Curt Doolittle

Theme: Responsibility

  • In P-Law Whose Money Do You Want to Waste?

    Mar 9, 2020, 1:28 PM

    —“I think an interesting idea as a prerequisite to being able to take someone to court for a violation of reciprocity under P-law would be the requirement that they show up to court “in propria persona” or “pro se,” or more succinctly, no more attorneys. Don’t kill them as Shakespeare suggested, just make it unlawful for them to show up in court except to represent themselves and their own interests.”—

    (good). Or go the other way: use the british method of a barrister, which won’t take a case from solicitor(lawyer) unless it has merit. So in the british model they have, in our terms, professional prosecutors for both sides. In america we have a lot of lawyers and a few prosecutors. It’s more ‘common law’ to take your route. It requires more judges with more skill but yes it will work. I’m not settled on the more adversarial american, or the less dishonest british. What I like about your position is that it’s cheap. What I like about their position is that it’s expensive. I think the judge-judy shows of the world illustrate how ignorant the public is of their own wrong doing. So it depends on whose time we want to waste on idiots: their own money with lawyers, or our money with the court’s.

  • That’s the deal.

    Mar 14, 2020, 11:22 AM

    Your body, your children, my capital, my polity. That’s the deal. No More Lies

  • That’s the deal.

    Mar 14, 2020, 11:22 AM

    Your body, your children, my capital, my polity. That’s the deal. No More Lies

  • How to Say No
    'HOW TO SAY NO. Russian block women have a simple symbol for no: "cross your arms, palms outward, and say no". If you don't do this at the time, then you are consenting. If you do this then you are not. It's that simple. I've only encountered it once - when a ukrainian woman figured out I was american. It's absolutely clear, doesn't really need vocalization or expression. It means 'break contact'. Women should use it only in response to male pursuit, and men should respect it and force other men to respect it.'
    HOW TO SAY NO. Russian block women have a simple symbol for no: “cross your arms, palms outward, and say no”. If you don’t do this at the time, then you are consenting. If you do this then you are not. It’s that simple. I’ve only encountered it once – when a ukrainian woman figured out I was american. It’s absolutely clear, doesn’t really need vocalization or expression. It means ‘break contact’. Women should use it only in response to male pursuit, and men should respect it and force other men to respect it.

  • How to Say No
    'HOW TO SAY NO. Russian block women have a simple symbol for no: "cross your arms, palms outward, and say no". If you don't do this at the time, then you are consenting. If you do this then you are not. It's that simple. I've only encountered it once - when a ukrainian woman figured out I was american. It's absolutely clear, doesn't really need vocalization or expression. It means 'break contact'. Women should use it only in response to male pursuit, and men should respect it and force other men to respect it.'
    HOW TO SAY NO. Russian block women have a simple symbol for no: “cross your arms, palms outward, and say no”. If you don’t do this at the time, then you are consenting. If you do this then you are not. It’s that simple. I’ve only encountered it once – when a ukrainian woman figured out I was american. It’s absolutely clear, doesn’t really need vocalization or expression. It means ‘break contact’. Women should use it only in response to male pursuit, and men should respect it and force other men to respect it.

  • Applied P-Law

    Mar 14, 2020, 7:23 PM P-law argues against shaming and moralizing as substitute for or avoidance of argument, not as disincentive for irreciprocity (immorality). I don’t know why visiting Thai Hookers is irreciprocal with the in group. I think it puts pressure on one’s virtue signaling – meaning worthiness for imitation – because it’s a signal of low sexual social economic market value to some, but for most I think it’s just reducing the cost of sex by reducing it to purely transactional. Hookers are expensive per transaction but there are no or few external costs. Relationships have high external costs. They may have high external rewards. But only if those rewards are of subjective value to you. Long and short of it is that GSRRM is the correct response to avoiding an argument, and for suppressing virtue signaling, but that’s all. I don’t know the context but it sounds like crossing signals between different sexual value markets.

