Theme: Science

  • That’s the science. The summary of the first principles of civilizational differ

    That’s the science. The summary of the first principles of civilizational differences. And it explains why conservatives are right and moral and why paternalism (adulting into responsibility) is necessary, and why maternalism (caring into infantilization) is a crime against humanity.

    Liberals are the archetype of the sick mother who seeks validation by perpetually infantilizing her children so that she is constantly recieving approval and attention.

    The most destructive force in civilization.

    Reply addressees: @Lord__Sousa @dr_duchesne @ThomasJMain


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-07 23:41:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1644485528438333443

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1644484343752998912


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @ThomasJMain;

    1) Western civilization’s disproportionate success in the bronze, iron, and steel ages, is due to the rate of discovery of the laws of the universe, including the formal(logical), physical, behavioral, and evolutionary, and our utilization of, adaptation to, and evolution in response to those discoveries. And we have nearly single handedly dragged mankind out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, the vicissitudes of a nature hostile to our existence, and which has nearly exterminated us with disturbing regularity.

    2) This rate of discovery, innovation, and adaptation is possible because of an accident of history, where our ancestors combined(Science, Techne) horse, cart, wheel, and bronze as steppe cattle raiders (Pirates, Vikings), and the entrepreneurial government between those raiders, as the only government possible between them: one that prohibited authority, preserving sovereignty, thus generating demand for contractualism, reciprocity, truth before face, duty before self, and excellence before adequacy, and directing dominance expression to the production of commons. (Self Determination, Sovereignty, Rule of Law, Legislature, Democracy, Meritocracy: Natural Aristocracy.) With a religion and cult universal heroism (Heroic, Militaristic, Hierarchical, Meritocratic, Technological, Expansionary, Sky Worshipping). This is the most rapidly evolutionary and adaptive social, political, economic order available to man. Today we call this “OODA” loop. In the past we called it Manuever. And infrequently, we call it ‘initiative’. And the cost of participation is “responsibility”.

    3) There are only three possible means of human influence: social(inclusion-exclusion) in norm and religion, economic(trade-boycott) in weights and measures in contract law, and physical(force-defense) regulation legislation and command via the government or state. These three institutions will develop in an order and priority. All civilizations are anchored by their first institution, which is permanent, followed by a second weaker institution, followed by a third weakest or failed institution. As such civilizations adapt given the rate of adaptabiility of their primary institutions: religion slowly if at all (MENA, India), the State(government) faster but calcifying (Sinic), and the law of contract or competitive cooperation via markets the fastest possible (Europe).

    4) But the physical, emotional, and psychological cost to the individual of these institutions, priority of these institutions, and rate of change permissible by these institutions varies by their adaptivity, and *individual responsibility*. With religion the lowest, the state next lowest, and the market the most burdensome. Why? Because the radius of religion is the self and family. The radius of responsibility under the state as dicated. The radius of responsibility under markets is ‘the maximum you are capable of’ because otherwise you are forcing costs upon others in the polity by the absence of your responsibility: equality of responsibility.

    5) The ‘liberal’ project in its prewar christian form was merely duty of care for the unfit, in exchange for training the unfit into greater moral fitness (religions). But the postwar ‘liberal left, socialist, equalitarian program’ ‘sells’ personal irresponsibility, dependence, and infantilization, and promises freedom from the logical(postmodern), physical scarcity(marxist), behavioral(neoMarxist, Feminist, Woke), and Evolutionary Laws(Darwinian explanation for all of existence) to authoritarians.

    6) Conservatives deny the equality of moral willingness, ability, and fitness for moral responsibility.

    7) We deny the utopian and accept the responsibility for the burden of the empirical.

    8) We accept the christian burden of providing care as a means of encouraging responsibility.

    You avoid responsibility, and claim false competenc and virtue.

    Cheers

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1644484343752998912

  • @ThomasJMain; 1) Western civilization’s disproportionate success in the bronze,

    @ThomasJMain;

    1) Western civilization’s disproportionate success in the bronze, iron, and steel ages, is due to the rate of discovery of the laws of the universe, including the formal(logical), physical, behavioral, and evolutionary, and our utilization of, adaptation to, and evolution in response to those discoveries. And we have nearly single handedly dragged mankind out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, the vicissitudes of a nature hostile to our existence, and which has nearly exterminated us with disturbing regularity.

