Curt Doolittle

Theme: Responsibility

  • Evidence is that (a) it’s damaging to children’s development (b) single mothers

    Evidence is that (a) it’s damaging to children’s development (b) single mothers produce most shooters and addicts, (c) externalize their insecurity and are irrationally overprotective prohibiting male involvement in the family – Fathers are better parents, b/c they remarry.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 21:36:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227345746669834240

    Reply addressees: @jenniferpierson

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227344474281594880

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227344474281594880

  • Anyone who tries to deny others choice genetic purity, or impurity is mentally i

    Anyone who tries to deny others choice genetic purity, or impurity is mentally ill and not fit for motherhoood, fatherhood, or continued existence.

    We either have the right to self determination – or we have the right to extermination. So choose.

    I’m happy either way.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 16:17:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227265439400591360

  • WHAT DO PAGAN(ANCESTOR) AND HEATHEN (NATURE) RELIGIONS ASK OF US? The only thing

    WHAT DO PAGAN(ANCESTOR) AND HEATHEN (NATURE) RELIGIONS ASK OF US?

    The only thing heathen (nature) and pagan(archetype) religions ask of us is to acknowledge debts of our inheritance so that we pass that inheritance ‘unspent’ on to others.

    The rest is an excuse to find relaxation, comfort, entertainment and and joy with others in some activity other than running, hunting, or eating.

    What you call spiritual is the result of two biological processes.

    The first is just auto association that is constantly going on in your brain. The human part of our brain never stops, we merely regulate attention or wakefulness to increase or decrease its activity – but it’s always working even in sleep. If It is always engaged in transforming perception into a world model, predicting from that world model, focusing our attention to narrow on some prediction or other, or when not doing so, it’s in continuous rehearsal of short term memory to convert it to long term, and auto association of stimuli to find opportunities.

    Auto association is like daydreaming. It’s cheap. It’s relaxing. While thinking, reasoning, calculating, and computing with reason is expensive and hard.

    The second is the old brain constantly worrying about (calculating) social status, advantage, safety.

    So the experience we call spiritual is the ritual act of sedating the auto-association function of the brain (which is very deep in the bottom center, so that it can fucking relax, and we can feel the safety we feel resting or sleeping with the well fed pack of males (herd of females).

    Meditation can do this, ritual can do it, prayer can do it exercise can do it, dancing, singing, any group activity that doesn’t force you to calculate status and hierarchy can do it.

    That’s all it is.

    A purely mechanical process by which we manage the primitive parts of our brain that evolved prior to reason, and that we gracefully fall back upon when we don’t want to think very hard, or cannot solve a problem, or must act rapidly by instinct.

    Now how does abrahamic religion work? It creates a false debt to a false god, for false crimes, and asks for us to submit and surrender our reason aspiration and transcendence and instead to ‘stay in place’.

    So if you wish to worship your evil semitic gods, whose sole purpose is to prevent you from transcendence of man, rather than just to use Jesus as another philosopher that is fine. But for the rest of us Jesus is just another philosophy, and gods are archetypes of our ancestors, and all those archetypes serve as proxies that we can through prayer (conversation), communicate with and obtain wisdom from.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 14:51:00 UTC

  • “WHY SHOULD YOU HAVE A VOTE?” If you have juridical defense in matters private a

    “WHY SHOULD YOU HAVE A VOTE?”

    If you have juridical defense in matters private and public, but haven’t served, aren’t financially independent and responsible for yourself, haven’t had a family that you are responsible for, don’t run a company whose employees and capital you are responsible for, or haven’t run an enterprise whose employees, capital, and patterns of trade you are responsible for, or run a state whose entire economy you are responsible for, then why do you have a vote in any of those matters without having demonstrated sufficient ability to successfully hold that responsibility?

    If you haven’t served then why do you have free speech, ownership of property?

    If you haven’t had replacement number of children, then why do you also have a vote in matters of commons?

    If you haven’t employed dozens, then why do you also have a vote in matters of the economy?

    If you haven’t employed tens of thousands, why do you have a vote in matters international?

    If you haven’t governed a state, then why do you have a vote in matters of the state?

    About 1/5-1/4 of the population is informed enough to make choices. The rest are either biased to a political party, or dependent upon filtering propaganda and opinions of friends and family. We are all capable of different levels of intellectual resolution whether by level of ability, level of interests, level of knowledge, or constitution of character.

    We do not have standing in matters public today – only private. The state deprived us of the user of courts in matters public – we had to invent class action to circumvent that deprivation.

    But If you have juridical defense, in matters BOTH private AND public – called ‘universal standing’ – then you have defense against harmed by others private and political.

    But aside from defense why should you have any opinion on anything over which you cannot demonstrate comprehension, success, and responsibility?

    All government action is limited to coercion, either by informing/lying, bribery/deprivation, or force/defense. It is only the rule of law of reciprocity, the judiciary, the monarchy, and the military as last resort, that protects us from abuse of those levers of coercion.

    Combine rule of law of reciprocity, with demonstrated investment and capacity for participation, with demand for truthful reciprocal speech, with houses of the classes, with a monarchy as a judge of last resort – and democracy can work.

