Theme: Science

  • @Wanderers_Choice @Nationalist7346 I am not using what NS created. I”m following

    @Wanderers_Choice @Nationalist7346 I am not using what NS created. I”m following the science, creating what the science says, and after having done so, discovering the NS were right …. scientifically right. .. at least as far as policy is concerned. Not as far as government is concerned. The monarchy was right. Which was a surprise for me.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-14 21:03:39 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107798372011857732

  • Boost of @Truthist7346 @Wanderers_Choice There’s a big difference between “shit

    Boost of @Truthist7346@Wanderers_Choice There’s a big difference between “shit talking” and scientific observation, analysis and argument. It’s not taking NS and adding some sprinkles or something to make it better. P-laws foundations are much more complete, it’s not just a revamp of NS. It takes an analysis of the third reich at this more complete level or methodology and says where it got things right and where it got things wrong. P is a methodology of falsification. It falsifies anything that can be falsified, which means it slaughters sacred cows. Many believe that NS is the solution while ignoring that it failed. Much like the communists do with “muh real communism”. It just didn’t work. Complete scientific law hasn’t been tried (because it hadn’t really been discovered till Curt) and when natural law has been tried, it’s lasted a whole lot longer than NS (Rome, British empires, and the US). I like NS, but it’s a pipe dream to think it can be resurrected as it was in its final state in the past and win with that strategy.

    People are looking for something to rally behind, a symbol, a man, an idea. Curt’s work doesn’t provide that so people want to defend their sacred cows.

    @curtd


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-14 20:01:47 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107804744539226302

  • Do you look at photos from the mars landscape with inspiration, humility, or ter

    Do you look at photos from the mars landscape with inspiration, humility, or terror? At the vastness of space with wonder, humility, or fear?


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-13 01:59:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1492679775764242435

  • @olddustyghost @Spacebunny @voxday @RolfNelson Um you dumb fuck, I’m a specialis

    @olddustyghost@Spacebunny@voxday@RolfNelson Um you dumb fuck, I’m a specialist in operationalization, and the falsification of cantorian sets and infinities as deviation from the cartesian restoration of mathematical realism. Now, given that you’ve just illustrated you’re a dumb fuck, let me explain for you and other dumb fucks, just what I said in one of the earilest posts to you dumb fucks on the topic: Infinities tell us only that we are missing sufficient information to identify the operational (existential limit) and that the question isn’t why evolution computes so quickly, but why evolution computes so well. So then JFG and I spent a bit of time explaining how evolution tries to limit the problem of infinities: in other words, what regulatory forces are extant in evolutionary reproduction that LOWER the rate of evolution to the maximum of selection pressure without collapse.

    Now if you weren’t a dumb fuck you would understand that. But if you weren’t a dumb fuck you wouldn’t ahve ever believed Vox, or any other moron that evolutionary computation can’t achieve ratdical evolutionary change witin just a generation, two, or three.

    In other words the rate of evoutionary adaptation is determined by the relatinoshiop between the productive content of the dna, the information content of the cell at any given state, the regulation of the dna production at any given state, the reproductive recombination of the dna during sexual reproduction, the mutation that occurs at division, recombination, regulation recombination, in-utero environment, and the very long list of selection pressures.

    So, of those, selection pressure appears to be the most controlling variable given the … and in humans regulatory expression rather than DNA coding appears to be the most influential axis of evolution given that there is one single universal direction of human evolution: neoteny. And while some neotenic signals are genetic (eyes, skin color) and are very simple, Neoteny is not so much determined by SNP but by many polygenic interactions, but by regulatory expression. So just as your brain (to the extent you dumb fucks have one) performs trillions of parallel computations – yet we cannot examine or understand them given that complexity, the same is true of neotenic evolution that regulates the migration of growth stem cells away from the neutral tube. That regulation is largely responisble for slowing our development and maturity to provide the benefits of childhood non-aggression, for long enough periods of time that our neuology can develop intentional self regulation (executive function, agency). But this development that leads to our intelligence and ability to cooperate, is offset by the lost of persistent short term memory which is why chimps defeat us so thorougly.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-13 00:58:14 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107787969774865720

  • @Spacebunny Are you claiming JFG didn’t show the math already? Years ago, and ju

    @Spacebunny Are you claiming JFG didn’t show the math already? Years ago, and just provide another link to it? You see, all along you keep making this claim as if JFG didn’t do the math already. Vox made the (lie) claim he did the math rather than copy it from Gelernter.

    Now, I can just copy paste JFG’s code.
    I can then add the additional dimensions.
    This will result in infinities
    So jfg’s code will go from explaining that vox is wrong (and lied)
    To that jfg was being conservative and kind.
    SO JFG’s code is sufficient to falsify You and Vox (and always has been).
    All I would do is show that jfg was being ‘kind’ and ‘conservative’.

    If you don’t want to watch us shit on you morons and vox for hours I undrestand. But then since all you have to do is how me where JFG’s code is wrong, then you can demonstrate you have the ability to hold an opinion rather than lie that you understand what you’re talking about.

    If you cant show me that, then you’re everything I accuse you of.

    Show me that JFG is wrong.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-12 21:34:36 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107787169040183202

  • @Spacebunny @voxday We just did THREE SHOWS on it – One by JFG, one with JFG and

    @Spacebunny@voxday We just did THREE SHOWS on it – One by JFG, one with JFG and I, and one by just me, in excruciating detail – you dumb fuck. The math ends in INFINITIES, not limits – and only moron would even imagine otherwise.

    Now I know you’re not smart enough to understand that. But that’s ok. Because I know you have a female mind, and that you’re practicing the female means of lying and denying in defense of your malinvestment in supernatural men in the sky. This is what the female mind does. It’s also why the female mind can’t reform – because feels don’t reform regardless of reals.

    So please, show me how the mat doesn’t end in infinities instead of limits? Show me that. Becasue JFG did the math without even including all the possible means of evolutionary computation (evolution). There are many more.

    If you can prove that the math doesn’t end in infinities then your stuck with proving that the math ends in limits. But you can’t just compare apples and oranges and claim an equality. It’s just lying.

    I do love shitting on you morons. I do. lol


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-12 21:22:31 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107787121576681190

  • THE UNIVERSE’S LEGO BRICKS It really is that simple you know

    THE UNIVERSE’S LEGO BRICKS
    It really is that simple you know. https://t.co/X3wXZdDHhe


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-12 20:25:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1492595692275126275

  • Learning The Science of Decidability Is Easy – Just Work

    Learning The Science of Decidability Is Easy – Just Work. https://t.co/CLCr8UDjNt


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-12 20:22:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1492595020716773381

  • 4) So how can you learn that? You can do it yourself, or you can follow those of

    4) So how can you learn that? You can do it yourself, or you can follow those of us who do it, producing that science of universal decidability, and our more than twenty-year project to complete it.
    At least now it’s vaguely comprehensible.
    But we are … an irreverent group. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-12 20:07:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1492591105715675137

    Reply addressees: @kyle_sheehan

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1492588224048353281

  • 2) Evolution constructs the entire persistent universe by the process of continu

    2) Evolution constructs the entire persistent universe by the process of continuous, recursive, disambiguation of disorder(entropy) into order(energy) that we call mass in a process we call evolutionary computation.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-12 20:03:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1492590285557313537

    Reply addressees: @kyle_sheehan

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1492588224048353281