    2) This rate of discovery, innovation, and adaptation is possible because of an accident of history, where our ancestors combined(Science, Techne) horse, cart, wheel, and bronze as steppe cattle raiders (Pirates, Vikings), and the entrepreneurial government between those raiders, as the only government possible between them: one that prohibited authority, preserving sovereignty, thus generating demand for contractualism, reciprocity, truth before face, duty before self, and excellence before adequacy, and directing dominance expression to the production of commons. (Self Determination, Sovereignty, Rule of Law, Legislature, Democracy, Meritocracy: Natural Aristocracy.) With a religion and cult universal heroism (Heroic, Militaristic, Hierarchical, Meritocratic, Technological, Expansionary, Sky Worshipping). This is the most rapidly evolutionary and adaptive social, political, economic order available to man. Today we call this “OODA” loop. In the past we called it Manuever. And infrequently, we call it ‘initiative’. And the cost of participation is “responsibility”.

    3) There are only three possible means of human influence: social(inclusion-exclusion) in norm and religion, economic(trade-boycott) in weights and measures in contract law, and physical(force-defense) regulation legislation and command via the government or state. These three institutions will develop in an order and priority. All civilizations are anchored by their first institution, which is permanent, followed by a second weaker institution, followed by a third weakest or failed institution. As such civilizations adapt given the rate of adaptabiility of their primary institutions: religion slowly if at all (MENA, India), the State(government) faster but calcifying (Sinic), and the law of contract or competitive cooperation via markets the fastest possible (Europe).

    4) But the physical, emotional, and psychological cost to the individual of these institutions, priority of these institutions, and rate of change permissible by these institutions varies by their adaptivity, and *individual responsibility*. With religion the lowest, the state next lowest, and the market the most burdensome. Why? Because the radius of religion is the self and family. The radius of responsibility under the state as dicated. The radius of responsibility under markets is ‘the maximum you are capable of’ because otherwise you are forcing costs upon others in the polity by the absence of your responsibility: equality of responsibility.

    5) The ‘liberal’ project in its prewar christian form was merely duty of care for the unfit, in exchange for training the unfit into greater moral fitness (religions). But the postwar ‘liberal left, socialist, equalitarian program’ ‘sells’ personal irresponsibility, dependence, and infantilization, and promises freedom from the logical(postmodern), physical scarcity(marxist), behavioral(neoMarxist, Feminist, Woke), and Evolutionary Laws(Darwinian explanation for all of existence) to authoritarians.

    6) Conservatives deny the equality of moral willingness, ability, and fitness for moral responsibility.

    7) We deny the utopian and accept the responsibility for the burden of the empirical.

    8) We accept the christian burden of providing care as a means of encouraging responsibility.

    You avoid responsibility, and claim false competenc and virtue.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-07 23:36:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1644484343752998912

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1644464687394742274

  • @ThomasJMain; 1) Western civilization’s disproportionate success in the bronze,

    @ThomasJMain;

    1) Western civilization’s disproportionate success in the bronze, iron, and steel ages, is due to the rate of discovery of the laws of the universe, including the formal(logical), physical, behavioral, and evolutionary, and our utilization of, adaptation to, and evolution in response to those discoveries. And we have nearly single handedly dragged mankind out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, the vicissitudes of a nature hostile to our existence, and which has nearly exterminated us with disturbing regularity.

    2) This rate of discovery, innovation, and adaptation is possible because of an accident of history, where our ancestors combined(Science, Techne) horse, cart, wheel, and bronze as steppe cattle raiders (Pirates, Vikings), and the entrepreneurial government between those raiders, as the only government possible between them: one that prohibited authority, preserving sovereignty, thus generating demand for contractualism, reciprocity, truth before face, duty before self, and excellence before adequacy, and directing dominance expression to the production of commons. (Self Determination, Sovereignty, Rule of Law, Legislature, Democracy, Meritocracy: Natural Aristocracy.) With a religion and cult universal heroism (Heroic, Militaristic, Hierarchical, Meritocratic, Technological, Expansionary, Sky Worshipping). This is the most rapidly evolutionary and adaptive social, political, economic order available to man. Today we call this “OODA” loop. In the past we called it Manuever. And infrequently, we call it ‘initiative’. And the cost of participation is “responsibility”.

