Curt Doolittle

Theme: Responsibility

  • No It”s Just a Normal Tort Case – Parents Don”t Have Special Privilege

    —“Curt, is this interesting or am I reading too much into it? From what I’ve read on UK property rights (past and present), the idea that pleas of injustice or “hey, no fair” could overrule the express wishes of the property owner is a significant shift away from the standard individualist approach to ownership rights. This is a move towards collectivist, ‘property is owned by the extended family’ principles.”— @lisa outhwaite

    No it’s a normal tort case, wherein a man spent his life working on a farm under the oft discussed promise he would inherit it, and the family broke the demonstrated contract.

    —“”Andrew’s parents put in place a series of measures which were designed to leave Andrew, in his fifties, with no home, no job, no savings, and no pension, despite a lifetime’s worth of work.”— —“his parents went back on promises they had made that he would inherit a substantial share of the family farm, which he had worked on for 32 years since the age of 16.”—

    In other words, if you and your parents stop talking to one another for some reason, well, sure they can will inheritance to anyone they choose. But if they stop talking that doesn’t break the contract that both parties invested in regardless of whether they are parents.

  • No It”s Just a Normal Tort Case – Parents Don”t Have Special Privilege

    —“Curt, is this interesting or am I reading too much into it? From what I’ve read on UK property rights (past and present), the idea that pleas of injustice or “hey, no fair” could overrule the express wishes of the property owner is a significant shift away from the standard individualist approach to ownership rights. This is a move towards collectivist, ‘property is owned by the extended family’ principles.”— @lisa outhwaite

    No it’s a normal tort case, wherein a man spent his life working on a farm under the oft discussed promise he would inherit it, and the family broke the demonstrated contract.

    —“”Andrew’s parents put in place a series of measures which were designed to leave Andrew, in his fifties, with no home, no job, no savings, and no pension, despite a lifetime’s worth of work.”— —“his parents went back on promises they had made that he would inherit a substantial share of the family farm, which he had worked on for 32 years since the age of 16.”—

    In other words, if you and your parents stop talking to one another for some reason, well, sure they can will inheritance to anyone they choose. But if they stop talking that doesn’t break the contract that both parties invested in regardless of whether they are parents.

  • Everything a (((libertarian))) Says Is a Lie.

    Mar 23, 2020, 12:08 PM

    –“Property is dirived from the axiom of self ownership ie, we own ourselves. External property is defined by labor investment – either direct labor such as, “I made this walking stick” or indirect labor such as “I bought this walking stick” or also indirectly as a title gift as “I was given this walking stick” or by contract such as, “I am making payments on this walking stick.””—JWarren Prescott

    No. Property is the result of seeking cooperation, trust, loyalty, and non-conflict between warriors dependent upon one another under the strategy and tactics of voluntary entrepreneurial warfare using maneuver. Sovereignty, and once we have sovereignty, reciprocity is required. From that all western civilization arises. Now what is difference between the PRESUMPTION of an impossibility of the sophistry of ‘self ownership’ and the evidentiary necessity of sovereignty and reciprocity among voluntary warriors (see organization of piracy). The difference is using the sophistry of self ownership to circumvent the need for a universal militia responsible for creating sovereignty and reciprocity from which property is the result. Everything a (((libertarian))) says is a lie. Let me say that again

    (a) everything a libertarian says is a lie. (b) every philosophical argument is a lie. (c) if you cannot construct an argument from physical and natural law it’s a lie. (d) people lie.

  • Everything a (((libertarian))) Says Is a Lie.

    Mar 23, 2020, 12:08 PM

    –“Property is dirived from the axiom of self ownership ie, we own ourselves. External property is defined by labor investment – either direct labor such as, “I made this walking stick” or indirect labor such as “I bought this walking stick” or also indirectly as a title gift as “I was given this walking stick” or by contract such as, “I am making payments on this walking stick.””—JWarren Prescott

    No. Property is the result of seeking cooperation, trust, loyalty, and non-conflict between warriors dependent upon one another under the strategy and tactics of voluntary entrepreneurial warfare using maneuver. Sovereignty, and once we have sovereignty, reciprocity is required. From that all western civilization arises. Now what is difference between the PRESUMPTION of an impossibility of the sophistry of ‘self ownership’ and the evidentiary necessity of sovereignty and reciprocity among voluntary warriors (see organization of piracy). The difference is using the sophistry of self ownership to circumvent the need for a universal militia responsible for creating sovereignty and reciprocity from which property is the result. Everything a (((libertarian))) says is a lie. Let me say that again

    (a) everything a libertarian says is a lie. (b) every philosophical argument is a lie. (c) if you cannot construct an argument from physical and natural law it’s a lie. (d) people lie.

  • Libertarians try to escape responsibility and liability to others for the produc

    Libertarians try to escape responsibility and liability to others for the production of Commons https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/libertarians-try-to-escape-responsibility-and-liability-to-others-for-the-production-of-commons/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 19:15:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266085723809210368

  • Libertarians try to escape responsibility and liability to others for the production of Commons

    Mar 23, 2020, 12:49 PM LIBERTARIAN > ANARCHO CAPITALISM > NEOREACTION > SOVEREIGNTARIANISM (SOVEREIGNTY) All libertarian thought is lying to avoid the natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity so that libertarians can escape responsibility and liability to others for the production of Commons. All Sovereigntarian thought enforces the natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity so that our people can restore responsibility and liability to others for the production of commons. Libertarianism like all abrahamic sophisms is a feminine free rider secular theology. Sovereigntarianism (european traditional law of tort) is a masculine accountable science.

  • Libertarians try to escape responsibility and liability to others for the production of Commons

    Mar 23, 2020, 12:49 PM LIBERTARIAN > ANARCHO CAPITALISM > NEOREACTION > SOVEREIGNTARIANISM (SOVEREIGNTY) All libertarian thought is lying to avoid the natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity so that libertarians can escape responsibility and liability to others for the production of Commons. All Sovereigntarian thought enforces the natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity so that our people can restore responsibility and liability to others for the production of commons. Libertarianism like all abrahamic sophisms is a feminine free rider secular theology. Sovereigntarianism (european traditional law of tort) is a masculine accountable science.

  • Conscientiousness always wins. IQ sometimes wins.

    Mar 23, 2020, 3:30 PM … Conscientiousness always wins.  IQ sometimes wins. … … The Academic ‘race’ was for positions in the bureaucracy. … … … To limit error and corruption. … … … … This is why we pay bureaucrats. … … … … … This is the french method.

  • Conscientiousness always wins. IQ sometimes wins.

    Mar 23, 2020, 3:30 PM … Conscientiousness always wins.  IQ sometimes wins. … … The Academic ‘race’ was for positions in the bureaucracy. … … … To limit error and corruption. … … … … This is why we pay bureaucrats. … … … … … This is the french method.

  • The Law on Gouging and Hoarding

    Mar 23, 2020, 3:35 PM You may profit from superior achievement in seizing opportunities made possible in the commons we call the market. You may not profit from harm that circumvents the market. Ergo the prohibition on gouging(offense) and hoarding(defense).

    You can clear inventory (rapidly sell out) at normal rates and prices. You can limit sales at normal rates and prices. People owe you the debt regardless of their ability to pay in the moment. But in times of war, plague, crisis, catastrophe, you may not profit from other’s hardship.

    (Reciprocity)Some instinctual immoralities are true.