Curt Doolittle

Theme: Responsibility

  • The Law on Gouging and Hoarding

    Mar 23, 2020, 3:35 PM You may profit from superior achievement in seizing opportunities made possible in the commons we call the market. You may not profit from harm that circumvents the market. Ergo the prohibition on gouging(offense) and hoarding(defense).

    You can clear inventory (rapidly sell out) at normal rates and prices. You can limit sales at normal rates and prices. People owe you the debt regardless of their ability to pay in the moment. But in times of war, plague, crisis, catastrophe, you may not profit from other’s hardship.

    (Reciprocity)Some instinctual immoralities are true.

  • Yes I know of the seven laws of Noah. 😉

    Yes I know of the seven laws of Noah. 😉 https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/yes-i-know-of-the-seven-laws-of-noah/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 12:45:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265987663095447553

  • I Gained My Knowledge by Investigating and Prosecuting Them for White Collar Cri

    I Gained My Knowledge by Investigating and Prosecuting Them for White Collar Crimes https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/i-gained-my-knowledge-by-investigating-and-prosecuting-them-for-white-collar-crimes/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 12:36:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265985224371994624

  • “do You Condone…?” Stupid Question of The Day (really)

    May 6, 2020, 11:03 AM

    —“Do you condone the IRA, Mao, Etc?”—

    What a stupid question. Really. “Do you condone prosecution of criminals” “Do you condone warfare” “Do you condone market economies” “Do you condone evolutionary necessity” “Do you condone gravity.” What is the market demand for morality(reciprocity) versus immorality (irreciprocity)? What is market demand for peace versus war? What is the limit of the utility of morality? Condone” = approve of, sanction, fail to suppress, fail to resist, fail to act to prevent some display word or deed – especially with reluctance under the presumption of an act of irreciprocity, where amoral, ethical and moral consist of non imposition of costs upon the demonstrated intersets of others with whom one or the group values cooperation within the limits of provoking retaliation. Implication(irreciprocal, harm) = criminal (direct physical), unethical (direct informational), moral (anonymous indirect informational or physical for personal gain or to prevent personal loss), evil (direct or indirect, informational or physical, loss regardless of personal gain or loss). Implication(irreciprocal, population) = scope of cooperation( inter-familial, interpersonal, inter-social, inter-political, universal). There is no morality in war. There is a demand for avoidance of harm in war. There is a market demand for harm in war. The market supplies what is necessary to prevent war, or to conduct war. This is why we are at war 2/3 of the time in human history. War for survival and persistence is the natural state of all creatures – we create political systems to limit war wether criminal, conspiratorial, political, or inter-political. Western man domesticated war largely by the Westphalian peace. We thought we could force the world into adopting the Westphalian peace. Communists ended the Westphalian peace but we nearly restored it because of our asymmetric power. Islamists copied the communists and ended the Westphalian peace. But we are unable due to dependence upon oil to resist their advancement once again after less than a century of suppressing their warfare against all civilization. So that is why we are in 4th Generation Warfare. Its why we lost in the middle east. Its’ why we are losing against china. Because we have domesticated warfare but by failing to complete the colonial program because of our world wars, we have failed to contain warfare to the Westphalian peace, and instead are reverting to natural warfare: a war of all against all where the state has lost control of actors who can create wars. The IRA demonstrated why it was possible at small scale. Mao how it was possible at large scale. The bolsheviks how it was possible from within. The communists how it was possible from within. Now the islamists are imitating the communists and undermining from within. And you wonder why I bother talking to people like you? Because I don’t blame you for intentionally being lied to and made ignorant sot that you were suckers for warfare-from within by marxism-postmodernism-feminism-hbd-denialism that unified pseudoscience, sophistry, and denial to replace christian supernaturalism, sophistry, and denial, so that you could be once again governed and profited from by a parasitic political and financial class intent on reversing a thousand years of eugenics that made possible the european miracle just it had the greek and roman miracles.

  • “do You Condone…?” Stupid Question of The Day (really)

    May 6, 2020, 11:03 AM

    —“Do you condone the IRA, Mao, Etc?”—

    What a stupid question. Really. “Do you condone prosecution of criminals” “Do you condone warfare” “Do you condone market economies” “Do you condone evolutionary necessity” “Do you condone gravity.” What is the market demand for morality(reciprocity) versus immorality (irreciprocity)? What is market demand for peace versus war? What is the limit of the utility of morality? Condone” = approve of, sanction, fail to suppress, fail to resist, fail to act to prevent some display word or deed – especially with reluctance under the presumption of an act of irreciprocity, where amoral, ethical and moral consist of non imposition of costs upon the demonstrated intersets of others with whom one or the group values cooperation within the limits of provoking retaliation. Implication(irreciprocal, harm) = criminal (direct physical), unethical (direct informational), moral (anonymous indirect informational or physical for personal gain or to prevent personal loss), evil (direct or indirect, informational or physical, loss regardless of personal gain or loss). Implication(irreciprocal, population) = scope of cooperation( inter-familial, interpersonal, inter-social, inter-political, universal). There is no morality in war. There is a demand for avoidance of harm in war. There is a market demand for harm in war. The market supplies what is necessary to prevent war, or to conduct war. This is why we are at war 2/3 of the time in human history. War for survival and persistence is the natural state of all creatures – we create political systems to limit war wether criminal, conspiratorial, political, or inter-political. Western man domesticated war largely by the Westphalian peace. We thought we could force the world into adopting the Westphalian peace. Communists ended the Westphalian peace but we nearly restored it because of our asymmetric power. Islamists copied the communists and ended the Westphalian peace. But we are unable due to dependence upon oil to resist their advancement once again after less than a century of suppressing their warfare against all civilization. So that is why we are in 4th Generation Warfare. Its why we lost in the middle east. Its’ why we are losing against china. Because we have domesticated warfare but by failing to complete the colonial program because of our world wars, we have failed to contain warfare to the Westphalian peace, and instead are reverting to natural warfare: a war of all against all where the state has lost control of actors who can create wars. The IRA demonstrated why it was possible at small scale. Mao how it was possible at large scale. The bolsheviks how it was possible from within. The communists how it was possible from within. Now the islamists are imitating the communists and undermining from within. And you wonder why I bother talking to people like you? Because I don’t blame you for intentionally being lied to and made ignorant sot that you were suckers for warfare-from within by marxism-postmodernism-feminism-hbd-denialism that unified pseudoscience, sophistry, and denial to replace christian supernaturalism, sophistry, and denial, so that you could be once again governed and profited from by a parasitic political and financial class intent on reversing a thousand years of eugenics that made possible the european miracle just it had the greek and roman miracles.

