Theme: Responsibility

  • Our Law: The Inalienablity of Sovereignty

    [S]overeigns cannot ‘give it up to god’that is an act of alienation of responsibility. A sovereign can neither surrender his rights or his responsibilities without breaking the contract for reciprocal insurance of sovereignty. This is why we must have stoicism in mind, and epicureanism in life. One is sovereign or not. Aristocracy requires sovereignty – the cult of non-submission. So we may need to face our permanent inequality of those who are sovereign for who responsibility is inalienable, and those who are serfs for whom responsibility is alienated by submission

  • Thinking Things Thru Is Scary

      —“Faith without works is dead.”—John Brennan —“Faith without works is free riding. It’s a crime. ;)”—Curt Doolittle —“Faith without works is: 1 – Baiting into hazard for oneself in both religious and logical terms, 2 – Making an unfalsifiable promise to the commons (i.e believe in Jesus and be saved in afterlife), 3 – Parasitism on others within the higher-trust group of other faithful All of which are violations of reciprocity. Even though faith attempts to define reciprocity as “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” it lacks the grammar to break it down to what it really means and how to apply it. P. solves that problem.”—James Dmitro Makienko

  • Thinking Things Thru Is Scary

      —“Faith without works is dead.”—John Brennan —“Faith without works is free riding. It’s a crime. ;)”—Curt Doolittle —“Faith without works is: 1 – Baiting into hazard for oneself in both religious and logical terms, 2 – Making an unfalsifiable promise to the commons (i.e believe in Jesus and be saved in afterlife), 3 – Parasitism on others within the higher-trust group of other faithful All of which are violations of reciprocity. Even though faith attempts to define reciprocity as “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” it lacks the grammar to break it down to what it really means and how to apply it. P. solves that problem.”—James Dmitro Makienko

  • OUR LAW Sovereigns cannot ‘give it up to god’ – that is an act of alienation of

    OUR LAW

    Sovereigns cannot ‘give it up to god’ – that is an act of alienation of responsibility. A sovereign can neither surrender his rights or his responsibilities without breaking the contract for reciprocal insurance of sovereignty. This is why we must have stoicism in mind, and epicureanism in life. One is sovereign or not. Aristocracy requires sovereignty – the cult of non-submission. So we may need to face our permanent inequality of those who are sovereign for who responsibility is inalienable, and those who are serfs for whom responsibility is alienated by submission.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 12:42:00 UTC

  • SECOND AMENDENT ENFORCEMENT By Jerry Odom. Any individual, governmental, private

    SECOND AMENDENT ENFORCEMENT

    By Jerry Odom.

    Any individual, governmental, private representative, or entity at any level of the government that introduces or votes to pass any new law, legislation, ordinance, or resolution on any aspects related to the bearing, holding, carrying, transportation, or storage of firearms, or, any aspect included within this amendment will be considered an act of treason.

    Their position will be automatically forfeited; they shall never be allowed to serve in any function of the government whether at the Local, State, or Federal levels for the remainder of their lifetime. Local law enforcement shall remove any individual who does not self-vacate.

    In the unlikely event that the local law enforcement fails to act on the same, they also will forfeit their positions immediately and can no longer serve in any capacity in the government for their lifetime as well.

    Should the above occur, then any local Constitutional Militia shall have the right and duty, along with full law enforcement authority, including the use of deadly force, to remove the guilty parties and restore order.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-18 09:25:00 UTC

  • The Law of Public Speech

    The Law of Public Speech https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/17/the-law-of-public-speech/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-17 01:45:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229220242062266370

  • The Law of Public Speech

    THE LAW OF PUBLIC SPEECH [I]n public, to the public, in matters public, speak the truth regardless of cost. In public, to the public, in matters public, limit your advocacy and demand to reciprocity, regardless of cost. In public, to the public, in matters public limit others to speaking the truth regardless of cost, and advocacy of reciprocity, regardless of cost. Reciprocity and Truth regardless of cost are what the enemy cannot bear, and what the enemy undermines – because they are the foundation of western civilization. Why? Because truth and reciprocity are meritocratic and eugenic methods of competing in markets for sexual, social, economic, political, and military value. And because truth, reciprocity, meritocracy, and eugenics in sexual, social, economic, political, and military markets produce the fastest cooperation, innovation and adaptation that is possible for conscious beings. Superiority is Demonstrable.

  • The Law of Public Speech

    THE LAW OF PUBLIC SPEECH [I]n public, to the public, in matters public, speak the truth regardless of cost. In public, to the public, in matters public, limit your advocacy and demand to reciprocity, regardless of cost. In public, to the public, in matters public limit others to speaking the truth regardless of cost, and advocacy of reciprocity, regardless of cost. Reciprocity and Truth regardless of cost are what the enemy cannot bear, and what the enemy undermines – because they are the foundation of western civilization. Why? Because truth and reciprocity are meritocratic and eugenic methods of competing in markets for sexual, social, economic, political, and military value. And because truth, reciprocity, meritocracy, and eugenics in sexual, social, economic, political, and military markets produce the fastest cooperation, innovation and adaptation that is possible for conscious beings. Superiority is Demonstrable.

  • Yes Eugenics Works. Period. So Do Many Things We Don’t Do.

    YES EUGENICS WORKS. PERIOD. SO DO MANY THINGS WE DON”T DO.

    —“No he’s not, he’s offering support to eugenics. It’s not scientifically, ethically, or socially valid AT ALL. Go read some bioethics.”—Dr Julie Blommaert @drjulie_b

    Julie you are a typical product of the feminist postmodern pseudoscience movement. (a) Eugenics would work. (b) So would many other things we don’t do. Even genocide works – it’s the most effective historical means of evolutionary competition. We don’t do it. SO STOP LYING. We have lost a full standard deviation of intelligence above the Hajnal Line in the past 150 years due to reversal. We’re just about to cross the line of 97 in the USA, and evidence is that 95 and 93 are cliff effects that are unrecoverable. That’s before personality trait diffs. So go read bio-ethics yourself. Not propaganda. Not marxist, feminist, postmodernist pseudoscience and sophistry. What is the human cost of reversing thousands of years of soft eugenics by taxation and credit expansion in the middle to profit the top and expand the bottom? Economics (in the Beckerian tradition) should be required to get any degree and any pretense of conception of what ‘ethics’ means. People like you are a cancer for mankind.

  • Yes Eugenics Works. Period. So Do Many Things We Don’t Do.

    YES EUGENICS WORKS. PERIOD. SO DO MANY THINGS WE DON”T DO.

    —“No he’s not, he’s offering support to eugenics. It’s not scientifically, ethically, or socially valid AT ALL. Go read some bioethics.”—Dr Julie Blommaert @drjulie_b

    Julie you are a typical product of the feminist postmodern pseudoscience movement. (a) Eugenics would work. (b) So would many other things we don’t do. Even genocide works – it’s the most effective historical means of evolutionary competition. We don’t do it. SO STOP LYING. We have lost a full standard deviation of intelligence above the Hajnal Line in the past 150 years due to reversal. We’re just about to cross the line of 97 in the USA, and evidence is that 95 and 93 are cliff effects that are unrecoverable. That’s before personality trait diffs. So go read bio-ethics yourself. Not propaganda. Not marxist, feminist, postmodernist pseudoscience and sophistry. What is the human cost of reversing thousands of years of soft eugenics by taxation and credit expansion in the middle to profit the top and expand the bottom? Economics (in the Beckerian tradition) should be required to get any degree and any pretense of conception of what ‘ethics’ means. People like you are a cancer for mankind.