    But universal unearned franchise, political parties, single house majoritarianism, and devolution from rule of law to rule by legislation (or even rule by discretion) has proven too vulnerable to baiting the ignorant and unaccountable into hazard with false promise of circumvention of nature’s necessity for markets in everything.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 13:52:00 UTC

  • “One of many duties that man has under P is that he is a warrior. My advice, hit

    —“One of many duties that man has under P is that he is a warrior. My advice, hit the range and train MMA. Sharpen your eye, harden the body. My take is that a martial art in it of it self is a pure and physical form a reciprocity. Under P, lying is a serious offense. Step into the gym, the mat never lies. Wrestling as you know was a huge part of Greco-Roman culture. It tests a man’s spirit and his resolve. And you get what you give. The more you sweat, the less you bleed. Stay honed. If your always ready, then you never have to get ready again.”—Torey Eric Anderson

    Be a man. Get fit ‘enough’. That’s all it takes.

    The first 20% of the training gives 80% of the value.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 09:28:00 UTC

  • Well via-negativa moral rules (prohibitions) are empirical and there is only one

    Well via-negativa moral rules (prohibitions) are empirical and there is only one: reciprocity within the limits of proportionality. Like rational choice within the limits of rationality. Like truthfulness within the limits of testifiability. That’s just obvious from a study of the history of law across every civilization. What satisfies reciprocity whether in manners, ethics (interpersonal), morals (extra-personal) varies because of differences in geography, economy, family structure, means of production, and stage of development – or more simply, dependent upon the scale of cooperation and the homogeneity or heterogeneity of the population in relation to its state of development.

    General Semantics by Korzybski, while originally an attempt to explain non-aristotelian frames of reference, was a (rather silly) dead end, just as is Eric Ganz’s present Generative Anthropology, and Derrida’s persistent trend in postmodernism, and somewhat less so Chomsky’s generative grammar. In the end Bourland extended the entire program to nothing more than eliminating the copula (verb to be) which, in english, eliminates the pretense of knowledge and clarifies thinking in the process. This effectively ended the GS program as a dead end. In P we use eliminating of the copula to prevent false knowledge claims by the no-operational obscurantism permitted by its use.

    This is particularly useful in suppressing the abrahamic method of deceit.

    Now, conversely Hilbert in mathematical physics, Bridgman in physics, Brouwer in mathematics, and (badly) Mises in economics all either criticized the set basis of mathematics, the Einstein-Bohr and Copenhagen consensus, or monetary economics as pseudoscientific – and only Bridgman succeeded in reforming physics. Even though, today, we have software to perform the drudgery of testing proofs. Turing and Godel brought about operational model and programming completed the transition between operational and computable and deductive. Minsky (correctly) stated that programming was a new method of thinking, because it completes the restoration of western thought back to its origins in ‘engineering’ (geometry) in the process begun by Descartes. But It wasn’t until the eighties and early nineties that psychology started to reform under operationism, and until P there was no solution to operationalizing social science.

    That’s enough for now.

    (BTW: I don’t take devolution to use of Godwin’s Law as anything other than evidence of my winning the argument.)

    And yes the only reason I respond is so that I can post these answers on the main feed to educate others

    – cheers.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 22:43:00 UTC

  • Hating is self serving emotional gluttony – I don’t do hate – it’s just not part

    Hating is self serving emotional gluttony – I don’t do hate – it’s just not part of my character. I do truth, problem solving, planning, organizing, and acting to punish those who have violated the trust of reciprocity.

    Don’t feel – Do.

    Revolution comes.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 13:57:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225780522997231617

    Reply addressees: @90_guillem

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225777179549749248

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225777179549749248

  • THEY ALWAYS WANT TO LIE CHEAT AND STEAL – BECAUES THEY DON”T WANT TO SELF-POLICE

    THEY ALWAYS WANT TO LIE CHEAT AND STEAL – BECAUES THEY DON”T WANT TO SELF-POLICE (THEY HAVE NO AGENCY)

    —“Ok the way the comments are here maybe you should call it totalitarianism. If the is what you want to do thats fine but take that shit to a deserted island and have at it”–John Lafferty

    Your only objection to natural law is to say that you have the right to impose costs upon others against their will. It means you want to lie, cheat, steal. So it means you’re a bad person. That’s all natural law prevents: lying, cheating, stealing, harming, directly or indirectly. SO why do you want to preserve lying, cheating, stealing, and harm? So you can lie cheat steal and harm?

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-04 16:01:00 UTC

  • THE NATURAL LAW DOES NOT CHANGE HUMAN BEHAVIOR, IT ACCOUNTS FOR IT, AND LIMITS O

    THE NATURAL LAW DOES NOT CHANGE HUMAN BEHAVIOR, IT ACCOUNTS FOR IT, AND LIMITS ONLY IRRECIPROCITY

    by Scott Strong

    The Natural Law doesn’t change human nature…it accounts for it.

    As for the diversity issue, that’s easy – less diversity, more homogeneity. We stop attempting to go against what humans do naturally…sort into groups with those who share our values and either trade if possible or war if threatened.

    Also, there may be many religions but we only know of one that is compatible with the law. The rest will be expunged and can continue lying themselves into an inbred hole elsewhere.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-04 15:56:00 UTC

  • “GSRRM IS WITNESS INTIMIDATION” GSRRM = Under Natural Law is Witness Intimidatio

    “GSRRM IS WITNESS INTIMIDATION”

    GSRRM = Under Natural Law is Witness Intimidation

    Threatening me with social penalty if I speak the truth (witness) is witness intimidation.

    We need shorthand for every concept. And those shorthands need to be directly tied to centuries held western male beliefs.

    —Greg HamiltonUpdated Feb 3, 2020, 4:17 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-03 16:17:00 UTC