—“The Gods likely side with Curt, despite the argumentation against him. Remember this.”— Thorn Lokison
( Well, I’m not gonna deny it. lolz )
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-24 11:37:00 UTC
Theme: Religion
-
“The Gods likely side with Curt, despite the argumentation against him. Remember
-
NO MORE LIES. Literature, History, Economy, Law, Sciences, Mathematics Oath, Sac
NO MORE LIES.
Literature, History, Economy, Law, Sciences, Mathematics
Oath, Sacrifice, Feast, Festival.
Nature, Kin, Family, Home, Hearth.
We are become the gods we imagined.
Those with false gods but admit their failure.
THE OATH OF TRANSCENDENT MAN
A Heathen, a Christian, an Aryan, a Warrior, a Man Transcendent
I am a Heathen if 1) I accept the laws of nature as binding on all of existence; and 2) if I treat nature as sacred and to be contemplated, protected and improved; and 3) I treat the world as something to transform closer to an Eden in whatever ways I can before I die; and 4) if I deny the existence of a supreme being with dominion over the physical laws, and treat all gods, demigods, heroes, saints, figures of history, and ancestors as characters with whom I may speak to in private contemplation in the hope of gaining wisdom and synchronicity from having done so. And 5) if I participate with others of my society in repetition of oaths, repetition of myths, repetition of festivals, repetition of holidays, and the perpetuation of all of the above to my offspring. And 6) if I leave open that synchronicity appears to exist now and then, and that it may be possible that there is a scientific explanation for it, other than just humans subject to similar stimuli producing similar intuitions and therefore similar ends.
As far as I know this is all that is required of me to be a Heathen.
I am a christian if I have adopted the teaching of christianity: 1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. 2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. 3) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.
As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Christian.
I am an Aryan if 1) I proudly display my excellences so that others seek to achieve or exceed them; 2) I seek competition to constantly test and improve myself so I do not weaken; 3) I swear to speak no insult and demand it; 4) I speak the truth and demand it; 5) I take nothing not paid for and demand it; 6) I grant sovereignty to my kin and demand it; 7) I insure my people regardless of condition, and demand it; and in doing so leave nothing but voluntary markets of cooperation between sovereign men; and to discipline, enserf, enslave, ostracize or kill those who do otherwise; 8) to not show fear or cowardice, abandon my brothers, or retreat, and 9) to die a good death in the service of my kin, my clan, my tribe and my people.
As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be an Aryan.
I am a warrior in that 1) we will prepare for war so perfectly that none dare enter it against us. 2) Once we go to war, we do so with *joy*, with eagerness, and with passion, and without mercy, without constraint, and without remorse; And 3) before ending war, we shall defeat an enemy completely such that no other dares a condition of our enemy, and the memory of the slaughter lives a hundred generations.
As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Warrior.
As far as I know, if I succeed as a Heathen, as a Christian, as an Aryan, as a Warrior, then I have transcended the animal man, and earned my place among the saints, heroes, demigods, gods, in the memories, histories, and legends of man.
And that is the objective of heroes. We leave the rest for ordinary men.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-24 11:37:00 UTC
-
Literature, History, Economy, Law, Sciences, Mathematics Oath, Sacrifice, Feast,
Literature, History, Economy, Law, Sciences, Mathematics
Oath, Sacrifice, Feast, Festival.
Nature, Kin, Family, Home, Hearth.
We are become the gods we imagined.
NO MORE LIES.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-24 11:32:00 UTC
-
“[List of developments under christianity]”— ^ Someone want to identify and ex
—“[List of developments under christianity]”—
^ Someone want to identify and explain this logical fallacy?
In other words, (a) range of choices under monopoly religion, (b) because of -vs- in spite of, (c) rates prior and after vs rates during, (d) evidence of demilitarization and feminization to the point of indefensibility (e) evidence of mandated illiteracy, (f) evidence of capital sequestration and rents, (g) rate of development after restoration of pre-abrahamic thought. (h) rate of development after defunding and disempowering the church, (i) rate of development after restoring literacy, (j) rate of development after de-sequestration of capital…. I mean, and the post darwinian collapse of a church unable and unwilling to reform (k) and the greater remaining corruption by longer under the church (l) the church’s movement to prey upon third worlders that they can ‘fool’ rather than reform to serve the european people. the church institutionalized semitic corruption.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-24 10:56:00 UTC
-
Understanding Charlemagne: The christians were useful to conquerors the same way
Understanding Charlemagne:
The christians were useful to conquerors the same way jesuits were to western expansion, and jews today are useful to statists both foreign and domestic, and greeks were to romans: literary specialists, bureaucrats, propagandists, and spies, hiding under cover of non-violence. In other words, using the female means of conspiracy as a group strategy.
Charlemagne was able to conquer effectively by the use of siege technology and technique, cavalry making it possible to cover large distances ( high transport cost), and most importantly, a willing conspiratorial HOSTILE bureaucracy.
Now, what I want people to learn is the importance of conquest by a HOSTILE BUREAUCRACY SPREADING A CULT.
In the western case we are occupied by that same cult under an anti-darwinian, innumerate, illiterate, ahistorical, religion: marxism, postmodernism, feminism,
WHY: We put too many men to work in the work force and not enough of them in the militia and military.