  • Applied P-Law

    Mar 14, 2020, 7:23 PM P-law argues against shaming and moralizing as substitute for or avoidance of argument, not as disincentive for irreciprocity (immorality). I don’t know why visiting Thai Hookers is irreciprocal with the in group. I think it puts pressure on one’s virtue signaling – meaning worthiness for imitation – because it’s a signal of low sexual social economic market value to some, but for most I think it’s just reducing the cost of sex by reducing it to purely transactional. Hookers are expensive per transaction but there are no or few external costs. Relationships have high external costs. They may have high external rewards. But only if those rewards are of subjective value to you. Long and short of it is that GSRRM is the correct response to avoiding an argument, and for suppressing virtue signaling, but that’s all. I don’t know the context but it sounds like crossing signals between different sexual value markets.

  • Ten Commandments in P-Law Terms

    Ten Commandments in P-Law Terms https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/29/ten-commandments-in-p-law-terms/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 00:46:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266169025488453632

  • Ten Commandments in P-Law Terms

    Mar 14, 2020, 8:02 PM (In response to James Dmitro Makienko and John Mark.) 1 – God/Nature has given us the many laws of nature, the one natural law: reciprocity, and the one choice: transcendence into gods ourselves by those laws, or the end of our existence for failing. 2 – You shall not use reciprocity falsely, or criticize reciprocity, and spread irreciprocity – this is to criticize god, god’s law, and doom mankind to failure of transcendence. 4 – You must return your parent’s investment in you with reciprocity of obedience, respect, and care. 5 – You shalt not commit murder – reciprocity of life cannot be restored, reciprocity of revenge cannot be unmade, and reciprocity in trust forever lost. 6 – You shalt not commit adultery – reciprocity of the marriage promise cannot be restored. 7 – You shalt not steal – reciprocity of goods may be restored, but reciprocity of trust cannot be restored. 8 – You shalt not lie – reciprocity of deceit may be restored, reciprocity of harm may not be, and reciprocity of trust cannot be restored. 9 – You shalt not contemplate lust of another’s wife or husband – lest in anger, weakness or folly you violate the reciprocity of a marriage. 10 – You shalt not contemplate lust of another’s property, lest in anger, weakness or folly you violate the reciprocity of property. 3 – One day a week you shall spend contemplating your reciprocity irreciprocity, to past, present and future kin and kith, and seek means of restitution. (something along those lines. should be extended to include male violence rape, female gossip, undermining. Not the shift of the third commandment to tenth place.)

  • Ten Commandments in P-Law Terms

    Mar 14, 2020, 8:02 PM (In response to James Dmitro Makienko and John Mark.) 1 – God/Nature has given us the many laws of nature, the one natural law: reciprocity, and the one choice: transcendence into gods ourselves by those laws, or the end of our existence for failing. 2 – You shall not use reciprocity falsely, or criticize reciprocity, and spread irreciprocity – this is to criticize god, god’s law, and doom mankind to failure of transcendence. 4 – You must return your parent’s investment in you with reciprocity of obedience, respect, and care. 5 – You shalt not commit murder – reciprocity of life cannot be restored, reciprocity of revenge cannot be unmade, and reciprocity in trust forever lost. 6 – You shalt not commit adultery – reciprocity of the marriage promise cannot be restored. 7 – You shalt not steal – reciprocity of goods may be restored, but reciprocity of trust cannot be restored. 8 – You shalt not lie – reciprocity of deceit may be restored, reciprocity of harm may not be, and reciprocity of trust cannot be restored. 9 – You shalt not contemplate lust of another’s wife or husband – lest in anger, weakness or folly you violate the reciprocity of a marriage. 10 – You shalt not contemplate lust of another’s property, lest in anger, weakness or folly you violate the reciprocity of property. 3 – One day a week you shall spend contemplating your reciprocity irreciprocity, to past, present and future kin and kith, and seek means of restitution. (something along those lines. should be extended to include male violence rape, female gossip, undermining. Not the shift of the third commandment to tenth place.)