Oct 29, 2019, 8:14 PM P-Law is not ‘superior’ to Christian Faith – we have no say over such things. P-Law is compatible with Christian ethics and morality, and superior in the material – science, economics, law, politics and war, and likewise christianity is compatible with P-law, and is outside of the material – science, economics, law, politics, and war. YOU HAVE IT BACKWARDS A Christian does not profess P. A christian professes Christianity, and assists the implementation of a P-constitution, Because p is compatible with christianity, and will preserve Christianity in theological, philosophical, traditional, rational, and scientific terms. If christians want a theological monopoly they can wait until the islamists eradicate the rest of them – and carry the blame for letting it happen.
Theme: Religion
-
Faith Is a Poor Weapon of Power
Faith Is a Poor Weapon of Power https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/faith-is-a-poor-weapon-of-power/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 15:36:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265668124214546432
-
Faith Is a Poor Weapon of Power
Oct 29, 2019, 8:18 PM
Your faith is a poor weapon of power. It is only a power of political resistance, social resistance, and psychological resistance. We can only trade.
-
Faith Is a Poor Weapon of Power
Oct 29, 2019, 8:18 PM
Your faith is a poor weapon of power. It is only a power of political resistance, social resistance, and psychological resistance. We can only trade.
-
doing everything possible to keep the Christian baby but lose the dark age bath
doing everything possible to keep the Christian baby but lose the dark age bath water https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/doing-everything-possible-to-keep-the-christian-baby-but-lose-the-dark-age-bath-water/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 15:15:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265662900481523712
-
doing everything possible to keep the Christian baby but lose the dark age bath water
Curt Doolittle is doing everything he can to prevent another dark age Christians: “Why do you hate us? 😭” Ffs. He’s doing everything possible to keep the Christian baby but lose the dark age bath water. If you can’t be happy with that, you’re just a parasite. So fuck off.
-
doing everything possible to keep the Christian baby but lose the dark age bath water
Curt Doolittle is doing everything he can to prevent another dark age Christians: “Why do you hate us? 😭” Ffs. He’s doing everything possible to keep the Christian baby but lose the dark age bath water. If you can’t be happy with that, you’re just a parasite. So fuck off.
-
Deliver Each Unto God and Unto Caesar
Deliver Each Unto God and Unto Caesar https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/deliver-each-unto-god-and-unto-caesar/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 13:37:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265638209956073473
-
Deliver Each Unto God and Unto Caesar
Oct 30, 2019, 11:01 PM The Catholics have been communists for a very long time, no matter what they use. Christianity has everything to say about family, manners, ethics and morality, and nothing at all to say about sciences, economics, politics and law. Deliver unto god what is his, and Caesar his. Otherwise we must go to war between the truthful and the faithful, and while the faithful can undermine, and resist, they poorly war, and this is not only because they are poorer, but because they are more feminine in composition and cognition. “Deliver Unto To Each” is a compromise between the male political-empirical and the female emotional-faithful, just as marriage is a compromise between male and female – under which neither obtains their ideal, but both achieves the optimum possible. Edit
-
Deliver Each Unto God and Unto Caesar
Oct 30, 2019, 11:01 PM The Catholics have been communists for a very long time, no matter what they use. Christianity has everything to say about family, manners, ethics and morality, and nothing at all to say about sciences, economics, politics and law. Deliver unto god what is his, and Caesar his. Otherwise we must go to war between the truthful and the faithful, and while the faithful can undermine, and resist, they poorly war, and this is not only because they are poorer, but because they are more feminine in composition and cognition. “Deliver Unto To Each” is a compromise between the male political-empirical and the female emotional-faithful, just as marriage is a compromise between male and female – under which neither obtains their ideal, but both achieves the optimum possible. Edit