THEY WIN BY CONSPIRATORS HIDING BEHIND WORDS.
We win by conspirators acting at war.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-23 15:33:00 UTC
-
THE STRUCTURE OF THE OTHER GREAT LIE: MONOTHEISM (POLITY) VS HEATHENISM (HEARTH)
THE STRUCTURE OF THE OTHER GREAT LIE: MONOTHEISM (POLITY) VS HEATHENISM (HEARTH)
(important)
I talk all the time about the lie of socialism vs capitalism instead of rule by man vs rule of law.
But the equally common lie is that of heathenism (paganism) vs monotheism, instead of rule of law vs rule of lies.
Our sovereignty > our law of tort > our reason > our empiricism > our science > our TESTIMONIALISM.
We can converge on rule of law (science) or diverge by rule of men and their lies.
Truth, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Rule of Law, Reason, Empiricism, Science, And Markets in Everything.
The literary means (analogies) by which we teach these principles need no magic, no superstition, just education.
Love of our own is enough.
Truth is enough.
Reality is enough for the gods we have become.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-23 15:28:00 UTC
-
Furthermore, the lack of success of the church to do so (govern) in the slavic l
—Furthermore, the lack of success of the church to do so (govern) in the slavic lands, the secession from church rule by the germanic states, and the state eviction of the church from rule by the americans, is the reason for the catholic, germanic, anglo-scandinavian, and slavic differences in perception of the good and evil of the church.—
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-23 13:44:00 UTC
-
“The primary tool of feminist communication: gossip, shaming, PC language, which
— “The primary tool of feminist communication: gossip, shaming, PC language, which has become the new religious orthodoxy and the new sins” — Dax Rayner
(via Brandon Hayes)
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-23 13:43:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1065963970648043520
-
EXAMPLE: RABBINICAL ARGUMENT > JESUIT ARGUMENT So for example, you just engaged
EXAMPLE: RABBINICAL ARGUMENT > JESUIT ARGUMENT
So for example, you just engaged in the following deceptions:
1) That the economic history of the world and europe has anything to do with being educated in a european country.
2) That taxation is equivalent to corruption and capital sequestration
3) That whether you are ‘convinced’ or not is a matter of the truth or falsehood of an argument – rather than a measure of your dishonesty.
4) The charity by the church, obtained by deceit, corruption, and rents was somehow comparable to the economic consequences of their corruption, deceit, rents, and capital sequestering.
5) That the (insignificant) rate of intellectual, technological, material, progress under the church was vastly lower, and that what progress that WAS made was due to the aristocracy and the military, metallurgy, and trade despite the church’s mandate of ignorance.
6) That Aristotle was somehow not practicing the european traditional method of legal-empirical argument, and applying it as a means of correcting Plato’s idealism, and that it is necessary to be of greek (now greco-anatolian) origin to categorize his thought as european.
7) That it was not the eastern non-roman empire in collusion with the egyptian and syrian that intentionally destroyed roman civilization through suppression of it’s traditions, closing of its schools, burning of its buildings, and murder of its teachers and rulers.
I mean, that’s a lot of lies in half a dozen comments.
And you want me to take you as other than a perfect demonstration of the abrahamic method of deceit: Sophism, Pseudoscience, and Supernaturalism?
I mean you just illustrated my point so thoroughly that it’s hard to imagine anyone could be that intellectually dishonest without studying how to be.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-23 13:37:00 UTC
-
JUDAISM, CHRISTIANITY AND ISLAM INVENTED THE MANDATE-OF IGNORANCE AND RULE UNDER
JUDAISM, CHRISTIANITY AND ISLAM INVENTED THE MANDATE-OF IGNORANCE AND RULE UNDER IT.
Science is founded upon the prehistoric european tradition of legal empiricism, and it’s non-adoption of eastern irrigation-system magianism. Aristotle invents pre-scientific thought. the british empirical thought. and anglo-american-german (less so french) scientific thought. With all of the west participating by the industrial revolution. The christians made near zero progress until the middle class re-evolved after the viking conquest, and restored commercial civilization through trade, giving rise to the germanic expansionary trade system, where the church had spent its efforts on local extraction of rents, and cumulative hoarding of europe’s capital, and the expansion of corruption.
Furthermore, the lack of success of the church to do so in the slavic lands, the secession from church rule by the germanic states, and the state eviction of the church from rule by the americans, is the reason for the catholic, germanic, anglo-scandinavian, and slavic differences in perception of the good and evil of the church.
There is a reason france is a cancer to europe and that is that she is the central advocate or the church’s method of rule, because the french state replaced the monarchical rule with church rule, and secularized it.
Christians accomplished almost nothing throughout the christian period – and what little they did accomplish was despite the church not because of it.
Jews accomplished absolutely nothing other than specialization in profiting from parasitic moral hazard, and survival because of it, until converted to aristotelianism.
Muslims accomplished nothing except the conquest of superior people, the murder of their aristocracies, the centralization of their though leadership so that they could be converted to the religion of mandatory ignorance, the expansion of their underclasses, vast slave immigration and consanguineous reproduction, and the total destruction of every great civilization land-reachable in the ancient world.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-23 13:03:00 UTC