By Martin ล tฤpรกn
—“Each person has inherent worth, inalienable human rights, and value, but we must not let political correctness dictate reality.”— a friend
Not quite. Inherent worth is Platonism. Your value, just like value of anything else, is subjective and not necessarily positive. The only way to ensure that our value to others isn’t negative is limiting our display, word and deed to reciprocity. Inalienable human rights only exist if we provide them to ourselves.
—“Regarding: “Inalienable human rights only exist if we provide them to ourselves.” How is this done? Watched John Mark’s recent video with Curt and the topic came up, but it’s not quite sinking in yet. My best guess is it means I am obligated to defend those rights with words, actions, arms, etc., for myself (and perhaps others), otherwise it is a crime.”—Jack Scarbrough
Correct. None may speak or act to remove them, nor may you by speaking or not, acting or not, surrender them.
—“Regarding: “Inalienable human rights only exist if we provide them to ourselves.” How is this done? Watched John Mark’s recent video with Curt and the topic came up, but it’s not quite sinking in yet. My best guess is it means I am obligated to defend those rights with words, actions, arms, etc., for myself (and perhaps others), otherwise it is a crime.”—Jack Scarbrough
Correct. None may speak or act to remove them, nor may you by speaking or not, acting or not, surrender them.
Well, both the military and indentured servitude can be classified as slavery – you can’t exit, but you obtain room and board in exchange for others taking responsibility for it and directing your labors. If you do not abandon rights and obligations that’s fine. It’s employment.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-01 20:50:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1234219488473690116
Reply addressees: @RickyBobby_USA @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1234205364943454210
In other words, you may not surrender a right or obligation that would deprive others of your reciprocal defense of their rights and obligations, without abandoning all rights and obligations, becoming an outlaw, and outside the defense of the law, subject to summary justice.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-01 19:17:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1234195982616793092
Reply addressees: @RickyBobby_USA @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1234195636892971013
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@RickyBobby_USA @JohnMarkSays P-Law(defense) is constructed from sovereignty(positive) and reciprocity(negative), and enumerates all rights and obligations, including display, word, deed, defense, and inalienability. It is a violation of inalienablity (treason) to escape from rights and responsibilities.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1234195636892971013
I don’t seek approval. I write law.
Either you will fight for your people, or you will not.
If you will not, you do not matter.
If you will fight for your people, your faith does not matter.
If you choose your faith over your people, then you are the enemy of your people.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-27 21:14:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233138446526558209
Reply addressees: @WillReturns1066
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1233134553457291264
by Brandon Hayes
—“Do you believe there are any objective measures of good and evil?”—Tim Allen Musse
I would use the term Righteous and Evil. Evil < Bad < Immoral < Unethical < Amoral > Ethical > Moral > Good > Righteous Measures for a given action are put up against a test of reciprocity. Evil is harm done for harms sake. Good = Productive Bad = Unproductive Righteous is the extinguishing of Evil.
by Brandon Hayes
—“Do you believe there are any objective measures of good and evil?”—Tim Allen Musse
I would use the term Righteous and Evil. Evil < Bad < Immoral < Unethical < Amoral > Ethical > Moral > Good > Righteous Measures for a given action are put up against a test of reciprocity. Evil is harm done for harms sake. Good = Productive Bad = Unproductive Righteous is the extinguishing of Evil.
Our Law: The Inalienablity of Sovereignty https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/25/our-law-the-inalienablity-of-sovereignty/
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-25 20:27:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1232401857219305475
[S]overeigns cannot ‘give it up to god’ – that is an act of alienation of responsibility. A sovereign can neither surrender his rights or his responsibilities without breaking the contract for reciprocal insurance of sovereignty. This is why we must have stoicism in mind, and epicureanism in life. One is sovereign or not. Aristocracy requires sovereignty – the cult of non-submission. So we may need to face our permanent inequality of those who are sovereign for who responsibility is inalienable, and those who are serfs for whom responsibility is alienated by submission