  • Lead Follow or Get out Of the Way 😉

    May 6, 2020, 11:24 AM

    —“Plain language that we can all agree on.”—Stephen Wells

    I’ve been consistent in my position. (a) I don’t practice equality even among my kinfolk – I practice loyalty and noblesse oblige. (b) researchers in the sciences produce research. activists gain status followers and influence by distributing it. I manufacture intellectual weaponry. it’s “your” (collective) job to figure out how to use it. 😉 (c) this ensures you are leaders and we distribute leadership rather than making me the center of anything at all. I manufacture goods that leaders will use. It’s a natural selection process. And if you can use P you pass. 😉 Now go out and lead. === OR By Noah J Revoy === You don’t have to agree. – Lead if you can understand, agree and can create. – Follow if you can understand and agree. – Or else get out of the way.

  • P Increases the Scope of The Crime of Baiting Into Hazard

    P Increases the Scope of The Crime of Baiting Into Hazard https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/p-increases-the-scope-of-the-crime-of-baiting-into-hazard/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 03:47:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265852236791459842

  • P Increases the Scope of The Crime of Baiting Into Hazard

    May 7, 2020, 8:32 AM The lender baits you into hazard, not the manufacturer. cash in hand is a present demonstrated capacity. credit is a prediction of future demonstrated capacity. So we don’t confuse ideals (omniscience) with due diligence and statistics free of arbitrage. Where arbitrage is charging It’s reciprocal as long as it’s fully informed. (we also included right to repair – which would increase the price of the car and decrease the price of maintenance.) creditworthiness is an actuarial science, and with linear returns and without loss-arbitrage, problem disappears. If it wasn’t in one’s self interest one wouldn’t do it. The court can’t determine self interest (via positiva) it can only determine harm. Courts do not determine ‘good’ (that’s choice) they determine harm. The Labor of rule of law is divided by design: Monarchy, Military, Law, Government, Court, Individual. And that law produces limits on monarchy, military, Government, court, and the individual.

    1. The individual produces agreements (good, specific).
    2. Court produces rulings (bad, specific),
    3. Government produces legislation (good and general),
    4. The military produces commands (necessary specific crisis)
    5. In UK Monarchy for when all fail. Monarchy is above the law. (Specific Crisis)

    The foundation of contract law is reciprocity, and irreciprocal contracts will not be enforced by the court. The problem is the court’s definition of irreciprocity favors personal choice and consequence rather than legal defense from baiting into hazard. P increases the scope of the law to cover both false promise, and baiting into hazard, at contractual ( private contracts ) and political ( contracts of the commons ) scales. This is the weakness in the current law. (Imagine what would happen if we kept credit ratings, but ended debt collection. We might not have to do anything else.)

  • P Increases the Scope of The Crime of Baiting Into Hazard

    May 7, 2020, 8:32 AM The lender baits you into hazard, not the manufacturer. cash in hand is a present demonstrated capacity. credit is a prediction of future demonstrated capacity. So we don’t confuse ideals (omniscience) with due diligence and statistics free of arbitrage. Where arbitrage is charging It’s reciprocal as long as it’s fully informed. (we also included right to repair – which would increase the price of the car and decrease the price of maintenance.) creditworthiness is an actuarial science, and with linear returns and without loss-arbitrage, problem disappears. If it wasn’t in one’s self interest one wouldn’t do it. The court can’t determine self interest (via positiva) it can only determine harm. Courts do not determine ‘good’ (that’s choice) they determine harm. The Labor of rule of law is divided by design: Monarchy, Military, Law, Government, Court, Individual. And that law produces limits on monarchy, military, Government, court, and the individual.

    1. The individual produces agreements (good, specific).
    2. Court produces rulings (bad, specific),
    3. Government produces legislation (good and general),
    4. The military produces commands (necessary specific crisis)
    5. In UK Monarchy for when all fail. Monarchy is above the law. (Specific Crisis)

    The foundation of contract law is reciprocity, and irreciprocal contracts will not be enforced by the court. The problem is the court’s definition of irreciprocity favors personal choice and consequence rather than legal defense from baiting into hazard. P increases the scope of the law to cover both false promise, and baiting into hazard, at contractual ( private contracts ) and political ( contracts of the commons ) scales. This is the weakness in the current law. (Imagine what would happen if we kept credit ratings, but ended debt collection. We might not have to do anything else.)

  • Giving the little Guy Power

    Giving the little Guy Power https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/giving-the-little-guy-power/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 03:45:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265851728383160321