that would allow anyone in the audience to demonstrate that knowledge, and thus demonstrate the capacity to hold with conviction the claims made.

    It’s ok to have faith in a magic man if it makes you happy. But faith is not testifiable. That is why it requires faith. Therefore you may claim it is good, but may not claim it is true. Faith requires bearing insult for doing so for the same reason women must bear insult for their emotional and cognitive indiscipline. And when a people, and their faith are failing – largely becuase of their faith – then they have every incentive in the world for not bearing insult for faith, and like women, called out in public to ‘calm down’ double down with moral outrage of children.

    The brain requires mindfulness to limit its costs. Some of us are more empathic and neurotic or of lower ability and value to others. As such those people are weaker than others. The need for faith is a weakness. This is why faith is ‘a good’ – for the weak.

    The people who do not have and are not weak enough to require faith, demonstrate loyalty to the faithful when they are kith and kin just as men demonstrate loyalty to the empathic and neurotic fragility of women.

    But to maintain that loyalty the women may never claim she is rational and possesed of agency, and the faithful may never claim they are testifying and that their words are true.

    This falsehod breaks our coopeation by loyaty and makes the weak the enemy of the strong.

    And the weak always double down on their weakness rather than adapt and in doing so mature into responsible agentful adulthood.

    Thus endeth the lesson.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-10 00:32:25 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107770881326771097

  • @StevenV The arguments I made were operational (scientific) of which empiricism

    @StevenV The arguments I made were operational (scientific) of which empiricism is but one dimensions. The responses were without exceptoin evidence of the female means of non-argument, defending the abrahamic method of deceit, combined with a failure to grasp basic concepts necessary to hold the claims your clowns asserted. In return I maintained the same strategy I have a long reputation for: reflect the insult and restate the central argument – or at least some component of it. Just as I have done in this paragraph. I even sent a set of links describing what I was doing and why. Yet all that occurred was evidence I was correction: common feminine justification of pretense of knowlege, use of GSSRM, pilpul, critique, as defense of the social construction of false promise (fraud) of freedom from formal, physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws.

    Really simple: no one has even understood basic criticisms of the variables that affect rates of evolution, nor a basic understanding of the limits of such mathematics, when results approach infinity. It’s like talking to kindergardeners about calculus. Adn I’ve baited every dimension that would allow anyone in the audience to demonstrate that knowledge, and thus demonstrate the capacity to hold with conviction the claims made.

    It’s ok to have faith in a magic man if it makes you happy. But fait is not testifiable. That is why it requires faith. Therefore you may claim it is good, but may not claim it is true. Faith requires bearing insult for doing so. And when a people, and their faith are failing – largely becuase of their faith – then they have every incentive in the world for not bearing insult for faith.

    The brain requires mindfulness to limit its costs. Some of us are more empathic and neurotic or of lower ability and value to others. As such they are weaker than others. The need for faith is a weakness.

    The people who do not have and are not weak enough to require faith, demonstrate loyalty to the faithful when they are kith and kin just as men demonstrate loyalty to the empathic and neurotic fragility of women.

    But to maintain that loyalty the women may never claim she is rational and possesed of agency, and the faithful may never claim they are testifying and that their words are true.

    This breaks our coopeation by loyaty and makes the weak the enemy of the strong.

    And the weak always double down on their weakness rather than adapt and in doing so mature into responsible agentful adulthood.

    Thus endeth the lesson.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-10 00:29:08 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107770868401644066

  • @Wanderers_Choice @RadioFreeNorthwest It’s there in my work becuse it’s science

    @Wanderers_Choice@RadioFreeNorthwest It’s there in my work becuse it’s science not ideology. That’s why it matters. Settled science. Settled science is legally decidable.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 21:27:22 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107770153693601574

  • Again, Another great question. There is knowledge that creates a marginal differ

    Again, Another great question. There is knowledge that creates a marginal difference in capture of energy and COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE over oursleves, others, and the universe. And knowledge that is merely curiosity, or entertainment. This distinction turns out to be simple.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 19:32:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1491495219677835276

    Reply addressees: @IamtheMKC

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1491485099388542979

  • @kdresden Thakns brother. Switch to english from german and we win. It’s the sam

    @kdresden Thakns brother. Switch to english from german and we win. It’s the same thing but english is legal and scientific and unemotional, and german is ideological and philsophical and emotional. This is the fundamental problem. Our people want religion (feels) but the solution is anglo law (reals).

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 18:58:48 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769569529087874

  • Boost of @curtd @kdresden Thakns brother. Switch to english from german and we w

    Boost of @curtd@kdresden Thakns brother. Switch to english from german and we win. It’s the same thing but english is legal and scientific and unemotional, and german is ideological and philsophical and emotional. This is the fundamental problem. Our people want religion (feels) but the solution is anglo law (reals).

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 18:58:48 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769620381987321

  • @Black_Rabbi Again, you prove I am right by claiming you can testify to what you

    @Black_Rabbi

    Again, you prove I am right by claiming you can testify to what you cannot, when others who can have testified to the opposite. I sweat because I am a man. If you don’t then you are less of a man, if you are a man at all, which by using the female method of deceit and denial is increasingly unlikely.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 18:48:47 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107769530121937849

  • @stevebuhk @RenegadeScoutr @Snidely_Whiplash @voxday You post this as if it has

    @stevebuhk@RenegadeScoutr@Snidely_Whiplash@voxday You post this as if it has any merit.

    How about really simple stuff like dark ages of superstition and ignorance poverty, hard labor, starvation, and disease. Scientific ages of knowledge, prosperity, elimination of labor, elimination of starvation, and radical suppression of disease.

    It’s ok. I know. Junkies gotta Junkie. You junkies never give it up until you crash.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-09 06:24:31 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107766603554377421

  • @Strigiformes @RedPilledWorld @voxday No it means I can’t start with the quantum

    @Strigiformes@RedPilledWorld@voxday No it means I can’t start with the quantum background and build that entire narrative step by step in this forum when it already takes me a few weeks to teach it to people who already know at least one hard science, programmming, and economics.

    What I hope to do, rather than as usual, typing the same thing a hundred times, is demonstrate the underlying universal pattern that the universe operates by so the one or two smart people in any faction can understand it.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 23:30:09 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107764974199357742