    3) There are only three possible means of human influence: social(inclusion-exclusion) in norm and religion, economic(trade-boycott) in weights and measures in contract law, and physical(force-defense) regulation legislation and command via the government or state. These three institutions will develop in an order and priority. All civilizations are anchored by their first institution, which is permanent, followed by a second weaker institution, followed by a third weakest or failed institution. As such civilizations adapt given the rate of adaptabiility of their primary institutions: religion slowly if at all (MENA, India), the State(government) faster but calcifying (Sinic), and the law of contract or competitive cooperation via markets the fastest possible (Europe).

    4) But the physical, emotional, and psychological cost to the individual of these institutions, priority of these institutions, and rate of change permissible by these institutions varies by their adaptivity, and *individual responsibility*. With religion the lowest, the state next lowest, and the market the most burdensome. Why? Because the radius of religion is the self and family. The radius of responsibility under the state as dicated. The radius of responsibility under markets is ‘the maximum you are capable of’ because otherwise you are forcing costs upon others in the polity by the absence of your responsibility: equality of responsibility.

    5) The ‘liberal’ project in its prewar christian form was merely duty of care for the unfit, in exchange for training the unfit into greater moral fitness (religions). But the postwar ‘liberal left, socialist, equalitarian program’ ‘sells’ personal irresponsibility, dependence, and infantilization, and promises freedom from the logical(postmodern), physical scarcity(marxist), behavioral(neoMarxist, Feminist, Woke), and Evolutionary Laws(Darwinian explanation for all of existence) to authoritarians.

    6) Conservatives deny the equality of moral willingness, ability, and fitness for moral responsibility.

    7) We deny the utopian and accept the responsibility for the burden of the empirical.

    8) We accept the christian burden of providing care as a means of encouraging responsibility.

    You avoid responsibility, and claim false competenc and virtue.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @Lord__Sousa @dr_duchesne @ThomasJMain


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-07 23:36:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1644484343333617667

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1644464687394742274

  • It’s grownup stuff. I don’t write in crayon for crayon munchers. 😉 (For adults

    It’s grownup stuff. I don’t write in crayon for crayon munchers. 😉

    (For adults in the room: in my work on epistemology I studied and documented the first principles of and logical construction of all forms of human lying. Including the Marxist < Abrahamic < Jewish < Feminine geneology of the female means of lying, by seduction into false promises (frauds, deceptions, lies, gossiping, shaming, rallying, undermining, social construction). So some people use this technique to create cult-narratives that are counter-to reality, to capture attention (clicks) by social construction of desirable falsehoods. It’s just therapy like religion and the marxist sequence are just therapy. In this case y’all are correctly venemous against the race-marxist-woke capture of the institutinos of cultural production, but too cowardly to show up and fight for your culture, so you produce a marxist/abrahamic savior myth that a 1T economy with endemic corruption will bring you salvation. Dimwitted. Childish. But at least understandable.)

    Reply addressees: @gedora071 @GonzaloLira1968


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-07 11:23:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1644299842833842176

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1644266573975224320

  • I’m saying that he diverged from maxwell’s insights and reversed descartes resto

    I’m saying that he diverged from maxwell’s insights and reversed descartes restoration of european realism in mathy, by restoring mysticism in physics, by creating a pictoral and linquistic description of the universe, rather than operational and existential. And as such physics ran dry by the seventies, and is still ‘lost in mathiness’. So technically speaking he engaged in sophistry rather than pseudoscience – a distinction that might not be obvious.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-07 11:15:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1644297775016820737

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1644282073358761984

  • I’m saying that he diverged from maxwell’s insights and reversed descartes resto

    I’m saying that he diverged from maxwell’s insights and reversed descartes restoration of european realism in mathy, by restoring mysticism in physics, by creating a pictoral and linquistic description of the universe, rather than operational and existential. And as such physics ran dry by the seventies, and is still ‘lost in mathiness’. So technically speaking he engaged in sophistry rather than pseudoscience – a distinction that might not be obvious.

    Reply addressees: @Zinah_Issa @duwadh @avardoutcast @_moldbridge_


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-07 11:15:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1644297774945501184

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1644282073358761984

  • Prostitution, Gambling, Loan Sharking, Pyramid Schemes, Financial Fraud, Organiz

    Prostitution, Gambling, Loan Sharking, Pyramid Schemes, Financial Fraud, Organized Religion, Continental Philosophy, Macro Economic Prediction, Marxist-to-Woke Pseudoscientific Religion, and Mathiness in Physics have all ‘been around’ longer than ESG. It’s just the most recent scam in the long series of scams that seeks to undermine the rule of law, transparency, concurrency, and commonality by using activists (cultists) to threaten to blackmail commercial organizations with canceling that don’t demonstrate fealty and submission, by paying the cult a tithe. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton’s were masters of it. It’s the same coercion with a new label.

    Reply addressees: @thenation


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-06 20:30:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1644075049647759365

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1644059908919250946

  • MUSK AND NEURALINK CHALLENGES IN CONTEXT The only thing to learn from this is th

    MUSK AND NEURALINK CHALLENGES IN CONTEXT
    The only thing to learn from this is that musk’s method of rapid development by hyper experimentation, does not translate to implantable medical devices. And that while Neuralink is the first mover, those that were second movers, ran with his company’s research, and were more cautious in experimentation in preparation for FDA approval have caught up and have not incurred the skepticism of regulators.

    My concern has always been that while Musk and team have been correctd that the most accessible and unabiguous sections of the brain are those of the motorcortex, and as such integration with motor functions that most basic and most possible, that the number of connections necessary to do so might be extremely difficult to achieve. Now, I’ve only seen a few bits of their tech and it’s absolutely amazing. So as far as I know this is another conflict created by the aggressivness of his research and development methods colliding with the backwardness of our regulatory structures. and this collision is itself part of the major disruption he is trying to bring about.

    Similar disruptions have been caused by the Russian strategic production vs american, and now Iraelie military research and development vs american. In other words there is a defect in not only our schools, our academy, our government, that is archaic and needs reform. And musk, the japanese in manufacturing, the Finns in education, the Germans in government, and the Israelies in military procureent are all teaching us what’s wrong with our system that needs ‘modernization’.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-06 00:50:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643778162197770242

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643755931329777664

  • MUSK AND NEURALINK CHALLENGES IN CONTEXT The only thing to learn from this is th

    MUSK AND NEURALINK CHALLENGES IN CONTEXT
    The only thing to learn from this is that musk’s method of rapid development by hyper experimentation, does not translate to implantable medical devices. And that while Neuralink is the first mover, those that were second movers, ran with his company’s research, and were more cautious in experimentation in preparation for FDA approval have caught up and have not incurred the skepticism of regulators.

    My concern has always been that while Musk and team have been correctd that the most accessible and unabiguous sections of the brain are those of the motorcortex, and as such integration with motor functions that most basic and most possible, that the number of connections necessary to do so might be extremely difficult to achieve. Now, I’ve only seen a few bits of their tech and it’s absolutely amazing. So as far as I know this is another conflict created by the aggressivness of his research and development methods colliding with the backwardness of our regulatory structures. and this collision is itself part of the major disruption he is trying to bring about.

    Similar disruptions have been caused by the Russian strategic production vs american, and now Iraelie military research and development vs american. In other words there is a defect in not only our schools, our academy, our government, that is archaic and needs reform. And musk, the japanese in manufacturing, the Finns in education, the Germans in government, and the Israelies in military procureent are all teaching us what’s wrong with our system that needs ‘modernization’.

    Reply addressees: @ToddNQuick1


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-06 00:50:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643778162029912065

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643755931329777664

  • We have metrics for increases in mass, weight, volume, speed, reaction time, etc

    We have metrics for increases in mass, weight, volume, speed, reaction time, etc. But we have no metric for information necessary to cause an incremental change in state, nor the ratio between that and the possible consequences. In other words, it takes more and more information to identify a tail event (unpredictable outlier), and the tail event will have a disproportionate effect relative to it’s median. We will have this with an AI, or some proxy for it. But we have no means of doing this with the brain. As such we should develop a general rule for information necessary to identify a tail event, and as a consquence a goal of obtaining sufficient information to eliminate tail events by predicting them. This formula wil be a universal as I many other laws of nature (pareto, power etc) are universal.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-04 20:41:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643353169206865922

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643351196558606339